Walz is very good, Vance is not bad either

What I saw was what would have been a very good Presidential Debate. Unlike the hogwash by the ones running for President.

While Walz gets a neutral rating, Walz gets a less than neutral because he told a couple of party lies. Overall, Walz did better but Vance wasn't terrible.
\
Vance lied more and those lies were more dangerous.
 
Are you trying to say that you don't believe your very own media?
I believe the majority of the mainstream media. I go to many sources to find what I feel is the truth.
I saw some say Vance won, some say Walz woon and some say it was a tie.

I will say Vance came out with a more favorable rating than he went in.
Why doesn't Trump comport himself the way Vance does? (and Walz and Harris)
Trump is a clown show evverywhere he goes.
 
I believe the majority of the mainstream media. I go to many sources to find what I feel is the truth.
I saw some say Vance won, some say Walz woon and some say it was a tie.

I will say Vance came out with a more favorable rating than he went in.
Why doesn't Trump comport himself the way Vance does? (and Walz and Harris)
Trump is a clown show evverywhere he goes.
The majority of the MSM slant to the left.
 
Lol watz proved himself a liar over his Hong Kong trip during the tiennimen square riots.
Waltz was in China before Teiman Square and shortly thereafter , actually lived there for a time. Had an extensive history there. Very interesting and a good read. Unlike Vance's terrible lies.
 

Forum List

Back
Top