Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have no idea what Trump does and doesn't know.So you admit Trump didn't know anything about it.
However...it is unlikely that Weisselberg did any of this without the approval or direction of Trump...and if the penalties become serious enough he will flip.I have no idea what Trump does and doesn't know.So you admit Trump didn't know anything about it.
Like a good mob boss, Trump is careful not to ever let his actions be recorded in writing. No emails. No notes.
He's spent a lifetime getting away with this shit.
ya cause after all trump micromanaged his businesses after hiring people to run them, I mean who wouldn't.However...it is unlikely that Weisselberg did any of this without the approval or direction of Trump...and if the penalties become serious enough he will flip.I have no idea what Trump does and doesn't know.So you admit Trump didn't know anything about it.
Like a good mob boss, Trump is careful not to ever let his actions be recorded in writing. No emails. No notes.
He's spent a lifetime getting away with this shit.
Trump ran a small company an was notoriously hands on and cheap. Again...it's unlikely that Weisselberg engaged in this behavior without the knowledge and direction of Trump but we'll see.ya cause after all trump micromanaged his businesses after hiring people to run them, I mean who wouldn't.However...it is unlikely that Weisselberg did any of this without the approval or direction of Trump...and if the penalties become serious enough he will flip.I have no idea what Trump does and doesn't know.So you admit Trump didn't know anything about it.
Like a good mob boss, Trump is careful not to ever let his actions be recorded in writing. No emails. No notes.
He's spent a lifetime getting away with this shit.
I am not sure what you mean by nothing? I highlighted the flawso, nothing, eh?actually it was directly in response to what you quoted^non-responsive drivel by a clown.haha yeah that's the desperate dems in Vance's office trying to have their cake and eat it too.View attachment 509327No one has been accused of falsifying any documents, moron.Falsifying documents is not normal. It’s a crime.which is normal
Either they were fringe benefits, that Weisselberg should have claimed as income, or it was compensation from the Trump Org, that the Trump Org didn't properly report as compensation...it can't be both. Moreover, the indictment itself even claims that it was Weisselberg himself that made the directions in the Trump Org to do what is alleged. Not Trump, not the entire Organzation. Holding the entire organization responsible for what they allege he did...just silly.
any input by you on your fellow clown's offering:
"No one has been accused of falsifying any documents, moron. "
thanks for wasting everyones time.
Supposedly Trump was a bit of a micromanager.ya cause after all trump micromanaged his businesses after hiring people to run them, I mean who wouldn't.
Non confused at all...they are saying Weisselberg falslifed the documents....in order to reduce his compensation....and then saying, well then he also should have claimed value of the fringe benefits....You seem confused. Vance's office isn't trying to claim it's both. It's just saying that their organization falsified documents in order to reduce Weisselberg's compensation. Trump's organization was part of the conspiracy.haha yeah that's the desperate dems in Vance's office trying to have their cake and eat it too.
Either they were fringe benefits, that Weisselberg should have claimed as income, or it was compensation from the Trump Org, that the Trump Org didn't properly report as compensation...it can't be both. Moreover, the indictment itself even claims that it was Weisselberg himself that made the directions in the Trump Org to do what is alleged. Not Trump, not the entire Organzation. Holding the entire organization responsible for what they allege he did...just silly.
Those documents came from the company, not Weisselberg.
Weisselberg committed his fraud as CFO of Trump’s organization with the assistance of members of the organization. They are not saying that Weisselberg falsified the documents, they’re saying that Trump’s organization did.Non confused at all...they are saying Weisselberg falslifed the documents....in order to reduce his compensation....and then saying, well then he also should have claimed value of the fringe benefits....You seem confused. Vance's office isn't trying to claim it's both. It's just saying that their organization falsified documents in order to reduce Weisselberg's compensation. Trump's organization was part of the conspiracy.haha yeah that's the desperate dems in Vance's office trying to have their cake and eat it too.
Either they were fringe benefits, that Weisselberg should have claimed as income, or it was compensation from the Trump Org, that the Trump Org didn't properly report as compensation...it can't be both. Moreover, the indictment itself even claims that it was Weisselberg himself that made the directions in the Trump Org to do what is alleged. Not Trump, not the entire Organzation. Holding the entire organization responsible for what they allege he did...just silly.
Those documents came from the company, not Weisselberg.
1) you can't hold the entire organization libel when you claim it was one person
2) either then it was compensation, and he was wrong for messing with the numbers at the organzation level, or it was fringe benefits, and he should have claimed the value. One or the other. How the company labels it really is irrelvant...he should arguably claimed the value, at least of some of those things, as income....
