What makes Hillary Clinton a good candidate for President?

It was the election of Obama that created the Tea Party

Suddenly, debt mattered

The (T)axed (E)nough (A)lready movement ... let's see they're for the Bill of Rights/Constitutional government, worried about the size and influence of government, the national debt and unfunded federal liabilities..I guess we can now we can add fortunetellers to their gifts along with patriotism..

Bullshit.

They are rebranded John Birchers spouting the same rhetoric that was ridiculed a generation ago

Unfunded liabilities because of your fucking wars??? Unfunded liabilities because you dont' want us to fix health care?

Going after things that don't add any debt is just dumb.
 
Hillaryw ill never get the nomination. She's yesterday's story.
Yeah, 2001-2008. A period of rising GDP, very low unemployment, very low inflation, when we confronted global terrorism and its state sponsors and made the world a safer place. Who would want more of that??
The Obama years: low GDP, high unemployment, declining household wealth, devalued currency, downgraded government debt, and rising danger across the globe. Who wouldn't want that??

Who wouldn't want...

The worst terrorist attack in history
Two wars
The US openly engaged in torture
Paying for wars with tax cuts
A collapsed economy
Losing 700,000 jobs a month
5 quarters of NEGATIVE GDP
A stock market that dropped from 14000 to 7000
A near Depression

Sure.... Let's give the Republicans another shot

Gee I had no idea those things happened over 8 years. In fact you are lying on every single item, in whole or part.
Ask anyone if they'd rather have Bush's average unemployment rate and workforce participation rate or Obama's. Ask anyone if they'd rather have Bush's debt or Obama's. The country was better off at the worst of Bush's presidency than at the best of Obama's.

We were better off on 9-11?
We were better off with a stock market crash
We were better off starting wars that didn't need to be fought?
We were better off losing 700,000 jobs each month?

You are a fool
 
Who wouldn't want...

The worst terrorist attack in history
Two wars
The US openly engaged in torture
Paying for wars with tax cuts
A collapsed economy
Losing 700,000 jobs a month
5 quarters of NEGATIVE GDP
A stock market that dropped from 14000 to 7000
A near Depression

Sure.... Let's give the Republicans another shot

Gee I had no idea those things happened over 8 years. In fact you are lying on every single item, in whole or part.
Ask anyone if they'd rather have Bush's average unemployment rate and workforce participation rate or Obama's. Ask anyone if they'd rather have Bush's debt or Obama's. The country was better off at the worst of Bush's presidency than at the best of Obama's.

We were better off on 9-11?
We were better off with a stock market crash
We were better off starting wars that didn't need to be fought?
We were better off losing 700,000 jobs each month?

You are a fool

We should of droned Bin laden way before 9-11. Of course the tea baggers don't like drones as they're mentally fucked up wanting it both ways. Hell, no we weren't better off after 9-11.
Nooo, bush allowed deregulation that lead to it.
Iraq you do have a point. ;) The people that attacked us after 9-11 needed a ass kicking.
Nope, too bad that we have a party that hates investment!
 
Who wouldn't want...

The worst terrorist attack in history
Two wars
The US openly engaged in torture
Paying for wars with tax cuts
A collapsed economy
Losing 700,000 jobs a month
5 quarters of NEGATIVE GDP
A stock market that dropped from 14000 to 7000
A near Depression

Sure.... Let's give the Republicans another shot

Gee I had no idea those things happened over 8 years. In fact you are lying on every single item, in whole or part.
Ask anyone if they'd rather have Bush's average unemployment rate and workforce participation rate or Obama's. Ask anyone if they'd rather have Bush's debt or Obama's. The country was better off at the worst of Bush's presidency than at the best of Obama's.

We were better off on 9-11?
We were better off with a stock market crash
We were better off starting wars that didn't need to be fought?
We were better off losing 700,000 jobs each month?

You are a fool



And you are a fool for not understanding that, regardless of the circumstances, your boy has done NOTHING about it. ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.

5 years of treading water. He was elected to "do something about it". What a Bull Shit artist your boy is.
 
