We need Covid -19 briefings.

[WelfareQueen]

Trump turned his daily briefings into campaign events, so we will lose nothing by him no longer doing them. However, for a while, we still need accurate daily science based reports of what is happening. I suggest Democrats have a daily report each day. The democratic report should not be used for political statements, but just for the scientific facts as they are known. I'm sure there are credible medical experts who are not afraid of Trump's response who could be called on to present the facts. Again, I repeat this should not be used as a political platform, but only a source for accurate information that we all will need for a while longer. Other than a quick introduction of the speaker, medical experts would be responsible for the briefing, and answering any questions about the virus that might arise. What do you think? Should we have accurate, science based briefings daily, or should we just not worry about it and hope everything works out OK?

The only scientific fact is Covid-19 can be transmitted human to human and if you are really old or in really poor health it is bad. Otherwise, not so much.

 

[Crepitus]

Should we have accurate, science based briefings daily

The Trump administration is already doing that and has been consistently and regularly doing that for a long fucking time now, you silly foolish TDS addled moron.

Are you going to ask if we should also have sunrises?

No, they haven't.

How the fuck would a low IQ individual such as yourself know the difference?

Amazing how many people here claim to know my IQ.

You have watched these tRump campaign events, right?

There is almost no real information and a lots of tRump ranting.

We can do without the ranting.

 

[BULLDOG]

"This shouldn't be a political thing but Democrats should do it."

Do you hear yourself?

It's obvious that republicans won't do it. Democrats are the only ones who could. Again, I stress that it should not be used for political rhetoric. Scientifically based information about the virus, and that is all. I would oppose turning it into a political circus like Trump did.

Why does your plan have to involve politicians at all? What's stopping CNN or Fox from rounding up a team of specialists to do their own assessments? Why do you think the freakin government is the answer to everything? They can't even deliver the goddamn mail efficiently.

Fox and CNN both have their experts on every day. This would be ranking members from the CDC and the NIH who are not part of the political free for all. Again, not a partisan event.

 

[BULLDOG]

Trump turned his daily briefings into campaign events, so we will lose nothing by him no longer doing them. However, for a while, we still need accurate daily science based reports of what is happening. I suggest Democrats have a daily report each day. The democratic report should not be used for political statements, but just for the scientific facts as they are known. I'm sure there are credible medical experts who are not afraid of Trump's response who could be called on to present the facts. Again, I repeat this should not be used as a political platform, but only a source for accurate information that we all will need for a while longer. Other than a quick introduction of the speaker, medical experts would be responsible for the briefing, and answering any questions about the virus that might arise. What do you think? Should we have accurate, science based briefings daily, or should we just not worry about it and hope everything works out OK?

The only scientific fact is Covid-19 can be transmitted human to human and if you are really old or in really poor health its bad. Otherwise, not so much.

See #8

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Trump turned his daily briefings into campaign events, so we will lose nothing by him no longer doing them. However, for a while, we still need accurate daily science based reports of what is happening. I suggest Democrats have a daily report each day. The democratic report should not be used for political statements, but just for the scientific facts as they are known. I'm sure there are credible medical experts who are not afraid of Trump's response who could be called on to present the facts. Again, I repeat this should not be used as a political platform, but only a source for accurate information that we all will need for a while longer. Other than a quick introduction of the speaker, medical experts would be responsible for the briefing, and answering any questions about the virus that might arise. What do you think? Should we have accurate, science based briefings daily, or should we just not worry about it and hope everything works out OK?

Elections have consequences.

.

 

[satrebil]

"This shouldn't be a political thing but Democrats should do it."

Do you hear yourself?

It's obvious that republicans won't do it. Democrats are the only ones who could. Again, I stress that it should not be used for political rhetoric. Scientifically based information about the virus, and that is all. I would oppose turning it into a political circus like Trump did.

Why does your plan have to involve politicians at all? What's stopping CNN or Fox from rounding up a team of specialists to do their own assessments? Why do you think the freakin government is the answer to everything? They can't even deliver the goddamn mail efficiently.