Sorry...it literally says in the quoted part that it was at his direction...he did it...Weisselberg committed his fraud as CFO of Trump’s organization with the assistance of members of the organization. They are not saying that Weisselberg falsified the documents, they’re saying that Trump’s organization did.Non confused at all...they are saying Weisselberg falslifed the documents....in order to reduce his compensation....and then saying, well then he also should have claimed value of the fringe benefits....You seem confused. Vance's office isn't trying to claim it's both. It's just saying that their organization falsified documents in order to reduce Weisselberg's compensation. Trump's organization was part of the conspiracy.haha yeah that's the desperate dems in Vance's office trying to have their cake and eat it too.
Either they were fringe benefits, that Weisselberg should have claimed as income, or it was compensation from the Trump Org, that the Trump Org didn't properly report as compensation...it can't be both. Moreover, the indictment itself even claims that it was Weisselberg himself that made the directions in the Trump Org to do what is alleged. Not Trump, not the entire Organzation. Holding the entire organization responsible for what they allege he did...just silly.
Those documents came from the company, not Weisselberg.
1) you can't hold the entire organization libel when you claim it was one person
2) either then it was compensation, and he was wrong for messing with the numbers at the organzation level, or it was fringe benefits, and he should have claimed the value. One or the other. How the company labels it really is irrelvant...he should arguably claimed the value, at least of some of those things, as income....
Therefore the organization is also criminal.
Yes, the entire organization did it since the organization produced the fraudulent documents.Sorry...it literally says in the quoted part that it was at his direction...he did it...Weisselberg committed his fraud as CFO of Trump’s organization with the assistance of members of the organization. They are not saying that Weisselberg falsified the documents, they’re saying that Trump’s organization did.Non confused at all...they are saying Weisselberg falslifed the documents....in order to reduce his compensation....and then saying, well then he also should have claimed value of the fringe benefits....You seem confused. Vance's office isn't trying to claim it's both. It's just saying that their organization falsified documents in order to reduce Weisselberg's compensation. Trump's organization was part of the conspiracy.haha yeah that's the desperate dems in Vance's office trying to have their cake and eat it too.
Either they were fringe benefits, that Weisselberg should have claimed as income, or it was compensation from the Trump Org, that the Trump Org didn't properly report as compensation...it can't be both. Moreover, the indictment itself even claims that it was Weisselberg himself that made the directions in the Trump Org to do what is alleged. Not Trump, not the entire Organzation. Holding the entire organization responsible for what they allege he did...just silly.
Those documents came from the company, not Weisselberg.
1) you can't hold the entire organization libel when you claim it was one person
2) either then it was compensation, and he was wrong for messing with the numbers at the organzation level, or it was fringe benefits, and he should have claimed the value. One or the other. How the company labels it really is irrelvant...he should arguably claimed the value, at least of some of those things, as income....
Therefore the organization is also criminal.
Not the entire organization.
Read the actual quoted part. Moreover, Trump had zero to do with it, and isn't mentioned at all
well except the CFO makes the decision on those matters and does not have to consult with the owner or the other officers on his area of responsibility.Yes, the entire organization did it since the organization produced the fraudulent documents.Sorry...it literally says in the quoted part that it was at his direction...he did it...Weisselberg committed his fraud as CFO of Trump’s organization with the assistance of members of the organization. They are not saying that Weisselberg falsified the documents, they’re saying that Trump’s organization did.Non confused at all...they are saying Weisselberg falslifed the documents....in order to reduce his compensation....and then saying, well then he also should have claimed value of the fringe benefits....You seem confused. Vance's office isn't trying to claim it's both. It's just saying that their organization falsified documents in order to reduce Weisselberg's compensation. Trump's organization was part of the conspiracy.haha yeah that's the desperate dems in Vance's office trying to have their cake and eat it too.
Either they were fringe benefits, that Weisselberg should have claimed as income, or it was compensation from the Trump Org, that the Trump Org didn't properly report as compensation...it can't be both. Moreover, the indictment itself even claims that it was Weisselberg himself that made the directions in the Trump Org to do what is alleged. Not Trump, not the entire Organzation. Holding the entire organization responsible for what they allege he did...just silly.
Those documents came from the company, not Weisselberg.
1) you can't hold the entire organization libel when you claim it was one person
2) either then it was compensation, and he was wrong for messing with the numbers at the organzation level, or it was fringe benefits, and he should have claimed the value. One or the other. How the company labels it really is irrelvant...he should arguably claimed the value, at least of some of those things, as income....
Therefore the organization is also criminal.
Not the entire organization.
