What God Thinks About Liberals In His Own Words

[Grizz]

God makes liberal's souls fat.

The liberal soul shall be made fat. -- Proverbs 11:25

And since having a fat soul is sure sign of righteousness in the eyes of God, liberals are righteous people.

The righteous shall flourish like the palm tree ... they shall be fat and flourishing. -- Psalm 92:12-14


Liberals are not vile, villainous, hypocrites that steal from the poor and hungry.

The vile person shall be no more called liberal ... For the vile person will speak villainy, and his heart will work iniquity, to practice hypocrisy ... to make empty the soul of the hungry, and he will cause the drink of the thirsty to fail. -- Isaiah 32:5-6


Liberals distribute wealth from the rich to the poor.

For your liberal distribution ... unto all men ... Thanks be unto God. -- 2 Corinthians 9:13-15

And lastly, liberals devise and stand for liberal things.

The liberal deviseth liberal things; and by liberal things shall he stand. -- Isaiah 32:8

Amen......makes you wonder why and how you people took God out of schools, Courts, and Government AND where and how God said it was up to the Government to determine wealth distribution. Wonder what God would say about the percentages of what the Government is taking to redistribute to the poor and needy as a ratio of what is being paid to cronies and bureaucrats?

Here's the Answer: God's vision of Liberalism and your people's version of Liberalism doesn't align. Namely, they are not the same.

Since God is everywhere God cannot be removed from anything so your lie about God being removed from schools it just that a lie. Religion doesn't belong in schools but you alt-righties would like it to be so that you can bring in your brand of Christianity which in reality is a wolf in sheep's clothing known as Satanism.

HOW DARE YOU MOCK ALMIGHTY GOD by saying man can remove him from anything.

If the US was more like Denmark there would be fairness and little poverty.

We're mocking you you pusillanimous piece of shit.
Skeptics Annotated Bible, what a crock satan.

When did you stop believing in the Bible?
When did you decide that you knew better than to believe in it?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Face it, God prefers Liberals and scripture proves it. When the Bible was written there were no political parties.

Liberal Catholicism, perhaps. I.E. not bound by legalism.

Liberal has many definitions, one being "without moral restraint."

When it comes to modern day liberal beliefs in this nation I tend to favor that definition. God would not approve.

The colloquial usage of 'Liberal' is identical with 'Socialism.'

Another dishonest fact-free quip from the alt-Right.

Put you in your place, didn't it.

There is no difference between the aims of Liberalism or Socialism.....or, Fascism, for that matter.

 

[Grizz]

"
The SAB will help those who believe in the Bible to honestly reconsider that belief. It will help those who are unfamiliar with the Bible to resist the temptation to believe. And it will help those who have already rejected the Bible defend their position.

It is time for us all to stop believing in, or pretending to believe in, a book that is so unworthy of belief."

SAB, Introduction

You have decided to be "as the most high".....you have decided you are as God.

 

[MrFritz]

Face it, God prefers Liberals and scripture proves it. When the Bible was written there were no political parties.

Liberal Catholicism, perhaps. I.E. not bound by legalism.

Liberal has many definitions, one being "without moral restraint."

When it comes to modern day liberal beliefs in this nation I tend to favor that definition. God would not approve.

The colloquial usage of 'Liberal' is identical with 'Socialism.'

Another dishonest fact-free quip from the alt-Right.

Put you in your place, didn't it.

There is no difference between the aims of Liberalism or Socialism.....or, Fascism, for that matter.

Your lies will put you in a place. That place is called hell.

God is crystal clear on this. Liberal is what God wants people to be and his Word is clear. You know it, I know it and anyone reading this knows it.

You can lie and deny all you want but when Jesus is separating the sheep from the goats be prepared for becoming a roasted goat.

Your lies will send you to where you belong... HELL!

 

[MrFritz]

God makes liberal's souls fat.

The liberal soul shall be made fat. -- Proverbs 11:25

And since having a fat soul is sure sign of righteousness in the eyes of God, liberals are righteous people.

