What is Trump hiding? Where are his Tax Returns

[LoneLaugher]

Just watch a very good broadcast in which all of the dots were connected. In the end - they presented a very compelling case that the Russian oligarchs (Putin and his cronies) have significant investments with Trump and thus why he is refusing to release his taxes. It was very convincing (and for the record - it was done by hard core conservatives so nobody can claim liberal bias on it).

That being said - I found the ending very disturbing. They harped on the dangers of (and I quote) "being hacked by a foreign nation". Yeah....uh....who gives a shit about the DNC? Foreign nations have hacked the DoD on multiple occasions. Now that is a grave concern. The fact that the DNC was hacked is something to celebrate. Any time lies by people in government can be exposed and the truth delivered to the people - it is a good thing. It is a great thing. Shame on any liberal denouncing the WikiLeaks release. The left should be more outraged than anybody over the DNC silencing their voice.

We're never going to clean this mess up until the right holds Donald Trump accountable (demand that he release his taxes) and the left hold Hitlery Clinton and the DNC accountable for voter fraud and making the will of the people irrelevant.

Voter fraud?

You are a huge clown. You are unable to discuss Trump without bashing Clinton.

Shocking, uh? You can't imagine someone not being a blind, partisan, ignorant lap dog such as yourself. How sad. Speaks volumes about your character and intellect (and since you're not too bright, I'll throw you a bone here: what it says is not good).

Are you trying to tell me that you are not a blind partisan lap dog?

I love the disconnect.

Clearly not as I'm voluntarily presenting evidence that I saw in a report that links Donald Trump's finances to Russia. That doesn't sound like a "blind, partisan, lap dog" to me. And it wouldn't to anyone else with an ounce of reason. Only an idiot would think so.

When is that last time you posted anything of substance that shed the left in a poor light? Game over.

Silly nutter. You don't pay attention.

If you weren't a partisan asshole, you'd not have mentioned Clinton in this thread.

 

[SmokeALib]

Just watch a very good broadcast in which all of the dots were connected. In the end - they presented a very compelling case that the Russian oligarchs (Putin and his cronies) have significant investments with Trump and thus why he is refusing to release his taxes. It was very convincing (and for the record - it was done by hard core conservatives so nobody can claim liberal bias on it).

That being said - I found the ending very disturbing. They harped on the dangers of (and I quote) "being hacked by a foreign nation". Yeah....uh....who gives a shit about the DNC? Foreign nations have hacked the DoD on multiple occasions. Now that is a grave concern. The fact that the DNC was hacked is something to celebrate. Any time lies by people in government can be exposed and the truth delivered to the people - it is a good thing. It is a great thing. Shame on any liberal denouncing the WikiLeaks release. The left should be more outraged than anybody over the DNC silencing their voice.

We're never going to clean this mess up until the right holds Donald Trump accountable (demand that he release his taxes) and the left hold Hitlery Clinton and the DNC accountable for voter fraud and making the will of the people irrelevant.

Voter fraud?

You are a huge clown. You are unable to discuss Trump without bashing Clinton.

Shocking, uh? You can't imagine someone not being a blind, partisan, ignorant lap dog such as yourself. How sad. Speaks volumes about your character and intellect (and since you're not too bright, I'll throw you a bone here: what it says is not good).

Are you trying to tell me that you are not a blind partisan lap dog?

I love the disconnect.

Clearly not as I'm voluntarily presenting evidence that I saw in a report that links Donald Trump's finances to Russia. That doesn't sound like a "blind, partisan, lap dog" to me. And it wouldn't to anyone else with an ounce of reason. Only an idiot would think so.

When is that last time you posted anything of substance that shed the left in a poor light? Game over.

Silly nutter. You don't pay attention.

You don't pay anything.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Voter fraud?

You are a huge clown. You are unable to discuss Trump without bashing Clinton.

Shocking, uh? You can't imagine someone not being a blind, partisan, ignorant lap dog such as yourself. How sad. Speaks volumes about your character and intellect (and since you're not too bright, I'll throw you a bone here: what it says is not good).

Are you trying to tell me that you are not a blind partisan lap dog?

I love the disconnect.

