TruthNotBS
Gold Member
- Mar 20, 2023
- 3,094
- 1,185
- 208
Was government correct in closing down many activities during COVID.
It depends if your focus is lives or money
Research suggests that the adoption of lockdowns in the initial COVID surge helped contain transmission and deaths, albeit at high economic and social costs.
I support saving lives. Lives do not come back, the economy does.
![]()
How Effective Were Pandemic Lockdowns ? | Econofact
Lockdowns were widely adopted worldwide during the COVID 19 pandemic and have been hotly debated ever since. What lessons can be drawn for future pandemics?econofact.org
I agree. If other countries with much fewer resources were able to practice a temporary lockdown and even provide an income and some resources and services to their citizens, so can the USA. If we would've ignored the pandemic, and just went as business as usual, the situation would've been much worse. Imagine 90% of a population of 330 million people, becoming infected in less than four or five months. About 15% of everyone who got infected, had to go to the hospital, so let's do the math. In five months:
49,500,000 Americans Hospitalized.
That's 12,375,000 monthly patients seeking medical care for Covid.
Our healthcare system would've collapsed.
US DEATH TOLL: 15 to 25 million.
That's 12,375,000 monthly patients seeking medical care for Covid.
Our healthcare system would've collapsed.
US DEATH TOLL: 15 to 25 million.
This doesn't factor in the fact that the others who are infected and don't need to go to the hospital, will still need to rest, stay at home, take medicine...etc. The economy would be ruined, even more so than when a temporary lockdown is implemented, to save lives and preserve the economy.
Mask mandates, for people in crowded public venues were also a good public safety measure:
During the Spanish flu in the early 1900s, it was proven that the towns and cities where people wore masks, had fewer infections and a lower mortality rate.
Last edited: