Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Trump is perfectly within the law. You just can't stand the laws as they are. You want laws that make it illegal for Republicans to win.Why must you always attempt to deflect?The Clintons have always been above the lawOn citizens?
Isn't this what you guys feared about government having too much power?
What happens when the threats go toward someone you do like?
Interesting, isn't it. Apparently, trump is above the law.
You do not deny Trump acts like he is above the law. What you do is suggest it's okay.
Guess you don't know either. Didn't you fight tooth and nail for the Evil Hill?What's the upside to accepting a US President threatening Blackmail
I don't know. Ask Hillary.
So you don't know but you know it's worth fighting for eh?
Partly . One can win the ec by a fluke.No one denies the electoral college determines the outcome, so why this deflection?
I had a clear impression from the reaction to the vote that many of you people had no clue whatsoever about the Electoral College, especially among your Millennial supporters. It was a big surprise.
Any President that wins the ec but loses the popular vote so widely, wins by a fluke in our system.
You just contradicted yourself. The Electoral College is constitutionally mandated. It is no fluke.
That is exactly the point. With his interference in investigations we will never know. But there are men like "Deep Throat" waiting in the wings of the FBI and Justice DeptAnd what is it exactly that Trump has done that's illegal?
Men like "Deep Throat" will come forward and then we will know what the Biog Douche is hiding and obstructingTrump is perfectly within the law. You just can't stand the laws as they are. You want laws that make it illegal for Republicans to win.
Wow, talk about misdirection. Let's look at that again:The right has been very effective is voter suppression, gerrymandering and vote theft.
And in brainwashing the gullible.
Brainwashing the gullible? Did you ever hear the advice about people in glass houses?
The Dimocrat party spends countless hours convincing you people that you never really lose any presidency--it's just that you were cheated out of them.
The reason Democrats brainwash people like you is because if you ever realized most Americans don't believe the way you do, it would knock the wind out of your sails and you might quit voting.
The party of excuses really know how to pull your puppet strings. Let's look at it starting with your own admissions:
* The Republicans stole votes.
* The Republicans suppressed votes through voter-ID.
* The Russians gave Trump the election
* The Russians changed the votes in three states.
* Comey was responsible for Hil-Liar losing
* The Supreme Court gave Bush the Presidency.
* Bush's friends at Diebold rigged the machines so he falsely won reelection.
* The Republicans used gerrymandering to win the election.
* The Republicans are a bunch of old white people dying off soon.
It's amazing how this is so in front of you leftists, yet you can't see it. You have no clue in the world how you are being used.
Partly . One can win the ec by a fluke.No one denies the electoral college determines the outcome, so why this deflection?
I had a clear impression from the reaction to the vote that many of you people had no clue whatsoever about the Electoral College, especially among your Millennial supporters. It was a big surprise.
Any President that wins the ec but loses the popular vote so widely, wins by a fluke in our system.
You just contradicted yourself. The Electoral College is constitutionally mandated. It is no fluke.
One Founding-era argument for the Electoral College stemmed from the fact that ordinary Americans across a vast continent would lack sufficient information to choose directly and intelligently among leading presidential candidates.Winning the ec but losing the popular vote is a fluke. It's only happened a few times
This objection rang true in the 1780s, when life was far more local. But the early emergence of national presidential parties rendered the objection obsolete by linking presidential candidates to slates of local candidates and national platforms, which explained to voters who stood for what.
* The Republicans stole votes.
I never heard that before. Do you know something we don't?
* The Republicans suppressed votes through voter-ID.
Well that's true. And the conservative Supreme court striking down the Voting Rights Act. Bringing unlimited money into our elections. Limiting the number of voting places among a host of other things. Republican wouldn't fight so hard for these things is they didn't work. Even you have to admit that.
* The Russians gave Trump the election
No one ever said that. They worked to get Trump elected, but if they gave Trump something, that is something we still need to find out.
* The Russians changed the votes in three states.
That doesn't even make sense. Do you have a link to that?
* Comey was responsible for Hil-Liar losing
He had a role, I have no doubt.
* The Supreme Court gave Bush the Presidency.
That is true and the nation suffered.
December 12, 2000: In ‘Bush v. Gore,’ the Supreme Court Gives the Presidential Election to George W. Bush
* The Republicans used gerrymandering to win the election.
The GOP is very good at gerrymandering. Even many of them admit it.
They are not limited to old white people. There are a lot of young white people. In fact, 90% of the GOP is white. And they attract a lot of white supremacists and Alt Right.
What's the upside to having a US president that can be blackmailed?Trump is perfectly within the law. You just can't stand the laws as they are. You want laws that make it illegal for Republicans to win.Why must you always attempt to deflect?The Clintons have always been above the lawOn citizens?
Isn't this what you guys feared about government having too much power?
What happens when the threats go toward someone you do like?
Interesting, isn't it. Apparently, trump is above the law.
You do not deny Trump acts like he is above the law. What you do is suggest it's okay.
