Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
not fleshed out?? Why be so afraid to say exactly why you feel that way???? What does your fear tell us, liberal??It's an opinion, and not a very fleshed-out one.
Ed's got a "special" approach to logic, so I don't bother responding either, much as Vandalshandle said.
Understanding why Hitler hated Liberal Tolerance will help you understand Liberalism.
Children born to unmarried mothers are more likely to grow up in a single-parent household, experience instability in living arrangements, live in poverty, and have socio-emotional problems.1,2,3,4 As these children reach adolescence, they are more likely to have low educational attainment, engage in sex at a younger age, and have a birth outside of marriage.5,6,7,8 As young adults, children born outside of marriage are more likely to be idle (neither in school nor employed), have lower occupational status and income, and have more troubled marriages and more divorces than those born to married parents.9
Women who give birth outside of marriage tend to be more disadvantaged than their married counterparts, both before and after the birth. Unmarried mothers generally have lower incomes, lower education levels, and are more likely to be dependent on welfare assistance compared with married mothers.10,11,12,13 Women who have a nonmarital birth also tend to fare worse than childless single women; for example, they have reduced marriage prospects compared with single women without children.
Understanding why Hitler hated Liberal Tolerance will help you understand Liberalism.
actually dear, Hitler was a liberal National Socialist. Our liberals spied for him and Stalin. Is it just coincidence that our liberals spied for them??
You can't compare today's Republican Party with past American Parties. I think the Nazi party is actually much closer.
Since the GOP has repeatedly agitated for individual political and economic freedom and less State control over individual actions by decreasing regulation and taxation, I fail to see a valid comparison between the GOP and Germany's National Socialist Party in the 1920-30s so it would fall to you to make that successful comparison. Comparing any GOP political platform to Mein Kampf or the National Socialist party platform would be a start but just throwing out the "N" bomb is insufficient proof. Remember both Hitler and Mussolini agreed with the latter's "Everything inside the State and nothing outside the State"; This is hardly a GOP talking point. Alternatively, present day 'Liberals' want to control guns, increase regulation, and completely control the health care sector; those things sound more like part of the National Socialists wish list then that of the GOP.
Republicans are 90% white. They want to take away citizenship of people who are the "wrong color". As you can see in my signature line, some KKK branches have even disbanded because the are no longer needed. They feel the Republican Party represents their ideals, positions and policies. That's just the truth. Too bad they feel it's "slander".
I reject this. It is well known that the overwhelming majority of segregationists (and Klansman) were Democrats and that much of the civil rights legislation (and the Emancipation Proclamation!) was achieved by conservative (i.e. Classically Liberal) Republicans pushing for them. Remember it was the Democrats in the South that passed Jim Crow Laws, required a poll tax, and passed gun control laws in an effort to suppress the black vote.
Additionally, there is not a shred of evidence that the GOP wants to or has "take[n] away citizenship of people who are the "wrong color". That is shear and pure Democratic demagoguery.
JM
Reject it all you like but all those Southern racists are Republicans now. They were only Democrats in the past due to an entrenched and corrupt system of political convenience. IOW if you weren't a Democrat you just didn't win an election.
Fast forward to today and the same thing is true with the word "Republican" substituted for "Democrat", which demonstrates that access to power for this group is far more important than alignment with any particular ideology. So it wasn't "Democrats" who passed Jim Crow laws, it was racists. That shit never had support outside the South. Your extrapolation is like observing that all the cars around you are travelling east and concluding that therefore, all cars travel east.
Notably, the DP decided to leave that solid bloc behind in the interest of civil rights, and the RP didn't mind stepping right in to take up the slack. In fact they actively cultivated it with the "Southern strategy" and euphemisms like "states rights" and Reagan kicking off his presidential campaign in Philadelphia, Mississippi.
So let's not try to pass off this bullshit about one party being basically more racist. If anything one party is more opportunist. To the point of the thread, it's interesting to note which party finds it necessary to suppress voter turnout, redraw congressional lines and reverse-engineer the way states vote in the EC, as their strategy to win elections. That should tell you something about the actual wishes of the electorate.