Fox and CNN both have their experts on every day. This would be ranking members from the CDC and the NIH who are not part of the political free for all. Again, not a partisan event.

So then do it. Call up the CDC or the NIH and get the ball rolling. Why do you feel the need to invoke a political party if your goal is not to play politics? That makes as much sense as tits on a bull.

 

[Oldestyle]

Trump turned his daily briefings into campaign events, so we will lose nothing by him no longer doing them. However, for a while, we still need accurate daily science based reports of what is happening. I suggest Democrats have a daily report each day. The democratic report should not be used for political statements, but just for the scientific facts as they are known. I'm sure there are credible medical experts who are not afraid of Trump's response who could be called on to present the facts. Again, I repeat this should not be used as a political platform, but only a source for accurate information that we all will need for a while longer. Other than a quick introduction of the speaker, medical experts would be responsible for the briefing, and answering any questions about the virus that might arise. What do you think? Should we have accurate, science based briefings daily, or should we just not worry about it and hope everything works out OK?

What we "need" is for healthy Americans to return to work! What we "need" is a main stream media that deals in facts not fears! You don't want accurate information! You want the fear mongering to continue!

 

[jknowgood]

Trump turned his daily briefings into campaign events, so we will lose nothing by him no longer doing them. However, for a while, we still need accurate daily science based reports of what is happening. I suggest Democrats have a daily report each day. The democratic report should not be used for political statements, but just for the scientific facts as they are known. I'm sure there are credible medical experts who are not afraid of Trump's response who could be called on to present the facts. Again, I repeat this should not be used as a political platform, but only a source for accurate information that we all will need for a while longer. Other than a quick introduction of the speaker, medical experts would be responsible for the briefing, and answering any questions about the virus that might arise. What do you think? Should we have accurate, science based briefings daily, or should we just not worry about it and hope everything works out OK?

I can hear it now. Pelosi, orange man bad!!!

 

[candycorn]

All you need to know about the virus:

 

[jknowgood]

"This shouldn't be a political thing but Democrats should do it."

Do you hear yourself?

It's obvious that republicans won't do it. Democrats are the only ones who could. Again, I stress that it should not be used for political rhetoric. Scientifically based information about the virus, and that is all. I would oppose turning it into a political circus like Trump did.

I see using this to destroy Trump isn't working out for you. The killer hornets failed from the get go! Lol

 

[jknowgood]

All you need to know about the virus:

I see a list of Obama care death panels. They didn't work fast enough. I heard Pelosi is telling seniors, Medicare isn't a right. Lol

 

[BULLDOG]

Trump turned his daily briefings into campaign events, so we will lose nothing by him no longer doing them. However, for a while, we still need accurate daily science based reports of what is happening. I suggest Democrats have a daily report each day. The democratic report should not be used for political statements, but just for the scientific facts as they are known. I'm sure there are credible medical experts who are not afraid of Trump's response who could be called on to present the facts. Again, I repeat this should not be used as a political platform, but only a source for accurate information that we all will need for a while longer. Other than a quick introduction of the speaker, medical experts would be responsible for the briefing, and answering any questions about the virus that might arise. What do you think? Should we have accurate, science based briefings daily, or should we just not worry about it and hope everything works out OK?

Elections have consequences.

.

And those consequences don't last forever. We need accurate scientifically based information. That orange fool isn't providing that.

 

[barn sour]

"This shouldn't be a political thing but Democrats should do it."

Do you hear yourself?

It's obvious that republicans won't do it. Democrats are the only ones who could. Again, I stress that it should not be used for political rhetoric. Scientifically based information about the virus, and that is all. I would oppose turning it into a political circus like Trump did.

It's kinda funny you actually think Democrats can do a single thing that doesn't turn into a political circus. Do you even live in this country?

 

[BULLDOG]

"This shouldn't be a political thing but Democrats should do it."

Do you hear yourself?

