Where did Roy Moore's accusers go???

[rightwinger]

Where do they need to go?

They made their point about Creepy Roy

 

[radical right]

No, their stories don't check out, Nimrod. You think they are credible because you want to believe them. That's the Democrat modus operandi: "it would be nice if it were true. Hence, it must be true."

They're credible because there is an unbroken string of ages that Roy Moore went out with. And there's court records to back up the 14 year olds meeting Moore. Corroboration of Moores hanging around teenage girls at football games and the mall.

 

[bodecea]

Creepy is a 32 year old man looking for a wife in high school.

not back then

it was pretty common

do you think we should rename federal building & the nation's capital because the founders were slave owners???

In the 70s? Yes, still creepy.

 

[radical right]

Wrong, the admitted she made notes under the yearbook signature, just like the other woman made notes under the graduation card. The signature was authenticated.

The signature was certainly not authenticated. No expert ever got his hands on the yearbook to do an analysis. .

An expert analyzed the signature, you just wanted a different expert. But it was authenticated.

 

[DrLove]

Really? Why don't you produce the text of that law and we'll see. She went after him. He didn't coerce her. He didn't make her job dependent on having sex with him. She went after him.

bripat is making shit up again. There was no crime involved with what Clinton did with Lewinsky. And she teased the F out of him with sexy lingerie and clearly wanted it Clinton's only crime was lying about a blow job.

 

[radical right]

Dating very young girls used to be a common thing in the South. Gerry Lee Lewis married his first cousin (once removed) who was 13 at the time.

It wasn't acceptable. Jerry Lee was drummed out of the music business for decades.

 

[bripat9643]

No, their stories don't check out, Nimrod. You think they are credible because you want to believe them. That's the Democrat modus operandi: "it would be nice if it were true. Hence, it must be true."

They're credible because there is an unbroken string of ages that Roy Moore went out with. And there's court records to back up the 14 year olds meeting Moore. Corroboration of Moores hanging around teenage girls at football games and the mall.

Because one thing checked out, that doesn't mean they all check out. The bottom line is that her description of events isn't plausible. Several of her claims are obvious lies, and she has a history of smearing men.

 

[bripat9643]

Really? Why don't you produce the text of that law and we'll see. She went after him. He didn't coerce her. He didn't make her job dependent on having sex with him. She went after him.

bripat is making shit up again. There was no crime involved with what Clinton did with Lewinsky. And she teased the F out of him with sexy lingerie and clearly wanted it Clinton's only crime was lying about a blow job.

I didn't say it was a crime, dumbass. However, it is grounds for a lawsuit.

 

[bripat9643]

Dating very young girls used to be a common thing in the South. Gerry Lee Lewis married his first cousin (once removed) who was 13 at the time.

It wasn't acceptable. Jerry Lee was drummed out of the music business for decades.

Nothing happened to Elvis because he married Priscilla when she was 16 years old.

 

[BulletProof]

In the 70s? Yes, still creepy.

It's typical for fags to prey on teenagers. Beyond creepy.

 

[bripat9643]

Wrong, the admitted she made notes under the yearbook signature, just like the other woman made notes under the graduation card. The signature was authenticated.

The signature was certainly not authenticated. No expert ever got his hands on the yearbook to do an analysis. .

An expert analyzed the signature, you just wanted a different expert. But it was authenticated.

What "expert" ever had the yearbook in his posession?

 

[DrLove]

They slandered him. That much is clear. The one with the yearbook admitted Moore's signature was a forgery. .

Wrong, the admitted she made notes under the yearbook signature, just like the other woman made notes under the graduation card. The signature was authenticated.

It's a forgery, in other words.

Ehhh - NO. Has it been THAT long since you had yearbooks signed? In both HS and college mine were signed over a period of as much as two weeks. Many times I added dates and locations just for memory's sake. MANY people do the same thing.

That is not forgery lil feller

 

[bripat9643]

They slandered him. That much is clear. The one with the yearbook admitted Moore's signature was a forgery. .

Wrong, the admitted she made notes under the yearbook signature, just like the other woman made notes under the graduation card. The signature was authenticated.

It's a forgery, in other words.

Ehhh - NO. Has it been THAT long since you had yearbooks signed? In both HS and college mine were signed over a period of as much as two weeks. Many times I added dates and locations just for memory's sake. MANY people do the same thing.

