I literally described that the alternatives are limitless, and from that...you arrived at me asserting only ONE possibility.Then by your own admission you admit that the only possibility you will consider is the universe arose through natural processes and you are unwilling to explore any other alternative.That WAS my objection, so how fucking stupid was this as a follow up?Putting your objection aside for the moment. Are you disagreeing with the assertion that there are only two options?No...thats an utterly absurd and false dichotomy.The definition of logic is reasoning conducted or assessed according to strict principles of validity.
The definition of reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way.
So let’s start it.
It should be obvious that there are only two options available. Either space and time were created by “spirit” or it arose through natural processes.
Sound reasonable?
Spirit could be a natural process.
There might not be such thing as spirit.
There could be something not thought of, that may happen to fall in neither category, and you can only eliminate that by arguing from ignorance: I cant think of something therefore it cant exist.
You shoot you miss almost every time dude. Its s000o0o0o0 gross.
Sorry, ding. Cant do this with ya, you're stupidity and obsession with begging for your religiousity to be agreed with is bitch made, to me. I value my time.
This discussion may not be for you because I am considering other alternatives.
So you might as well leave now as every post you make will only be made to prevent an objective discussion on the possibilities.
Thats so fucking retarded, ding. Are you drunk?