The righteous shall flourish like the palm tree ... they shall be fat and flourishing. -- Psalm 92:12-14


Liberals are not vile, villainous, hypocrites that steal from the poor and hungry.

The vile person shall be no more called liberal ... For the vile person will speak villainy, and his heart will work iniquity, to practice hypocrisy ... to make empty the soul of the hungry, and he will cause the drink of the thirsty to fail. -- Isaiah 32:5-6


Liberals distribute wealth from the rich to the poor.

For your liberal distribution ... unto all men ... Thanks be unto God. -- 2 Corinthians 9:13-15

And lastly, liberals devise and stand for liberal things.

The liberal deviseth liberal things; and by liberal things shall he stand. -- Isaiah 32:8

Amen......makes you wonder why and how you people took God out of schools, Courts, and Government AND where and how God said it was up to the Government to determine wealth distribution. Wonder what God would say about the percentages of what the Government is taking to redistribute to the poor and needy as a ratio of what is being paid to cronies and bureaucrats?

Here's the Answer: God's vision of Liberalism and your people's version of Liberalism doesn't align. Namely, they are not the same.

Since God is everywhere God cannot be removed from anything so your lie about God being removed from schools it just that a lie. Religion doesn't belong in schools but you alt-righties would like it to be so that you can bring in your brand of Christianity which in reality is a wolf in sheep's clothing known as Satanism.

HOW DARE YOU MOCK ALMIGHTY GOD by saying man can remove him from anything.

If the US was more like Denmark there would be fairness and little poverty.

We're mocking you you pusillanimous piece of shit.
Skeptics Annotated Bible, what a crock satan.

When did you stop believing in the Bible?
When did you decide that you knew better than to believe in it?

For some reason Satan, you are unable to post scripture in any color but red.

You must be a red letter Christian and that makes you a satanist.

Your lies just bought you a one way trip on the Hell train. Prepare to meet Satan!

 

[PoliticalChic]

Face it, God prefers Liberals and scripture proves it. When the Bible was written there were no political parties.

Liberal Catholicism, perhaps. I.E. not bound by legalism.

Liberal has many definitions, one being "without moral restraint."

When it comes to modern day liberal beliefs in this nation I tend to favor that definition. God would not approve.

The colloquial usage of 'Liberal' is identical with 'Socialism.'

Another dishonest fact-free quip from the alt-Right.

Put you in your place, didn't it.

There is no difference between the aims of Liberalism or Socialism.....or, Fascism, for that matter.

Your lies will put you in a place. That place is called hell.

God is crystal clear on this. Liberal is what God wants people to be and his Word is clear. You know it, I know it and anyone reading this knows it.

You can lie and deny all you want but when Jesus is separating the sheep from the goats be prepared for becoming a roasted goat.

Your lies will send you to where you belong... HELL!

I never lie.

it's clear that my posts destroyed your blasphemy...

I truly appreciate your ire.

 

[Grizz]

Amen......makes you wonder why and how you people took God out of schools, Courts, and Government AND where and how God said it was up to the Government to determine wealth distribution. Wonder what God would say about the percentages of what the Government is taking to redistribute to the poor and needy as a ratio of what is being paid to cronies and bureaucrats?

Here's the Answer: God's vision of Liberalism and your people's version of Liberalism doesn't align. Namely, they are not the same.

Since God is everywhere God cannot be removed from anything so your lie about God being removed from schools it just that a lie. Religion doesn't belong in schools but you alt-righties would like it to be so that you can bring in your brand of Christianity which in reality is a wolf in sheep's clothing known as Satanism.

HOW DARE YOU MOCK ALMIGHTY GOD by saying man can remove him from anything.

If the US was more like Denmark there would be fairness and little poverty.

We're mocking you you pusillanimous piece of shit.
Skeptics Annotated Bible, what a crock satan.

When did you stop believing in the Bible?
When did you decide that you knew better than to believe in it?

