Unkotare
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2011
- 129,774
- 24,879
....do you get to go to China and have a trail , or DUE PROCES [sic] first.......
Yes
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
....do you get to go to China and have a trail , or DUE PROCES [sic] first.......
It is unconstitutional to charge someone with a crime in this country and deny them due process of law.
The laws in China do not effect our laws. We have a constitution. We must uphold it. SCOTUS has upheld this law.
Due Process for Undocumented Immigrants, Explained
The court case:
ZADVYDAS v. DAVIS
Do undocumented immigrants have a right to due process?
Yes. Courts have consistently held that anyone on United States soil is protected by the Constitution’s right to due process, even if they illegally entered the country, though people generally have greater legal protections inside the country than at the border.
NEWS FLASH DEMOCRAT WHORES
IF YOU ARE NOT AN AMERICAN AND NOT BORN HERE YOU HAVE NO RIGHTS ASSHOLES!!
OTHER COUNTRIES DO NOT HAND OVER THEIR CITIZNES RIGHT TO ANYBODY WHO WALKS ONTO THEIR LAND AS THEY BREAK THE LAW. YOU STUPID MOTHER FKRS.!!!
As much as I hate to say it, this is not true. Anyone who steps foot on our soil has a right to due process.
No they don't they are NOT CITIZENS do you get to go to China and have a trail , or DUE PROCES first..
Obama just about got rid of DUE PROCESS the LEFTIST COMMUNIST assholes are working on getting rid of it.
if you are not a born citzines you do not have OUR RIGHTS! and SHOULDn'T have them..
process of VETTING is not being "CHARGED WITH A CRIME"
Notice the date on the other article I posted where 800 were quarantined.................Nah.........I doubt it........
process of VETTING is not being "CHARGED WITH A CRIME"
And if you read the court case I cited, he wasn't charged with a crime either. He was being vetted and the SCOTUS ruled he has due process rights.
Don't argue with me, argue with SCOTUS.
process of VETTING is not being "CHARGED WITH A CRIME"
And if you read the court case I cited, he wasn't charged with a crime either. He was being vetted and the SCOTUS ruled he has due process rights.
Don't argue with me, argue with SCOTUS.
THAT is NOT TRUE.This will make those with an empathy gene cringe (and Trumpkins proud I suppose). F-ing disgusting IMHO.
CHICAGO (AP) - When Lidia Karine Souza would call her 9-year-old son -- allowed just 20 minutes per week -- he would beg his mom though tears to do everything in her power to get him out of U.S. government custody and back to her.
The 27-year-old Brazilian mother, who is seeking asylum, has been trying with all her might.
She searched for weeks to find Diogo after the two were separated at the border in late May. When she was released June 9 from a Texas facility, she filled out nearly 40 pages of documents that U.S. officials told her were required to regain custody.
Then they told her that the rules had changed and that she needed any family members living with her in the United States to be fingerprinted and still more documents. This was not the safety she had sought for herself and her son. This was not the American dream.
"This ... is a nightmare," she said, sitting in a suburban Chicago hotel, still waiting to be reunited with Diogo, from whom she'd never spent more than a week apart before this.
On Tuesday, Souza's attorneys filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration to demand her son be immediately released. He has spent four weeks at a government-contracted shelter in Chicago, much of it alone in a room, quarantined with chicken pox. He spent his 9th birthday on Monday without his mom.
Continued:
Immigrant mom heads to court to get her son back
The only lie in the article, is the claim the Trump administration did this.
Trump had nothing to do with this. If you really had an "empathy gene cringe" and found it "F-ing disgusting"... then you should have done something about it in the past 20 years. This law has been in place since the late 90s. This started under Clinton.
Truth hurts buddy. You are clearly not as empathic as you claim, or you would have pushed to change this for 20 years, instead of just freaking out when a president you don't like, is in office.
the Bush administration and the Obama administration did not automatically incarcerate those seeking refugee status, they allowed them in to the public, until their refugee hearings, and if they did not get their refugee asylum status, they were deported together as a family. And yes, some did not show up for their hearings....
