And lastly, liberals devise and stand for liberal things.
The liberal deviseth liberal things; and by liberal things shall he stand. -- Isaiah 32:8
Remarking only on the translation you've chosen to cite -- King James -- one must be very careful when using that version of the Bible because its language is that of the Renaissance. Recalling the etymology of "liberal," one finds that in King James' time, "liberal" referred to being of free birth or being unfettered in expression or being noble or generous. The term lacked the ideological context that we today ascribe to it.
I haven't checked the other passages for representational faithfulness in their application to the context of "liberal" as we in the 21st century use that term in politics. Have you provided the KJV version from Proverbs too? If so, the remarks above apply again.
References:
Please, going forward, apply a considerably more rigorous degree of circumspection to the inferences and conclusions you draw from what you read in the Bible and then attempt to correlate to American politics. Or don't...It's up to you as to how credible you care to be seen.
The scripture stands on its own and this from the KJV. It speaks for itself. You may not like it but the Word of God is clear on this point. God is a liberal.
When the "Grand Old Party" came into existence in President Lincoln's day, can you imagine that Jesus would not have wanted his followers to be "Republicans" (not to be confused with the party that bears that name today), and to participate energetically in that party's heroic campaign to eradicate the scourge of slavery from the United States of America? Actually, as we show at JesusWouldBeFurious.Org/BibleBeltChristianity.html, there are still Christian Conservatives in the Bible Belt who believe that segregation and even slavery are called for by "the Word of God'. That misquided way of interpreting the bible would certainly move its adherents to embrace today's conservative Republican Party over the more liberal Democratic Party.
Teddy Roosevelt was another great "Republican" President, whom Jesus might well have recognized as a man after his own heart. Not only did Teddy fight to preserve vast areas of the country from those who were bent on exploiting the public's land, water and air for their own selfish gain, but he also fought on behalf of oppressed working people for many of the reasons that would later be embraced by the Democratic Party under his even more liberal cousins, Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt.
Of course, that is false.
Matthew 25:14-30English Standard Version
The Parable of the Talents
14 “For it will be like a man going on a journey, who called his servants[a]and entrusted to them his property. 15 To one he gave five talents,[b] to another two, to another one, to each according to his ability. Then he went away. 16 He who had received the five talents went at once and traded with them, and he made five talents more. 17 So also he who had the two talents made two talents more. 18 But he who had received the one talent went and dug in the ground and hid his master's money.
19 Now after a long time the master of those servants came and settled accounts with them. 20 And he who had received the five talents came forward, bringing five talents more, saying, ‘Master, you delivered to me five talents; here I have made five talents more.’ 21 His master said to him, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant.[c] You have been faithful over a little; I will set you over much. Enter into the joy of your master.’
22 And he also who had the two talents came forward, saying, ‘Master, you delivered to me two talents; here I have made two talents more.’23 His master said to him, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant. You have been faithful over a little; I will set you over much. Enter into the joy of your master.’
24 He also who had received the one talent came forward, saying, ‘Master, I knew you to be a hard man, reaping where you did not sow, and gathering where you scattered no seed, 25 so I was afraid, and I went and hid your talent in the ground. Here you have what is yours.’ 26 But his master answered him, ‘You wicked and slothful servant! You knew that I reap where I have not sown and gather where I scattered no seed? 27 Then you ought to have invested my money with the bankers, and at my coming I should have received what was my own with interest. 28 So take the talent from him and give it to him who has the ten talents.
29 For to everyone who has will more be given, and he will have an abundance. But from the one who has not, even what he has will be taken away. 30 And cast the worthless servant into the outer darkness. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.’
... he finds, to his chagrin, that the slave to whom he had entrusted one talent had simply buried the wealth and had garnered neither gain nor interest. Angered, he orders that the one talent be taken from the timid servant and given to the servant who had invested most boldly.
The problem with the timid servant who buried his talent is not that he was an ineffective venture capitalist but that he fundamentally misunderstood the nature of what he had been given. The Deeper Meaning of the Parable of the Talents | Catholic World Report - Global Church news and views
Couple that parable with this:
In 2 Thessalonians 3:10, Paul said, “If anyone will not work, neither shall he eat”...
..... and one is led, ineluctably, away from socialism, and toward the greatest economic advance in the history of mankind:
capitalism.