Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Were you in a coma during that period? Bush pushed the envelope through his signing statements.He may not have nearly as many EOs as Bush, but he certainly pushed the envelope of executive powers with the few EOs he wrote. In that respect, he is right up there with Bush.Right, I think Reagan was very open to compromise, I also think Obama has been. The difference here to me is Congress.
Reagan understood what a compromise is, you trade one thing for another. Obama thinks baiting your opponent or using executive orders are compromise. Huge difference.
Obama hardly holds the record on executive actions. And I think you are confusing politics for baiting.
Which of Bush's EOs "pushed the envelope?"
I thought the point was to appeal to voters outside of the party. How can you win an election if all you appeal to is a minority of the voters?If you support a guy who is so blazingly the OPPOSITE of traditional Republican values ACROSS THE BOARD, then you are no better than a person born with seven pounds of brain damage.You assume falsely that being a Republican is a good thing these days. If you're an establishment Republican you're no better than a Democrat.
Your post was directed at me. And you said, "you tell us this guy is the genuine article".It's funny how leftwing turds like you are always complaining that Trump is not a genuine conservative when you tell us this guy is the genuine article:
There's a true RINO for you.
Another FAIL!
So many assumptions you rubes pull out of your asses! This is great.
Look here, dumbass: Jeb, It Is Time To Go
What "assumptions" are those?
Nope. I never have.
You ASS-U-MEd.
I called for Jeb to drop out a while ago, because he's vomit.
What upsets people in the GOP is the way our representatives rollover. They're sellouts. They tell us they'll stop Obama, but instead they gave him the biggest tax increase in American history. It's like watching Obama making deals with Iran. We're getting fucked.I like that Trump has hurt the cowardly, hypocritical, lying GOP Establishment. But he was able to do this by being a caricature of them. This is what the rubes don't get.
By supporting Trump, you are supporting everything wrong with the GOP Establishment to the power of three!
Were you in a coma during that period? Bush pushed the envelope through his signing statements.He may not have nearly as many EOs as Bush, but he certainly pushed the envelope of executive powers with the few EOs he wrote. In that respect, he is right up there with Bush.Right, I think Reagan was very open to compromise, I also think Obama has been. The difference here to me is Congress.
Reagan understood what a compromise is, you trade one thing for another. Obama thinks baiting your opponent or using executive orders are compromise. Huge difference.
Obama hardly holds the record on executive actions. And I think you are confusing politics for baiting.
Which of Bush's EOs "pushed the envelope?"
The Problem with Presidential Signing Statements: Their Use and Misuse by the Bush Administration
I thought the point was to appeal to voters outside of the party. How can you win an election if all you appeal to is a minority of the voters?If you support a guy who is so blazingly the OPPOSITE of traditional Republican values ACROSS THE BOARD, then you are no better than a person born with seven pounds of brain damage.You assume falsely that being a Republican is a good thing these days. If you're an establishment Republican you're no better than a Democrat.
Stop making sense.
Ruby5000 wants Kasich to be the nominee. He's the guy with the weird jaw tick, and 2.3% support.
He'd be obliterated in the general election. But he'd be very polite.
Well, see, that's how you go wrong in a big way. First, by thinking in your deranged mind I am a liberal. Everything in your head goes to shit from there.Your post was directed at me. And you said, "you tell us this guy is the genuine article".It's funny how leftwing turds like you are always complaining that Trump is not a genuine conservative when you tell us this guy is the genuine article:
There's a true RINO for you.
Another FAIL!
So many assumptions you rubes pull out of your asses! This is great.
Look here, dumbass: Jeb, It Is Time To Go
What "assumptions" are those?
Nope. I never have.
You ASS-U-MEd.
I called for Jeb to drop out a while ago, because he's vomit.
Yes, I did assume, because the guy all you leftwing turds want.
The poor dumb rubes. They parrot whatever their propaganda organs tell them to.
There is only one candidate in both parties who has ever actually balanced the federal budget.
As governor, the same guy took his state from a deficit to a surplus and increased jobs. What was Trump's response to that performance? "He got lucky." Says the guy who inherited $300 million, born on third base!
But what have the rubes been programmed to call this candidate? A RINO. Why? Just because he took the Medicare money which the taxpayers of his state were forced to pay for!
1. Balanced the federal budget and put us on a track of federal surpluses.
2. Took his state from a deficit to a surplus.
3. Increased jobs and employment in his state above the national average.
This is what the rubes call a RINO!
Now let's take a look at the pied piper the tards are following into the cave.
