What are REPUBLICANS going to do to clean up Trump's 7 trillion debt?

[sealybobo]

They seem to have no answers and let him make this mess.

I imagine they will do the same thing democrats did with obamas debt,,,

Obama decreased deficits, trump has increased every year...

the topic is debt,,,do try and stay on topic,,,

You are too dumb to understand the importance of deficits when discussing debt?

true,, but this discussion is about how to pay it back not reduce the increase,,,

I will say the debt is one if the biggest reasons I NEVER vote for dems or repubes,,,

We can only hope to decrease the increases after all the damage Trump has done.

thats not the topic,,,

Well the answer is repubs will leave it to dems to try to clean up. Repubs give tax cuts, increase military spending and borrow. That’s all they do.

so what is it the dems do to pay back their debt???

Well it is probably mostly through growth. Repubs can’t do that cause they offset growth with tax cuts and increased military spending. If dems increase spending they are responsible enough to increase some taxes.

Then turn around and wipe out any increased revenue with much greater spending, leaving us with higher taxes AND bigger debt. You can't outspend a democrat.

Yet republicans always do. Clinton had a surplus. Bush racked up debt he didn’t need to rack up.

Democrats may spend on infrastructure. We need it. Don’t cry about it. Better than giving it to defense contractors and the pentagon.

Well, except for Obama. We gave him billions for shovel ready infrastructure jobs that weren't shovel ready. And don't forget who gave Bubba the spending bills that kept the budget in line. It wasn't democrats. And who gave Bush his spending bills.

Don’t bring up the lame old arguments of the past. Next you’ll be talking about solyndra fast and furious and what about her emails
Plus Benghazi. Obama was a saint compared to criminal donald

 

[JusticeHammer]

They seem to have no answers and let him make this mess.

What did demscum do to clean up obuthole's 9 trillion? Hypocritical idiot.

 

[JusticeHammer]

You just called me literally "partisan" because I said it was stupid to blame a virus on a political party and you said no it's not it's the Republicans.

I challenge you to produce any posts that state you aren't a Democrat with content demonstrating that

Sure, after you produce evidence that you're not a wife-beater.

OK, since you're stupid and you don't think, I'll DUMB DOWN my question for you.

Show any posts you wrote where it's clear a Democrat wouldn't have written that. Show any value not Democrat party.

And that Democrats aren't far left enough isn't it. That's just saying the only problem with Democrats is they aren't pure enough for you.

Show any posts where you said something a Democrat would say wow, that isn't us.

Something that CONTRADICTS you being a Democrat.

I mean my God you're a simpleton. Dude, think ...

But that's true. The problem with Democrats like Hillary are that they act too much like Republicans. We wish Democrats fought harder for universal healthcare, strengthening social security, unions, global warming, gays, abortion rights and common sense gun legislation. And we wish the corporate media would have had the balls to say Bush lied us into Iraq.

I will admit the black community needs to get it's act together. But the problem is, I also know we as a country need to provide these cities in these major cities with more economic opportunities.

Companies should come to where the workers are. There are a lot of people in Chicago and Detroit who need jobs. Instead of Mexico and China, send those jobs to Detroit.

Here is another one. I don't like illegal immigrants either. So lets go after the illegal employers who hire them. If illegal employers didn't hire illegal workers, they'd go home.

I like guns. I just also don't mind common sense gun legislation. And I don't want to block any and all legislation because I'm paranoid Kamala Harris wants to take my guns away.

Blue skies, rainbows and unicorns. Democrats are the most wonderful people on earth. I mean no one else wants everything to be perfect. And you have no plan to do it. But darn it, you want good things to happen. No one else wants that. So what if you have no idea how to do it? LOL. What a tool

Things were fine in 1999 we should have elected Gore and things were fine in 2016 we should have nominated Hillary.

So Bill, Gore Hillary then Obama would be president right now. That's the way it should have gone.

Yes, then the United States would be free and rich. There would be no crime, no poverty. Hangovers and hangnails would not exist. Pixie dust would cover the world. Oh hallelujah, save us oh wonderful Democrats!

No 9-11. No Iraq. No Great Recession.

Let me point out to you that in the 2000's you Republicans waged war on the middle class when you attacked unions. You said they were lazy and overpaid. You did this because you knew you were going to be sending all those jobs overseas.

