What actions should be taken at the border in respect to the caravan arriving ?

1. Should they be allowed to cross into the United States ??

2. Why didn't they find refuge in Mexico ??

3. Should the national guard set temporary camps up that will feed them, vett them, and then turn them back into the direction from which they came ??

4. Should the nation listen to their stories all about the horrors in which they are fleeing from, and if believed, then go with them back to their country, make war with the forces within that country in which caused them to flee to begin with, and help to liberate their Homeland for their soon to be triumphant return ??
First-class tickets to the sanctuary city of their choice, free housing and food stamps, instant citizenship and automatic voter registration.
 
So the conservative response is to murder them or enslave them. Christ, this country has some truly despicable people in it.
What is your answer, let them all in?
Soon the number collecting welfare will out number the ones paying taxes.

Demon-crats don't care about that, they just hope that they can take a working man or woman's money, give it to them freely against the working man or women's will, and then hope that it was used in a way to someday make Demon-crat voters and citizens out of these people.
 
If the country the most blessed of all times cannot be generous, what hope can we have for world peace?
Well if it were for the heartfelt reasoning that you give, then it would be just fine, but we have a Demon-crat party that makes bad out of these situations.
 
1. Should they be allowed to cross into the United States ??

2. Why didn't they find refuge in Mexico ??

3. Should the national guard set temporary camps up that will feed them, vett them, and then turn them back into the direction from which they came ??

4. Should the nation listen to their stories all about the horrors in which they are fleeing from, and if believed, then go with them back to their country, make war with the forces within that country in which caused them to flee to begin with, and help to liberate their Homeland for their soon to be triumphant return ??
First-class tickets to the sanctuary city of their choice, free housing and food stamps, instant citizenship and automatic voter registration.
Yep, that's what the Demon-crats want.
 
"34-year-old Aide Hernandez from Guatemala who had four children in tow" believes the United States should give her amnesty because her husband abused her. She better learn to defend herself back in Guatemala or Mexico whichever place she stays.

Migrant ‘caravan’ at U.S.-Mexico border prepares for mass crossing | BWCentral
So there are no laws in Guatamala ?? It is a lawless place ? Sounds like we need to go there with our military, and kick some ace, set up camps for these people until liberation comes for them, and then that country can pay the US back with natural resources or other that might be present in the area.

No more freebies for the world in these situations.
 
Debate !!

sure

how's we call all our troops protecting every other nations boarders home to protect ours?

then we could spend the $$$ on our boys ,instead of some wall that won't work

~S~
 
I don't know where you live, but in this country we are pretty damned spoiled. High standard of living, plenty of jobs and safety nets if we can't find one, lots of opportunities to get ahead if we choose to take advantage of it.
Yes, our country is great because our culture made it that way, These people have shit countries because their culture made them that way. I have zero interest in sucky cultures coming over here and making us sucky too. If they want to live somewhere nice, they need to make their country that way, just like we did.
Why don't they want to do exactly that, otherwise make their countries a great place to live ?? Why don't they cry out to the UN if they are being abused in their countries, and why don't they ask for intervention by the UN ? This whole thing is a fraud .....
 
Founding documents of the U.S. speak of inalienable rights in such a way that it is clear they apply to all people. Any person anywhere has them.
Not anywhere in the world they don't, but of course within our borders yes we have rules and laws to be kept up, and this is what these so called seekers know all to well these days (that we aren't keeping our rules and laws up or enforced).
 
What should be done is that the "People of Faith" in our country, all of them of so many faiths, will help these people cross, comfort them, and get them settled in their new home. After years of talk (and complaining and yelling) about "faith," this is a perfect opportunity for "faith" in action.
Now you support the people of faith eh ? You people are like the waves on the sea, tossing and rolling any which way that the wind blows.
 
Allow them to cross the border, arrest the train operators, confiscate the train. Load the people up on a boat with our crew, take them back.
 
What should be done is that the "People of Faith" in our country, all of them of so many faiths, will help these people cross, comfort them, and get them settled in their new home. After years of talk (and complaining and yelling) about "faith," this is a perfect opportunity for "faith" in action.
Now you support the people of faith eh ? You people are like the waves on the sea, tossing and rolling any which way that the wind blows.

I support real people of faith (and not just those from Christian denominations), not the loudmouth phonies and impostors who seem to have grabbed the microphones.
 
Founding documents of the U.S. speak of inalienable rights in such a way that it is clear they apply to all people. Any person anywhere has them.
Not anywhere in the world they don't, but of course within our borders yes we have rules and laws to be kept up, and this is what these so called seekers know all to well these days (that we aren't keeping our rules and laws up or enforced).
What does 'inalienable rights' mean, then? They are granted by the U.S. government because one is on U.S. soil, or that they are granted due to birth under U.S. government?
 
Debate !!

That’s a tough one-

On one hand, as the leader of the free world we need to extend ourselves to the less fortunate and spread the idea of freedom and liberty against tyranny, but on the other hand, if we allow these people to inundate across our borders we will encourage more people to come, and overwhelm our already stressed system of caring for those unwilling and incapable of caring for themselves.

I know this- if we allow anybody to walk in and tap in, our experiment will fail much sooner.

Your “experiment” has already failed. When the richest nation in the world turns its back humanitarian refugees, you have betrayed the very values you claim to hold dear.

When you do so because “you can’t afford it”, after giving away trillions of dollars in tax cuts to your wealthiest citizens and corporations, you are a hypocrite.

Your nation’s values are now personal greed and xenophobia.
 
1. Should they be allowed to cross into the United States ??

2. Why didn't they find refuge in Mexico ??

3. Should the national guard set temporary camps up that will feed them, vett them, and then turn them back into the direction from which they came ??

4. Should the nation listen to their stories all about the horrors in which they are fleeing from, and if believed, then go with them back to their country, make war with the forces within that country in which caused them to flee to begin with, and help to liberate their Homeland for their soon to be triumphant return ??
Hold them in tent prison camp until their asylum hearing. Do not release. None of them will ever show up fr the hearing. We have historical examples.
 
Most of the cons here want to kill people. One would assume the children there as well. Pro life?

Uh huh.
No we just want invaders to stay on the south side of the border. Its like Palestinians in Gaza jumping on the fence to over into Israel with foreknowledge that a bullet awaits them if that is what they choose to do. That doesn't sound like a wise choice to make it not only affects the recipient of said bullet but their family as well. Ooohh, the choices people make.
In other words you want to kill unarmed people who have committed no violence to you.
No I would consider that they are inflicting and subjecting themselves when they know that is what awaits them if they choose to cross over illegally. That is akin to suicide.
 
Shoot them and stack them like cord wood. They will stop comming soon enough.
LOL. We should at least watch them step foot into our country illegally then shoot them as an invasion force. We are not murderers.
 
Sounds like a job for the Guardsmen at Kent State; they'll shoot anybody. Maybe Calley is still around, too. You could invite him.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top