Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Shrub 43 gave $3 trillion in tax cut welfare to millionaires. The GOP has always been about protecting the profits of corporations....military contractors...BIG OIL...Big Pharma...real estate...insurance companies...and Wall Street banks....Your really are as dumb as a bag of door knobs.This is why the stupid vote republican.^^^^^The wealthiest one percent have benefited more under dem rule than they ever did under con rule.
Seems to me the stupid ones keep voting Democrat. Under Democrat rule the one percenters have always done better than under repub rule. That's a simple fact. Dems have controlled this country far more than the repubs have.
Gosh, I'm really looking forward to your link to a reliable source that President Bush GAVE $3 TRILLION in tax cut welfare to millionaires!
Yes, Republicans protect the profits of corporations! PROUDLY SO! Do you work in the private sector or suckle at the government teat?
I look forward to your response!
Gosh, I'm really looking forward to your link to a reliable source that President Bush GAVE $3 TRILLION in tax cut welfare to millionaires!
Yes, Republicans protect the profits of corporations! PROUDLY SO! Do you work in the private sector or suckle at the government teat?
I look forward to your response!
Get out your calculator. You 'should' be very upset when you see the total.
Shrub 43 gave $3 trillion in tax cut welfare to millionaires. The GOP has always been about protecting the profits of corporations....military contractors...BIG OIL...Big Pharma...real estate...insurance companies...and Wall Street banks....Your really are as dumb as a bag of door knobs.This is why the stupid vote republican.^^^^^The wealthiest one percent have benefited more under dem rule than they ever did under con rule.
Seems to me the stupid ones keep voting Democrat. Under Democrat rule the one percenters have always done better than under repub rule. That's a simple fact. Dems have controlled this country far more than the repubs have.
Gosh, I'm really looking forward to your link to a reliable source that President Bush GAVE $3 TRILLION in tax cut welfare to millionaires!
Yes, Republicans protect the profits of corporations! PROUDLY SO! Do you work in the private sector or suckle at the government teat?
I look forward to your response!
Gosh, I'm really looking forward to your link to a reliable source that President Bush GAVE $3 TRILLION in tax cut welfare to millionaires!
Yes, Republicans protect the profits of corporations! PROUDLY SO! Do you work in the private sector or suckle at the government teat?
I look forward to your response!
Get out your calculator. You 'should' be very upset when you see the total.
Ten Years of the Bush Tax Cuts Benefiting the Rich
Ten Years of the Bush Tax Cuts Benefiting the Rich
The 2nd calls for Militias to be armed, not the general citizenry. That's in English, too.Doesn't matter because you interpret it wrongly. Just the way it is.
It is in English. It doesn't need to be interpreted.
Fort Drum, Fort Hamilton, Watervliet, Arsenal NAVY NSU, US Military Academy West Point are all in NYS.
Let us move on to NJ liar.
1. Fort Dix
2. McGuire AFB
3. Picatinny Arsenal
4. Fort Monmouth
Connecticut has the Coast Guard Academy and the New London Sub Base
Massachusettes has Hanscomb AFB, Westover AFB, and Fort Devens.
New Hampshire has the Portsmouth Shipyard
Rhode Island has Naval Stations at Newport, Castle Hill and Point Judith.
Shall I continue liar? I think I will.
California has 32 Military Bases
Vandenburg AFB,
Edwards AFB
Sierra Army Depot
Beale AFB
McClellan AFB
Military Ocean Terminal Concord
San Joaquin Army Depot
TRACEN Peteluma Coast Guard
ISC Alameda Coast Guard
Mountain Training Marine Center
Camp Parks Army PRAFT
Camp Pendleton Marine Base
Here are 21 more military Bases in California.
Blue states have more military bases and still they are no parasite states like the red states. Your argument is a fail.
As a percentage of those states local economy, they are nothing in NY and CA.
In Mississippi they are huge.
The real question is why does your bullshit survey count military spending as dollar handouts?
Because bagger is a propagandist. Real facts don't matter to a propagandist. They're scum.
Leave it to a biased CON mod to call facts propaganda and call the presenter of facts a propagandist. CONS hate facts and that is why the post fact free statements, tell outright lies and quote Faux News.