But Union workers didn't suck. This is from 1997 to 1999

'99 Profit Sharing at Ford Averages $8,000 (Published 2000)

Ford Motor Co says its hourly workers in US will receive average of $8,000 in profit sharing for 1999, topping record $6,100 average workers got for 1998; Ford's figure compares with average $1,775 that General Motors Corp will pay its 154,000 US hourly work force; DaimlerChrysler AG has not yet...

www.nytimes.com

Ford's Profit Soars 56% in '97 to a Record $6.9 Billion

Autos: Rise caps the most profitable year ever for U.S. car makers. But the industry may find it hard to repeat the performance.

www.latimes.com

So what was the problem? No problem. But I remember back then you Republicans loved Toyota and Honda. You are ignorant mother fuckers. Jealous that us Blue states had it so good. Instead of getting it for yourselves you argued if you don't have it so good, no one else should either. Jealous fucks.

Now Trump gives you a $2 raise and brings a few manufacturing jobs home and you suck his dick for it? You Republican voters are stupid. I don't blame the rich for trying to con you. I blame you for being stupid. You're ruining America not the rich. For them America is great. And to be honest, you aint hurting me. But you are hurting yourselves and you don't even seem to care. You don't realize we took a huge step backward in the 2000's with all those manufacturing jobs going bye bye and you don't even remember you were all for them going bye bye.

You even nominated Mitt Romney Mr. Bain Capital. Bain would break up US companies and send those jobs overseas. You republicans don't remember because you have very short memories. Funny you have an elephant for a mascot.

The 9-11 attackers were in the US training for their mission under Clinton.

Democrats voted for the Iraq Invasion

Both parties did the 2008 Great Recession. Clinton started the policies to lower lending standards and Bush continued it.

No your stupid partisan shit is just that, stupid and partisan. You don't know what the hell you're talking about

They couldn't pull off 9.11 until Bush was in off because Clinton wanted to create a domestic terrorism team, which Republicans opposed. So the terrorists waited until Bush was president and sleeping at the wheel, to attack us.

An intelligence person told bush exactly what was going to happen. Bush was busy planning how to start a war with Iraq and told the guy, “you covered your ass, now get. That was in Crawford texas.

Then bush lyingly linked 9-11 to Iraq and lied about them having wmds

Even trump said it when he was running in the primaries at a debate. When pressed he said there were no wmds and they knew it. They lied. They lied”

If trump said it youd nod. When I say it you’ll go into republican mode where you make shit up and say Hillary voted to invade.

You forget it was after 9-11. Bush said not going along was unpatriotic. Who would believe besides us liberals that he might be lying. Certainly not the corporate media which you think is liberal. And so what? It should be. Call out any liars democrats or republicans

"An intelligence person told bush exactly what was going to happen."

You're full of shit. No one told W the names, location or date or any actionable information. The government gets millions of intelligence tips. And to say they told "bush" himself is idiotic, which is what you are, a total douche idiot.

They were IN THE US training under Clinton. They had motive, means and opportunity. It was just random.

I'm not blaming Clinton for it, I'm saying your blaming W is the stupid ass hat partisan whore that you are. Go fuck yourself, you're just being a finger pointing dick

An intelligence officer went to Crawford, bush said yea yea you covered your ass now get. Then he went back to painting.

Youre not blaming Clinton because he wasn’t hit on 9-11.

Meanwhile, trump is not letting biden get intelligence briefings. You motherfuckers tried saying bush was new on the job when he got hit on 9-11 but bush was getting Intelligence briefings in November 2000. You might want to let trump know he’s making us less safe by not letting biden get ready for his taking over.

You read too many Clancy novels. Dude was a great writer, no doubt. But the President still isn't responsible for weeding out intelligence reports. Get your panties out of their bundle.

Intelligence officers don't report to the President, they report to their leadership who brief the President

God you are so wrong and it was so easy to find.


The content of the memo was kept secret, as with all but a handful of PDBs, until it was leaked in 2002.[2] CBS Evening News reported on the document on May 15.[1][5]

The PDB was declassified and approved for release to the 9/11 Commission on April 10, 2004, and reported in the 9/11 Commission Report on July 22, 2004.