Clearly not as I'm voluntarily presenting evidence that I saw in a report that links Donald Trump's finances to Russia. That doesn't sound like a "blind, partisan, lap dog" to me. And it wouldn't to anyone else with an ounce of reason. Only an idiot would think so.

When is that last time you posted anything of substance that shed the left in a poor light? Game over.

Silly nutter. You don't pay attention.

You don't pay anything.

Is that right? Tell me more.

 

[P@triot]

Just watch a very good broadcast in which all of the dots were connected. In the end - they presented a very compelling case that the Russian oligarchs (Putin and his cronies) have significant investments with Trump and thus why he is refusing to release his taxes. It was very convincing (and for the record - it was done by hard core conservatives so nobody can claim liberal bias on it).

That being said - I found the ending very disturbing. They harped on the dangers of (and I quote) "being hacked by a foreign nation". Yeah....uh....who gives a shit about the DNC? Foreign nations have hacked the DoD on multiple occasions. Now that is a grave concern. The fact that the DNC was hacked is something to celebrate. Any time lies by people in government can be exposed and the truth delivered to the people - it is a good thing. It is a great thing. Shame on any liberal denouncing the WikiLeaks release. The left should be more outraged than anybody over the DNC silencing their voice.

We're never going to clean this mess up until the right holds Donald Trump accountable (demand that he release his taxes) and the left hold Hitlery Clinton and the DNC accountable for voter fraud and making the will of the people irrelevant.

Voter fraud?

You are a huge clown. You are unable to discuss Trump without bashing Clinton.

Shocking, uh? You can't imagine someone not being a blind, partisan, ignorant lap dog such as yourself. How sad. Speaks volumes about your character and intellect (and since you're not too bright, I'll throw you a bone here: what it says is not good).

Are you trying to tell me that you are not a blind partisan lap dog?

I love the disconnect.

Clearly not as I'm voluntarily presenting evidence that I saw in a report that links Donald Trump's finances to Russia. That doesn't sound like a "blind, partisan, lap dog" to me. And it wouldn't to anyone else with an ounce of reason. Only an idiot would think so.

When is that last time you posted anything of substance that shed the left in a poor light? Game over.

Silly nutter. You don't pay attention.

If you weren't a partisan asshole, you'd not have mentioned Clinton in this thread.

Silly ignorant asshole - why not? Oh wait....that's right....because as a blind, partisan, lap dog who can't handle having the truth about Hitlery Clinton or Dumbocrats discussed.

 

[Papageorgio]

Just watch a very good broadcast in which all of the dots were connected. In the end - they presented a very compelling case that the Russian oligarchs (Putin and his cronies) have significant investments with Trump and thus why he is refusing to release his taxes. It was very convincing (and for the record - it was done by hard core conservatives so nobody can claim liberal bias on it).

That being said - I found the ending very disturbing. They harped on the dangers of (and I quote) "being hacked by a foreign nation". Yeah....uh....who gives a shit about the DNC? Foreign nations have hacked the DoD on multiple occasions. Now that is a grave concern. The fact that the DNC was hacked is something to celebrate. Any time lies by people in government can be exposed and the truth delivered to the people - it is a good thing. It is a great thing. Shame on any liberal denouncing the WikiLeaks release. The left should be more outraged than anybody over the DNC silencing their voice.

We're never going to clean this mess up until the right holds Donald Trump accountable (demand that he release his taxes) and the left hold Hitlery Clinton and the DNC accountable for voter fraud and making the will of the people irrelevant.

Voter fraud?

You are a huge clown. You are unable to discuss Trump without bashing Clinton.

Shocking, uh? You can't imagine someone not being a blind, partisan, ignorant lap dog such as yourself. How sad. Speaks volumes about your character and intellect (and since you're not too bright, I'll throw you a bone here: what it says is not good).

Are you trying to tell me that you are not a blind partisan lap dog?

I love the disconnect.

Clearly not as I'm voluntarily presenting evidence that I saw in a report that links Donald Trump's finances to Russia. That doesn't sound like a "blind, partisan, lap dog" to me. And it wouldn't to anyone else with an ounce of reason. Only an idiot would think so.

When is that last time you posted anything of substance that shed the left in a poor light? Game over.

