Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Haha, excellent point.Now put that into perspective with the Bundy's at Nevada and Oregon.One of the most regular barbs thrown at liberals is that they act disruptively or unlawfully...or if they question or criticise authority they are anti-cop or don't support the troops or want to destroy America.Complete nonsense of course but whatever....To a conservative the worst possible crime is not accepting, without question, instructions from 'authority'.The soon to be rich doctor already has his lawyers ready to sick 'em on the soon to be defendents.
Watch now: Dr. David Dao's lawyers, daughter speak to the media
Watch now: Dr. David Dao's lawyers, daughter speak to the media
It's always instructive when some jackboot authoritarian citizen-abuse event happens ---- who comes out on which side.
Always instructive, rarely surprising.
Essentially, by not accepting authority they're anti-American.
It's a point of difference that Conservatives draw between themselves and Liberals
Uniteds attempts to evict paying customers from their seat was disruptiveI guess there's more to the story than meets the eye. Was Dr. Dao escorted off the plane earlier? Only to return to his seat, and resist authoritie's SECOND request to leave permanently? I admirer guy that sticks to his guns, airline overbooking has to end. I would have just left the first time. But, he was being disruptive...and so it goes.
Rather predictable tho.It's always instructive when some jackboot authoritarian citizen-abuse event happens ---- who comes out on which side.
Always instructive, rarely surprising.
Agreed. Isn't ironic how the "small government" individual liberty "loving" Tea Party conservatives always come out on the side of big government thuggery?
It was extreme, what WAS the correct response?Uniteds attempts to evict paying customers from their seat was disruptiveI guess there's more to the story than meets the eye. Was Dr. Dao escorted off the plane earlier? Only to return to his seat, and resist authoritie's SECOND request to leave permanently? I admirer guy that sticks to his guns, airline overbooking has to end. I would have just left the first time. But, he was being disruptive...and so it goes.
Uniteds attempts to evict paying customers from their seat was disruptiveI guess there's more to the story than meets the eye. Was Dr. Dao escorted off the plane earlier? Only to return to his seat, and resist authoritie's SECOND request to leave permanently? I admirer guy that sticks to his guns, airline overbooking has to end. I would have just left the first time. But, he was being disruptive...and so it goes.
Lol !!I heard the tape. Dr Dao never threw a tantrum and was quite respectful. He explained the reason why he could not miss the flightUnited is at fault
They had no business removing paying passengers once they were seated. When Republic called and said they needed four seats, United should have just said .....too late, we have already boarded
Yes, and that's great that this stupid practice is now likely to end.
HOWEVER, until that happens, how about acting like the rest of us grown-ups and not fucking up the day for everyone else.
Of course, I keep forgetting that the universe orbits around this one asshole paseenger.
Bullshit
Acting like a grownup means the airline realizes that kicking off people who need to reach their destination that day was going to cause trouble
Blame the airline for provoking the disturbance, not the passengers for being disturbed
The airline is at fault for having a system like this in the first place, but once the police come the adult thing to do is comply, then contemplate a lawsuit.
Instead we have the little three year old narcicistic go into his tantrum fucking up everyone elses flight.
United threw a tantrum when nobody surrendered their seat
The correct response was to tell Republic that the flight had already been boarded and that inserting their employees would be disruptiveIt was extreme, what WAS the correct response?Uniteds attempts to evict paying customers from their seat was disruptiveI guess there's more to the story than meets the eye. Was Dr. Dao escorted off the plane earlier? Only to return to his seat, and resist authoritie's SECOND request to leave permanently? I admirer guy that sticks to his guns, airline overbooking has to end. I would have just left the first time. But, he was being disruptive...and so it goes.
What did Dr Dao say that was not respectful?Lol !!I heard the tape. Dr Dao never threw a tantrum and was quite respectful. He explained the reason why he could not miss the flightUnited is at fault
They had no business removing paying passengers once they were seated. When Republic called and said they needed four seats, United should have just said .....too late, we have already boarded
Yes, and that's great that this stupid practice is now likely to end.
HOWEVER, until that happens, how about acting like the rest of us grown-ups and not fucking up the day for everyone else.
Of course, I keep forgetting that the universe orbits around this one asshole paseenger.
Bullshit
Acting like a grownup means the airline realizes that kicking off people who need to reach their destination that day was going to cause trouble
Blame the airline for provoking the disturbance, not the passengers for being disturbed
The airline is at fault for having a system like this in the first place, but once the police come the adult thing to do is comply, then contemplate a lawsuit.
Instead we have the little three year old narcicistic go into his tantrum fucking up everyone elses flight.
United threw a tantrum when nobody surrendered their seat
Respectful? Heeeeee heeeeeee!!!
That's a good one !!!
