Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
it is things like that that show there is no way in hell the government was competent enough to pull off what you morons believeit doesnt hurt
what it does do is show that the government didnt do proper checks on him
and of course, they are going to point the finger at Rumsfeld
how can you possible believe that and if you do how can you put your faith in government reports or investigations surrounding 9/11
Just a reminder to the airheads (aka truthers--that means you); if you're going to say that the government was responsible for 9/11 in any way, you have to come up with some sort of bullshit theory as to why the government didn't plant a single WMD in Iraq or Afghanistan to justify the entire enterprise.
You can't.
You won't.
I win...I always win.
just a reminder to the airheads (aka truthers--that means you); if you're going to say that the government was responsible for 9/11 in any way, you have to come up with some sort of bullshit theory as to why the government didn't plant a single wmd in iraq or afghanistan to justify the entire enterprise.
You can't.
You won't.
I win...i always win.
Israel is the ONLY nation who benefited from 9/11I agree with you,
And some way, some how, Mossad was involved and helped plan the event.
Several foreign governments knew and apparently warned the US before it happened; Israel may have been one of them. They obviously benefited from it...
and who would be the people DOING that dating and checking?Just a reminder to the airheads (aka truthers--that means you); if you're going to say that the government was responsible for 9/11 in any way, you have to come up with some sort of bullshit theory as to why the government didn't plant a single WMD in Iraq or Afghanistan to justify the entire enterprise.
You can't.
You won't.
I win...I always win.
There is an easy answer. Planting wmd was an unnecessary risk. NBC weapons can be dated and traced through their chemical compounds so if wmd had been planted in iraq there would have been an international inspection of them and once discovered the weapons were planted, there's a whole new international nightmare of fucking public relations.
You want the absolute proof it was an unnecessary risk? All the evidence is right there for you to see. The bush admin admitted to the world wmd was not found. What were the consequences of that admission? Did anyone get charged with a crime for the invasion? Did it force immediate withdrawal of US troops? No. The absence of wmd did not do one single fuckig thing to impede the goals of invasion, occupation, or installation of permanent bases.
Next question.
noIsrael is the ONLY nation who benefited from 9/11Several foreign governments knew and apparently warned the US before it happened; Israel may have been one of them. They obviously benefited from it...
But who made the most money?
Haliburton stock price
10.35 March 21, 2003
14.74 March 21, 2004
21.96 March 21, 2005
35.20 March 21, 2006
Dick's aid was quoted as saying "We knew attacks were coming, but we we're expecting truck bombs, nothing like this"
Was he saying the Administration was Okay with truck bombs?
and who would be the people DOING that dating and checking?Just a reminder to the airheads (aka truthers--that means you); if you're going to say that the government was responsible for 9/11 in any way, you have to come up with some sort of bullshit theory as to why the government didn't plant a single WMD in Iraq or Afghanistan to justify the entire enterprise.
You can't.
You won't.
I win...I always win.
There is an easy answer. Planting wmd was an unnecessary risk. NBC weapons can be dated and traced through their chemical compounds so if wmd had been planted in iraq there would have been an international inspection of them and once discovered the weapons were planted, there's a whole new international nightmare of fucking public relations.
You want the absolute proof it was an unnecessary risk? All the evidence is right there for you to see. The bush admin admitted to the world wmd was not found. What were the consequences of that admission? Did anyone get charged with a crime for the invasion? Did it force immediate withdrawal of US troops? No. The absence of wmd did not do one single fuckig thing to impede the goals of invasion, occupation, or installation of permanent bases.
Next question.
the government that planted them
you really are too fucking stupid for words
International team = USA and allies.
Bottom line is that WMD could have been planted in a hundred different ways in Iraq. We had the trace elements found in scientists homes that could have been used. For one. But we didn't.
noIsrael is the ONLY nation who benefited from 9/11
But who made the most money?
Haliburton stock price
10.35 March 21, 2003
14.74 March 21, 2004
21.96 March 21, 2005
35.20 March 21, 2006
Dick's aid was quoted as saying "We knew attacks were coming, but we we're expecting truck bombs, nothing like this"
Was he saying the Administration was Okay with truck bombs?
it was saying the focus was on something of that nature
and who would be the people DOING that dating and checking?Just a reminder to the airheads (aka truthers--that means you); if you're going to say that the government was responsible for 9/11 in any way, you have to come up with some sort of bullshit theory as to why the government didn't plant a single WMD in Iraq or Afghanistan to justify the entire enterprise.
You can't.
You won't.
I win...I always win.
There is an easy answer. Planting wmd was an unnecessary risk. NBC weapons can be dated and traced through their chemical compounds so if wmd had been planted in iraq there would have been an international inspection of them and once discovered the weapons were planted, there's a whole new international nightmare of fucking public relations.