It's obvious that republicans won't do it. Democrats are the only ones who could. Again, I stress that it should not be used for political rhetoric. Scientifically based information about the virus, and that is all. I would oppose turning it into a political circus like Trump did.

Why does your plan have to involve politicians at all? What's stopping CNN or Fox from rounding up a team of specialists to do their own assessments? Why do you think the freakin government is the answer to everything? They can't even deliver the goddamn mail efficiently.

Fox and CNN both have their experts on every day. This would be ranking members from the CDC and the NIH who are not part of the political free for all. Again, not a partisan event.

So then do it. Call up the CDC or the NIH and get the ball rolling. Why do you feel the need to invoke a political party if your goal is not to play politics? That makes as much sense as tits on a bull.

I would, but unfortunately, I'm just another anonymous poster on the internet. If I could make it happen on my own, I would.

 

[okfine]

Trump turned his daily briefings into campaign events, so we will lose nothing by him no longer doing them. However, for a while, we still need accurate daily science based reports of what is happening. I suggest Democrats have a daily report each day. The democratic report should not be used for political statements, but just for the scientific facts as they are known. I'm sure there are credible medical experts who are not afraid of Trump's response who could be called on to present the facts. Again, I repeat this should not be used as a political platform, but only a source for accurate information that we all will need for a while longer. Other than a quick introduction of the speaker, medical experts would be responsible for the briefing, and answering any questions about the virus that might arise. What do you think? Should we have accurate, science based briefings daily, or should we just not worry about it and hope everything works out OK?

The media will report with or without the disaster master. In 6 months things will be different.

 

[BULLDOG]

Trump turned his daily briefings into campaign events, so we will lose nothing by him no longer doing them. However, for a while, we still need accurate daily science based reports of what is happening. I suggest Democrats have a daily report each day. The democratic report should not be used for political statements, but just for the scientific facts as they are known. I'm sure there are credible medical experts who are not afraid of Trump's response who could be called on to present the facts. Again, I repeat this should not be used as a political platform, but only a source for accurate information that we all will need for a while longer. Other than a quick introduction of the speaker, medical experts would be responsible for the briefing, and answering any questions about the virus that might arise. What do you think? Should we have accurate, science based briefings daily, or should we just not worry about it and hope everything works out OK?

What we "need" is for healthy Americans to return to work! What we "need" is a main stream media that deals in facts not fears! You don't want accurate information! You want the fear mongering to continue!

Wouldn't do much good to explain how you are wrong, would it?

 

[Muhammed]

Should we have accurate, science based briefings daily

The Trump administration is already doing that and has been consistently and regularly doing that for a long fucking time now, you silly foolish TDS addled moron.

Are you going to ask if we should also have sunrises?

Trump isn't doing that. He is having a daily campaign rally. He says he doesn't want to do it any more anyway.

The terms "science based briefing" and "daily campaign rally", are not necessarily mutually exclusive. Are you intelligent enough to comprehend that, or too fucking stupid to comprehend that?

 

[BULLDOG]

All you need to know about the virus:

I see a list of Obama care death panels. They didn't work fast enough. I heard Pelosi is telling seniors, Medicare isn't a right. Lol

You must be hallucinating again.

 

[jknowgood]

All you need to know about the virus:

I see a list of Obama care death panels. They didn't work fast enough. I heard Pelosi is telling seniors, Medicare isn't a right. Lol

You must be hallucinating again.

Nope, your party is imploding. Thank God!

 

[BULLDOG]

"This shouldn't be a political thing but Democrats should do it."

Do you hear yourself?

It's obvious that republicans won't do it. Democrats are the only ones who could. Again, I stress that it should not be used for political rhetoric. Scientifically based information about the virus, and that is all. I would oppose turning it into a political circus like Trump did.

It's kinda funny you actually think Democrats can do a single thing that doesn't turn into a political circus. Do you even live in this country?

I can see how hard it is for you to imagine somebody that wouldn't be as unethical as you, but I already said it would specifically not be used as a political platform. You can't stretch your mind to evaluate what I actually said instead of what you want to think I said?