Which POTUS admin is to blame for North Korea having an operational nuclear ICBM that can reach USA?

[radical right]

The Taiwanese have their own military, supplied by the US, and are completely independent. The Chinese won't invade them.

Then explain why the chinese spent the last decade building their militaries amphibious assault capabilities.

To scare the Taiwanese into submission.

You just went circular. That china won't invade taiwan, but they're building their military to scare taiwan into submission.

 

[radical right]

China supports N. Korea just like Rusia support Syria.

 

[JBond]

Mod Message:

Topic is NOT Iraq. Topic is NOT Iran. Topic is not what drug someone might be using.
Read the title and OP BEFORE you hit Reply. Off-topic diversions will be warned...

All deviation/diversion will be deleted? Does it apply to all threads/posts and OP's?

Don't care HOW you choose to argue a topic. Because we don't do content control. But the rules are designed for TOPIC control. So that the discussion matches the title and OP. Otherwise, no one wants to read thru a 5 way free for all. In Zone2 -- EVERY POST needs to contain specific topical content.

Wanna discuss something else? Find an existing thread topic or start a new one.. It's not difficult..

I was confused by the "because we don't do content control", I was a bit curious about the application of the policy. Can you please elaborate? Thank you.

 

[usmbguest5318]

Which POTUS admin is to blame for North Korea having an operational nuclear ICBM that can reach USA?

What's done was done re: all those prior administrations. The fact is that Trump was POTUS when the DPRK obtained an ICBM. He and he alone must bear the blame (or praise if one is North Korean) for allowing that to happen because Trump the "tough talker" certainly has at his disposal the means to have prevented it from happening. Remember, Trump is purportedly "all about America first," so he doesn't have to care what anyone else or any other nation may say about his actions....

I believe "so what" was the refrain most often aired by Trump sycophants when I posted a thread about other nations' views of the U.S., Trump and his actions. A few of the early replies to that effect included:

• Low Confidence in Trump Wordwide
  
• Low Confidence in Trump Wordwide
  
• Low Confidence in Trump Wordwide
  
• Low Confidence in Trump Wordwide

So the "what" now is that Trump failed to act and the DPRK now has an ICBM. Do I hear "so what" coming from the Trumpkin tribe? I don't think so....

 

[theHawk]

The Taiwanese have their own military, supplied by the US, and are completely independent. The Chinese won't invade them.

Then explain why the chinese spent the last decade building their militaries amphibious assault capabilities.

To scare the Taiwanese into submission.

You just went circular. That china won't invade taiwan, but they're building their military to scare taiwan into submission.

How is that circular? It's called a bluff.

 

[theHawk]

China supports N. Korea just like Rusia support Syria.

Not any more. North Korea jeopardizes China's relationship with the US. China makes much of their wealth from the US. NK is a welfare state costing them money.

 

[JBond]

Which POTUS admin is to blame for North Korea having an operational nuclear ICBM that can reach USA?

What's done was done re: all those prior administrations. The fact is that Trump was POTUS when the DPRK obtained an ICBM. He and he alone must bear the blame (or praise if one is North Korean) for allowing that to happen because Trump the "tough talker" certainly has at his disposal the means to have prevented it from happening. Remember, Trump is purportedly "all about America first," so he doesn't have to care what anyone else or any other nation may say about his actions....

I believe "so what" was the refrain most often aired when I posted a thread about other nations' views of the U.S., Trump and his actions. So the "what" now is that Trump failed to act and the DPRK now has an ICBM. Do I hear "so what" coming from the Trumpkin tribe? I don't think so....

Another ignorant liberal leader. Good. Keep it up.

 

[usmbguest5318]

Which POTUS admin is to blame for North Korea having an operational nuclear ICBM that can reach USA?

What's done was done re: all those prior administrations. The fact is that Trump was POTUS when the DPRK obtained an ICBM. He and he alone must bear the blame (or praise if one is North Korean) for allowing that to happen because Trump the "tough talker" certainly has at his disposal the means to have prevented it from happening. Remember, Trump is purportedly "all about America first," so he doesn't have to care what anyone else or any other nation may say about his actions....

