“What Percentage Of Murders Are Committed With An AR-15?”

we have a First Amendment.

Which is why even the dull and ignorant, they too have a story that we must listen too...


... snoe.

Our Second Amendment is about the security of a free State.

Yes, although that's not what the left believe.

imrs.php
yes, it is. that isn't what the right wing believes.

Scalia was on the right... and yet some leftists want to define him... in and on their terms.

Foolish, that.
 
Constitutional version:
""A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, shall not be infringed."

your version:
" I only claim, well regulated militia may not be infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union. "

Major differences
nope; no difference.

Only well regulated militia of the whole People may not be Infringed in the keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union. Has nothing to do with natural rights.

Only well regulated militia of the whole People may not be Infringed

English your second language?

" the right of the people to keep and bear Arms"

the right of the PEOPLE, not the Militia shall not be infringed.
 
Constitutional version:
""A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, shall not be infringed."

your version:
" I only claim, well regulated militia may not be infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union. "

Major differences
nope; no difference.

Only well regulated militia of the whole People may not be Infringed in the keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union. Has nothing to do with natural rights.

Only well regulated militia of the whole People may not be Infringed

English your second language?

" the right of the people to keep and bear Arms"

the right of the PEOPLE, not the Militia shall not be infringed.
Dan is a fucking troll.
 
Gunman's attempted robbery on families waiting outside a school in Sao Paulo foiled by mother - Gun control works again - Criminal achieves room temperature.

4C314FD000000578-5724427-The_mother_of_two_who_has_served_as_a_policewoman_for_20_years_s-a-12_1526282310012.jpg


Attempted robbery on families at Sao Paulo school foiled

Another happy ending.

:cool:
Chaos over Order?

That fellow should have had recourse to unemployment compensation simply for being unemployed. No excuse to rob, then.

IOW, you want us to believe welfare prevents crime? Tell us, where is crime more prevalent, among welfare recipients or the working?
 
Constitutional version:
""A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, shall not be infringed."

your version:
" I only claim, well regulated militia may not be infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union. "

Major differences
nope; no difference.

Only well regulated militia of the whole People may not be Infringed in the keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union. Has nothing to do with natural rights.

Only well regulated militia of the whole People may not be Infringed

English your second language?

" the right of the people to keep and bear Arms"

the right of the PEOPLE, not the Militia shall not be infringed.
are you incompetent in the English language? The People are the Militia. Only the right wing, is "too dumb", to get it.
 
Gunman's attempted robbery on families waiting outside a school in Sao Paulo foiled by mother - Gun control works again - Criminal achieves room temperature.

4C314FD000000578-5724427-The_mother_of_two_who_has_served_as_a_policewoman_for_20_years_s-a-12_1526282310012.jpg


Attempted robbery on families at Sao Paulo school foiled

Another happy ending.

:cool:
Chaos over Order?

That fellow should have had recourse to unemployment compensation simply for being unemployed. No excuse to rob, then.

IOW, you want us to believe welfare prevents crime? Tell us, where is crime more prevalent, among welfare recipients or the working?
Where there is no welfare.
 
Constitutional version:
""A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, shall not be infringed."

your version:
" I only claim, well regulated militia may not be infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union. "

Major differences
nope; no difference.

Only well regulated militia of the whole People may not be Infringed in the keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union. Has nothing to do with natural rights.

Only well regulated militia of the whole People may not be Infringed

English your second language?

" the right of the people to keep and bear Arms"

the right of the PEOPLE, not the Militia shall not be infringed.
are you incompetent in the English language? The People are the Militia. Only the right wing, is "too dumb", to get it.

The People are the Militia.

only able bodied men between the ages 16-46.

There's a lot more people in the country outside those limits allowed to own firearms


Only the right wing, is "too dumb", to get it.

seems they "get it" more than you do.

you don't even know what comprised the militia, and cant read plain English
 
Constitutional version:
""A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, shall not be infringed."

your version:
" I only claim, well regulated militia may not be infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union. "

Major differences
nope; no difference.

Only well regulated militia of the whole People may not be Infringed in the keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union. Has nothing to do with natural rights.

Only well regulated militia of the whole People may not be Infringed

English your second language?

" the right of the people to keep and bear Arms"

the right of the PEOPLE, not the Militia shall not be infringed.
are you incompetent in the English language? The People are the Militia. Only the right wing, is "too dumb", to get it.

The People are the Militia.

only able bodied men between the ages 16-46.

There's a lot more people in the country outside those limits allowed to own firearms


Only the right wing, is "too dumb", to get it.

seems they "get it" more than you do.

you don't even know what comprised the militia, and cant read plain English
Our Second Amendment is about who may not be Infringed, when the security of our free States is at stake.
 
