Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So you claim. Now, try to support that contention. Links.Who says I don’t? Again, regardless of how irresponsible the mother is, the child still exists either way. If the mother can’t provide, then yeah, enter the tax payers. It’s part of being part of a society.
Single moms having kids they can’t afford is an easy target. It makes a right winger feel superior by shitting on such a woman. It makes it easy to rail against the idea of food stamps altogether. Such a person judging feels superior because they aren’t on food stamps and have a full time job in comparison. Somebody should probably tell them that it is very common for anyone to have a full time job and not be on food stamps lol. Such people judging aren’t as special as they like to think they are. Food stamps is not the epidemic that republicans like to think it is. They simply pretend that it is because it makes them feel less insecure about themselves. The truth is that few actual able bodied adults are even on food stamps. The ones that are have dependents.
But sure, such irresponsible women do exist.
We can all agree: an impoverished woman should not have kids and she made a mistake when she had one. Okay sure. However, the kid still…. exists. What should we do with that kid? Should the kid suffer because of the mom’s mistakes? Probably not, right? Government assistance is required either way.
New USDA Report Provides Picture of Who Participates in SNAP - Food Research & Action Center
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has been issuing a series of annual reports on the demographic and economic characteristics of households and individuals participating in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The latest report, covering fiscal year 2019, was released at...frac.org
“SNAP targets those in greatest need. Among those participating in the program, most are children, elderly persons, or individuals with a disability. In fact, 86 percent of all SNAP benefits go to households that include a child, elderly person, or person with disabilities. In addition, about 92 percent of all SNAP benefits go to households with income at or below the federal poverty line.”
Republicans could care less about babies after they were born. There were people taunting the Uvalde mourner at the NRA convention on Friday. So sad Republicans have no soul.So you claim. Now, try to support that contention. Links.
It may be nice to help care for the children of the irresponsible. But is it an obligation of society? Who gave you the authority to tell anybody else what they are obliged to do?
Lol you want me to provide links to support the moral obligation that we as a society should chip in and help take care of this baby? Well that’s stupid. I guess I shouldn’t waste my time explaining all this to republicans. You’re all too selfish and dimwitted to care about anyone but yourselves even when it comes to kids. It makes your pro life stance all the more stupid and bizarre. The democrats are the grown ups I guess.So you claim. Now, try to support that contention. Links.
It may be nice to help care for the children of the irresponsible. But is it an obligation of society? Who gave you the authority to tell anybody else what they are obliged to do?
Lol you want me to provide links to support the moral obligation that we as a society should chip in and help take care of this baby? Well that’s stupid. I guess I shouldn’t waste my time explaining all this to republicans. You’re all too selfish and dimwitted to care about anyone but yourselves even when it comes to kids. It makes your pro life stance all the more stupid and bizarre. The democrats are the grown ups I guess.
Who says I don’t? Again, regardless of how irresponsible the mother is, the child still exists either way. If the mother can’t provide, then yeah, enter the tax payers. It’s part of being part of a society.
Single moms aren't the problem. Military guns and Republicans are the problem. We need to vote out the Republicana and get the guns. We will.
Do you think people are just lining up to adopt kids? Hell no. The older they are the less likely. Also, do you know how much it would cost tax payers per year for a kid in the foster system?If the mother can't provide, she should give the child up to adoption. You'd see how fast she'd find a way to feed her family.
Stinky strawman alert. No one's asking you to support my kids. I support my own. And the difference between you and me is that I don't want your kids cut up into pieces by armor piercing shells, either. You could care less about anything else but yourself and your immediate family. You're just as bad as Abbott and the rest of them.
May God have mercy on your. Serously.
Also, what if the woman refuses to give the kid up? Is your fascist solution for the government to take her kid away from her? Why would that even be best for the kid psychologically? Why should these strangers be the best thing for this kid?If the mother can't provide, she should give the child up to adoption. You'd see how fast she'd find a way to feed her family.
You mean your display of reading incomprehension is a dodge? I thought it was genuine. Kudos.Dodge noted. Thanks for playing.
What is general welfare if not articles of benevolence?And constitutionally ignorant.
"I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution that grants congress the right, of EXPENDING ON ARTICLES OF BENEVOLENCE, the money of their constituents."
James Madison, annals of Congress, 1794
What is general welfare if not articles of benevolence?
Oh. Right.
Reading incomprehension. My bad.
Also, what if the woman refuses to give the kid up? Is your fascist solution for the government to take her kid away from her? Why would that even be best for the kid psychologically? Why should these strangers be the best thing for this kid?
Oh good. Another libtard ^ spouting stale old false cliches.Republicans could care less about babies after they were born. There were people taunting the Uvalde mourner at the NRA convention on Friday. So sad Republicans have no soul.
Yes. Links to support your claim, you fumbling retard. Or,alternatively, maybe you could get an intelligent adult to assist you in order to cobble together the premises and the syllogism that supports an otherwise mere empty claim (your idiotic opinion) that there exists such an obligation.Lol you want me to provide links to support the moral obligation that we as a society should chip in and help take care of this baby? Well that’s stupid. I guess I shouldn’t waste my time explaining all this to republicans. You’re all too selfish and dimwitted to care about anyone but yourselves even when it comes to kids. It makes your pro life stance all the more stupid and bizarre. The democrats are the grown ups I guess.
As opposed to you just spouting false cliches.Oh good. Another libtard ^ spouting stale old false cliches.
Irrelevant. You classify everyone who disagrees with your smarmy bullshit as a right wing nut. But opposing your views doesn’t require being any kind of nut.21 pages and not one single right wing nut could explain how not supporting SNAP (food stamps) for children is in line with their BS “pro life” movement. Just whining about lazy poor people, personal responsibility, and fraud. Pro life means caring about real children. Fake caring about a group of cells doesn’t absolve you MFers.
Lol dude you are so full of shit. This does not happen to you at the check out line. It’s so stupid to lie about it. I get that I makes you feel manly and superior shitting on these people, but making shit up like this is so pathetic.They wouldn't but few women would give up their children, that's the point. You on the left always try to get your way because of the children. The children are a crutch for not having a job and feeding your own family.
I go to the store, I see what goes on with these SNAP people. Sometimes they'll bug you in the checkout line asking if they can purchase some of your food items with their SNAP's card, and at the end of the line you give them cash for your items back. I see what they have on the belt when they checkout. Greeting cards, beer and wine, flowers, huge bags of dog food or cat litter, or both. They pay for their food items with the card and whip out a wad of cash for their other goodies. A few times I seen them leave the line and go to the head cashier to buy a carton of cigarettes or a bunch of lottery tickets.
The point is that many don't need these handouts to survive, but as long as we're stupid enough to give it to them, of course they'll take advantage of it.