Bin Ladin Determined To Strike in US was the title of the President's Daily Brief prepared by the Central Intelligence Agency and given to U.S. President George W. Bush on Monday, August 6, 2001. The brief warned, 36 days before the September 11 attacks, of terrorism threats from Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda, including "patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for a hijacking" of U.S. aircraft.

In response to accusations that the Administration failed to act on the contents of the briefing, U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and General Richard Myers emphasized that the CIA's PDB did not warn the President of a specific new threat but "contained historical information based on old reporting".

President Bush later claimed that if he had "had any inkling whatsoever that the people were going to fly airplanes into buildings we would have moved heaven and earth to save the country." The North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) conducted a training exercise in the two years prior to September 11, 2001, in which it simulated a civilian airliner being hijacked and used as a missile to crash into buildings in the United States, including the World Trade Center. In October 2000, the U.S. Department of Defense had conducted exercises rehearsing a plane crashing into the Pentagon.

And where's the part that the intelligence community recommended actions that W torpedoed?

The CIA told Bush what was going to happen. Is it their job to tell him what to do with the threat? No. They told Bush/Rumsfeld and Chaney and they questioned whether these reports might not be deception on the part of al-Qaeda, purposely designed to needlessly expend resources in response.

So the Bush team thought Al Queda was bluffing.

Bottom line is you didn't even believe or know that the CIA warned Bush about the coming attacks. They did, and he did nothing, and we got hit.

Actually, yes, it is specifically their job to tell W what to do with the threat. What is wrong with you? You still think the President sits down and goes through thousands of threats and decides what to do about each one?

You're dumb as shit. No wonder you want a minimum wage increase

And yet, when Clinton received a similar warning, he had airport security raised in the NE and thwarted the attack. Proving a) you're a moron; b) Clinton succeeded where Bush failed miserably; and c) you're a moron.

You haven't shown that Clinton did shit. Show how you know that Clinted sifted through thousands of threats and said "that one." So? You're a total boob. Incredible

No one said he sifted through thousands of threats. That's just you kazzing again because it's eating you up alive that Bush failed to protect America where Clinton did. Clinton was given a brief which summarized the looming threat of bin Laden....

PDB: Bin Ladin Preparing to Hijack US Aircraft and Other Attacks

declassified article from President's Daily Brief of December 4, 1998

fas.org

^^^ that's not "thousands of threats." You should stop kazzing.

Nope, can't take you seriously. You know you're getting your ass handed to you so now you start posting like a little boy again

LOLOLOL

Your derangement is noted and laughed at. In reality, I just bitch-slapped your kaz that Clinton would have had to review thousands of threats with the actual PDB which contained only 3 brief sections. Keep claiming victory while you're lying prostate on the floor and can't git up.

You haven't shown anything about anything. You just made up what you wanted to make up and justified it only with your opinion.

You claimed that Clinton just knew what to do, no one recommended it to him. So, prove it

LOL

Dumbfuck, no one said he knew what to do. What was said was that he had airport security raised which thwarted the looming hijackings regardless of whether or not that was his idea, Clarke's idea, or someone else's idea.

Now compare & contrast that to Bush -- he did nothing.

A deer in the headlights....

View attachment 417950

Still making up your "facts" (sic)

Nope, reading the Congressional report on 9/11.

Which said what? Note I'm not asking your opinion

Already posted what it says.

You stated your opinion. You have not provided any actual meaningful quotes of what advice W got that he ignored. So?

It's not my problem you can't comprehend what you read.

kaz: prove it

Faun: I already did.

LOL, stupid douche. With as how constantly Democrats lie, one would think you'd be better at it, LOL

Again, I already posted it. I posted a link to the report and I cut & pasted the relevant text from it. That would be the opposite of my opinion. And again, your inability to comprehend what you read isn't my problem.

I posted proof that was a lie and you made it up. Don't be lazy, go find it

LOLOLOL

I have no need to lookup something I already posted. Again, your G-d given comprehension limitations are not my problem.

I already posted proof that you lied

LOL

Suure, Spunky.

Need I remind you, you thought the Congressional report I copied and pasted from was my opinion. So who knows what you think you refuted?

You said what you think the report says, yes, that is your opinion.

I wanted to know where in the report it said W had declined recommendations. So far you've just been dancing

LOLOL

Dumbfuck, I quoted the report. You're such an imbecile, you still don't understand that.

