Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And why do RWers and other Republicans like to ignore it?
What are the words that identifies and separates the individual rights from the "Well regulated militia's?"And why do RWers and other Republicans like to ignore it?
We don't ignore it, the 2nd provides two distinct rights. One to the States to maintain militias at their discretion and the individual right to keep and bear arms.
You on the other hand like to claim incorrectly that there is only one right and that it belongs to the States.
What are the words that identifies and separates the individual rights from the "Well regulated militia's?"And why do RWers and other Republicans like to ignore it?
We don't ignore it, the 2nd provides two distinct rights. One to the States to maintain militias at their discretion and the individual right to keep and bear arms.
You on the other hand like to claim incorrectly that there is only one right and that it belongs to the States.
What are the words that identifies and separates the individual rights from the "Well regulated militia's?"And why do RWers and other Republicans like to ignore it?
We don't ignore it, the 2nd provides two distinct rights. One to the States to maintain militias at their discretion and the individual right to keep and bear arms.
You on the other hand like to claim incorrectly that there is only one right and that it belongs to the States.
And why do RWers and other Republicans like to ignore it?
And why do RWers and other Republicans like to ignore it?
They don't like regulations.
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state
the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
I'll repeat my question, as it seems you didn't get it b/c you have not answerd it...What are the words that identifies and separates the individual rights from the "Well regulated militia's?"We don't ignore it, the 2nd provides two distinct rights. One to the States to maintain militias at their discretion and the individual right to keep and bear arms.
You on the other hand like to claim incorrectly that there is only one right and that it belongs to the States.
There is a comma in the 2nd, ever notice it? Understand basic English?
And why do RWers and other Republicans like to ignore it?
They don't like regulations.
Fail.
They cannot explain the well-regulated part, and they also cannot show where gun owners have a privacy right pertaining to their guns.
I'll repeat my question, as it seems you didn't get it b/c you have not answerd it...What are the words that identifies and separates the individual rights from the "Well regulated militia's?"
There is a comma in the 2nd, ever notice it? Understand basic English?
What are the words that identifies and separates the individual rights from the "Well regulated militia's?
And why do RWers and other Republicans like to ignore it?
We don't ignore it, the 2nd provides two distinct rights. One to the States to maintain militias at their discretion and the individual right to keep and bear arms.
You on the other hand like to claim incorrectly that there is only one right and that it belongs to the States.
They cannot explain the well-regulated part, and they also cannot show where gun owners have a privacy right pertaining to their guns.
Traditional knowledge needs no explanation.
You can't have our guns. Period.
They cannot explain the well-regulated part, and they also cannot show where gun owners have a privacy right pertaining to their guns.
Sorry, but the Supreme Court settled that issue, You do recall they ruled that the 2nd does in fact provide an individual right separate and distinct from belonging to an organized militia?