"I'm very pro-choice...Again, it may be a little bit of a New York background, because there is some different attitude in different parts of the country, and I was raised in New York, and grew up and work and everything else in New York City."
After I met Ivanka and praised her to her father, he said, "Yeah, she's really something, and what a beauty, that one. If I weren't happily married and, ya know, her father . . . "
Two things.Yep, takes a special kind of rube piss drinker to say one man in 535 members of congress, single handedly balanced the federal budget.
As Chairman of the House budget committee, Kasich was a key figure. No one else can make the claim they helped balanced the federal budget.
Kasich knows how to do it, and he knows how to work with the opposition to get it done. Because he has done it before.
Nor can any others claim to have increased employment in their state, and taken their state's budget from a deficit to a surplus.
He has long time Legislative AND Executive experience.
There isn't any other candidate with that skill set.
But who do we have leading the polls? A complete and total RINO and two first term senators.
Gee, how'd it work out the last time we elected a first term senator?
Rubio will get better with time, but everyone in Congress HATES Cruz. How would that work out if he is President?
As Chairman of the House budget committee, Kasich was a key figure. No one else can make the claim they helped balanced the federal budget.
Wasn't Sanders part of the congress that balanced the budget?
1) Sanders had no part in putting together the balanced budget.
2) Sanders voted against the balanced budget.
See for yourself: H.R. 2015 (105th): Balanced Budget Act of 1997 -- House Vote #345 -- Jul 30, 1997
Nice try. Not.
No, signing statements are not EOs.Were you in a coma during that period? Bush pushed the envelope through his signing statements.He may not have nearly as many EOs as Bush, but he certainly pushed the envelope of executive powers with the few EOs he wrote. In that respect, he is right up there with Bush.Reagan understood what a compromise is, you trade one thing for another. Obama thinks baiting your opponent or using executive orders are compromise. Huge difference.
Obama hardly holds the record on executive actions. And I think you are confusing politics for baiting.
Which of Bush's EOs "pushed the envelope?"
The Problem with Presidential Signing Statements: Their Use and Misuse by the Bush Administration
Signing statements are EOs.
The poor dumb rubes. They parrot whatever their propaganda organs tell them to.
There is only one candidate in both parties who has ever actually balanced the federal budget.
As governor, the same guy took his state from a deficit to a surplus and increased jobs. What was Trump's response to that performance? "He got lucky." Says the guy who inherited $300 million, born on third base!
But what have the rubes been programmed to call this candidate? A RINO. Why? Just because he took the Medicare money which the taxpayers of his state were forced to pay for!
1. Balanced the federal budget and put us on a track of federal surpluses.
2. Took his state from a deficit to a surplus.
3. Increased jobs and employment in his state above the national average.
This is what the rubes call a RINO!
Now let's take a look at the pied piper the tards are following into the cave.
"I'm very pro-choice...Again, it may be a little bit of a New York background, because there is some different attitude in different parts of the country, and I was raised in New York, and grew up and work and everything else in New York City."
After I met Ivanka and praised her to her father, he said, "Yeah, she's really something, and what a beauty, that one. If I weren't happily married and, ya know, her father . . . "
You were obviously committing a stupid logical fallacy. You were desperately trying to take away credit that can't be taken away. As if a member of Congress who had no part in the budget process was just as creditable as the guy who was the Chairman of the committee that wrote the budget.Two things.Yep, takes a special kind of rube piss drinker to say one man in 535 members of congress, single handedly balanced the federal budget.
As Chairman of the House budget committee, Kasich was a key figure. No one else can make the claim they helped balanced the federal budget.
Kasich knows how to do it, and he knows how to work with the opposition to get it done. Because he has done it before.
Nor can any others claim to have increased employment in their state, and taken their state's budget from a deficit to a surplus.
He has long time Legislative AND Executive experience.
There isn't any other candidate with that skill set.
But who do we have leading the polls? A complete and total RINO and two first term senators.
Gee, how'd it work out the last time we elected a first term senator?
Rubio will get better with time, but everyone in Congress HATES Cruz. How would that work out if he is President?
As Chairman of the House budget committee, Kasich was a key figure. No one else can make the claim they helped balanced the federal budget.
Wasn't Sanders part of the congress that balanced the budget?
1) Sanders had no part in putting together the balanced budget.
2) Sanders voted against the balanced budget.
See for yourself: H.R. 2015 (105th): Balanced Budget Act of 1997 -- House Vote #345 -- Jul 30, 1997
Nice try. Not.