Gee I had no idea those things happened over 8 years. In fact you are lying on every single item, in whole or part.
Ask anyone if they'd rather have Bush's average unemployment rate and workforce participation rate or Obama's. Ask anyone if they'd rather have Bush's debt or Obama's. The country was better off at the worst of Bush's presidency than at the best of Obama's.

We were better off on 9-11?
We were better off with a stock market crash
We were better off starting wars that didn't need to be fought?
We were better off losing 700,000 jobs each month?

You are a fool



And you are a fool for not understanding that, regardless of the circumstances, your boy has done NOTHING about it. ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.

5 years of treading water. He was elected to "do something about it". What a Bull Shit artist your boy is.

What do you want him to do? You're against him doing anything.
 
We were better off on 9-11?
We were better off with a stock market crash
We were better off starting wars that didn't need to be fought?
We were better off losing 700,000 jobs each month?

You are a fool



And you are a fool for not understanding that, regardless of the circumstances, your boy has done NOTHING about it. ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.

5 years of treading water. He was elected to "do something about it". What a Bull Shit artist your boy is.

What do you want him to do? You're against him doing anything.


You're kidding, right?? This fool has surrounded himself with every "academic marxist" that he can and they have been "advising" him to take America away from a capitalist society to a more marxist system since the day he strode (like Caesar) into the White House.

EVERY THING he has done from day one, has been to cripple business. EVERY SINGLE THING.

A PRESIDENT in these United States, works with BUSINESS and provides incentives for BUSINESS to expand - to hire and to actually maintain the ECONOMY. We have 58 MILLION people sitting on their asses. When was the last time that this president even TRIED to work with American BUSINESS!?!? Oh, that's right - when he stole 500 MILLION from the taxpayer and GAVE it to his friends at Solyndra. That was it.

Think about it youngster. IF A NATION ISN'T WORKING - IT WILL FALL. IT HAS NO FUTURE.
 
Gee I had no idea those things happened over 8 years. In fact you are lying on every single item, in whole or part.
Ask anyone if they'd rather have Bush's average unemployment rate and workforce participation rate or Obama's. Ask anyone if they'd rather have Bush's debt or Obama's. The country was better off at the worst of Bush's presidency than at the best of Obama's.

We were better off on 9-11?
We were better off with a stock market crash
We were better off starting wars that didn't need to be fought?
We were better off losing 700,000 jobs each month?

You are a fool

We should of droned Bin laden way before 9-11. Of course the tea baggers don't like drones as they're mentally fucked up wanting it both ways. Hell, no we weren't better off after 9-11.
Nooo, bush allowed deregulation that lead to it.
Iraq you do have a point. ;) The people that attacked us after 9-11 needed a ass kicking.
Nope, too bad that we have a party that hates investment!

What deregulation did Bush do? Yeah, none. That's been debunked so many times only a moron would say that. Of course look who we've got here, the original Johnny One Note.
 
She's not a 'tard.

She's not actively malicious towards democracy and the Constitution.

She's not a Christian-taliban member.

Hence, she's head and shoulders above the Republican candidates.

Yes, the bar has been set that low. Thanks, Republicans. Sure, I'd prefer it if some perfect liberal candidate could win, but the perfect is the enemy of the good. An imperfect candidate who wins beats a perfect loser.
 
Last edited:
Who wouldn't want...

The worst terrorist attack in history
Two wars
The US openly engaged in torture
Paying for wars with tax cuts
A collapsed economy
Losing 700,000 jobs a month
5 quarters of NEGATIVE GDP
A stock market that dropped from 14000 to 7000
A near Depression

Sure.... Let's give the Republicans another shot

Gee I had no idea those things happened over 8 years. In fact you are lying on every single item, in whole or part.
Ask anyone if they'd rather have Bush's average unemployment rate and workforce participation rate or Obama's. Ask anyone if they'd rather have Bush's debt or Obama's. The country was better off at the worst of Bush's presidency than at the best of Obama's.

We were better off on 9-11?
We were better off with a stock market crash
We were better off starting wars that didn't need to be fought?
We were better off losing 700,000 jobs each month?