Never, partisan nutters never do.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[Slyhunter]

Just watch a very good broadcast in which all of the dots were connected. In the end - they presented a very compelling case that the Russian oligarchs (Putin and his cronies) have significant investments with Trump and thus why he is refusing to release his taxes. It was very convincing (and for the record - it was done by hard core conservatives so nobody can claim liberal bias on it).

That being said - I found the ending very disturbing. They harped on the dangers of (and I quote) "being hacked by a foreign nation". Yeah....uh....who gives a shit about the DNC? Foreign nations have hacked the DoD on multiple occasions. Now that is a grave concern. The fact that the DNC was hacked is something to celebrate. Any time lies by people in government can be exposed and the truth delivered to the people - it is a good thing. It is a great thing. Shame on any liberal denouncing the WikiLeaks release. The left should be more outraged than anybody over the DNC silencing their voice.

We're never going to clean this mess up until the right holds Donald Trump accountable (demand that he release his taxes) and the left hold Hitlery Clinton and the DNC accountable for voter fraud and making the will of the people irrelevant.

Voter fraud?

You are a huge clown. You are unable to discuss Trump without bashing Clinton.

Shocking, uh? You can't imagine someone not being a blind, partisan, ignorant lap dog such as yourself. How sad. Speaks volumes about your character and intellect (and since you're not too bright, I'll throw you a bone here: what it says is not good).

Are you trying to tell me that you are not a blind partisan lap dog?

I love the disconnect.

Clearly not as I'm voluntarily presenting evidence that I saw in a report that links Donald Trump's finances to Russia. That doesn't sound like a "blind, partisan, lap dog" to me. And it wouldn't to anyone else with an ounce of reason. Only an idiot would think so.

When is that last time you posted anything of substance that shed the left in a poor light? Game over.

I saw a report that Obama was born in Kenya.

 

[easyt65]

Trump e-mailed them to Hillary hut she accidently deleted / destroyed them.

Instead of demanding things NOT required by the law to be released, why not demand Obama turn over all the court-ordeted documents regarding the whereabouts of illegals he refuses to release? Obama is breaking the law - Trump isn't.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Shocking, uh? You can't imagine someone not being a blind, partisan, ignorant lap dog such as yourself. How sad. Speaks volumes about your character and intellect (and since you're not too bright, I'll throw you a bone here: what it says is not good).

Are you trying to tell me that you are not a blind partisan lap dog?

I love the disconnect.

Clearly not as I'm voluntarily presenting evidence that I saw in a report that links Donald Trump's finances to Russia. That doesn't sound like a "blind, partisan, lap dog" to me. And it wouldn't to anyone else with an ounce of reason. Only an idiot would think so.

When is that last time you posted anything of substance that shed the left in a poor light? Game over.

Silly nutter. You don't pay attention.

You don't pay anything.

Is that right? Tell me more.

Well you have to have a job first.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Just watch a very good broadcast in which all of the dots were connected. In the end - they presented a very compelling case that the Russian oligarchs (Putin and his cronies) have significant investments with Trump and thus why he is refusing to release his taxes. It was very convincing (and for the record - it was done by hard core conservatives so nobody can claim liberal bias on it).

That being said - I found the ending very disturbing. They harped on the dangers of (and I quote) "being hacked by a foreign nation". Yeah....uh....who gives a shit about the DNC? Foreign nations have hacked the DoD on multiple occasions. Now that is a grave concern. The fact that the DNC was hacked is something to celebrate. Any time lies by people in government can be exposed and the truth delivered to the people - it is a good thing. It is a great thing. Shame on any liberal denouncing the WikiLeaks release. The left should be more outraged than anybody over the DNC silencing their voice.

We're never going to clean this mess up until the right holds Donald Trump accountable (demand that he release his taxes) and the left hold Hitlery Clinton and the DNC accountable for voter fraud and making the will of the people irrelevant.

Voter fraud?

You are a huge clown. You are unable to discuss Trump without bashing Clinton.

Shocking, uh? You can't imagine someone not being a blind, partisan, ignorant lap dog such as yourself. How sad. Speaks volumes about your character and intellect (and since you're not too bright, I'll throw you a bone here: what it says is not good).

Are you trying to tell me that you are not a blind partisan lap dog?

I love the disconnect.

