What are you prepared to do?

[Kondor3]

...Just a minute ago Kondor3 was demanding that you WILL take our guns and that we will hand them over without resistance...

Hor$e$hit, Princess... never said any such thing... never implied any such thing... never thought any such thing... never hoped for any such thing.

Zat rite Comrade?

Do Democrats REALLY Think Americans Will Turn Their Guns In Peacefully If They Pass a Law

Show us where I said that your guns will be taken away and that you will hand them over without resistance.

C'mon, my little Internet Warrior Princess... show us... give us a link to a post where I said that.

 

[RhinelandCityLimits]

Do Democrats REALLY Think Americans Will Turn Their Guns In Peacefully If They Pass a Law

Grow up and discover cerebral function, lying America impeders
Fox News Analyst Quits, Calling Network a ‘Propaganda Machine’

 

[Desperado]

No wise person will anser that question

 

[RhinelandCityLimits]

I'll answer: No duh (There is no freaking 'law'. Just fake 'comin' fer yer guns' ...narrative, pathetically dizzy AR -Ma$$acre glory)

 

[Pop23]

The Feinsteins and other Kalipornia Socialist Trash whom you clowns pretend are leading the charge for Gun Control, do not represent much of that base, even though you fools pretend that they represent the mainstream of your Opposites in that matter.

There is, indeed, a fairly sizable chunk of the Gun Control Advocacy crowd who stupidly advocate for a complete or near-complete ban.

Most of us, however, merely want uniform and consistent accountability of owners and dealers nationwide, as part of a multi-generational effort to dry-up the illicit firearms marketplace, in order to substantively reduce the intolerable level of gun violence in our beloved country.

Most of us are looking for substantive compromise that ends-up getting the job done while preserving the best of the past.

The Absolutists on the Gun Rights side of the fence, however, play this "Give 'em an inch and they'll take a mile" game, while more dozens and hundreds of thousands of Americans continue to die, including an increasing Dead Pool of innocent school children.

The Absolutists are setting the stage for a severe over-reaction by their Opponents, once those Opponents regain political power.

Begin reconciling yourselves to change, now, while you still have the time.

Begin moving towards a Middle Ground on this issue, while you can still get 60 or 70 percent of what you want, before your recalcitrance kills another several hundred school kids, and infuriates the rest of America enough so that they arrange for you to have 10 or 20 percent of what you wanted, rather than what you could have preserved.

But, it is the Fate of Fools, while they still hold political power, to assume an arrogant and ignorant stance, until the bottom falls out.

And the bottom ALWAYS falls out, in the context of political power...

Especially when the lying Imperial Cheeto continues to flirt with Impeachment and Conviction.

But... what the hell... I'm not a stake-holder with respect to guns...

Go ahead and stick to your present course... just don't blame us for laughing at your angst, later, when the inevitable happens.

If you don’t take all guns then there is zero evidence that the goal of saving life’s can be accomplished. And I might remind all, that most gun related deaths are gang, drug dealers and suicide.

Gangs and drug dealers ignore the law, suicides have an incredible amount of different ways to accomplish their goals.

So only a complete moron would give up anything to accomplish nothing. And the other side of the coin is, the left MUST ban all guns to even put a dent in the numbers.

No negotiation, PERIOD.

 

[RhinelandCityLimits]

Uhhhhh...nnnot helping with.... that chit

 

[LuckyDuck]

i ask all of my brothers and sisters this famous question from The Untouchables:

“What are you prepared to do?

View attachment 191687

I have heard a lot of talk here and elsewhere from 2nd Amendment supporters like me. How theywont turn in their guns, how it will be the next Civil War if they try to take them, I see hats with Mulon Labe on them and I see Gadson Flags flying.

But what are you REALLY prepared to do when they come? You have jobs, you have a family, a mortgage, are you ready to become an outlaw?

I have given this a lot of real thought. I have personally decided that yes, I am prepared to be an outlaw. I have a mortgage, I have a family but they are all grown and on their own now. I have a job that I love but will put in jeopardy. But I am willing.

The key I think is to defy the laws and not get caught. To have my guns and everything else too. I am making plans to that end.

This guy WILL
NOT COMPLY, EVER.

What are YOU prepared to do?

I spent a career in the military, my house is paid for, my wife died, my one kid is grown and I'd rather die by gunfire than wither away for months with cancer, so I will physically defend my right to bear arms if they come for the weapons that I have legally purchased.
I see that Deerfield, Illinois banned the ownership of semi-automatic firearms coupled with a fine of $1,000 per day to those who do not turn them in, yet I have not heard of anyone in that community rising up against the gun-grabbing establishment of that region.

Will you fight to the death for your First Amendment Rights?

The First Amendment keeps us free

Apparently you didn't grasp my post. The obvious answer was yes.

 

[RhinelandCityLimits]

Freedom of Apocalyptic Murdering Nightmares ?
(...and they shun SCIENTISTS for thermometer readings ??)

 

[BULLDOG]

I laugh at you regularly, and I am prepared to continue laughing at you. You can have your little civil war if you want to, but you should pull your pants up to cover that butt crack first.