That is not forgery lil feller

For all you know, the date was added 40 years later.

 

[DrLove]

Wrong, the admitted she made notes under the yearbook signature, just like the other woman made notes under the graduation card. The signature was authenticated.

The signature was certainly not authenticated. No expert ever got his hands on the yearbook to do an analysis. .

An expert analyzed the signature, you just wanted a different expert. But it was authenticated.

bripat would insist that Sheriff Joe be given the yearbook for authentication and he'd have given it to 4 or 5 of his "experts". You know, the same ones who said Obama's certificate of live birth from the State of Hawaii was a fake.

 

[dcbl]

Allred refused to release it for proper examination

the signature is an EXACT match of Moore's stamped sugnature from when he was a judge; AND he was the judge for THAT woman's divorce - why did she not come forward when she sat before him in court? you know; if the memories were so traumatic for her - would have been fresher in her mind 20 years ago when she had him as her divorce judge

so, with those facts; you are either lying or just really stupid

fwiw - I really don't care which

Roy Moore wasn't the Judge in the Woman's divorce case.


So much for knowning the facts.


Roy Moore’s Evidence Against Accuser Was Wrong
Roy Moore’s attorney lies in attempt to discredit accuser



>>>>

you progs are really bad with facts

Moore was part of the case & actually signed an official document related to the case; the one that dismissed the case

see the "D.A." in the signature?

Moore's assistant - NOT an attempt by Moore pretending to be the DA as opposed to the DDA

 

[DrLove]

I didn't say it was a crime, dumbass. However, it is grounds for a lawsuit.

Hardly dumbass - Monica bragged about the whole deal both before and after with a number of friends.

 

[bripat9643]

Wrong, the admitted she made notes under the yearbook signature, just like the other woman made notes under the graduation card. The signature was authenticated.

The signature was certainly not authenticated. No expert ever got his hands on the yearbook to do an analysis. .

An expert analyzed the signature, you just wanted a different expert. But it was authenticated.

bripat would insist that Sheriff Joe be given the yearbook for authentication and he'd have given it to 4 or 5 of his "experts". You know, the same ones who said Obama's certificate of live birth from the State of Hawaii was a fake.

It sure appears to be a fake. One thing is certain: it is not is the orginal issued on the day of his birth.

Why shouldn't 4-5 experts have a chance to examing the yearbook? Moore could choose two of them and Gloria Alred could choose the other two. Why do Dims always object to examining the evidence?

 

[dcbl]

An expert analyzed the signature, you just wanted a different expert. But it was authenticated.

it was/is his signature; from a signature stamp

the fact that his assistant's initials are part of the signature is really all the proof needed

try to be honest about this

it won't hurt you

 

[Preacher]

Why would they still be out in public? It was painful enough for them to come out in the first place.

Do you miss them?

Oh, and sorry about Creepy Roy

What else can they do now? They've spoken out. They've been heard or not heard. They've been vilified by the Rightwing. One woman said she was afraid to go out of her house. As they have said their peace, they have no other recourse. Either people believed them or didn't. And let's not forget that police, mall supervisors, security guards, and others backed up their stories.

They lied about a great man so they could make some money and get 15 minutes of fame....they should be scared.... Oh and no none of those people backed ANYTHING up. The mall manager said Moore was NEVER banned from the mall and even an accusers step son said she was lying AND another forged his signature to her yearbook.

First, he was not a great man, just the opposite. Second, they didn't lie: their stories were backed up by mall security, police, and many others. The yearbook was not forged, that story has been debunked. You all ask why they didn't speak out before; well, look what happens when they do. And they were young girls then--even less likely to believed than now.

They lied,they help defeat a great man,they cashed their checks,they will never be heard from again unless Judge Moore runs for office again. You can live in your fantasyland I will stick with facts.

The fact is the Republicans in congress hate him as much as anybody and didn't want him. If there was any conspiracy, which I don't believe there was, the Repubs would have been in on it.

The RINO establishment was in on it. That was VERY clear.

 

[DrLove]

you progs are really bad with facts

Moore was part of the case & actually signed an official document related to the case; the one that dismissed the case

see the "D.A." in the signature?

Moore's assistant - NOT an attempt by Moore pretending to be the DA as opposed to the DDA

I love it .. jpegs that could be depicting literally ANYTHING