Constitutional version:
""A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, shall not be infringed."

your version:
" I only claim, well regulated militia may not be infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union. "

Major differences
nope; no difference.

Only well regulated militia of the whole People may not be Infringed in the keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union. Has nothing to do with natural rights.

Only well regulated militia of the whole People may not be Infringed

English your second language?

" the right of the people to keep and bear Arms"

the right of the PEOPLE, not the Militia shall not be infringed.
are you incompetent in the English language? The People are the Militia. Only the right wing, is "too dumb", to get it.

The People are the Militia.

only able bodied men between the ages 16-46.

There's a lot more people in the country outside those limits allowed to own firearms


Only the right wing, is "too dumb", to get it.

seems they "get it" more than you do.

you don't even know what comprised the militia, and cant read plain English
Our Second Amendment is about who may not be Infringed, when the security of our free States is at stake.

Our Second Amendment is about who may not be Infringed,

I agree, and the Second says the right of THE PEOPLE shall not be infringed, not the militia.

and, as I just noted, there were restrictions on who could belong to the militia
 
nope; no difference.

Only well regulated militia of the whole People may not be Infringed in the keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union. Has nothing to do with natural rights.

Only well regulated militia of the whole People may not be Infringed

English your second language?

" the right of the people to keep and bear Arms"

the right of the PEOPLE, not the Militia shall not be infringed.
are you incompetent in the English language? The People are the Militia. Only the right wing, is "too dumb", to get it.

The People are the Militia.

only able bodied men between the ages 16-46.

There's a lot more people in the country outside those limits allowed to own firearms


Only the right wing, is "too dumb", to get it.

seems they "get it" more than you do.

you don't even know what comprised the militia, and cant read plain English
Our Second Amendment is about who may not be Infringed, when the security of our free States is at stake.

Our Second Amendment is about who may not be Infringed,

I agree, and the Second says the right of THE PEOPLE shall not be infringed, not the militia.

and, as I just noted, there were restrictions on who could belong to the militia
The People are the Militia. Why bother to declare well regulated militia (of the whole and entire People), Necessary, if not to quibble.
 
Gunman's attempted robbery on families waiting outside a school in Sao Paulo foiled by mother - Gun control works again - Criminal achieves room temperature.

4C314FD000000578-5724427-The_mother_of_two_who_has_served_as_a_policewoman_for_20_years_s-a-12_1526282310012.jpg


Attempted robbery on families at Sao Paulo school foiled

Another happy ending.

:cool:
Chaos over Order?

That fellow should have had recourse to unemployment compensation simply for being unemployed. No excuse to rob, then.

IOW, you want us to believe welfare prevents crime? Tell us, where is crime more prevalent, among welfare recipients or the working?
Where there is no welfare.

Evidence is required.
 
Gunman's attempted robbery on families waiting outside a school in Sao Paulo foiled by mother - Gun control works again - Criminal achieves room temperature.

4C314FD000000578-5724427-The_mother_of_two_who_has_served_as_a_policewoman_for_20_years_s-a-12_1526282310012.jpg


Attempted robbery on families at Sao Paulo school foiled

Another happy ending.

:cool:
Chaos over Order?

That fellow should have had recourse to unemployment compensation simply for being unemployed. No excuse to rob, then.

IOW, you want us to believe welfare prevents crime? Tell us, where is crime more prevalent, among welfare recipients or the working?
Where there is no welfare.

Evidence is required.
the first world has a better quality of life, ceteris paribus.
 
so, the lgbt community can, take your word for it?
What the fuck is that supposed to mean? Take my word for what?

I don't, know if, they can take, my word for it. (commas are fun)

"...the right of the people...shall not be infringed."
The rights of the people are clearly infringed, if you cant see that you are mental
 
"...the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not infringed."

Repeated 10000 times.

:auiqs.jpg:
so, the lgbt community can, take your word for it?

"...the right of the people...shall not be infringed."
The people have no rights, in fact you can't even watch a TV show that the govt did not approve of and produce, and you can only own a gun that they say you can own and if they say so
 
"...the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not infringed."

Repeated 10000 times.

:auiqs.jpg:
so, the lgbt community can, take your word for it?

"...the right of the people...shall not be infringed."
The people have no rights, in fact you can't even watch a TV show that the govt did not approve of and produce, and you can only own a gun that they say you can own and if they say so

On cable you can. The use of the public airways is like the use of the public roadways. They are shared in common so to use them you must obey the laws established for that use.

Law abiding gun owners do the same with the use of their guns.
 

Forum List

Back
Top