Which is why you will lose.

It's easy to read snarky scripts from leftist hate sites and post that hatred here. But when it gets real, you'll shrink and cower, by your own admission.

Many of us will die for the cause of liberty - many more of you will though.

Should I salute now or what?

 

[MikeK]

30,000 die as a result of firearms.

They do not keep us safe

Neither does the freedom to own fast cars, and to drive a car whenever we choose to, keep us safe. And a hell of a lot more people own and use cars unnecessarily and for recreational purposes than those who own guns.

If a law were passed to limit the use of automobiles to absolute necessity a lot more than 30,000 lives would be saved every year. Cars, including their toxic emissions, kill far more Americans than guns do, but I never hear any calls for seriously limiting their use.

My neighbor's grandson owns a car that sounds like a WW-II bomber when it starts and the rumbling sound of the engine suggests it has two or three times the horsepower it needs to get him around. How many such dangerous cars are on America's streets and highways today? And how many less potentially lethal cars are on the roads but have no practical need to be?

I wonder how the teen-age anti-gun protesters would react to a proposed ban on all but necessary use and ownership of cars.

 

[Pop23]

Uhhhhh...nnnot helping with.... that chit

Not sure who you were posting to, but unless you get criminals to give up guns, or the suicidal to stop going down the freeway the wrong way, the death toll will remain the same. Gun ban or no gun ban.

I’m not much in favor of solutions that accomplish nothing.

 

[Marion Morrison]

[...]

The key I think is to defy the laws and not get caught. To have my guns and everything else too. I am making plans to that end.

This guy WILL
NOT COMPLY, EVER.

What are YOU prepared to do?

I presently have no plan for counteraction because I have no idea how a government plan for disarming the People would be implemented. My response to such a plan would depend entirely on my general mood at the time, my overall social condition and, most importantly, what others are doing about it. So I think you could expect more specific responses to your rather important question if you present it in a more specific hypothetical form, such as how I might become aware of government's intention to disarm the People.

Any such effort would necessarily require as its initial stage the voluntary surrender of all civilian-owned firearms, such as was successfully implemented in Australia. If the American People's response to such a mandate was to solidly ignore it the plan would be defeated in that initial stage. But what percentage of the People would voluntarily comply?

Any reduction in firearms access would come as a result of We the People saying we have had enough........just like other countries have done

We the People aren't other countries. Since you think it's such a great idea, I suggest you go to one of those countries that has.

Better yet, just take your sorry ass out camping in the middle of the woods for a week. You get no gun.

Our wonderful Constitution says we don’t have to go to other countries. We the People have the ability to change the government we have

They sure do....They read that 30,000 Americans get killed by guns every year. They read about our massacres every few weeks and wonder why we do nothing about it

Yeah, they hate gang bangers and suicides are messy.

What’s your point again?

30,000 die as a result of firearms.

They do not keep us safe

And exactly how many of those would be saved from a ban on AR style rifles?

They are rarely used in suicide and of those that do, the AR could easily replaced by one still legal

So the answer to the above is likely few or none.

A vast majority of gang related or drug related are handgun. In every case, again the AR would easily be replaced by a still legal weapon.

So the answer to those, few to none.

That leaves accidental shootings. And your odds of that?

1.55 per 327,000,000 on any given day.

And this is what keeps you up at night?

Excuse me if I chuckle at, what can only be discribed as, your incredible paranoia.

And since the AR style rifle is rarely involved in even accidental shootings, you need to answer, “what does the ban accomplish?”

Answer, nothing

And that’s why it won’t happen.

A ban on AR-15s is not the goal, it is merely the camels nose.

Correct. A ban ONLY on the AR accomplishes nothing. But lets face facts, a ban on guns altogether, would be the only way to stop all gun deaths in theory. But even that is reliant on criminals obeying the law, and suicidal individuals simply using other means. Anyone who things that criminals care, or that suicidal individuals only have a single option to end their life's are either dishonest about their goals or simply stupid.

Criminals don't obey the law, next!

 

[dblack]

i ask all of my brothers and sisters this famous question from The Untouchables:

“What are you prepared to do?

View attachment 191687

I have heard a lot of talk here and elsewhere from 2nd Amendment supporters like me. How theywont turn in their guns, how it will be the next Civil War if they try to take them, I see hats with Mulon Labe on them and I see Gadson Flags flying.

But what are you REALLY prepared to do when they come? You have jobs, you have a family, a mortgage, are you ready to become an outlaw?

I have given this a lot of real thought. I have personally decided that yes, I am prepared to be an outlaw. I have a mortgage, I have a family but they are all grown and on their own now. I have a job that I love but will put in jeopardy. But I am willing.

The key I think is to defy the laws and not get caught. To have my guns and everything else too. I am making plans to that end.

This guy WILL
NOT COMPLY, EVER.

What are YOU prepared to do?

If it was ever my intention to go outlaw, I'm pretty sure I wouldn't announce it publicly.

 

[Pop23]

[...]