What is wrong with you? I already proved you were lying. I already told you that. I posted it earlier

LOL

I quoted the Congressional report. Who cares if you call that lying?

No, you didn't "quote" the congressional report." I asked you what W was told he should do by the intelligence community and you had no answer, you were lying

LOLOLOL

You're such a flaming imbecile. I never said anything about the Congressional report in terms of Bush declining recommendations.

Seems you're arguing with yourself now.

That's what the question was. My God you're stupid. So where did you move the goalposts to now then?

Why would you be asking me to answer a question about something I never said??

Exactly how deranged are you?

I already answered that, go back and find it

No need for me to look for it since I never said Bush declined recommendations. Another poster was saying that, not me. It's not my problem you are too deranged to know who you're talking to.

Trump said “ok you told me. You covered your ass. Now get”

Thats what bush told the intelligence agent who flew all the way to Crawford Texas to tell the president because that’s where he spent most of his time.

This is how the story is told. What evidence do i have? The same evidence republicans have that this election was rigged.

Oh, and trump was going to say 2016 was rigged if he lost. He won so suddenly the election wasn’t rigged.

You just said: " You were a lot more interesting when trump was in charge. Now it’s like arguing with or about bush. Who cares. Move on. Biden’s the president now. Take it in. "

I didn’t know you were rich. Now I know your motivation and reason for voting gop. If you were middle class I’d call you dumb

If you were stupid I would call you a Dem, oh wait, right on both counts.

 

[JWBooth]

 

[kaz]

Says the sleazy little sales monkey. The most comically shallow and insincere form of life on this planet.

I found your video:

My customers love me because I always tell them when their prices are wrong. I could charge them what's on the PO they would never know but I'm honest and successful. I make my company a profit.

Meanwhile you produce a lousy product. You teach inner city kids in New England right?

Are you working now? Then you are failing those students.

Teachers union backs plan for Manchester schools to go remote into January

The head of the Manchester teachers union says members back the superintendent’s recommendation that city schools shift to full remote status from late November to mid-January, due to rising COVID-19

www.unionleader.com

A government loving leftist is harassing a teacher. Where are you driving with that?

And you check prices on POs, that sounds like your ability level

You mean you wouldn’t be careful and check your sales to make sure you’re getting all your commission? Maybe you should be a plumber or welder.

I would never be in a job that paid a commission. You're a trained seal. You sell what people who work for people like me train you to sell. You never understand it.

But then I earned more 20 years ago in base before my stock options and bonuses than you make now in base + commissions

Oh I get a 65 base

Right, you get total about $80K, $65 base.

21 years ago (1999), my base was $105 and that was before my performance bonus, which was 10-15%.

 

[kaz]

Trump said “ok you told me. You covered your ass. Now get”

Thats what bush told the intelligence agent who flew all the way to Crawford Texas to tell the president because that’s where he spent most of his time.

This is how the story is told. What evidence do i have? The same evidence republicans have that this election was rigged.

Oh, and trump was going to say 2016 was rigged if he lost. He won so suddenly the election wasn’t rigged.

You just said: " You were a lot more interesting when trump was in charge. Now it’s like arguing with or about bush. Who cares. Move on. Biden’s the president now. Take it in. "

I didn’t know you were rich. Now I know your motivation and reason for voting gop. If you were middle class I’d call you dumb

Gawd you're stupid. You said move on from W before you kept talking about W

 

[LeftofLeft]

They seem to have no answers and let him make this mess.

Stop the Democrats from making it worse. Trump is culpable and accountable for this but what lurks is an insult to injury scenario where the debt will worsen under Democrats while they simply blame Trump.

If Americans want the problem solved, it must first start with reduced spending. It must also follow with more money going into the economy. But, Democrats don’t want to hear that.

 

[hadit]

They seem to have no answers and let him make this mess.

I imagine they will do the same thing democrats did with obamas debt,,,

Obama decreased deficits, trump has increased every year...

the topic is debt,,,do try and stay on topic,,,

You are too dumb to understand the importance of deficits when discussing debt?

true,, but this discussion is about how to pay it back not reduce the increase,,,

I will say the debt is one if the biggest reasons I NEVER vote for dems or repubes,,,

We can only hope to decrease the increases after all the damage Trump has done.

thats not the topic,,,

Well the answer is repubs will leave it to dems to try to clean up. Repubs give tax cuts, increase military spending and borrow. That’s all they do.

so what is it the dems do to pay back their debt???