For some reason Satan, you are unable to post scripture in any color but red.

You must be a red letter Christian and that makes you a satanist.

Your lies just bought you a one way trip on the Hell train. Prepare to meet Satan!

The quote below is from the website of the "bible" you are quoting, did you think nobody would check it out kid?


"The SAB will help those who believe in the Bible to honestly reconsider that belief. It will help those who are unfamiliar with the Bible to resist the temptation to believe. And it will help those who have already rejected the Bible defend their position.

It is time for us all to stop believing in, or pretending to believe in, a book that is so unworthy of belief. "

SAB, Introduction

When did you start hating God?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Since God is everywhere God cannot be removed from anything so your lie about God being removed from schools it just that a lie. Religion doesn't belong in schools but you alt-righties would like it to be so that you can bring in your brand of Christianity which in reality is a wolf in sheep's clothing known as Satanism.

HOW DARE YOU MOCK ALMIGHTY GOD by saying man can remove him from anything.

If the US was more like Denmark there would be fairness and little poverty.

We're mocking you you pusillanimous piece of shit.
Skeptics Annotated Bible, what a crock satan.

When did you stop believing in the Bible?
When did you decide that you knew better than to believe in it?

For some reason Satan, you are unable to post scripture in any color but red.

You must be a red letter Christian and that makes you a satanist.

Your lies just bought you a one way trip on the Hell train. Prepare to meet Satan!

The quote below is from the website of the "bible" you are quoting, did you think nobody would check it out kid?


"The SAB will help those who believe in the Bible to honestly reconsider that belief. It will help those who are unfamiliar with the Bible to resist the temptation to believe. And it will help those who have already rejected the Bible defend their position.

It is time for us all to stop believing in, or pretending to believe in, a book that is so unworthy of belief. "

SAB, Introduction

When did you start hating God?

1. The Founders believed in it, and build a nation that reflects same.

2. Archaeological evidence largely validates the book as historically true.
T.E. Lawrence and Leonard Woolley uncovered real evidence of Old Testament sites.

3.The Old Testament was written, although not compiled, almost three millennia ago. It is extraordinary that the writer of the creation account in Genesis, chapter one, got it right in his exposition of the series of events: his sequence turns out to be scientifically accurate in terms of contemporary knowledge.

The images in that writer’s mind of how our planet and life came to be must have seemed curious for the knowledge and experience of the time! Yet….he presented it as though it had been dictated to him, as though he had been spoken to by God.

If it is not evidence for the God, then the author of Genesis 1, or Moses, perhaps, must have understood that the universe formed first, then the seas appeared on earth, and that life forms were photosynthetic. Following that, he had to have realized that an eye evolved in an early animal in the geological past, which triggered the evolution of all the major groups of animals that exist today. Still further, he must have felt that all of this occurred in the seas, before animals moved onto land, and only when they did move out of the water did mammals and birds evolve.
See "The Genesis Enigma," by Andrew Parker, chapter 9.
This from a writer who lived in the desert.

What an incredibly lucky guess! What a considerable stroke of good fortune!

The alternative explanation is divine intervention.



Soooo....what's your point?

 

[Grizz]

We're mocking you you pusillanimous piece of shit.
Skeptics Annotated Bible, what a crock satan.

When did you stop believing in the Bible?
When did you decide that you knew better than to believe in it?

For some reason Satan, you are unable to post scripture in any color but red.

You must be a red letter Christian and that makes you a satanist.

Your lies just bought you a one way trip on the Hell train. Prepare to meet Satan!

The quote below is from the website of the "bible" you are quoting, did you think nobody would check it out kid?


"The SAB will help those who believe in the Bible to honestly reconsider that belief. It will help those who are unfamiliar with the Bible to resist the temptation to believe. And it will help those who have already rejected the Bible defend their position.

It is time for us all to stop believing in, or pretending to believe in, a book that is so unworthy of belief. "

SAB, Introduction

When did you start hating God?