Read the actual quoted part. Moreover, Trump had zero to do with it, and isn't mentioned at all
LOL you have not nor has the DA established anyone except the CFO had anything to do with what was charged.Sounds like Trump Humpers are getting ready to throw Weisselberg under the bus
Sure. And the CFO’s employees followed his illegal requests which makes it a criminal organization.well except the CFO makes the decision on those matters and does not have to consult with the owner or the other officers on his area of responsibility.Yes, the entire organization did it since the organization produced the fraudulent documents.Sorry...it literally says in the quoted part that it was at his direction...he did it...Weisselberg committed his fraud as CFO of Trump’s organization with the assistance of members of the organization. They are not saying that Weisselberg falsified the documents, they’re saying that Trump’s organization did.Non confused at all...they are saying Weisselberg falslifed the documents....in order to reduce his compensation....and then saying, well then he also should have claimed value of the fringe benefits....You seem confused. Vance's office isn't trying to claim it's both. It's just saying that their organization falsified documents in order to reduce Weisselberg's compensation. Trump's organization was part of the conspiracy.haha yeah that's the desperate dems in Vance's office trying to have their cake and eat it too.
Either they were fringe benefits, that Weisselberg should have claimed as income, or it was compensation from the Trump Org, that the Trump Org didn't properly report as compensation...it can't be both. Moreover, the indictment itself even claims that it was Weisselberg himself that made the directions in the Trump Org to do what is alleged. Not Trump, not the entire Organzation. Holding the entire organization responsible for what they allege he did...just silly.
Those documents came from the company, not Weisselberg.
1) you can't hold the entire organization libel when you claim it was one person
2) either then it was compensation, and he was wrong for messing with the numbers at the organzation level, or it was fringe benefits, and he should have claimed the value. One or the other. How the company labels it really is irrelvant...he should arguably claimed the value, at least of some of those things, as income....
Therefore the organization is also criminal.
Not the entire organization.
Read the actual quoted part. Moreover, Trump had zero to do with it, and isn't mentioned at all
"does not have to consult"well except the CFO makes the decision on those matters and does not have to consult with the owner or the other officers on his area of responsibility.
wrong it makes the FO and perhaps any knowledgeable employee culpable not the entire organization and again no connection is made to Trump or any other organization head.Sure. And the CFO’s employees followed his illegal requests which makes it a criminal organization.well except the CFO makes the decision on those matters and does not have to consult with the owner or the other officers on his area of responsibility.Yes, the entire organization did it since the organization produced the fraudulent documents.Sorry...it literally says in the quoted part that it was at his direction...he did it...Weisselberg committed his fraud as CFO of Trump’s organization with the assistance of members of the organization. They are not saying that Weisselberg falsified the documents, they’re saying that Trump’s organization did.Non confused at all...they are saying Weisselberg falslifed the documents....in order to reduce his compensation....and then saying, well then he also should have claimed value of the fringe benefits....You seem confused. Vance's office isn't trying to claim it's both. It's just saying that their organization falsified documents in order to reduce Weisselberg's compensation. Trump's organization was part of the conspiracy.haha yeah that's the desperate dems in Vance's office trying to have their cake and eat it too.
Either they were fringe benefits, that Weisselberg should have claimed as income, or it was compensation from the Trump Org, that the Trump Org didn't properly report as compensation...it can't be both. Moreover, the indictment itself even claims that it was Weisselberg himself that made the directions in the Trump Org to do what is alleged. Not Trump, not the entire Organzation. Holding the entire organization responsible for what they allege he did...just silly.
Those documents came from the company, not Weisselberg.
1) you can't hold the entire organization libel when you claim it was one person
2) either then it was compensation, and he was wrong for messing with the numbers at the organzation level, or it was fringe benefits, and he should have claimed the value. One or the other. How the company labels it really is irrelvant...he should arguably claimed the value, at least of some of those things, as income....
Therefore the organization is also criminal.
Not the entire organization.
Read the actual quoted part. Moreover, Trump had zero to do with it, and isn't mentioned at all
Nope. The organization produced fraudulent documents. That makes the organization criminally liable.wrong it makes the FO and perhaps any knowledgeable employee culpable not the entire organization and again no connection is made to Trump or any other organization head.
TRUMP! organization tax cheats should get the same punishment as Al Sharpton and Tim Geithner. I mean, we're serious about tax cheats, so they should be really, really punished.They do when it's more than a millionNo one goes to jail for 83 dollars in unpaid taxes
Fining rich people isn’t a deterrent. These assholes are defrauding the government and should be prosecuted. Everyone of us pays more in taxes when these guys don’t.This would have been an audit issue or at most a civil case if it didn't involve Trump.
It makes the relevant officers liable and the criminal part is a stretch since in the past ever since IRS was established the charged offenses were not criminal in nature.Nope. The organization produced fraudulent documents. That makes the organization criminally liable.wrong it makes the FO and perhaps any knowledgeable employee culpable not the entire organization and again no connection is made to Trump or any other organization head.
