Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
“Effective”….WTF….are you serious?So, how many did he try to prosecute for collusion? None? Right. He concentrated on real crimes. That is why he was effective. There is no arguing with the record.
No.Wasn’t the Russia collusion case stronger than the four current dog and pony shows are?
Here is an article on subjects in the Mueller investigation. If it make you feel and better, not a single one was charged or referred on "collusion".“Effective”….WTF….are you serious?
The TDS loons set out to GET TRUMP on conspiracy with Russia and all they end up with is a few bullshit charges of financial crimes and lying to investigators and you call that “effective”?
Imagine a slam-dunk murder investigation that yields nothing more than a couple traffic tickets in the end….That’s your “effective” equivalent.
hahahahaha….silly Libs!
www.rollingstone.com
Says cyber-space based TDS’ers?No.
Not even close.
Especially when your boy has been recorded committing a crime.
Especially when your boy is haunted by a great deal of documentation proving that he was engaged in fraudulent behaviors.
Your ignorant, arrogant, selfish, lying, sociopathic orange-tinted piece-of-$hit is in major-league trouble this time.
All of the Teflon has been scraped-off of Teflon Don...
He can no longer shoot somebody in broad daylight in the middle of Fifth Avenue and get away with it.
Your boy is in trouble... Bigly.
Couldn't happen to a nicer modern-day Benedict Arnold.
Remember all the hype surrounding the Russia collusion case? Remember how certain Adam Schiff and ALL of the left was about Trumps guilt? Remember Ukraine / Zelensky and the quid pro quo….remember how certain the left was on that one?
Hold on…so your weaponized authoritarian Democrats stole $50 million dollars from taxpayers to fund Robert Mueller to prove something there is no law against?
Hmmm? You actually meant to type that retarded bullshit?
You TDS’ing wack-jobs say that yet you couldn’t prove it with inspector gadget and $50 million taxpayer dollars."collusion" is a trump word for the cozy relationship he and his campaign enjoy with russian government, russian oligarchs, russian "thieves in law," and the coyotes who deliver russian females to the trump "modeling agency"
muller did not say that there was no criminal activity, muller said that he was not authorized to priosecure criminal activity.
I posted the “report” for you.If you read the report and the indictments, you would have a pretty good idea.
Remember when people used to make a point, instead of spewing bullshit innuendo's?Remember all the hype surrounding the Russia collusion case? Remember how certain Adam Schiff and ALL of the left was about Trumps guilt? Remember Ukraine / Zelensky and the quid pro quo….remember how certain the left was on that one?
You get the point…you simply can’t refute it so you pretend you don’t.Remember when people used to make a point, instead of spewing bullshit innuendo's?
Yep... whatever.Says cyber-space based TDS’ers?
And the US Dept of Justice and four separate District Attorneys and Attorneys General say different. I'll abide by THEIR judgment.Meanwhile legal scholars such as Alan Dershowitz (a fellow TDS’er) says there is no legitimate case against Trump.
Your belief in what I'm saying is not required. I truly enjoy counterpointing you MAGABut but but…we believe you, just like we believed Adam pencil neck Schiff we he swore he had Trump by the nutsack.
What are you fucking talking about? There are several examples of Trump and his cabal colluding with the Russians.You get the point…you simply can’t refute it so you pretend you don’t.
Well see examples would normally lead to conclusions. You did not get your desired conclusion so you pretend you did anywayWhat are you fucking talking about? There are several examples of Trump and his cabal colluding with the Russians.
No matter how many homework assignments you lib loons hand out it won’t change the decision Muller made which was not what you wanted. That’s all you are proposing, emotional satisfaction from falsity.You should have read the Mueller report, instead of listening to right wing quilting circles. It is stated on page 1 or 2 by Mueller, he chose not to chase the collusion thing as there was no federal statute, choosing instead to concentrate on actual crimes. That is why there were so many successful prosecution and confessions. He refused to take the bait and take his eyes off of the real laws, to chase down collusion, as it could not be prosecuted.
Hearing you guys rant about it is entertaining to this very day. Doesn't change his prosecution, referral and confession score on trump insiders, though. I guess it is like trumpism itself. You can fool some of the people some of the time, some people all the time, but some people simply refuse to fall for the false messaging, from the start.
Shirts had video, written and audio proof!Yes, the Russian Collusion case was a slam dunk. Oh, wait a minute, I guess it wasn't.
Trump's son met with Russian oligarchs in Trump Tower to get dirt on Hillary. That is a fact! That meeting actually happened. THAT, is collusion!Well see examples would normally lead to conclusions. You did not get your desired conclusion so you pretend you did anyway
I posted the “report” for you.
What part of this language has you thrown for a loop?
“That requires more than the two parties takingactions that were informed by or responsive to the other's actions or interests. We applied the term coordination in that sense when stating in the report that the investigation did not establish that the Trump Campaign coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”