United scared the hell out so everyone when they said if nobody volunteered they would pick someoneUniteds attempts to evict paying customers from their seat was disruptiveI guess there's more to the story than meets the eye. Was Dr. Dao escorted off the plane earlier? Only to return to his seat, and resist authoritie's SECOND request to leave permanently? I admirer guy that sticks to his guns, airline overbooking has to end. I would have just left the first time. But, he was being disruptive...and so it goes.
Yes, and it completely sucked.
Contemplate complaints and lawsuits later, but for now comply with their demands, since for one thing it's not your fucking plane, and allow everyone else at least to get home on time instead of scaring the fuck out of other passengers with your three year old-like wailing.
One of the most regular barbs thrown at liberals is that they act disruptively or unlawfully...or if they question or criticise authority they are anti-cop or don't support the troops or want to destroy America.Complete nonsense of course but whatever....To a conservative the worst possible crime is not accepting, without question, instructions from 'authority'.The soon to be rich doctor already has his lawyers ready to sick 'em on the soon to be defendents.
Watch now: Dr. David Dao's lawyers, daughter speak to the media
Lawyers for Dr. David Dao, the Kentucky doctor who was violently pulled from a United Airlines flight on Sunday, have called a press conference for 11 a.m. Thursday in Chicago. His daughter, Crystal Dao Pepper, will also speak....
Watch now: Dr. David Dao's lawyers, daughter speak to the media
It's always instructive when some jackboot authoritarian citizen-abuse event happens ---- who comes out on which side.
Always instructive, rarely surprising.
Essentially, by not accepting authority they're anti-American.
It's a point of difference that Conservatives draw between themselves and Liberals
I blame airline policies. I don't fly anymore, because they can find all sorts of ways to screw the consumer. Outrageous charges for carry on's to this ridiculous overbooking. IF we are equating Dr Dao to Dr. King resisting the slings and arrows of outrageous laws, well, OK. But I smell something fishy here.What did Dr Dao say that was not respectful?Lol !!I heard the tape. Dr Dao never threw a tantrum and was quite respectful. He explained the reason why he could not miss the flightYes, and that's great that this stupid practice is now likely to end.
HOWEVER, until that happens, how about acting like the rest of us grown-ups and not fucking up the day for everyone else.
Of course, I keep forgetting that the universe orbits around this one asshole paseenger.
Bullshit
Acting like a grownup means the airline realizes that kicking off people who need to reach their destination that day was going to cause trouble
Blame the airline for provoking the disturbance, not the passengers for being disturbed
The airline is at fault for having a system like this in the first place, but once the police come the adult thing to do is comply, then contemplate a lawsuit.
Instead we have the little three year old narcicistic go into his tantrum fucking up everyone elses flight.
United threw a tantrum when nobody surrendered their seat
Respectful? Heeeeee heeeeeee!!!
That's a good one !!!
Because....in your mind....your house scenerio is exactly the same.....right?Rather predictable tho.It's always instructive when some jackboot authoritarian citizen-abuse event happens ---- who comes out on which side.
Always instructive, rarely surprising.
Agreed. Isn't ironic how the "small government" individual liberty "loving" Tea Party conservatives always come out on the side of big government thuggery?
Again, you are an idiot to think this is about authority.
If I hired you to come clean my house and even had a contract, and out of the blue I ordered you out of my house, would you refuse to leave because it would be too authoritarian, and too cowardly to obey my command?
In your scenario would you simply get up and leave?One of the most regular barbs thrown at liberals is that they act disruptively or unlawfully...or if they question or criticise authority they are anti-cop or don't support the troops or want to destroy America.Complete nonsense of course but whatever....To a conservative the worst possible crime is not accepting, without question, instructions from 'authority'.The soon to be rich doctor already has his lawyers ready to sick 'em on the soon to be defendents.
Watch now: Dr. David Dao's lawyers, daughter speak to the media
Watch now: Dr. David Dao's lawyers, daughter speak to the media
It's always instructive when some jackboot authoritarian citizen-abuse event happens ---- who comes out on which side.
Always instructive, rarely surprising.
Essentially, by not accepting authority they're anti-American.
It's a point of difference that Conservatives draw between themselves and Liberals
Problem is with your comments, this wasn't about any of that.
If you're having dinner in a restaurant, and suddenly waiters come to your table and tell you you must leave because they have a large party coming in that needs all the tables. Do you leave, or do you refuse because you believe it's cowardly to give in, and believe it's too authoritarian of the restaurant to tell you what to do?
Do you hold on to the table and refuse to leave and scream your bloody head off even when security comes in and demands that you leave?
After reading all of you fucking liberals posts here, apparently this is how you fuckers behave.
More and more I see why so many people believe liberalism is a mental disorder.
What if United told you once you were seated that they were bumping you because you paid $200 for your seat and someone at the gate is willing to pay $800?One of the most regular barbs thrown at liberals is that they act disruptively or unlawfully...or if they question or criticise authority they are anti-cop or don't support the troops or want to destroy America.Complete nonsense of course but whatever....To a conservative the worst possible crime is not accepting, without question, instructions from 'authority'.The soon to be rich doctor already has his lawyers ready to sick 'em on the soon to be defendents.