Clearly not as I'm voluntarily presenting evidence that I saw in a report that links Donald Trump's finances to Russia. That doesn't sound like a "blind, partisan, lap dog" to me. And it wouldn't to anyone else with an ounce of reason. Only an idiot would think so.

When is that last time you posted anything of substance that shed the left in a poor light? Game over.

Never, partisan nutters never do.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Who are you? Are you someone?

 

[LoneLaugher]

Are you trying to tell me that you are not a blind partisan lap dog?

I love the disconnect.

Clearly not as I'm voluntarily presenting evidence that I saw in a report that links Donald Trump's finances to Russia. That doesn't sound like a "blind, partisan, lap dog" to me. And it wouldn't to anyone else with an ounce of reason. Only an idiot would think so.

When is that last time you posted anything of substance that shed the left in a poor light? Game over.

Silly nutter. You don't pay attention.

You don't pay anything.

Is that right? Tell me more.

Well you have to have a job first.

That's a cool story.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Voter fraud?

You are a huge clown. You are unable to discuss Trump without bashing Clinton.

Shocking, uh? You can't imagine someone not being a blind, partisan, ignorant lap dog such as yourself. How sad. Speaks volumes about your character and intellect (and since you're not too bright, I'll throw you a bone here: what it says is not good).

Are you trying to tell me that you are not a blind partisan lap dog?

I love the disconnect.

Clearly not as I'm voluntarily presenting evidence that I saw in a report that links Donald Trump's finances to Russia. That doesn't sound like a "blind, partisan, lap dog" to me. And it wouldn't to anyone else with an ounce of reason. Only an idiot would think so.

When is that last time you posted anything of substance that shed the left in a poor light? Game over.

Silly nutter. You don't pay attention.

If you weren't a partisan asshole, you'd not have mentioned Clinton in this thread.

Silly ignorant asshole - why not? Oh wait....that's right....because as a blind, partisan, lap dog who can't handle having the truth about Hitlery Clinton or Dumbocrats discussed.

Nope. If you were not a partisan loser, you'd be OK with simply discussing Trump. The fact that you had to wedge in that BS about Clinton and voter fraud....is evidence that you cannot be normal.

You know it. Why argue?

 

[buckeye45_73]

Clearly not as I'm voluntarily presenting evidence that I saw in a report that links Donald Trump's finances to Russia. That doesn't sound like a "blind, partisan, lap dog" to me. And it wouldn't to anyone else with an ounce of reason. Only an idiot would think so.

When is that last time you posted anything of substance that shed the left in a poor light? Game over.

Silly nutter. You don't pay attention.

You don't pay anything.

Is that right? Tell me more.

Well you have to have a job first.

That's a cool story.

I know...the truth shall set you free.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Silly nutter. You don't pay attention.

You don't pay anything.

Is that right? Tell me more.

Well you have to have a job first.

That's a cool story.

I know...the truth shall set you free.

Serious question. Why do so many of you losers keep hold of that lame line? It should be clear to you by now that unemployed USMB members are mostly nutbag cons.

 

[Papageorgio]

Voter fraud?

You are a huge clown. You are unable to discuss Trump without bashing Clinton.

Shocking, uh? You can't imagine someone not being a blind, partisan, ignorant lap dog such as yourself. How sad. Speaks volumes about your character and intellect (and since you're not too bright, I'll throw you a bone here: what it says is not good).

Are you trying to tell me that you are not a blind partisan lap dog?

I love the disconnect.

Clearly not as I'm voluntarily presenting evidence that I saw in a report that links Donald Trump's finances to Russia. That doesn't sound like a "blind, partisan, lap dog" to me. And it wouldn't to anyone else with an ounce of reason. Only an idiot would think so.

When is that last time you posted anything of substance that shed the left in a poor light? Game over.

Never, partisan nutters never do.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Who are you? Are you someone?

I'm just one person, not that much different than you, who is just one person.

They are right you are pretty dumb. In fact I think they over estimated you.

 

[P@triot]

Nope. If you were not a partisan loser, you'd be OK with simply discussing Trump. The fact that you had to wedge in that BS about Clinton and voter fraud....is evidence that you cannot be normal.

Like I said - you simply can't handle having the truth about how corrupt the Dumbocrats and Hitlery Clinton are, how they engage in voter fraud (even against you, stupid - they make you an irrelevant slave whose voice doesn't matter), and how their entire platform is nothing but a big lie to keep them in power.