I believe "so what" was the refrain most often aired when I posted a thread about other nations' views of the U.S., Trump and his actions. So the "what" now is that Trump failed to act and the DPRK now has an ICBM. Do I hear "so what" coming from the Trumpkin tribe? I don't think so....

Another ignorant liberal leader. Good. Keep it up.

Oh, I see you are still a member of the bleating chorus.

Another ignorant liberal leader. Good. Keep it up.

As compared with you who, quite simply, is no leader of any sort.

 

[hortysir]

There is a lot of blame to go around.

We have simply been paying North Korea extortion money for decades.

Appeasement does not work. It has never worked.

We are doing the same thing with Iran. It's so fucking stupid. North Korea now is Iran in less than a decade.

Kicking the can to the next administration is NOT A STRATEGY.

You may as well ask if it's Germany's or Sweden's or Poland's fault that we became a world super power.

Just because NK has built missiles doesn't necessarily lay the blame at the WH steps

 

[Two Thumbs]

There is a lot of blame to go around.

We have simply been paying North Korea extortion money for decades.

Appeasement does not work. It has never worked.

We are doing the same thing with Iran. It's so fucking stupid. North Korea now is Iran in less than a decade.

Kicking the can to the next administration is NOT A STRATEGY.

Whenever Republicans don't want to own something they say there's a lot of blame to go around.

You wouldn't allow Iran to develope a nuke and yet you're allowing Kim Jung to lob missles at us? And what was Trump's response?"doesn't that guy have anything better to do?"

What a weak and pathetic response

Betcha if Kim keeps up his silly game he'll be ducking a Tomahawk.

RR signed a treaty that prevents us from killing just him.

I agree but if Kim fires a missile at the US then he would be fair game.

not even then.

the only way to kill him would be if he got into a gun battle and was just someone that got killed.

As a leader of a nation, we would have to kill him by accident or offer to capture him.

 

[there4eyeM]

Which POTUS admin is to blame for North Korea having an operational nuclear ICBM that can reach USA?
None. The U.S. is not to 'blame' for the dubious actions of other nations. It doesn't control the world. If any country is to blame, it is China. We can, however, criticize the policies of administrations, and in that regard none was truly effective in this situation.

 

[Bassman007]

There is a lot of blame to go around.

We have simply been paying North Korea extortion money for decades.

Appeasement does not work. It has never worked.

We are doing the same thing with Iran. It's so fucking stupid. North Korea now is Iran in less than a decade.

Kicking the can to the next administration is NOT A STRATEGY.

North Korea does not have any operational ICBM's, shit half their supposed missiles blow up on the launch pad, so they would be incinerating themselves.

Grow up kid

Beyond the one they launched?

North Korea: Missile launch towards Japan on US Independence Day say South Korean military | World | News | Express.co.uk

North Korea did not launch an ICBM, they tested a rocket that had no payload, which is NOT AN ICBM, so if it blew up on the launch pad as one did last month then North Korea would not be irradiated. Again kid, this is fake news, as North Korea does not have the ability to make and launch a real ICBM. Look at these photos of their missiles on parade, they are clearly fake and designed to fool fools like you.

 

[sealybobo]

There is a lot of blame to go around.

We have simply been paying North Korea extortion money for decades.

Appeasement does not work. It has never worked.

We are doing the same thing with Iran. It's so fucking stupid. North Korea now is Iran in less than a decade.

Kicking the can to the next administration is NOT A STRATEGY.

Whenever Republicans don't want to own something they say there's a lot of blame to go around.

You wouldn't allow Iran to develope a nuke and yet you're allowing Kim Jung to lob missles at us? And what was Trump's response?"doesn't that guy have anything better to do?"

What a weak and pathetic response

Betcha if Kim keeps up his silly game he'll be ducking a Tomahawk.

Let's see. So far the only difference between Obama and Trump is talk.

 

[sealybobo]

There is a lot of blame to go around.

We have simply been paying North Korea extortion money for decades.

Appeasement does not work. It has never worked.

We are doing the same thing with Iran. It's so fucking stupid. North Korea now is Iran in less than a decade.

Kicking the can to the next administration is NOT A STRATEGY.

Whenever Republicans don't want to own something they say there's a lot of blame to go around.

You wouldn't allow Iran to develope a nuke and yet you're allowing Kim Jung to lob missles at us? And what was Trump's response?"doesn't that guy have anything better to do?"

