Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thank you! I didn't know that about California, during that period.You can start here.
Duke University Press - Lynching in the West
www.dukeupress.edu
Amazon product ASIN 0822337940
350 such documented lynchings in California alone.
Most whites didn't qualify either until after the Civil War.It is in the US, especially in the former slave states. Like Texas. For instance, it was a privilege of whites never to fail a literacy test for voting.
The same happened to whites in the west. We could talk bout even worse done to white and Spanish settlers by the Indians if you would like to.Thank you! I didn't know that about California, during that period.
But notice, it was not against whites, but against minorities, Latinos, Asians, and Native Americans.
This is what you said.How about you try coming up with something in the last say half century?
Being white is not and never has been in and of itself a privilege. Billions of whites have been subjugated and enslaved over the centuries. Some privilege.
The same happened to whites in the west.
Texas is a white Southern state, right? I can see why you try to argue against white privilege. I mean, you may have to admit to it, if it existed.after roughly 4 million enslaved African Americans were emancipated, they became the primary targets of white Southerners.
Absolutely. It is America, after all, society as a feeding frenzy, of which you seem to be proud, as you mourn it's no longer so hellish. But Blacks did not have white privilege.
Here's a white privilege, in case you think it didn't/doesn't exist: easier voting.
Apart from the privilege of being white. I'm pretty sure that's a majority, guaranteed to be a plurality. That's not 'very few'.
Even with all the evidence you display I bet you weren't failed on your literacy test.How is it anymore difficult for a black to vote than a white? Tell me of this policy you speak of and where it's taking place.
Even with all the evidence you display I bet you weren't failed on your literacy test.
Republicans have never cared about children they don't care about human life this last week proves just that how can there even be a question?Single moms having kids they can’t afford is an easy target. It makes a right winger feel superior by shitting on such a woman. It makes it easy to rail against the idea of food stamps altogether. Such a person judging feels superior because they aren’t on food stamps and have a full time job in comparison. Somebody should probably tell them that it is very common for anyone to have a full time job and not be on food stamps lol. Such people judging aren’t as special as they like to think they are. Food stamps is not the epidemic that republicans like to think it is. They simply pretend that it is because it makes them feel less insecure about themselves. The truth is that few actual able bodied adults are even on food stamps. The ones that are have dependents.
But sure, such irresponsible women do exist.
We can all agree: an impoverished woman should not have kids and she made a mistake when she had one. Okay sure. However, the kid still…. exists. What should we do with that kid? Should the kid suffer because of the mom’s mistakes? Probably not, right? Government assistance is required either way.
New USDA Report Provides Picture of Who Participates in SNAP - Food Research & Action Center
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has been issuing a series of annual reports on the demographic and economic characteristics of households and individuals participating in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The latest report, covering fiscal year 2019, was released at...frac.org
“SNAP targets those in greatest need. Among those participating in the program, most are children, elderly persons, or individuals with a disability. In fact, 86 percent of all SNAP benefits go to households that include a child, elderly person, or person with disabilities. In addition, about 92 percent of all SNAP benefits go to households with income at or below the federal poverty line.”
Republicans have never cared about children they don't care about human life this last week proves just that how can there even be a question?
Cynical and evil repukes.
Stinky strawman alert. No one's asking you to support my kids. I support my own. And the difference between you and me is that I don't want your kids cut up into pieces by armor piercing shells, either. You could care less about anything else but yourself and your immediate family. You're just as bad as Abbott and the rest of them.If I don't financially support your children, that means I don't care about children? If you ask me, having children you can't support and then expecting others to is what I would call not caring about children.
Shouldn't you be asking the single moms this question, Billy?When republicans complain about single moms getting food stamps, why don’t they consider the well-being of the child?
Single moms aren't the problem. Military guns and Republicans are the problem. We need to vote out the Republicana and get the guns. We will.Shouldn't you be asking the single moms this question, Billy?
Maybe someday, but not this year.We need to vote out the Republicans and get the guns. We will.
It'll take a couple of cycles. We'll do it. Canada's not better than us.Maybe someday, but not this year.
Who says I don’t? Again, regardless of how irresponsible the mother is, the child still exists either way. If the mother can’t provide, then yeah, enter the tax payers. It’s part of being part of a society.Shouldn't you be asking the single moms this question, Billy?
