Taz
Gold Member
- Jul 8, 2014
- 22,876
- 2,119
- 190
- Banned
- #481
That's no proof, that's pure fiction.No. It’s the proof you are looking for.So it's all hearsay.Yes. You think they had internet back then or something?So the first manuscript was written up to 25 years after the facts?No different than any other event in antiquity except in this case there were orders of magnitude more writings and less time had passed between the event and the recording of the event.No first hand writings of miracles were recorded. Everything written later wasn’t even written by the witnesses. Let’s not start this argument again.
And I’ve seen David copper field walk on water too.
24,000 written manuscripts with the first one written within 25 years.
There’s your proof.