So the Obama admin got tired of that bull crud, and with newer technology, began a test program of putting ankle bracelet monitors on them, and when they wore monitors, it was 100% compliance, on showing up for their court dates.
I repeat, 100% compliance.
the "no tolerance" policy that Sessions announce a month or so ago, is what is causing this problem to this problematic situation.
Yes, Obama and Bush took kids away from sex traffickers, and Gang members, etc.... And Obama and Bush took in children without adults...but did NOT as policy.... like the ''no tolerance' policy, separate refugee parents from their children, seeking asylum as an automatic policy.
obama handed kids over to human traffickers who claimed to be their parents, twit....... they didn't care about those kids as long as they were able to let them into the country....as future democrat voters..
Same shit happened under Obama.............and they purposely left out that the kid had Chicken Pox...........Purposely left out that she and the son have been reunited........and were granted Asylum.
I showed the article and you refuted nothing. Quarantine procedures changed exactly when..........can you put up the ICE rule that changed that policy......or the cdc that did the same............Same shit happened under Obama.............and they purposely left out that the kid had Chicken Pox...........Purposely left out that she and the son have been reunited........and were granted Asylum.
Nonsense - You are entitled to your opinion but not your alternative facts.
Trump’s separation of immigrant families wasn't Obama policy
Fact check: Did Obama administration separate families?
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/obama-trump-child-separation-meme/
Family separation was new, but Trump’s new border policy is an Obama throwback
Kindly stop lying
![]()
![]()
![]()
This will make those with an empathy gene cringe (and Trumpkins proud I suppose). F-ing disgusting IMHO.
CHICAGO (AP) - When Lidia Karine Souza would call her 9-year-old son -- allowed just 20 minutes per week -- he would beg his mom though tears to do everything in her power to get him out of U.S. government custody and back to her.
The 27-year-old Brazilian mother, who is seeking asylum, has been trying with all her might.
She searched for weeks to find Diogo after the two were separated at the border in late May. When she was released June 9 from a Texas facility, she filled out nearly 40 pages of documents that U.S. officials told her were required to regain custody.
Then they told her that the rules had changed and that she needed any family members living with her in the United States to be fingerprinted and still more documents. This was not the safety she had sought for herself and her son. This was not the American dream.
"This ... is a nightmare," she said, sitting in a suburban Chicago hotel, still waiting to be reunited with Diogo, from whom she'd never spent more than a week apart before this.
On Tuesday, Souza's attorneys filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration to demand her son be immediately released. He has spent four weeks at a government-contracted shelter in Chicago, much of it alone in a room, quarantined with chicken pox. He spent his 9th birthday on Monday without his mom.
Continued:
Immigrant mom heads to court to get her son back
you have an odd sense of humor, eagle. -------a whole bunch of persons from DIFFERENT third world hell holes is a prescription for INFECTIOUS NITEMARE
you have an odd sense of humor, eagle. -------a whole bunch of persons from DIFFERENT third world hell holes is a prescription for INFECTIOUS NITEMARE
Oh God - Not you too![]()
![]()
Trump blaming immigrants for spreading disease isn’t just offensive, it’s scientifically wrong
Are illegal immigrants bringing ‘tremendous’ disease across the border, as Trump says? Unlikely
Did the OP forget to post all the information............No the OP didn't............did it say she was now reunited.........nope.......did it say the kid had chicken pox and was in quarantine...........nope...........did it say they were granted Asylum via the courts.........nope.......you have an odd sense of humor, eagle. -------a whole bunch of persons from DIFFERENT third world hell holes is a prescription for INFECTIOUS NITEMARE
Oh God - Not you too![]()
![]()
Trump blaming immigrants for spreading disease isn’t just offensive, it’s scientifically wrong
Are illegal immigrants bringing ‘tremendous’ disease across the border, as Trump says? Unlikely
Notice how the left only wants to talk about the separations. They'll never denounce the fact that our borders are being invaded in the first place.
You are simply lying again.It is a misdemeanor to cross the border outside of the gate, NOT A FELONY CRIME, and NO we do not lock up people for a crime, that does not require jail time as a penalty and we certainly do not take the kids of mothers who have committed a misdemeanor, we release them after they are charged with a misdemeanor in most ALL cases