1. The Founders believed in it, and build a nation that reflects same.

2. Archaeological evidence largely validates the book as historically true.
T.E. Lawrence and Leonard Woolley uncovered real evidence of Old Testament sites.

3.The Old Testament was written, although not compiled, almost three millennia ago. It is extraordinary that the writer of the creation account in Genesis, chapter one, got it right in his exposition of the series of events: his sequence turns out to be scientifically accurate in terms of contemporary knowledge.

The images in that writer’s mind of how our planet and life came to be must have seemed curious for the knowledge and experience of the time! Yet….he presented it as though it had been dictated to him, as though he had been spoken to by God.

If it is not evidence for the God, then the author of Genesis 1, or Moses, perhaps, must have understood that the universe formed first, then the seas appeared on earth, and that life forms were photosynthetic. Following that, he had to have realized that an eye evolved in an early animal in the geological past, which triggered the evolution of all the major groups of animals that exist today. Still further, he must have felt that all of this occurred in the seas, before animals moved onto land, and only when they did move out of the water did mammals and birds evolve.
See "The Genesis Enigma," by Andrew Parker, chapter 9.
This from a writer who lived in the desert.

What an incredibly lucky guess! What a considerable stroke of good fortune!

The alternative explanation is divine intervention.



Soooo....what's your point?

(Looking around the room) What are you talking about?

 

[PoliticalChic]

When did you stop believing in the Bible?
When did you decide that you knew better than to believe in it?

For some reason Satan, you are unable to post scripture in any color but red.

You must be a red letter Christian and that makes you a satanist.

Your lies just bought you a one way trip on the Hell train. Prepare to meet Satan!

The quote below is from the website of the "bible" you are quoting, did you think nobody would check it out kid?


"The SAB will help those who believe in the Bible to honestly reconsider that belief. It will help those who are unfamiliar with the Bible to resist the temptation to believe. And it will help those who have already rejected the Bible defend their position.

It is time for us all to stop believing in, or pretending to believe in, a book that is so unworthy of belief. "

SAB, Introduction

When did you start hating God?

1. The Founders believed in it, and build a nation that reflects same.

2. Archaeological evidence largely validates the book as historically true.
T.E. Lawrence and Leonard Woolley uncovered real evidence of Old Testament sites.

3.The Old Testament was written, although not compiled, almost three millennia ago. It is extraordinary that the writer of the creation account in Genesis, chapter one, got it right in his exposition of the series of events: his sequence turns out to be scientifically accurate in terms of contemporary knowledge.

The images in that writer’s mind of how our planet and life came to be must have seemed curious for the knowledge and experience of the time! Yet….he presented it as though it had been dictated to him, as though he had been spoken to by God.

If it is not evidence for the God, then the author of Genesis 1, or Moses, perhaps, must have understood that the universe formed first, then the seas appeared on earth, and that life forms were photosynthetic. Following that, he had to have realized that an eye evolved in an early animal in the geological past, which triggered the evolution of all the major groups of animals that exist today. Still further, he must have felt that all of this occurred in the seas, before animals moved onto land, and only when they did move out of the water did mammals and birds evolve.
See "The Genesis Enigma," by Andrew Parker, chapter 9.
This from a writer who lived in the desert.

What an incredibly lucky guess! What a considerable stroke of good fortune!

The alternative explanation is divine intervention.



Soooo....what's your point?

(Looking around the room) What are you talking about?

Your post #127...
"The SAB will help those who believe in the Bible to honestly reconsider that belief. It will help those who are unfamiliar with the Bible to resist the temptation to believe. And it will help those who have already rejected the Bible defend their position.

It is time for us all to stop believing in, or pretending to believe in, a book that is so unworthy of belief. "

I provided a dispute to that quote.

 

[TooTall]

When did you stop believing in the Bible?
When did you decide that you knew better than to believe in it?

For some reason Satan, you are unable to post scripture in any color but red.