So the answer is YES, he was part of the congress that balanced the budget, his vote was irrelevant to the question. My point was Kasich can't be given sole credit, I think if any one person can take credit it would be Newtster, he's the one that ultimately got it done.
I thought the point was to appeal to voters outside of the party. How can you win an election if all you appeal to is a minority of the voters?If you support a guy who is so blazingly the OPPOSITE of traditional Republican values ACROSS THE BOARD, then you are no better than a person born with seven pounds of brain damage.You assume falsely that being a Republican is a good thing these days. If you're an establishment Republican you're no better than a Democrat.
Stop making sense.
Ruby5000 wants Kasich to be the nominee. He's the guy with the weird jaw tick, and 2.3% support.
He'd be obliterated in the general election. But he'd be very polite.
You were obviously committing a stupid logical fallacy. As if a member of Congress who had no part in the budget process was just as creditable as the guy who was the Chairman of the committee that wrote the budget.Two things.Yep, takes a special kind of rube piss drinker to say one man in 535 members of congress, single handedly balanced the federal budget.
As Chairman of the House budget committee, Kasich was a key figure. No one else can make the claim they helped balanced the federal budget.
Kasich knows how to do it, and he knows how to work with the opposition to get it done. Because he has done it before.
Nor can any others claim to have increased employment in their state, and taken their state's budget from a deficit to a surplus.
He has long time Legislative AND Executive experience.
There isn't any other candidate with that skill set.
But who do we have leading the polls? A complete and total RINO and two first term senators.
Gee, how'd it work out the last time we elected a first term senator?
Rubio will get better with time, but everyone in Congress HATES Cruz. How would that work out if he is President?
As Chairman of the House budget committee, Kasich was a key figure. No one else can make the claim they helped balanced the federal budget.
Wasn't Sanders part of the congress that balanced the budget?
1) Sanders had no part in putting together the balanced budget.
2) Sanders voted against the balanced budget.
See for yourself: H.R. 2015 (105th): Balanced Budget Act of 1997 -- House Vote #345 -- Jul 30, 1997
Nice try. Not.
So the answer is YES, he was part of the congress that balanced the budget, his vote was irrelevant to the question. My point was Kasich can't be given sole credit, I think if any one person can take credit it would be Newtster, he's the one that ultimately got it done.
Your idiot fallacy failed, and now you have to backtrack.
Kasich helped write the balanced budget. You can't deny that, because it is a fact.
No other candidate has ever written a balanced federal budget.
Its a dream come true for his opponent if he is nominatedA very pro-choice, incestuous, gambling magnate who is pro-Clinton.
I can't help but wonder what special kind of mental retardation it takes to believe this guy is the right guy for the Republican nomination.
You have an actual RINO right in front of your faces, and you are stabbing your eyes out to avoid this truth.
I believe Obama wanted the ACA debated in Congress (and contrary to wingnut beliefs it was) and he specifically asked Republicans to get involved. I agree that too much of the burden and most of the success to getting the ACA through belongs to Pelosi.
However, the ACA would not exist if Obama were not in office and he's still taking fire for it (not Congres) and he's the one out there now more than anyone else defending it. I think he was too laid back while it was passing, I don't think he was being a coward though.
Well, as I have said many times, Trump won't be the nominee, but the utterly corrupted GOP won't hesitate to use him as a tool to play dirty politics and attack Clinton while they pretend their white gloves are unstained by mud.Its a dream come true for his opponent if he is nominatedA very pro-choice, incestuous, gambling magnate who is pro-Clinton.
I can't help but wonder what special kind of mental retardation it takes to believe this guy is the right guy for the Republican nomination.
You have an actual RINO right in front of your faces, and you are stabbing your eyes out to avoid this truth.
Wasn't Sanders part of the congress that balanced the budget?
You are a fool.I thought the point was to appeal to voters outside of the party. How can you win an election if all you appeal to is a minority of the voters?If you support a guy who is so blazingly the OPPOSITE of traditional Republican values ACROSS THE BOARD, then you are no better than a person born with seven pounds of brain damage.You assume falsely that being a Republican is a good thing these days. If you're an establishment Republican you're no better than a Democrat.
Stop making sense.
Ruby5000 wants Kasich to be the nominee. He's the guy with the weird jaw tick, and 2.3% support.
He'd be obliterated in the general election. But he'd be very polite.
He was one of those protesting after Bill Clinton signed it into law.Wasn't Sanders part of the congress that balanced the budget?
Sanders is a Republican now?