But...like I said...I'm not surprised that you are shocked by someone who is not a blind, obedient lap dog to a party. If one lived their entire life like that, someone like me would be a bit "shocking". We all know who and what you are so nobody is expecting more out of you LoneLaugher. That's the upside to setting the bar low as you have!

 

[P@triot]

You don't pay anything.

Is that right? Tell me more.

Well you have to have a job first.

That's a cool story.

I know...the truth shall set you free.

Serious question. Why do so many of you losers keep hold of that lame line? It should be clear to you by now that unemployed USMB members are mostly nutbag cons.

Because we can't help but laugh at people like you who are willfully ignorant because you prefer the political comfort food of ideology over reality.

I mean - just look at the past few posts by you on this very thread. You have completely lost your shit because I had the audacity to point out the truth about both candidates instead of just bashing Donald Trump while protecting Hitlery Clinton at all costs (as you do).

 

[HenryBHough]

You know I have the highest respect for you HBH. But the fact is - that's an absurd comment saying as nobody here is running for public office (not even mayor of a podunk town - much less president of the United States). That's just nonsensical.

Shame, hypocrite!

You show us yours then you can expect anyone else to show you theirs.

Do you really believe you have some sort of "special" right to privacy beyond that of others?

 

[P@triot]

You know I have the highest respect for you HBH. But the fact is - that's an absurd comment saying as nobody here is running for public office (not even mayor of a podunk town - much less president of the United States). That's just nonsensical.

Shame, hypocrite!

You show us yours then you can expect anyone else to show you theirs.

Do you really believe you have some sort of "special" right to privacy beyond that of others?

Um....yeah. When someone runs for public office they voluntarily surrender their "right to privacy". You can differentiate between the terms public and private I assume?

 

[yiostheoy]

This election, every presidential candidate has made at least some tax information public—except for Donald Trump.

More at MSN.com

Obviously the small fraction of a person who won the GOP nomination last evening is hiding something. One would figure that the normally boisterous bloward would be happy to show off his riches....unless they are not as impressive as he has been saying.

National Review said the following which may be the way a lot of delegates feel:

A political party that didn’t demand the public release of Donald Trump’s tax returns could be committing electoral suicide. In his 40-year business career, he has assembled an empire of great complexity along with a serial record of credibility problems. In other words, he often “makes stuff up.” This is a man who said, under oath, in a 2008 libel suit he later lost: “My net worth fluctuates, and it goes up and down with the markets and with attitudes and with feelings, even my own feelings.”

Clearly Drumpf is engaged in hiding something from his supporters. The question is whether or not the supporters care or not.

It is actually a very stupid idea to ever reveal your tax return(s).

I don't know who first thought of this foolishness.

Revealing it allows the IRS and State to examine it and then slap you with an audit.

There is nothing on Earth worse financially than an IRS or State audit of your taxes.

They will always find more taxes. Always.

They even disallow routine deductions and credits knowing that it is too expensive for you to fight it.

Most people have no idea of this until they are finally audited.

So the primary goal is NOT EVER to be audited.

And if you are already being audited then there is even more reason NOT to publish your return. Some genius in the Ethernet can find something and make a big deal out of it and then the IRS or State will assess you more tax as a result.

 

[P@triot]

It is actually a very stupid idea to ever reveal your tax return(s). I don't know who first thought of this foolishness. Revealing it allows the IRS and State to examine it and then slap you with an audit. There is nothing on Earth worse financially than an IRS or State audit of your taxes. They will always find more taxes. Always. They even disallow routine deductions and credits knowing that it is too expensive for you to fight it. Most people have no idea of this until they are finally audited. So the primary goal is NOT EVER to be audited. And if you are already being audited then there is even more reason NOT to publish your return. Some genius in the Ethernet can find something and make a big deal out of it and then the IRS or State will assess you more tax as a result.

Sorry...but I'm not buying any of that. If you do your taxes by the book - there would be nothing to worry about. It's the people who take 10,000 deductions for things they have no business taking deductions for that think like this. I'd gladly show my taxes to the world if I were running for public office. Other than my home and my children, I've never taken a deduction.