You must be a red letter Christian and that makes you a satanist.

Your lies just bought you a one way trip on the Hell train. Prepare to meet Satan!

The quote below is from the website of the "bible" you are quoting, did you think nobody would check it out kid?


"The SAB will help those who believe in the Bible to honestly reconsider that belief. It will help those who are unfamiliar with the Bible to resist the temptation to believe. And it will help those who have already rejected the Bible defend their position.

It is time for us all to stop believing in, or pretending to believe in, a book that is so unworthy of belief. "

SAB, Introduction

When did you start hating God?

1. The Founders believed in it, and build a nation that reflects same.

2. Archaeological evidence largely validates the book as historically true.
T.E. Lawrence and Leonard Woolley uncovered real evidence of Old Testament sites.

3.The Old Testament was written, although not compiled, almost three millennia ago. It is extraordinary that the writer of the creation account in Genesis, chapter one, got it right in his exposition of the series of events: his sequence turns out to be scientifically accurate in terms of contemporary knowledge.

The images in that writer’s mind of how our planet and life came to be must have seemed curious for the knowledge and experience of the time! Yet….he presented it as though it had been dictated to him, as though he had been spoken to by God.

If it is not evidence for the God, then the author of Genesis 1, or Moses, perhaps, must have understood that the universe formed first, then the seas appeared on earth, and that life forms were photosynthetic. Following that, he had to have realized that an eye evolved in an early animal in the geological past, which triggered the evolution of all the major groups of animals that exist today. Still further, he must have felt that all of this occurred in the seas, before animals moved onto land, and only when they did move out of the water did mammals and birds evolve.
See "The Genesis Enigma," by Andrew Parker, chapter 9.
This from a writer who lived in the desert.

What an incredibly lucky guess! What a considerable stroke of good fortune!

The alternative explanation is divine intervention.



Soooo....what's your point?

(Looking around the room) What are you talking about?

I believe PC pointed out that non-believers are too ignorant to understand what divine intervention is.

 

[Grizz]

When did you stop believing in the Bible?
When did you decide that you knew better than to believe in it?

For some reason Satan, you are unable to post scripture in any color but red.

You must be a red letter Christian and that makes you a satanist.

Your lies just bought you a one way trip on the Hell train. Prepare to meet Satan!

The quote below is from the website of the "bible" you are quoting, did you think nobody would check it out kid?


"The SAB will help those who believe in the Bible to honestly reconsider that belief. It will help those who are unfamiliar with the Bible to resist the temptation to believe. And it will help those who have already rejected the Bible defend their position.

It is time for us all to stop believing in, or pretending to believe in, a book that is so unworthy of belief. "

SAB, Introduction

When did you start hating God?

1. The Founders believed in it, and build a nation that reflects same.

2. Archaeological evidence largely validates the book as historically true.
T.E. Lawrence and Leonard Woolley uncovered real evidence of Old Testament sites.

3.The Old Testament was written, although not compiled, almost three millennia ago. It is extraordinary that the writer of the creation account in Genesis, chapter one, got it right in his exposition of the series of events: his sequence turns out to be scientifically accurate in terms of contemporary knowledge.

The images in that writer’s mind of how our planet and life came to be must have seemed curious for the knowledge and experience of the time! Yet….he presented it as though it had been dictated to him, as though he had been spoken to by God.

If it is not evidence for the God, then the author of Genesis 1, or Moses, perhaps, must have understood that the universe formed first, then the seas appeared on earth, and that life forms were photosynthetic. Following that, he had to have realized that an eye evolved in an early animal in the geological past, which triggered the evolution of all the major groups of animals that exist today. Still further, he must have felt that all of this occurred in the seas, before animals moved onto land, and only when they did move out of the water did mammals and birds evolve.
See "The Genesis Enigma," by Andrew Parker, chapter 9.
This from a writer who lived in the desert.

What an incredibly lucky guess! What a considerable stroke of good fortune!

The alternative explanation is divine intervention.