CONS are pathetic and so are the states in which they reside.
The 2nd calls for Militias to be armed, not the general citizenry. That's in English, too.Doesn't matter because you interpret it wrongly. Just the way it is.
It is in English. It doesn't need to be interpreted.
The 2nd calls for Militias to be armed, not the general citizenry. That's in English, too.Doesn't matter because you interpret it wrongly. Just the way it is.
It is in English. It doesn't need to be interpreted.
Constitution gives the Congress the right to admit states, so it has the right to stop states from leaving as well as booting them out.Congress has no legislative authority to eject a state from the union, just as it has no legislative authority to prevent a state from leaving the union.It is **WARNING** a ... fact that the biggest parasite states are the red states, so from a strictly economic stand point they should be gone but one could make the humanitarian plea and say that these welfare states need a hand up and not a hand out. Also other states like Alaska have lots of natural resources while others don't and have to rely on smart people as their natural resources e.g. NY, CT, MA, NJ. The smart people are in the Northeast.
Some states need to go for moral reasons. Florida is a toilet, Texas has been whining about seceding for a long time and to those turds I say, "America, love it or leave it. Get the fuck out and see if Mexico will baby sit you." Alabama, Kentucky and Mississippi should go too.
America would be better off without corrupt states such as Florida and Texas and the other corrupt, immoral and parasitic red states.
The 2nd calls for Militias to be armed, not the general citizenry.
In the case of Texas v. White in 1869, Supreme Court Chief Justice Salmon P. Chase wrote that, “The union between Texas and the other states was as complete, as perpetual, and as indissoluble as the union between the original states. There was no place for reconsideration or revocation, except through revolution or through consent of the States.” The majority opinion struck down the Texas Ordinance of Secession, calling it “null,” and crafted a decision that rendered all acts of secession illegal according to the “perpetual union” of both the Articles of Confederation and subsequent Constitution for the United States. Chase did leave an opening, “revolution or the consent of the States,” but without either, secession could never be considered a legal act.
Secession is unconstitutional and so is part of a state forming another state. That said, if Texas or Florida or any other read state wants to go the US most hard working people won't mind. Nobody like parasites.
Washington, DC isn't a state, dumbass.It is **WARNING** a ... fact that the biggest parasite states are the red states, so from a strictly economic stand point they should be gone but one could make the humanitarian plea and say that these welfare states need a hand up and not a hand out. Also other states like Alaska have lots of natural resources while others don't and have to rely on smart people as their natural resources e.g. NY, CT, MA, NJ. The smart people are in the Northeast.
Some states need to go for moral reasons. Florida is a toilet, Texas has been whining about seceding for a long time and to those turds I say, "America, love it or leave it. Get the fuck out and see if Mexico will baby sit you." Alabama, Kentucky and Mississippi should go too.
America would be better off without corrupt states such as Florida and Texas and the other corrupt, immoral and parasitic red states.
Washington DC
OMG, you just attacked Obama and his 57 States. You're a ... racist ... DC is too black for you, is it, grand wizard?
You can't tap dance away from calling Washington DC a state, libtard.
^^^He's not very bright.D.C. got statehood?It is **WARNING** a ... fact that the biggest parasite states are the red states, so from a strictly economic stand point they should be gone but one could make the humanitarian plea and say that these welfare states need a hand up and not a hand out. Also other states like Alaska have lots of natural resources while others don't and have to rely on smart people as their natural resources e.g. NY, CT, MA, NJ. The smart people are in the Northeast.
Some states need to go for moral reasons. Florida is a toilet, Texas has been whining about seceding for a long time and to those turds I say, "America, love it or leave it. Get the fuck out and see if Mexico will baby sit you." Alabama, Kentucky and Mississippi should go too.
America would be better off without corrupt states such as Florida and Texas and the other corrupt, immoral and parasitic red states.
Washington DC
DC is to black for you, is it negro hater? Clearly DC is one of Obama's 57 States. Racism is great for you as long as it works for you
- Doesn't know 'to' from 'too'.
- Thinks DC is a state.
- Like a typical wingnut, screws up, tries to blame Obama.