What a weak and pathetic response

Betcha if Kim keeps up his silly game he'll be ducking a Tomahawk.

RR signed a treaty that prevents us from killing just him.

I just heard if we strike North Korea Kim Jung is the first target

 

[sealybobo]

I agree but if Kim fires a missile at the US then he would be fair game.

There was never a question of what we could do to retaliate. The problem is how many collateral casualties would there be, and how would the Chinese react seeing a nuke heading toward them.

We won't nuke them.

 

[sealybobo]

There is a lot of blame to go around.

We have simply been paying North Korea extortion money for decades.

Appeasement does not work. It has never worked.

We are doing the same thing with Iran. It's so fucking stupid. North Korea now is Iran in less than a decade.

Kicking the can to the next administration is NOT A STRATEGY.

Whenever Republicans don't want to own something they say there's a lot of blame to go around.

You wouldn't allow Iran to develope a nuke and yet you're allowing Kim Jung to lob missles at us? And what was Trump's response?"doesn't that guy have anything better to do?"

What a weak and pathetic response

Betcha if Kim keeps up his silly game he'll be ducking a Tomahawk.

RR signed a treaty that prevents us from killing just him.

I agree but if Kim fires a missile at the US then he would be fair game.

not even then.

the only way to kill him would be if he got into a gun battle and was just someone that got killed.

As a leader of a nation, we would have to kill him by accident or offer to capture him.

I just heard different on ABC news.

 

[JBond]

Which POTUS admin is to blame for North Korea having an operational nuclear ICBM that can reach USA?

What's done was done re: all those prior administrations. The fact is that Trump was POTUS when the DPRK obtained an ICBM. He and he alone must bear the blame (or praise if one is North Korean) for allowing that to happen because Trump the "tough talker" certainly has at his disposal the means to have prevented it from happening. Remember, Trump is purportedly "all about America first," so he doesn't have to care what anyone else or any other nation may say about his actions....

I believe "so what" was the refrain most often aired when I posted a thread about other nations' views of the U.S., Trump and his actions. So the "what" now is that Trump failed to act and the DPRK now has an ICBM. Do I hear "so what" coming from the Trumpkin tribe? I don't think so....

Another ignorant liberal leader. Good. Keep it up.

Oh, I see you are still a member of the bleating chorus.

Another ignorant liberal leader. Good. Keep it up.

As compared with you who, quite simply, is no leader of any sort.

You are a moron. Blaming Trump for NK is one of the dumbest things you clowns have ever suggested.

 

[iceberg]

i blame n korea. if we go outside of that, china, s korea, japan, the US, russia - everyone has a role in this and the boy needs to be smacked down and hard. his time is coming and one day we're going to wake up to news trump launched on them.

not anxious for that day any more than i am for the day we hear n korea nuked someone and the world gets to deal with the fallout. them included.

 

[iceberg]

Which POTUS admin is to blame for North Korea having an operational nuclear ICBM that can reach USA?

What's done was done re: all those prior administrations. The fact is that Trump was POTUS when the DPRK obtained an ICBM. He and he alone must bear the blame (or praise if one is North Korean) for allowing that to happen because Trump the "tough talker" certainly has at his disposal the means to have prevented it from happening. Remember, Trump is purportedly "all about America first," so he doesn't have to care what anyone else or any other nation may say about his actions....

I believe "so what" was the refrain most often aired when I posted a thread about other nations' views of the U.S., Trump and his actions. So the "what" now is that Trump failed to act and the DPRK now has an ICBM. Do I hear "so what" coming from the Trumpkin tribe? I don't think so....

Another ignorant liberal leader. Good. Keep it up.

Oh, I see you are still a member of the bleating chorus.

Another ignorant liberal leader. Good. Keep it up.

As compared with you who, quite simply, is no leader of any sort.

You are a moron. Blaming Trump for NK is one of the dumbest things you clowns have ever suggested.

hate doesn't reason.

it just hates.

 

[debbiedowner]

Definitely has nothing to do with NK's immediate neighbors, Russia and China, wanting them to have this capability. No way.

Which border does NK share with Russia, sploogy?

You fascists sure are smart....

Russia shares border with NK along the Tumen River.