healthmyths
Platinum Member
- Sep 19, 2011
- 28,841
- 10,357
"Fake News" as President Trump calls it is valid and the sooner those of you that don't believe it come to the knowledge the MSM bias is real, the better off YOU will be.
Case in point...
Why were only 20% of Obama news stories have negative assessments?
Was it because the MSM was afraid of being called racists if they covered Obama with the same negative assessments they did with Bush or Clinton?
More importantly, why was there over 3 times the negative assessment of Trump?
I definitely call it biased. A few of you anti-Trumpers will NEVER agree and this post isn't for you.
BUT for those of you still on the fence in making up your mind.
Consider this: if nearly 2 of 3 Trump stories are negative, do you people on the fence really think that is
possible? I mean really I could see how the biased MSM could do 2 of 4 stories... but come on folks.
almost 2 of 3 stories negative!
Truly what has Trump done to deserve this?
WELL I know one thing for sure! He coined "FAKE NEWS" and that just drives the MSM crazy...even though
it is TRUE!
So if you are truly and intelligent, rational, THINKING person and you still are undecided... shouldn't you
factor in that with 2 of 3 stories you read/hear about Trump are negative, that means one of two things:
A) Trump is wrong at least 60% of the time and deserves the negative coverage...which given the
facts that
1) more people are working today, paying more in Federal payroll taxes for one thing..
2) Blacks/women, hispanics have the lowest UNEMPLOYMENT rate in over 50 years..
3) THE USA is energy independent...again thanks to Trump dumping onerous rules and regulations
4) Very one sided trade agreements are being scrapped meaning "Made in the USA" is even more valid.
OR:
B) Trump is right and the biased MSM is influencing those of you on the fence erroneously and harmfully.
Comparing news coverage of Trump's first 100 days to coverage of past administrations
Case in point...
Why were only 20% of Obama news stories have negative assessments?
Was it because the MSM was afraid of being called racists if they covered Obama with the same negative assessments they did with Bush or Clinton?
More importantly, why was there over 3 times the negative assessment of Trump?
I definitely call it biased. A few of you anti-Trumpers will NEVER agree and this post isn't for you.
BUT for those of you still on the fence in making up your mind.
Consider this: if nearly 2 of 3 Trump stories are negative, do you people on the fence really think that is
possible? I mean really I could see how the biased MSM could do 2 of 4 stories... but come on folks.
almost 2 of 3 stories negative!
Truly what has Trump done to deserve this?
WELL I know one thing for sure! He coined "FAKE NEWS" and that just drives the MSM crazy...even though
it is TRUE!
So if you are truly and intelligent, rational, THINKING person and you still are undecided... shouldn't you
factor in that with 2 of 3 stories you read/hear about Trump are negative, that means one of two things:
A) Trump is wrong at least 60% of the time and deserves the negative coverage...which given the
facts that
1) more people are working today, paying more in Federal payroll taxes for one thing..
2) Blacks/women, hispanics have the lowest UNEMPLOYMENT rate in over 50 years..
3) THE USA is energy independent...again thanks to Trump dumping onerous rules and regulations
4) Very one sided trade agreements are being scrapped meaning "Made in the USA" is even more valid.
OR:
B) Trump is right and the biased MSM is influencing those of you on the fence erroneously and harmfully.
Comparing news coverage of Trump's first 100 days to coverage of past administrations