So when Jesus wreaked havoc on the money changers in the Temple,
where does that act of lawlessness and destruction fall on the okay not okay scale?
If some people came into your house and set up different businesses, wouldn't you bodily throw them out? What if they came into your father's house?
If one is forced to accept a rather absurd premise that Jesus was in fact the divinely sired son of a supernatural being whose existence, not to mention ownership of all places of worship,
is an indisputable fact, i.e., proven beyond all reasonable doubt, then yeah,
I suppose you have a point.
I doubt however that anyone nowadays who vandalized a church would get very far with the claim that he was the divine Jesus, or the equivalent.
So, given that, would you like to try another answer?
Yeshua was and is "devine". It was His Father's house.
He did not vandalize the house. He vandalized the vandals.