“What Percentage Of Murders Are Committed With An AR-15?”

[danielpalos]

There are no implied terms in our Second Amendment.

So, quit implying terms, dan.

Because X, we shall not do Y.

Not, unless X, shall do Y

English is not your first language, so why don't you leave it it us.

Our Second Amendment is about what is necessary to the security of a free State.

If that was all, it would not exist in tha Bill of Rights.

States' sovereign rights, matter.

 

[Pop23]

There are no implied terms in our Second Amendment.

So, quit implying terms, dan.

Because X, we shall not do Y.

Not, unless X, shall do Y

English is not your first language, so why don't you leave it it us.

Our Second Amendment is about what is necessary to the security of a free State.

If that was all, it would not exist in tha Bill of Rights.

States' sovereign rights, matter.

And...........................................

 

[danielpalos]

There are no implied terms in our Second Amendment.

So, quit implying terms, dan.

Because X, we shall not do Y.

Not, unless X, shall do Y

English is not your first language, so why don't you leave it it us.

Our Second Amendment is about what is necessary to the security of a free State.

If that was all, it would not exist in tha Bill of Rights.

States' sovereign rights, matter.

And...........................................

A bill of rights, is a bill of rights. States rights' are clearly covered.

 

[Pop23]

So, quit implying terms, dan.

Because X, we shall not do Y.

Not, unless X, shall do Y

English is not your first language, so why don't you leave it it us.

Our Second Amendment is about what is necessary to the security of a free State.

If that was all, it would not exist in tha Bill of Rights.

States' sovereign rights, matter.

And...........................................

A bill of rights, is a bill of rights. States rights' are clearly covered.

That's simply a deflection. The Bill of rights clearly is a warning to Governments that the those institutions may not take certain rights form it's citizens and awards protection from the same.

Sorry Kid, your loses are mounting, but there is always hope. Even for you! How's Havana BTW?

 

[jbander]

You just have to roll on the floor ,after these flag waving constitutional heros elected and excepted a dictator. What a comedy act and there can't be anything more hypocritical then that.

 

[danielpalos]

Our Second Amendment is about what is necessary to the security of a free State.

If that was all, it would not exist in tha Bill of Rights.

States' sovereign rights, matter.

And...........................................

A bill of rights, is a bill of rights. States rights' are clearly covered.

That's simply a deflection. The Bill of rights clearly is a warning to Governments that the those institutions may not take certain rights form it's citizens and awards protection from the same.

Sorry Kid, your loses are mounting, but there is always hope. Even for you! How's Havana BTW?

that is Your story, bro. our Constitution is Express, not Implied.

 

[Pop23]

If that was all, it would not exist in tha Bill of Rights.

States' sovereign rights, matter.

And...........................................

A bill of rights, is a bill of rights. States rights' are clearly covered.

That's simply a deflection. The Bill of rights clearly is a warning to Governments that the those institutions may not take certain rights form it's citizens and awards protection from the same.

Sorry Kid, your loses are mounting, but there is always hope. Even for you! How's Havana BTW?

that is Your story, bro. our Constitution is Express, not Implied.

And it is done in a way so that the protection of the Individuals rights are given more importance than the rights of the State or Federal Government. If you were ANYWHERE as knowledgeable as you claim to be, you would understand this. But you don't, so you will continue to be treated as a fool. AND THAT'S SO EASY TO DO!

 

[danielpalos]

States' sovereign rights, matter.

And...........................................

A bill of rights, is a bill of rights. States rights' are clearly covered.

That's simply a deflection. The Bill of rights clearly is a warning to Governments that the those institutions may not take certain rights form it's citizens and awards protection from the same.

Sorry Kid, your loses are mounting, but there is always hope. Even for you! How's Havana BTW?

that is Your story, bro. our Constitution is Express, not Implied.

And it is done in a way so that the protection of the Individuals rights are given more importance than the rights of the State or Federal Government. If you were ANYWHERE as knowledgeable as you claim to be, you would understand this. But you don't, so you will continue to be treated as a fool. AND THAT'S SO EASY TO DO!

No, it isn't. We have a First Amendment.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

that is Your story, bro. our Constitution is Express, not Implied.

...says the non-English speaking guy implying the fuck out of it.

 

[hadit]

dude; you have nothing but a fallacy of false Cause, by confusing natural rights with express, civil rights.

nobody takes the right wing seriously about the law, Constitutional or otherwise.

What?

Can ANYONE explain what this tool is talking about?

Where am I trying to establish a false causal connection?

Don't just drop that bomb and run away. Explain it.

there are no individual rights in our Second Amendment. every dictionary proves my point.

We've dealt with this before. Your position leaves you as an individual unprotected by the 1st Amendment.

