Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
well at least you finally admit it.....now get your buddies Dean and Franco and ShitSpeados up to speed....some people have lives.....i see that @boedicca decided to back out of this thread. Not gracefully but ....
Seriously it cracks me up when someone so thoroughly gets destroyed and can't admit it.
you cant tell if that guy is fat.....the fucker could be a body builder for all you know....Liberal parents must be too dumb to instruct their offspring in such matters. Leave it up to some clueless civil servant to inform the kiddies... Precious.
There are no fat conservatives
Lol!! Enter The Silly Zone.
the federal free and reduced lunch program should have no say over what it pays for?
interesting and quite liberal theory there, "conservatives."
the federal free and reduced lunch program should have no say over what it pays for?
interesting and quite liberal theory there, "conservatives."
No, the federal free and reduced lunch program should provide calories in keeping with the things they said BEFORE they got funding..namely that kids weren't getting enough to eat, and needed more calories at school.
well at least you finally admit it.....now get your buddies Dean and Franco and ShitSpeados up to speed....some people have lives.....i see that @boedicca decided to back out of this thread. Not gracefully but ....
Seriously it cracks me up when someone so thoroughly gets destroyed and can't admit it.
you cant tell if that guy is fat.....the fucker could be a body builder for all you know....Liberal parents must be too dumb to instruct their offspring in such matters. Leave it up to some clueless civil servant to inform the kiddies... Precious.
There are no fat conservatives
Lol!! Enter The Silly Zone.
Most of the kids who need the calories aren't there for breakfast.
You get that, right?
Most of the kids who need the calories aren't there for breakfast.
You get that, right?
"On any given school
day, the calorie level for the meal may
fall outside of the minimum and
maximum levels as long as the average
number of calories for the week is
within the required range."
What if the hungry kid isn't there on the high calorie day?
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-01-26/pdf/2012-1010.pdf
koshergirl, they ARE getting more calories. IF they eat both meals and the snack than they WERE getting when it was just the one meal. I mean you get that right?
koshergirl, they ARE getting more calories. IF they eat both meals and the snack than they WERE getting when it was just the one meal. I mean you get that right?
You DO realize the federal government has provided breakfast and lunch to illegal aliens for decades, right?
You act like the additional meals are new since the Michelle O rules went into effect, they aren't.
Out here in the Peoples Republic, schools are open even on weekends and holidays to feed the illegals. One Obama official stated "if we don't feed them, they'll quit coming, so this administration is dedicated to providing NSLP 365 days a year."
Most of the kids who need the calories aren't there for breakfast.
You get that, right?
"On any given school
day, the calorie level for the meal may
fall outside of the minimum and
maximum levels as long as the average
number of calories for the week is
within the required range."
What if the hungry kid isn't there on the high calorie day?
Oh, and they admit to a reduction in calories:
"The final rule will also
limit certain fats and reduce calories
and sodium in school meals."
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-01-26/pdf/2012-1010.pdf
"On any given school
day, the calorie level for the meal may
fall outside of the minimum and
maximum levels as long as the average
number of calories for the week is
within the required range."
What if the hungry kid isn't there on the high calorie day?
Oh, and they admit to a reduction in calories:
"The final rule will also
limit certain fats and reduce calories
and sodium in school meals."
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-01-26/pdf/2012-1010.pdf
Are we going to insert little computer chips which track how many calories a student eats per week so the school can cut them off once they've hit their limits...or force feed them if they are way below the minimum?
"On any given school
day, the calorie level for the meal may
fall outside of the minimum and
maximum levels as long as the average
number of calories for the week is
within the required range."
What if the hungry kid isn't there on the high calorie day?
Oh, and they admit to a reduction in calories:
"The final rule will also
limit certain fats and reduce calories
and sodium in school meals."
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-01-26/pdf/2012-1010.pdf
Are we going to insert little computer chips which track how many calories a student eats per week so the school can cut them off once they've hit their limits...or force feed them if they are way below the minimum?
"On any given school
day, the calorie level for the meal may
fall outside of the minimum and
maximum levels as long as the average
number of calories for the week is
within the required range."
What if the hungry kid isn't there on the high calorie day?
Oh, and they admit to a reduction in calories:
"The final rule will also
limit certain fats and reduce calories
and sodium in school meals."
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-01-26/pdf/2012-1010.pdf
Are we going to insert little computer chips which track how many calories a student eats per week so the school can cut them off once they've hit their limits...or force feed them if they are way below the minimum?
back for more eh dumb dumb?
Do you acknowledge that a school can in fact feed its students as much of whatever as it wants?
I am saying what I said.
That we were told children were starving, and needed to receive more food, thus justifying more funding for the school programs.
As soon as the funding was received, suddenly the children weren't starving, they're obese, and we need to use more money to CUT the calories (and the calories have been reduced).
Most poor kids don't get to school early enough to eat the breakfasts they offer. They stop serving them before the last buses come in.
So what was the purpose of the huge increase in lunch program c
"On any given school
day, the calorie level for the meal may
fall outside of the minimum and
maximum levels as long as the average
number of calories for the week is
within the required range."
What if the hungry kid isn't there on the high calorie day?
Oh, and they admit to a reduction in calories:
"The final rule will also
limit certain fats and reduce calories
and sodium in school meals."
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-01-26/pdf/2012-1010.pdf
Are we going to insert little computer chips which track how many calories a student eats per week so the school can cut them off once they've hit their limits...or force feed them if they are way below the minimum?
Statists would love that.