The 2nd calls for Militias to be armed, not the general citizenry.
No it doesn't.
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the
right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
The right of the people within that Militia, shall not be infringed.
The founding fathers did not want stupid people aka today's Republicans to be running around with guns.
The 2nd calls for Militias to be armed, not the general citizenry.
No it doesn't.
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the
right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
The right of the people within that Militia, shall not be infringed. The founding fathers did not want stupid people aka today's Republicans to be running around with guns.
The right of the people within that Militia, shall not be infringed. The founding fathers did not want stupid people aka today's Republicans to be running around with guns.
They didn't? So did they give congress the legislative power in Art I, section 8 to prohibit the acquisition or possession of guns by the people of the states?
Did you fail remedial reading? The rights of the well regulated militia shall not be infringed.
That does not mean that that any idiot can have a gun. Back then they didn't let idiots in the militias.
For you idiots [... blah blah]
Why are you only quoting parts of their statements, out of context?The 2nd calls for Militias to be armed, not the general citizenry. That's in English, too.Doesn't matter because you interpret it wrongly. Just the way it is.
It is in English. It doesn't need to be interpreted.
Wrong. Simple English, which you clearly don't understand, is very clear on the subject. Here are the very words of the Founders which absolutely refutes your BS.
Tenche Coxe: “Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American… The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.” – Tenche Coxe, The Pennsylvania Gazette, Feb. 20, 1788.
Tench Coxe: “Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birth-right of an American… [T]he unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.”, Pennsylvania Gazette, Feb. 20, 1788.
Rep. Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts: “Whenever governments mean to invade the rights and liberties of the people, they always attempt to destroy the militia, in order to raise an army upon their ruins.” (spoken during floor debate over the Second Amendment, I Annals of Congress at 750, August 17, 1789.)
Alexander Hamilton: “…that standing army can never be formidable (threatening) to the liberties of the people, while there is a large body of citizens, little if at all inferior to them in the use of arms.” (Federalist Paper #29)
Alexander Hamilton: “The project of disciplining all the militia of the United States is as futile as it would be injurious, if it were capable of being carried into execution. A tolerable expertness in military movements is a business that requires time and practice. It is not a day, or even a week, that will suffice for the attainment of it. To oblige the great body of the yeomanry, and of the other classes of the citizens, to be under arms for the purpose of going through military exercises and evolutions, as often as might be necessary to acquire the degree of perfection which would entitle them to the character of a well-regulated militia, would be a real grievance to the people, and a serious public inconvenience and loss. It would form an annual deduction from the productive labor of the country, to an amount which, calculating upon the present numbers of the people, would not fall far short of the whole expense of the civil establishments of all the States. To attempt a thing which would abridge the mass of labor and industry to so considerable an extent, would be unwise: and the experiment, if made, could not succeed, because it would not long be endured. Little more can reasonably be aimed at, with respect to the people at large, than to have them properly armed and equipped” – Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No.2
Patrick Henry: “The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun.” 3 Elliot, Debates at 386.
Thomas Jefferson: “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.”, Proposal for a Virginia Constitution, 1 T. Jefferson Papers, 334 (C.J. Boyd, Ed. 1950)
Richard Henry Lee: “To preserve liberty it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them…” (LIGHT HORSE HARRY) LEE, writing in Letters from the Federal Farmer to the Republic (1787-1788)
And the most relevant one to this discussion....
George Mason: “I ask you sir, who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people.” (Elliott, Debates, 425-426)
Did you fail remedial reading? The rights of the well regulated militia shall not be infringed.
I think it's you that failed remedial reading. This is what the amendment says:
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the
right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
And this is what you comprehended it to say:
"The rights of the well regulated militia shall not be infringed."
Do you see now that your reading comprehension kind of sucks?
That does not mean that that any idiot can have a gun. Back then they didn't let idiots in the militias.
For you idiots [... blah blah]
If your contention is that congress has constitutional legislative authority to interfere with the acquisition or possession of arms by the people of the states, please quote the language.
The 2nd calls for Militias to be armed, not the general citizenry. That's in English, too.Doesn't matter because you interpret it wrongly. Just the way it is.
It is in English. It doesn't need to be interpreted.