Soooo....what's your point?

(Looking around the room) What are you talking about?

Your post #127...
"The SAB will help those who believe in the Bible to honestly reconsider that belief. It will help those who are unfamiliar with the Bible to resist the temptation to believe. And it will help those who have already rejected the Bible defend their position.

It is time for us all to stop believing in, or pretending to believe in, a book that is so unworthy of belief. "

I provided a dispute to that quote.

No, you failed to comprehend what was actually written.

 

[PoliticalChic]

For some reason Satan, you are unable to post scripture in any color but red.

You must be a red letter Christian and that makes you a satanist.

Your lies just bought you a one way trip on the Hell train. Prepare to meet Satan!

The quote below is from the website of the "bible" you are quoting, did you think nobody would check it out kid?


"The SAB will help those who believe in the Bible to honestly reconsider that belief. It will help those who are unfamiliar with the Bible to resist the temptation to believe. And it will help those who have already rejected the Bible defend their position.

It is time for us all to stop believing in, or pretending to believe in, a book that is so unworthy of belief. "

SAB, Introduction

When did you start hating God?

1. The Founders believed in it, and build a nation that reflects same.

2. Archaeological evidence largely validates the book as historically true.
T.E. Lawrence and Leonard Woolley uncovered real evidence of Old Testament sites.

3.The Old Testament was written, although not compiled, almost three millennia ago. It is extraordinary that the writer of the creation account in Genesis, chapter one, got it right in his exposition of the series of events: his sequence turns out to be scientifically accurate in terms of contemporary knowledge.

The images in that writer’s mind of how our planet and life came to be must have seemed curious for the knowledge and experience of the time! Yet….he presented it as though it had been dictated to him, as though he had been spoken to by God.

If it is not evidence for the God, then the author of Genesis 1, or Moses, perhaps, must have understood that the universe formed first, then the seas appeared on earth, and that life forms were photosynthetic. Following that, he had to have realized that an eye evolved in an early animal in the geological past, which triggered the evolution of all the major groups of animals that exist today. Still further, he must have felt that all of this occurred in the seas, before animals moved onto land, and only when they did move out of the water did mammals and birds evolve.
See "The Genesis Enigma," by Andrew Parker, chapter 9.
This from a writer who lived in the desert.

What an incredibly lucky guess! What a considerable stroke of good fortune!

The alternative explanation is divine intervention.



Soooo....what's your point?

(Looking around the room) What are you talking about?

Your post #127...
"The SAB will help those who believe in the Bible to honestly reconsider that belief. It will help those who are unfamiliar with the Bible to resist the temptation to believe. And it will help those who have already rejected the Bible defend their position.

It is time for us all to stop believing in, or pretending to believe in, a book that is so unworthy of belief. "

I provided a dispute to that quote.

No, you failed to comprehend what was actually written.

Perhaps the fault is in your articulation.

 

[Grizz]

The quote below is from the website of the "bible" you are quoting, did you think nobody would check it out kid?


"The SAB will help those who believe in the Bible to honestly reconsider that belief. It will help those who are unfamiliar with the Bible to resist the temptation to believe. And it will help those who have already rejected the Bible defend their position.

It is time for us all to stop believing in, or pretending to believe in, a book that is so unworthy of belief. "

SAB, Introduction

When did you start hating God?

1. The Founders believed in it, and build a nation that reflects same.

2. Archaeological evidence largely validates the book as historically true.
T.E. Lawrence and Leonard Woolley uncovered real evidence of Old Testament sites.

3.The Old Testament was written, although not compiled, almost three millennia ago. It is extraordinary that the writer of the creation account in Genesis, chapter one, got it right in his exposition of the series of events: his sequence turns out to be scientifically accurate in terms of contemporary knowledge.

The images in that writer’s mind of how our planet and life came to be must have seemed curious for the knowledge and experience of the time! Yet….he presented it as though it had been dictated to him, as though he had been spoken to by God.