Specifically and expressly declared civil rights, cover individuals; but are not, individual rights nor arise from the concept of natural rights.

Meaningless.

 

[danielpalos]

dude; you have nothing but a fallacy of false Cause, by confusing natural rights with express, civil rights.

nobody takes the right wing seriously about the law, Constitutional or otherwise.

What?

Can ANYONE explain what this tool is talking about?

Where am I trying to establish a false causal connection?

Don't just drop that bomb and run away. Explain it.

there are no individual rights in our Second Amendment. every dictionary proves my point.

We've dealt with this before. Your position leaves you as an individual unprotected by the 1st Amendment.

Specifically and expressly declared civil rights, cover individuals; but are not, individual rights nor arise from the concept of natural rights.

Meaningless.

What happened to Dred Scott and the lgbt community?

 

[hadit]

What?

Can ANYONE explain what this tool is talking about?

Where am I trying to establish a false causal connection?

Don't just drop that bomb and run away. Explain it.

there are no individual rights in our Second Amendment. every dictionary proves my point.

We've dealt with this before. Your position leaves you as an individual unprotected by the 1st Amendment.

Specifically and expressly declared civil rights, cover individuals; but are not, individual rights nor arise from the concept of natural rights.

Meaningless.

What happened to Dred Scott and the lgbt community?

You know, you might be considered a little more intellectually sound of you restrained yourself from making nonsensical random statements like that.

 

[danielpalos]

there are no individual rights in our Second Amendment. every dictionary proves my point.

We've dealt with this before. Your position leaves you as an individual unprotected by the 1st Amendment.

Specifically and expressly declared civil rights, cover individuals; but are not, individual rights nor arise from the concept of natural rights.

Meaningless.

What happened to Dred Scott and the lgbt community?

You know, you might be considered a little more intellectually sound of you restrained yourself from making nonsensical random statements like that.

What happened to the lgbt community?

 

[Pop23]

We've dealt with this before. Your position leaves you as an individual unprotected by the 1st Amendment.

Specifically and expressly declared civil rights, cover individuals; but are not, individual rights nor arise from the concept of natural rights.

Meaningless.

What happened to Dred Scott and the lgbt community?

You know, you might be considered a little more intellectually sound of you restrained yourself from making nonsensical random statements like that.

What happened to the lgbt community?

What does that have to do with the OP?

 

[danielpalos]

Specifically and expressly declared civil rights, cover individuals; but are not, individual rights nor arise from the concept of natural rights.

Meaningless.

What happened to Dred Scott and the lgbt community?

You know, you might be considered a little more intellectually sound of you restrained yourself from making nonsensical random statements like that.

What happened to the lgbt community?

What does that have to do with the OP?

right wing inconsistency regarding natural rights.

 

[Pop23]

Meaningless.

What happened to Dred Scott and the lgbt community?

You know, you might be considered a little more intellectually sound of you restrained yourself from making nonsensical random statements like that.

What happened to the lgbt community?

What does that have to do with the OP?

right wing inconsistency regarding natural rights.

Go for it, make your argument, but we all see you are trying to hijack the thread because of the embarrassing loses that you have encountered since your first post in this thread.

 

[danielpalos]

What happened to Dred Scott and the lgbt community?

You know, you might be considered a little more intellectually sound of you restrained yourself from making nonsensical random statements like that.

What happened to the lgbt community?

What does that have to do with the OP?

right wing inconsistency regarding natural rights.

Go for it, make your argument, but we all see you are trying to hijack the thread because of the embarrassing loses that you have encountered since your first post in this thread.

all i did was ask questions regarding casualties per incident, with AR type weapons.

 

[Pop23]

You know, you might be considered a little more intellectually sound of you restrained yourself from making nonsensical random statements like that.

What happened to the lgbt community?

What does that have to do with the OP?

right wing inconsistency regarding natural rights.

Go for it, make your argument, but we all see you are trying to hijack the thread because of the embarrassing loses that you have encountered since your first post in this thread.

all i did was ask questions regarding casualties per incident, with AR type weapons.

And the answer was supplied. And yet you continue to whine.

 

[danielpalos]

What happened to the lgbt community?

What does that have to do with the OP?

right wing inconsistency regarding natural rights.

Go for it, make your argument, but we all see you are trying to hijack the thread because of the embarrassing loses that you have encountered since your first post in this thread.

all i did was ask questions regarding casualties per incident, with AR type weapons.

And the answer was supplied. And yet you continue to whine.

Muster the militia, is not "whining".

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Muster the militia, is not "whining".

Which militia?

The organized or the unorganized?

Or the third group you made up, call the "well-regulated" militia, which does not mean organized or unorganized?