Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As soon as you show me where Donald Trump decided that highly classified military documents were “personal”, then we can address the rest of your inaccuracies.Actually it was the judge in the Clinton case that insisted that a President and only a President has the authority over what is and isn't personal documents. I'm just the one pointing out that what was true for Clinton would therefore be true for Trump!
I'm also the person pointing out that as the ultimate authority on classification Trump could literally declassify anything he wanted to at any time he wanted to.
You do know that you are wrong, as usual. As I have told you, when you support evidence, we then can rebut.When did the law change, John?
(You do know that when you try to argue with the adults that they're going to ask that you back up your silly posts...right?)
He will be convicted because a DC jury is hearing the case.
Actually, Marener...until the powers of a President to declassify documents is clarified by the Supreme Court your claim that Trump has done something illegal is meaningless.As soon as you show me where Donald Trump decided that highly classified military documents were “personal”, then we can address the rest of your inaccuracies.
Until you do so, your statement is irrelevant.
You are wrong. We are in court because of Trump's illegal actions about this issue. Even a judge partial to him has been unable to get rid of the charges.Actually, Marener...until the powers of a President to declassify documents is clarified by the Supreme Court your claim that Trump has done something illegal is meaningless.
No one is contesting the ability for the president to declassify information.Actually, Marener...until the powers of a President to declassify documents is clarified by the Supreme Court your claim that Trump has done something illegal is meaningless.
It changed when Biden got elected.When did the law change, John?
(You do know that when you try to argue with the adults that they're going to ask that you back up your silly posts...right?)
Standing up for the same rights that every President before you had while you're being attacked by your political rival's DOJ is "obstructing justice"?No one is contesting the ability for the president to declassify information.
Trump has yet to tell the court or the DoJ that the documents are declassified.
Even if he did, that’s still not an excuse for him to obstruct justice.
Until the Supreme Court rules that Trump's actions WERE illegal the Biden DOJ had no business staging an FBI Swat team raid on his home! That was done for political reasons and deep down I think ALL of you on the left know it! It was a sleazy move....made even more sleazy when it turned out that Joe Biden had been stealing classified materials for years! You want to know everything there is to know about the Bidens? They think they can break the law with impunity and people like you, John will have their backs. They're sitting in their mansions laughing at how naive you are!You are wrong. We are in court because of Trump's illegal actions about this issue. Even a judge partial to him has been unable to get rid of the charges.
No president has ever tried to take highly classified military documents home, defied a subpoena to return them. No one has ever claimed a president has a right to do so, and no intelligent person ever would.Standing up for the same rights that every President before you had while you're being attacked by your political rival's DOJ is "obstructing justice"?
That isn't "justice"! That's weaponizing the DOJ against your political foes! It's the kind of thing that goes on in Russia and Cuba.
Only criminals think so.Standing up for the same rights that every President before you had while you're being attacked by your political
That isn't "justice"! That's weaponizing the DOJ against your political foes! It's the kind of thing that goes on in Russia and Cuba.
With all due respect, Marener? How do you know what President's have taken home? Did you know that Joe Biden took home classified documents when he was a Senator?No president has ever tried to take highly classified military documents home, defied a subpoena to return them. No one has ever claimed a president has a right to do so, and no intelligent person ever would.
Joe Biden turned over any and all documents. He didn’t claim he had a right to possess them as you’re trying to claim for Trump.With all due respect, Marener? How do you know what President's have taken home? Did you know that Joe Biden took home classified documents when he was a Senator?
Of course a President has the right to take ANY document home! He's the President!
Such a foolish statement but consider the source.With all due respect, Marener? How do you know what President's have taken home? Did you know that Joe Biden took home classified documents when he was a Senator?
Of course a President has the right to take ANY document home! He's the President!
Nope. It's 100% factual.Such a foolish statement but consider the source.
How could Biden claim that? He stole them when he was a Senator and Vice President! He had ZERO right to possess them! That doesn't change the fact that he had them and had to have known he had them yet he still let his DOJ raid his chief political foe's home with an FBI Swat team that they flew in from Washington DC especially for that raid!Joe Biden turned over any and all documents. He didn’t claim he had a right to possess them as you’re trying to claim for Trump.
Trump ceased being the president at which point he was required to return all government property. government. He certainly should have returned them after receiving a subpoena.
Anyone who defends Biden in this mess is a certified scumbag.How could Biden claim that? He stole them when he was a Senator and Vice President! He had ZERO right to possess them! That doesn't change the fact that he had them and had to have known he had them yet he still let his DOJ raid his chief political foe's home with an FBI Swat team that they flew in from Washington DC especially for that raid!
As for what Biden did and didn't turn over? We have no way of knowing what he actually possessed, Marener! The FBI let his lawyers conduct a search for documents. See the difference between the two?
And once again...we're right back to the question of what is personal papers of an outgoing President and what isn't! A question that SHOULD have been settled in court just as it was with Bill Clinton! His home wasn't raided by the FBI! A judge decided that in a court of law! A judge who decided that a President and ONLY a President could say what was and wasn't personal documents or in that case tapes!Joe Biden turned over any and all documents. He didn’t claim he had a right to possess them as you’re trying to claim for Trump.
Trump ceased being the president at which point he was required to return all government property. government. He certainly should have returned them after receiving a subpoena.
You are on to something! Call Jack Smith!! Do it now!!!How could Biden claim that? He stole them when he was a Senator and Vice President! He had ZERO right to possess them! That doesn't change the fact that he had them and had to have known he had them yet he still let his DOJ raid his chief political foe's home with an FBI Swat team that they flew in from Washington DC especially for that raid!
As for what Biden did and didn't turn over? We have no way of knowing what he actually possessed, Marener! The FBI let his lawyers conduct a search for documents. See the difference between the two?
Jack's a bit busy right now, John! Trying to find something to prosecute Donald Trump with and struggling mightily! You know...just like Letitia James and Fat Fanny? Between the three of them they're burning through millions in tax payer money pushing cases that will be throw out on appeal. But they make naive folks like you happy...don't they, little buddy?You are on to something! Call Jack Smith!! Do it now!!!