If it is not evidence for the God, then the author of Genesis 1, or Moses, perhaps, must have understood that the universe formed first, then the seas appeared on earth, and that life forms were photosynthetic. Following that, he had to have realized that an eye evolved in an early animal in the geological past, which triggered the evolution of all the major groups of animals that exist today. Still further, he must have felt that all of this occurred in the seas, before animals moved onto land, and only when they did move out of the water did mammals and birds evolve.
See "The Genesis Enigma," by Andrew Parker, chapter 9.
This from a writer who lived in the desert.

What an incredibly lucky guess! What a considerable stroke of good fortune!

The alternative explanation is divine intervention.



Soooo....what's your point?

(Looking around the room) What are you talking about?

Your post #127...
"The SAB will help those who believe in the Bible to honestly reconsider that belief. It will help those who are unfamiliar with the Bible to resist the temptation to believe. And it will help those who have already rejected the Bible defend their position.

It is time for us all to stop believing in, or pretending to believe in, a book that is so unworthy of belief. "

I provided a dispute to that quote.

No, you failed to comprehend what was actually written.

Perhaps the fault is in your articulation.

LOL. Sure thing...it's funny how partisan's on BOTH sides allow their need to be "right" to control their emotions and responses.
Here, let me provide you a key to the riddle.
My responses are rarely in bold, my source quotations always are.
Lay your pride aside.

 

[keepitreal]

No, you failed to comprehend what was actually written.

Grizz....love your posts....

May I make a suggestion....leave mrfritz where he is or you'll make yourself mad.

I haven't been responding to his posts.

Vengeance is mine saith the Lord...

Let God fight this battle!

God bless, Lynn

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. The Founders believed in it, and build a nation that reflects same.

2. Archaeological evidence largely validates the book as historically true.
T.E. Lawrence and Leonard Woolley uncovered real evidence of Old Testament sites.

3.The Old Testament was written, although not compiled, almost three millennia ago. It is extraordinary that the writer of the creation account in Genesis, chapter one, got it right in his exposition of the series of events: his sequence turns out to be scientifically accurate in terms of contemporary knowledge.

The images in that writer’s mind of how our planet and life came to be must have seemed curious for the knowledge and experience of the time! Yet….he presented it as though it had been dictated to him, as though he had been spoken to by God.

If it is not evidence for the God, then the author of Genesis 1, or Moses, perhaps, must have understood that the universe formed first, then the seas appeared on earth, and that life forms were photosynthetic. Following that, he had to have realized that an eye evolved in an early animal in the geological past, which triggered the evolution of all the major groups of animals that exist today. Still further, he must have felt that all of this occurred in the seas, before animals moved onto land, and only when they did move out of the water did mammals and birds evolve.
See "The Genesis Enigma," by Andrew Parker, chapter 9.
This from a writer who lived in the desert.

What an incredibly lucky guess! What a considerable stroke of good fortune!

The alternative explanation is divine intervention.



Soooo....what's your point?

(Looking around the room) What are you talking about?

Your post #127...
"The SAB will help those who believe in the Bible to honestly reconsider that belief. It will help those who are unfamiliar with the Bible to resist the temptation to believe. And it will help those who have already rejected the Bible defend their position.

It is time for us all to stop believing in, or pretending to believe in, a book that is so unworthy of belief. "

I provided a dispute to that quote.

No, you failed to comprehend what was actually written.

Perhaps the fault is in your articulation.

LOL. Sure thing...it's funny how partisan's on BOTH sides allow their need to be "right" to control their emotions and responses.
Here, let me provide you a key to the riddle.
My responses are rarely in bold, my source quotations always are.
Lay your pride aside.

I provided substance. You ignored it, conjuring up some babble about 'pride.'

I asked this earlier: Soooo....what's your point?

So far you have failed to fulfill that request.

 

[Grizz]

(Looking around the room) What are you talking about?

