Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Trump Ally Drastically Changes Story On Altering GOP Platform On UkraineSee how these words games get interesting?
So you need to investigate how something there is no evidence happened was pulled off
so you can't say what was said that he lied about.Please state clearly the precise question concerning the meeting with the Russian ambassador posed by Al Franken at the hearing, then Session's response, then tell us where the problem is.
Since you probably know damn well what the question was from both Franken and Leahy, as well as you know Sessions' response (something along the line of Nyet).......What is the use.....STAY DUMB !!!
(and look up the meaning of perjury.)
And we're not going to do it. See how that works?So you need to investigate how something there is no evidence happened was pulled off
That's what Trump wants in order to find 3-5 million illegal votes.
Okay. CNN again. Weren't they the source of the fake news Franken was using when this whole thing started?Trump Ally Drastically Changes Story On Altering GOP Platform On UkraineSee how these words games get interesting?
In a significant reversal, a Trump campaign official on Thursday told CNN that he personally advocated for softening the language on Ukraine in the GOP platform at the Republican National Convention, and that he did so on behalf of the President.
It may have been legit.He's recused himself, so let's see what happens. Quite frankly, perjury is really the only thing they can throw at him, because it was perfectly legit for him to meet with the ambassador and they would have to prove he colluded on the campaign, and that would be very difficult.Somewhat dumb, yes. Perjurious? Probably not.Then as I said, Sessions should have easily pushed it aside. Instead, he volunteered more information than was asked of him.
I've never called for perjury charges. That would require showing that he intended to lie. Nearly impossible to do.
I'll settle for the recusal right now and see where an investigation leads.
An investigation would compel him to testify as to the nature and scope of the discussions in the meeting. Any transcripts or recordings of the meeting may also be reviewed.
It is odd though that Sessions was the only member of the 26 member committee to have met with the ambassador in all of 2016, while he was a member of the Trump campaign and during the height of the news about Russian hacking. He did not disclose this in either his oral or written testimony. He actually denied it.
That is certainly enough probable cause to warrant further scrutiny.
No. It's not probable cause. It's not even reasonable suspicion
^ fake newsWell, the Trump haters are focused on collusion to impact the election (kind of dumb in my book because Trump was such a long shot),.
When criminals fix a horse race, or a boxing match, they fix it so the longshot wins.
Is that why the DNC rigged the primary for Hillary?
Except in this case it's actually true.^ fake newsWell, the Trump haters are focused on collusion to impact the election (kind of dumb in my book because Trump was such a long shot),.
When criminals fix a horse race, or a boxing match, they fix it so the longshot wins.
Is that why the DNC rigged the primary for Hillary?
And we're not going to do it. See how that works?So you need to investigate how something there is no evidence happened was pulled off
That's what Trump wants in order to find 3-5 million illegal votes.
And we're not going to do it. See how that works? He can ask for it if he wants to, but it's not going to happen. Too many interests would be too disrupted.And we're not going to do it. See how that works?So you need to investigate how something there is no evidence happened was pulled off
That's what Trump wants in order to find 3-5 million illegal votes.
Trump calls for ‘major investigation’ into voter fraud — after Sean Spicer was grilled on why he hadn’t
Trump calls for ‘major investigation’ into voter fraud
In their never-ending stupidity, right wingers on here will bring out all the Dems. that ever met Putin.
This is the abject stupidity of right wingers who are trying, ANYTHING, to divert from the upcoming scandal facing the Trump administration.
NO ONE is stating that it is "wrong" to meet Putin, the entire scandal revolves around the COLLUSION between Trump surrogates prior to and after Trump campaign, election and inauguration ....and even that PALES in front of Trump surrogates LYING about those meetings.
As Nixon found out, the initial stupidity of breaking into the DNC headquarters was minor in comparison to the attempted, later COVER-UPS.
Maybe there is one right winger who can discern the difference......and I mean "maybe",,,,
Do you just expect them to sit there and take it?In their never-ending stupidity, right wingers on here will bring out all the Dems. that ever met Putin.
In lieu of having any political power, probably.Only fair that everyDemocrat who met a Russian be knvestigated, tried, convicted and then be shot. Dead. Isn't what Queen Nancy wants for Republicans?
how did they rig it? please b specific...Well, the Trump haters are focused on collusion to impact the election (kind of dumb in my book because Trump was such a long shot),.
When criminals fix a horse race, or a boxing match, they fix it so the longshot wins.
Is that why the DNC rigged the primary for Hillary?
You lost
YOU DID TOO, BUT YOU'RE TOO DUMB TO REALIZE IT...YET.............lol
I so enjoy watching them.
As I so much enjoy your right wing nitwits trying to defend the need for a thorough investigation.....You should know that it is INEVITABLE.....Live with it......LOL.
You lost
YOU DID TOO, BUT YOU'RE TOO DUMB TO REALIZE IT...YET.............lol
suuuuuuuuuuuurrrrree it has. see below.so you can't say what was said that he lied about.Please state clearly the precise question concerning the meeting with the Russian ambassador posed by Al Franken at the hearing, then Session's response, then tell us where the problem is.
Since you probably know damn well what the question was from both Franken and Leahy, as well as you know Sessions' response (something along the line of Nyet).......What is the use.....STAY DUMB !!!
(and look up the meaning of perjury.)
Funny. It's been clearly publicized. I guess you're still trying to decipher Obama's birth certificate.
Yes, it does, and, yes, it will happen.The conflict in his comments warrants further investigation, yes, and it will happen.It may have been legit.He's recused himself, so let's see what happens. Quite frankly, perjury is really the only thing they can throw at him, because it was perfectly legit for him to meet with the ambassador and they would have to prove he colluded on the campaign, and that would be very difficult.I've never called for perjury charges. That would require showing that he intended to lie. Nearly impossible to do.
I'll settle for the recusal right now and see where an investigation leads.
An investigation would compel him to testify as to the nature and scope of the discussions in the meeting. Any transcripts or recordings of the meeting may also be reviewed.
It is odd though that Sessions was the only member of the 26 member committee to have met with the ambassador in all of 2016, while he was a member of the Trump campaign and during the height of the news about Russian hacking. He did not disclose this in either his oral or written testimony. He actually denied it.
That is certainly enough probable cause to warrant further scrutiny.
No. It's not probable cause. It's not even reasonable suspicion
No it doesn't