Sent from my SM-G935P using USMessageBoard.com mobile app
Hilarious. I retired last July and have been voting since Nixon. For the first time in my life, I was able to watch the election every day. And every station couldn't stop talking about Donald Trump. If he gave four speeches in four days, even MSNBC would play 90% to all of every speech. The media chased him around on his golf course in Scotland for a free infomercial. They followed him around in his new Hotel for over an hour waiting for him to say something about Obama's birth certificate and this is what he said in the last 36 seconds:* The Republicans stole votes.
I never heard that before. Do you know something we don't?
Yes I do, it's in your post #35. You said this: "The right has been very effective is voter suppression, gerrymandering and vote theft." The best thing about telling the truth is you never have to remember what you said.
* The Republicans suppressed votes through voter-ID.
Well that's true. And the conservative Supreme court striking down the Voting Rights Act. Bringing unlimited money into our elections. Limiting the number of voting places among a host of other things. Republican wouldn't fight so hard for these things is they didn't work. Even you have to admit that.
No, it's just that Republicans don't feel it takes a week or so to vote, and there is no reason to have extended hours. Voter-ID is used in many states and thus far, no voter suppression found. As for unlimited money, Hilary spent over twice as much as Trump, and still lost.
* The Russians gave Trump the election
No one ever said that. They worked to get Trump elected, but if they gave Trump something, that is something we still need to find out.
Gave him something. In other words, leftists just made it up. They didn't give him anything. No evidence, no suspicion, just make the charge. The only possible Russian involvement (not proven yet) is they hacked into the DNC emails exposing what nefarious things they were discussing.
* The Russians changed the votes in three states.
That doesn't even make sense. Do you have a link to that?
You are discussing politics and are unaware of the three states Democrats had recounts in this past election?????
* Comey was responsible for Hil-Liar losing
He had a role, I have no doubt.
No doubt and no proof either. Again, it's brainwashing by the Democrats.
* The Supreme Court gave Bush the Presidency.
That is true and the nation suffered.
December 12, 2000: In ‘Bush v. Gore,’ the Supreme Court Gives the Presidential Election to George W. Bush
They didn't give him anything. Gore's buddies on the Florida SC said Gore could have recounts and take as much time as he wanted. This judicial legislation was examined by the federal Supreme Court because the law in Florida is that all ballots had to be certified in seven days. No if's, and's or but's about it. The Supreme Court returned it to the Florida SC court and asked them WTF they were doing? A court is not allowed to change or create law on the bench which is what the Florida courts did. That's when Gore conceded the election; the Florida courts could not answer the Supreme Court and knew they were wrong.
* The Republicans used gerrymandering to win the election.
The GOP is very good at gerrymandering. Even many of them admit it.
They do? Like who?
They are not limited to old white people. There are a lot of young white people. In fact, 90% of the GOP is white. And they attract a lot of white supremacists and Alt Right.
Well "deplorable" was part of Hillary losing the race. Keep it up. It's what we need.
What's the upside to having a US president that can be blackmailed?
That is exactly the point. With his interference in investigations we will never know. But there are men like "Deep Throat" waiting in the wings of the FBI and Justice DeptAnd what is it exactly that Trump has done that's illegal?
The upside? Getting rid of liberal scum in Washington for starters.
The upside? Getting rid of liberal scum in Washington for starters.
You do know that their are 2 parties right? So again, what is the upside if this is accepted from a President? And what happen's when it's aimed at someone you like? Will you see how it's not beneficial then?
miketx is too stupid and too dishonest (very likely both) to give a damn about a reasonable post as the one posted by CC.
If you take both trumps and Hildasbeasts votes away in crazy Cali... Trump won the popular vote in the rest of the country. We can't have crazy Cali determining the direction of this country.Gerrymandering?You do realize that the electoral college determines the president?worth a grinDream onThe upside? Getting rid of liberal scum in Washington for starters.
It is worth a grin to see the NYPost digging up all the dirt on Comey, and suggesting he should have been fired last July (or was it October?) for interference in our national election with his announcements of investigation of Clinton.
We will never know, but I can imagine what would have happened in the Republican Party if Comey had been fired by Obama for his pre-election blabbing about the Clinton investigation, as the Post suggests.
But it is downright funny, hilarious even, to see them in knuckle-biting anger over the thing that gave them the election, in the gerrymandered EC if not the popular vote. Situational outrage?
Happy Mother's Day! to all you mothers
...and Most of the state houses and governorships are conservative for a reason?
No one denies the electoral college determines the outcome, so why this deflection?
Any President that wins the ec but loses the popular vote so widely, wins by a fluke in our system.
The system set up for a possible situation where electors would vote their consciences versus the vote, but make no mistake about it, DJT did not win THAT way
Why the deflection?
Gerrymandering is a strawman
If you take both trumps and Hildasbeasts votes away in crazy Cali...
What's the upside to having a US president that can be blackmailed?
What's the upside of being a douche bag, dumbass snowflake who thinks he can fool people into answering loaded questions?
What was the upside to voting for the criminal Hillary?
If there was anything for some potential deepthroat to leak to the press, he would have done it by now.
You snowflakes are going to have to get used to the idea that the whole "Russia hack" scheme is a great big dud.