Your post #127...
"The SAB will help those who believe in the Bible to honestly reconsider that belief. It will help those who are unfamiliar with the Bible to resist the temptation to believe. And it will help those who have already rejected the Bible defend their position.

It is time for us all to stop believing in, or pretending to believe in, a book that is so unworthy of belief. "

I provided a dispute to that quote.

No, you failed to comprehend what was actually written.

Perhaps the fault is in your articulation.

LOL. Sure thing...it's funny how partisan's on BOTH sides allow their need to be "right" to control their emotions and responses.
Here, let me provide you a key to the riddle.
My responses are rarely in bold, my source quotations always are.
Lay your pride aside.

I provided substance. You ignored it, conjuring up some babble about 'pride.'

I asked this earlier: Soooo....what's your point?

So far you have failed to fulfill that request.

...and you still can't read.
(shrugs) Your pride seems to be inflated beyond a healthy level.
Sorry honey, you and Mr. Fritz are two sides of the same coin.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Your post #127...
"The SAB will help those who believe in the Bible to honestly reconsider that belief. It will help those who are unfamiliar with the Bible to resist the temptation to believe. And it will help those who have already rejected the Bible defend their position.

It is time for us all to stop believing in, or pretending to believe in, a book that is so unworthy of belief. "

I provided a dispute to that quote.

No, you failed to comprehend what was actually written.

Perhaps the fault is in your articulation.

LOL. Sure thing...it's funny how partisan's on BOTH sides allow their need to be "right" to control their emotions and responses.
Here, let me provide you a key to the riddle.
My responses are rarely in bold, my source quotations always are.
Lay your pride aside.

I provided substance. You ignored it, conjuring up some babble about 'pride.'

I asked this earlier: Soooo....what's your point?

So far you have failed to fulfill that request.

...and you still can't read.
(shrugs) Your pride seems to be inflated beyond a healthy level.
Sorry honey, you and Mr. Fritz are two sides of the same coin.

"...and you still can't read."

No one can read what hasn't been written.

Seems we've discovered that you can't write.

 

[Dot Com]

Your post #127...
"The SAB will help those who believe in the Bible to honestly reconsider that belief. It will help those who are unfamiliar with the Bible to resist the temptation to believe. And it will help those who have already rejected the Bible defend their position.

It is time for us all to stop believing in, or pretending to believe in, a book that is so unworthy of belief. "

I provided a dispute to that quote.

No, you failed to comprehend what was actually written.

Perhaps the fault is in your articulation.

LOL. Sure thing...it's funny how partisan's on BOTH sides allow their need to be "right" to control their emotions and responses.
Here, let me provide you a key to the riddle.
My responses are rarely in bold, my source quotations always are.
Lay your pride aside.

I provided substance. You ignored it, conjuring up some babble about 'pride.'

I asked this earlier: Soooo....what's your point?

So far you have failed to fulfill that request.

...and you still can't read.
(shrugs) Your pride seems to be inflated beyond a healthy level.
Sorry honey, you and Mr. Fritz are two sides of the same coin.

I see you've met PoliSpice and YES, she has an inflated and, more importantly, unfounded sense of pride

Sent from my VS415PP using Tapatalk

 

[Grizz]

No, you failed to comprehend what was actually written.

Perhaps the fault is in your articulation.

LOL. Sure thing...it's funny how partisan's on BOTH sides allow their need to be "right" to control their emotions and responses.
Here, let me provide you a key to the riddle.
My responses are rarely in bold, my source quotations always are.
Lay your pride aside.

I provided substance. You ignored it, conjuring up some babble about 'pride.'

I asked this earlier: Soooo....what's your point?

So far you have failed to fulfill that request.

...and you still can't read.
(shrugs) Your pride seems to be inflated beyond a healthy level.
Sorry honey, you and Mr. Fritz are two sides of the same coin.

"...and you still can't read."

No one can read what hasn't been written.

Seems we've discovered that you can't write.

LOL, I am as always quite comfy with the ignorance of folks like you honey.