You are a fool

Were we better off after 9/11? Yes. How many terrorist attacks occurred that Clinton did absolutely nothing about?
Were we better off after the market declined? Yes, stocks were cheap. Anyone who bought then made lots of money afterwards.
There were no wars that didnt need to be fought. Even Democrats agreed they needed to be, and Democrats continued to fund those wars, even after they could have cut off funding.
We've lost many more jobs since Obama took office. How many people have left the labor force entirely?
 
Gee I had no idea those things happened over 8 years. In fact you are lying on every single item, in whole or part.
Ask anyone if they'd rather have Bush's average unemployment rate and workforce participation rate or Obama's. Ask anyone if they'd rather have Bush's debt or Obama's. The country was better off at the worst of Bush's presidency than at the best of Obama's.

We were better off on 9-11?
We were better off with a stock market crash
We were better off starting wars that didn't need to be fought?
We were better off losing 700,000 jobs each month?

You are a fool

Were we better off after 9/11? Yes. How many terrorist attacks occurred that Clinton did absolutely nothing about?
Were we better off after the market declined? Yes, stocks were cheap. Anyone who bought then made lots of money afterwards.
There were no wars that didnt need to be fought. Even Democrats agreed they needed to be, and Democrats continued to fund those wars, even after they could have cut off funding.
We've lost many more jobs since Obama took office. How many people have left the labor force entirely?

Save us the Clinton deflections....nobody s buying it

America knows the horrors that Bush and Cheney wrought. So much so that it may be a generation before another Republucan is given a chance
 
Last edited:
We were better off on 9-11?
We were better off with a stock market crash
We were better off starting wars that didn't need to be fought?
We were better off losing 700,000 jobs each month?

You are a fool

Were we better off after 9/11? Yes. How many terrorist attacks occurred that Clinton did absolutely nothing about?
Were we better off after the market declined? Yes, stocks were cheap. Anyone who bought then made lots of money afterwards.
There were no wars that didnt need to be fought. Even Democrats agreed they needed to be, and Democrats continued to fund those wars, even after they could have cut off funding.
We've lost many more jobs since Obama took office. How many people have left the labor force entirely?

Save us the Clinton deflections....nobody s buying it

America knows the horrors that Bush and Chenet wrought. So much so that it may be a generation before another Republucan is given a chance
The only one not buying it is you. Because you are a mindless dem-drone. Truth will never penetrate that thick skull of yours, which is capable only of the most absurd spin to defend the indefensible.
I think Bush's current rating is higher than Obama's, so your statements about "America knows" are as wrong as anything else you post.
Simp.
 
What makes Hillary Clinton a good candidate for President?

She'll be at least way better than anyone the republicans can throw at her. Last time it was a guy in magic underwear. What'll it be this time? A guy with a tinfoil hat?

:thanks:
 
What makes Hillary Clinton a good candidate for President?

She'll be at least way better than anyone the republicans can throw at her. Last time it was a guy in magic underwear. What'll it be this time? A guy with a tinfoil hat?

:thanks:

Another newly minted dunce, I see. The GOP has a stellar lineup. Mainly because anyone would be better than the community-organizer chimp currently in office, or the old hag liar who plans on running.
 
What makes Hillary Clinton a good candidate for President?

She'll be at least way better than anyone the republicans can throw at her. Last time it was a guy in magic underwear. What'll it be this time? A guy with a tinfoil hat?

:thanks:

Cruz?
 
Were we better off after 9/11? Yes. How many terrorist attacks occurred that Clinton did absolutely nothing about?
Were we better off after the market declined? Yes, stocks were cheap. Anyone who bought then made lots of money afterwards.
There were no wars that didnt need to be fought. Even Democrats agreed they needed to be, and Democrats continued to fund those wars, even after they could have cut off funding.
We've lost many more jobs since Obama took office. How many people have left the labor force entirely?

Save us the Clinton deflections....nobody s buying it

America knows the horrors that Bush and Chenet wrought. So much so that it may be a generation before another Republucan is given a chance
The only one not buying it is you. Because you are a mindless dem-drone. Truth will never penetrate that thick skull of yours, which is capable only of the most absurd spin to defend the indefensible.
I think Bush's current rating is higher than Obama's, so your statements about "America knows" are as wrong as anything else you post.
Simp.

Among historians, Bush is considered fifth worst of all time and the worst in a hundred years

He earned it
 

Forum List

Back
Top