Watch now: Dr. David Dao's lawyers, daughter speak to the media
Watch now: Dr. David Dao's lawyers, daughter speak to the media
It's always instructive when some jackboot authoritarian citizen-abuse event happens ---- who comes out on which side.
Always instructive, rarely surprising.
Essentially, by not accepting authority they're anti-American.
It's a point of difference that Conservatives draw between themselves and Liberals
Problem is with your comments, this wasn't about any of that.
If you're having dinner in a restaurant, and suddenly waiters come to your table and tell you you must leave because they have a large party coming in that needs all the tables. Do you leave, or do you refuse because you believe it's cowardly to give in, and believe it's too authoritarian of the restaurant to tell you what to do?
Do you hold on to the table and refuse to leave and scream your bloody head off even when security comes in and demands that you leave?
After reading all of you fucking liberals posts here, apparently this is how you fuckers behave.
More and more I see why so many people believe liberalism is a mental disorder.
The poster you are replying to already established that he would meekly kow tow to the corporation.What if United told you once you were seated that they were bumping you because you paid $200 for your seat and someone at the gate is willing to pay $800?One of the most regular barbs thrown at liberals is that they act disruptively or unlawfully...or if they question or criticise authority they are anti-cop or don't support the troops or want to destroy America.Complete nonsense of course but whatever....To a conservative the worst possible crime is not accepting, without question, instructions from 'authority'.It's always instructive when some jackboot authoritarian citizen-abuse event happens ---- who comes out on which side.
Always instructive, rarely surprising.
Essentially, by not accepting authority they're anti-American.
It's a point of difference that Conservatives draw between themselves and Liberals
Problem is with your comments, this wasn't about any of that.
If you're having dinner in a restaurant, and suddenly waiters come to your table and tell you you must leave because they have a large party coming in that needs all the tables. Do you leave, or do you refuse because you believe it's cowardly to give in, and believe it's too authoritarian of the restaurant to tell you what to do?
Do you hold on to the table and refuse to leave and scream your bloody head off even when security comes in and demands that you leave?
After reading all of you fucking liberals posts here, apparently this is how you fuckers behave.
More and more I see why so many people believe liberalism is a mental disorder.
It is a business decision.....bump you so they can give your seat to someone more profitable
That is what they did to Dr Dao.......we have someone we will make more money off of to take your seat
United scared the hell out so everyone when they said if nobody volunteered they would pick someoneUniteds attempts to evict paying customers from their seat was disruptiveI guess there's more to the story than meets the eye. Was Dr. Dao escorted off the plane earlier? Only to return to his seat, and resist authoritie's SECOND request to leave permanently? I admirer guy that sticks to his guns, airline overbooking has to end. I would have just left the first time. But, he was being disruptive...and so it goes.
Yes, and it completely sucked.
Contemplate complaints and lawsuits later, but for now comply with their demands, since for one thing it's not your fucking plane, and allow everyone else at least to get home on time instead of scaring the fuck out of other passengers with your three year old-like wailing.
United scared the hell out of when they called in the Brute squad
United scared the hell out of everyone when their goons knocked a paying passenger unconscious and dragged him bloody off the plane
United scared the hell out of every potential customer who asks...what if that was me?
What if United told you once you were seated that they were bumping you because you paid $200 for your seat and someone at the gate is willing to pay $800?One of the most regular barbs thrown at liberals is that they act disruptively or unlawfully...or if they question or criticise authority they are anti-cop or don't support the troops or want to destroy America.Complete nonsense of course but whatever....To a conservative the worst possible crime is not accepting, without question, instructions from 'authority'.It's always instructive when some jackboot authoritarian citizen-abuse event happens ---- who comes out on which side.
Always instructive, rarely surprising.
Essentially, by not accepting authority they're anti-American.
It's a point of difference that Conservatives draw between themselves and Liberals
Problem is with your comments, this wasn't about any of that.
If you're having dinner in a restaurant, and suddenly waiters come to your table and tell you you must leave because they have a large party coming in that needs all the tables. Do you leave, or do you refuse because you believe it's cowardly to give in, and believe it's too authoritarian of the restaurant to tell you what to do?
Do you hold on to the table and refuse to leave and scream your bloody head off even when security comes in and demands that you leave?
After reading all of you fucking liberals posts here, apparently this is how you fuckers behave.
More and more I see why so many people believe liberalism is a mental disorder.
It is a business decision.....bump you so they can give your seat to someone more profitable
That is what they did to Dr Dao.......we have someone we will make more money off of to take your seat
I guess there's more to the story than meets the eye. Was Dr. Dao escorted off the plane earlier? Only to return to his seat, and resist authoritie's SECOND request to leave permanently? I admirer guy that sticks to his guns, airline overbooking has to end. I would have just left the first time. But, he was being disruptive...and so it goes.