Well it is probably mostly through growth. Repubs can’t do that cause they offset growth with tax cuts and increased military spending. If dems increase spending they are responsible enough to increase some taxes.

Then turn around and wipe out any increased revenue with much greater spending, leaving us with higher taxes AND bigger debt. You can't outspend a democrat.

Yet republicans always do. Clinton had a surplus. Bush racked up debt he didn’t need to rack up.

Democrats may spend on infrastructure. We need it. Don’t cry about it. Better than giving it to defense contractors and the pentagon.

Well, except for Obama. We gave him billions for shovel ready infrastructure jobs that weren't shovel ready. And don't forget who gave Bubba the spending bills that kept the budget in line. It wasn't democrats. And who gave Bush his spending bills.

Don’t bring up the lame old arguments of the past. Next you’ll be talking about solyndra fast and furious and what about her emails
Plus Benghazi. Obama was a saint compared to criminal donald

Then don't make sweeping, meaningless generalizations that are easily punctured. As for the rest of your blargle, you brought it up, I didn't. Did you notice that your post doesn't even reference what I said? Maybe that was intentional.

 

[sealybobo]

They seem to have no answers and let him make this mess.

I imagine they will do the same thing democrats did with obamas debt,,,

Obama decreased deficits, trump has increased every year...

the topic is debt,,,do try and stay on topic,,,

You are too dumb to understand the importance of deficits when discussing debt?

true,, but this discussion is about how to pay it back not reduce the increase,,,

I will say the debt is one if the biggest reasons I NEVER vote for dems or repubes,,,

We can only hope to decrease the increases after all the damage Trump has done.

thats not the topic,,,

Well the answer is repubs will leave it to dems to try to clean up. Repubs give tax cuts, increase military spending and borrow. That’s all they do.

so what is it the dems do to pay back their debt???

Well it is probably mostly through growth. Repubs can’t do that cause they offset growth with tax cuts and increased military spending. If dems increase spending they are responsible enough to increase some taxes.

Then turn around and wipe out any increased revenue with much greater spending, leaving us with higher taxes AND bigger debt. You can't outspend a democrat.

Yet republicans always do. Clinton had a surplus. Bush racked up debt he didn’t need to rack up.

Democrats may spend on infrastructure. We need it. Don’t cry about it. Better than giving it to defense contractors and the pentagon.

Well, except for Obama. We gave him billions for shovel ready infrastructure jobs that weren't shovel ready. And don't forget who gave Bubba the spending bills that kept the budget in line. It wasn't democrats. And who gave Bush his spending bills.

Don’t bring up the lame old arguments of the past. Next you’ll be talking about solyndra fast and furious and what about her emails
Plus Benghazi. Obama was a saint compared to criminal donald

Then don't make sweeping, meaningless generalizations that are easily punctured. As for the rest of your blargle, you brought it up, I didn't. Did you notice that your post doesn't even reference what I said? Maybe that was intentional.

Because I'm not going to give credibility to your right wing bullshit talking points from the past present or future.

The Claim: "There was a very large infrastructure bill that was approved during the Obama administration, $1 trillion, and nobody ever saw anything being built. To this day I haven't heard of anything that's been built. They took this money and used it on social programs."

Short Answer: He's mostly wrong here. It wasn't an "infrastructure bill," and plenty was built. However, some money was spent on social programs.

But then again, Trump knew at some point that this bill was about economic stimulus, rather than just road- and bridge-building, because back in 2009 he applauded the stimulus for taking a multiple-pronged approach to boosting the economy.

"Well, I think taxes are very good. I think it goes quickly. It is easily done, and etc., etc.," Trump said, as reported by Buzzfeed. "But building infrastructure, building great projects, putting people to work in that sense is also very good, so I think you have a combination of both, plus he is doing a rebate system, and I think that is good also."

Your claim has been deemed mostly false

Fox's Eric Bolling exaggerates shortcomings of stimulus

President Barack Obama will soon hand over the keys to the White House to one of his biggest critics. But the outgoing p

www.politifact.com

You don't like my sources? Well you are wrong and my sources explain in great detail why you are wrong fos.