You want the absolute proof it was an unnecessary risk? All the evidence is right there for you to see. The bush admin admitted to the world wmd was not found. What were the consequences of that admission? Did anyone get charged with a crime for the invasion? Did it force immediate withdrawal of US troops? No. The absence of wmd did not do one single fuckig thing to impede the goals of invasion, occupation, or installation of permanent bases.
Next question.
the government that planted them
you really are too fucking stupid for words
noBut who made the most money?
Haliburton stock price
10.35 March 21, 2003
14.74 March 21, 2004
21.96 March 21, 2005
35.20 March 21, 2006
Dick's aid was quoted as saying "We knew attacks were coming, but we we're expecting truck bombs, nothing like this"
Was he saying the Administration was Okay with truck bombs?
it was saying the focus was on something of that nature
100% right as per usual.
To defend everything is to defend nothing. The modus operandi up until 9/11 was truck bomb so naturally our investigators that were privvy to the knowledge of the attack were looking at truck bomb type attacks.
Stock price doesn't necessarily translate into a company making money; the shareholders are the ones who make the money when prices go up; the company makes the money during the initial offering. Granted the board probably is the single largest owning entity but a little old lady in Belarus may have made the most money off of Halliburton stock.
International team = USA and allies.
Bottom line is that WMD could have been planted in a hundred different ways in Iraq. We had the trace elements found in scientists homes that could have been used. For one. But we didn't.
International team = USA and allies.
Bottom line is that WMD could have been planted in a hundred different ways in Iraq. We had the trace elements found in scientists homes that could have been used. For one. But we didn't.
Yeah...we really listened to Hans Blix and the IAEA before going in; surely the feared "international team" would have cleaned our clock.
Curvelight is just fucking stupid.
and clearly you are too fucking stupid to understand that to plant them would be to also make them appear to be authenticand who would be the people DOING that dating and checking?There is an easy answer. Planting wmd was an unnecessary risk. NBC weapons can be dated and traced through their chemical compounds so if wmd had been planted in iraq there would have been an international inspection of them and once discovered the weapons were planted, there's a whole new international nightmare of fucking public relations.
You want the absolute proof it was an unnecessary risk? All the evidence is right there for you to see. The bush admin admitted to the world wmd was not found. What were the consequences of that admission? Did anyone get charged with a crime for the invasion? Did it force immediate withdrawal of US troops? No. The absence of wmd did not do one single fuckig thing to impede the goals of invasion, occupation, or installation of permanent bases.
Next question.
the government that planted them
you really are too fucking stupid for words
I guess you missed the part of my post that pointed out there would have been an INTERNATIONAL INSPECTION TEAM.
dumbfucking divecon
and clearly you are too fucking stupid to understand that to plant them would be to also make them appear to be authenticand who would be the people DOING that dating and checking?
the government that planted them
you really are too fucking stupid for words
I guess you missed the part of my post that pointed out there would have been an INTERNATIONAL INSPECTION TEAM.
dumbfucking divecon
and if you dont think the government has the capacity to make something look and have the signatures of being authentically Iraqi, you are a bigger idiot than i already think you are
and who would be the people DOING that dating and checking?There is an easy answer. Planting wmd was an unnecessary risk. NBC weapons can be dated and traced through their chemical compounds so if wmd had been planted in iraq there would have been an international inspection of them and once discovered the weapons were planted, there's a whole new international nightmare of fucking public relations.
You want the absolute proof it was an unnecessary risk? All the evidence is right there for you to see. The bush admin admitted to the world wmd was not found. What were the consequences of that admission? Did anyone get charged with a crime for the invasion? Did it force immediate withdrawal of US troops? No. The absence of wmd did not do one single fuckig thing to impede the goals of invasion, occupation, or installation of permanent bases.
Next question.
the government that planted them
you really are too fucking stupid for words
Leave it to curvelight to swing and miss.
I'll take the ball from here. The consequences are far reaching for not finding WMDs. Herei just one. Okay now Iran is rattling it's saber. Had the GOP been in office, could they come to the population and say WMD when we found none in Iraq? No. I mean its almost as if the twoofers have the mind capacity of a gnat; too much inhalation of the chili and frostys at Wendy's is curvelight's problem I'm guessing; that or cannabis.
no
it was saying the focus was on something of that nature
100% right as per usual.
To defend everything is to defend nothing. The modus operandi up until 9/11 was truck bomb so naturally our investigators that were privvy to the knowledge of the attack were looking at truck bomb type attacks.
Stock price doesn't necessarily translate into a company making money; the shareholders are the ones who make the money when prices go up; the company makes the money during the initial offering. Granted the board probably is the single largest owning entity but a little old lady in Belarus may have made the most money off of Halliburton stock.
They also tend to forget that Haliburton received it's first no bid contract under the Clinton administration.