The key I think is to defy the laws and not get caught. To have my guns and everything else too. I am making plans to that end.

This guy WILL
NOT COMPLY, EVER.

What are YOU prepared to do?

I presently have no plan for counteraction because I have no idea how a government plan for disarming the People would be implemented. My response to such a plan would depend entirely on my general mood at the time, my overall social condition and, most importantly, what others are doing about it. So I think you could expect more specific responses to your rather important question if you present it in a more specific hypothetical form, such as how I might become aware of government's intention to disarm the People.

Any such effort would necessarily require as its initial stage the voluntary surrender of all civilian-owned firearms, such as was successfully implemented in Australia. If the American People's response to such a mandate was to solidly ignore it the plan would be defeated in that initial stage. But what percentage of the People would voluntarily comply?

Any reduction in firearms access would come as a result of We the People saying we have had enough........just like other countries have done

We the People aren't other countries. Since you think it's such a great idea, I suggest you go to one of those countries that has.

Better yet, just take your sorry ass out camping in the middle of the woods for a week. You get no gun.

Our wonderful Constitution says we don’t have to go to other countries. We the People have the ability to change the government we have

Yeah, they hate gang bangers and suicides are messy.

What’s your point again?

30,000 die as a result of firearms.

They do not keep us safe

And exactly how many of those would be saved from a ban on AR style rifles?

They are rarely used in suicide and of those that do, the AR could easily replaced by one still legal

So the answer to the above is likely few or none.

A vast majority of gang related or drug related are handgun. In every case, again the AR would easily be replaced by a still legal weapon.

So the answer to those, few to none.

That leaves accidental shootings. And your odds of that?

1.55 per 327,000,000 on any given day.

And this is what keeps you up at night?

Excuse me if I chuckle at, what can only be discribed as, your incredible paranoia.

And since the AR style rifle is rarely involved in even accidental shootings, you need to answer, “what does the ban accomplish?”

Answer, nothing

And that’s why it won’t happen.

A ban on AR-15s is not the goal, it is merely the camels nose.

Correct. A ban ONLY on the AR accomplishes nothing. But lets face facts, a ban on guns altogether, would be the only way to stop all gun deaths in theory. But even that is reliant on criminals obeying the law, and suicidal individuals simply using other means. Anyone who things that criminals care, or that suicidal individuals only have a single option to end their life's are either dishonest about their goals or simply stupid.

Criminals don't obey the law, next!

Yep, and criminals and rapists appreciate the lefts support

 

[Marion Morrison]

I'm prepared to do whatever it takes, baby.

 

[Marion Morrison]

RE: The thread title's question

I am prepared to do nothing.

*****

I do not own a gun.
I do not know how to use one.
If I had a gun, and the government told me to turn it in, this coward would be the first person in line to do so.

*****

I admire the OP for his courage.

If all the guns were confiscated from good people like him, today's crime rates would look like child's play compared with what crime would look life if the bad guys (and there are so many!) knew that the good guys and their families were just sitting ducks.

Myth

Many many countries have tight gun laws and they are safer

So you can provide a list of those like.. no problem, amirite? Pls do so.

 

[rightwinger]

30,000 die as a result of firearms.

They do not keep us safe

Neither does the freedom to own fast cars, and to drive a car whenever we choose to, keep us safe. And a hell of a lot more people own and use cars unnecessarily and for recreational purposes than those who own guns.

If a law were passed to limit the use of automobiles to absolute necessity a lot more than 30,000 lives would be saved every year. Cars, including their toxic emissions, kill far more Americans than guns do, but I never hear any calls for seriously limiting their use.

My neighbor's grandson owns a car that sounds like a WW-II bomber when it starts and the rumbling sound of the engine suggests it has two or three times the horsepower it needs to get him around. How many such dangerous cars are on America's streets and highways today? And how many less potentially lethal cars are on the roads but have no practical need to be?

I wonder how the teen-age anti-gun protesters would react to a proposed ban on all but necessary use and ownership of cars.

We take action to reduce car deaths

Safer cars, safer roads, require licensing, registration, insurance

We need to do the same with guns

 

[rightwinger]

RE: The thread title's question

I am prepared to do nothing.

*****

I do not own a gun.
I do not know how to use one.
If I had a gun, and the government told me to turn it in, this coward would be the first person in line to do so.

*****

I admire the OP for his courage.

If all the guns were confiscated from good people like him, today's crime rates would look like child's play compared with what crime would look life if the bad guys (and there are so many!) knew that the good guys and their families were just sitting ducks.

Myth

Many many countries have tight gun laws and they are safer

So you can provide a list of those like.. no problem, amirite? Pls do so.

England, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Australia, Canada

 

[RhinelandCityLimits]

I wonder how the teen-age anti-gun protesters would react to a proposed ban on all but necessary use and ownership of cars.

Rationally unlike yer pathetic AR-Ma$$acre needy... analogy

 

[RhinelandCityLimits]

Uhhhhh...nnnot helping with.... that chit

Gun ban or no gun ban.

AR-15 sales ban duh (Absolution got us ...into this mess)