It really doesn't matter if the Republicans see themselves as racist or not. What matters is that non-white minorities see the Republican Party as racist. As long as non-white minorities see the Party as racist, they won't vote for them.
I would like to hear from both sides on this.
My definition of a modern day liberal is someone that wants a big intrusive controlling government, someone who wants wealth and income redistribution, someone who wants abortion on demand but does not want the 2nd amendment upheld, someone who wants to punish success and reward failure, someone who is comfortable being a slave to the government and wants an active thought and speech police.
I would like to hear from both sides on this.
My definition of a modern day liberal is someone that wants a big intrusive controlling government, someone who wants wealth and income redistribution, someone who wants abortion on demand but does not want the 2nd amendment upheld, someone who wants to punish success and reward failure, someone who is comfortable being a slave to the government and wants an active thought and speech police.
Children born to unmarried mothers are more likely to grow up in a single-parent household, experience instability in living arrangements, live in poverty, and have socio-emotional problems.1,2,3,4 As these children reach adolescence, they are more likely to have low educational attainment, engage in sex at a younger age, and have a birth outside of marriage.5,6,7,8 As young adults, children born outside of marriage are more likely to be idle (neither in school nor employed), have lower occupational status and income, and have more troubled marriages and more divorces than those born to married parents.9
Women who give birth outside of marriage tend to be more disadvantaged than their married counterparts, both before and after the birth. Unmarried mothers generally have lower incomes, lower education levels, and are more likely to be dependent on welfare assistance compared with married mothers.10,11,12,13 Women who have a nonmarital birth also tend to fare worse than childless single women; for example, they have reduced marriage prospects compared with single women without children.
Births to Unmarried Women | Child Trends Databank
Don't forget this one:I would like to hear from both sides on this.
My definition of a modern day liberal is someone that wants a big intrusive controlling government, someone who wants wealth and income redistribution, someone who wants abortion on demand but does not want the 2nd amendment upheld, someone who wants to punish success and reward failure, someone who is comfortable being a slave to the government and wants an active thought and speech police.
For those conservatives interested in an effort to explain a leftist "Wordsmith's" actions here is an interesting empirically based take by a Navy Pshyciatrist. Included: Imbedded link as to why the left hates capitalism:Two different worlds: the school room and the school yard, which does the liberal prefer? American Thinker
For those with a little more time, try Evan Sayet's Kindergarden of Eden. If you've felt that a lot of leftist opinions seem naive or obviously the opposite of common sense Evan has a theory that fits: Indiscriminationism Baby!
JM
It really doesn't matter if the Republicans see themselves as racist or not. What matters is that non-white minorities see the Republican Party as racist. As long as non-white minorities see the Party as racist, they won't vote for them.
It really doesn't matter if the Republicans see themselves as racist or not. What matters is that non-white minorities see the Republican Party as racist. As long as non-white minorities see the Party as racist, they won't vote for them.
Translation to plain English: Until Republicans start pandering to minorities with more 'free shit' than the Dems offer, they can write off ANY possible support from said minorities.
It really doesn't matter if the Republicans see themselves as racist or not. What matters is that non-white minorities see the Republican Party as racist. As long as non-white minorities see the Party as racist, they won't vote for them.
Translation to plain English: Until Republicans start pandering to minorities with more 'free shit' than the Dems offer, they can write off ANY possible support from said minorities.
It really doesn't matter if the Republicans see themselves as racist or not. What matters is that non-white minorities see the Republican Party as racist. As long as non-white minorities see the Party as racist, they won't vote for them.
Translation to plain English: Until Republicans start pandering to minorities with more 'free shit' than the Dems offer, they can write off ANY possible support from said minorities.
Once again, building a staw man out of wet straw is foolish, it won't burn even with the large amount of hot air you are using.
The free stuff most minorities want is called freedom, until the Republican Party decides to support universal freedom they will continue to lose women voters, Hispanics voters, Blacks voters and other Americans who believe - unlike it seems Republicans -that all men and women are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness
