Whistleblower’s Lawyers Release Statement Threatening Journalists If They Publish His Name

It was an illegal FISA warrant obtained through perjury.
False. Sorry my angry little friend, your fantasy is only that.
The CIA cannot collect intelligence on American citizens without a legal FISA warrant.
100% wrong.

Dude... when was the last time you were right about ANYTHING? Anything at all? This is what Trump has done to your brain.
You record for being wrong is 100%.
Neat! Witty, and fresh!
 
It's illegal for the CIA to investigate American citizens
But it can be perfectly legal for them to collect intelligence on American citizens.

and for the FBI to investigate Americans without a Grand Jury.
Where DO you get this nonsense?
Only with a legal FISA warrant, not that perjured piece of shit Brennan and Comey used.
Sorry my man, that was a FISA warrant.

And you're wrong anyway. No, the CIA does not need a FISA warrant to collect intelligence on american citizens. FISA warrants are for wiretaps and their variants.

You're just kind of making shit up as you go, aren't ya?
It was an illegal FISA warrant obtained through perjury. Do you leftwing assholes ever question anything the deep state does?

Looks like someone sold you the Brooklyn bridge chump.

Out here in the real world, three years into Trump’s admin, FISA warrants were reviewed and nothing illegal was found, no one charged with anything.
 
It's illegal for the CIA to investigate American citizens
But it can be perfectly legal for them to collect intelligence on American citizens.

and for the FBI to investigate Americans without a Grand Jury.
Where DO you get this nonsense?
Only with a legal FISA warrant, not that perjured piece of shit Brennan and Comey used.
Sorry my man, that was a FISA warrant.

And you're wrong anyway. No, the CIA does not need a FISA warrant to collect intelligence on american citizens. FISA warrants are for wiretaps and their variants.

You're just kind of making shit up as you go, aren't ya?
It was an illegal FISA warrant obtained through perjury. Do you leftwing assholes ever question anything the deep state does?

Looks like someone sold you the Brooklyn bridge chump.

Out here in the real world, three years into Trump’s admin, FISA warrants were reviewed and nothing illegal was found, no one charged with anything.
Wrong, turd. Barr is preparing to hound down the indictments right now.
 
But it can be perfectly legal for them to collect intelligence on American citizens.

Where DO you get this nonsense?
Only with a legal FISA warrant, not that perjured piece of shit Brennan and Comey used.
Sorry my man, that was a FISA warrant.

And you're wrong anyway. No, the CIA does not need a FISA warrant to collect intelligence on american citizens. FISA warrants are for wiretaps and their variants.

You're just kind of making shit up as you go, aren't ya?
It was an illegal FISA warrant obtained through perjury. Do you leftwing assholes ever question anything the deep state does?

Looks like someone sold you the Brooklyn bridge chump.

Out here in the real world, three years into Trump’s admin, FISA warrants were reviewed and nothing illegal was found, no one charged with anything.
Wrong, turd. Barr is preparing to hound down the indictments right now.

Yea yea, any day now chump :rolleyes:
 
The 'Whistle Blower' is NOT a 'Whistle Blower' because they do NOT qualify as such.

The Faux Whistle Blower filed a complaint regarding INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITY.
- The DIPLOMATIC PHONE CALL between the President of the United States and the Ukraine PM has NOTHING to do with the Intel Community or Intel activity. Nether the United States and the Ukraine PM are members of the Intel Community!

FAIL!
 
The Faux Whistle Blower is NOT entitled to ANONYMITY, even if they were a legitimate, qualified Whistle Blower - WHICH THEY ARE NOT!

Legitimate Whistle Blowerss - ACCORDING TO THE LAW - are entitled to PROTECTION FROM TARGETING / REPRAISAL IN THE WORK-PLACE!!

The whole claim that they are entitled to anonymity is BULLSHIT - its just the Democrats wanting to keep the already exposed partisan, politically-biased, Deep State, Biden-connected, former Co-Conspirator Brennan-connected CIA spy's identity secret to try to prevent it being proven further that this is all ANOTHER Democrat coup attempt - one do SEVERAL during the last 4 years!
 
Out here in the real world, three years into Trump’s admin, FISA warrants were reviewed and nothing illegal was found, no one charged with anything.


Mueller - Comey mentor and former FBI Director who was called before a Secret FISA Court hearing to answer for numerous FBI FISA Court Abuses -actually NEVER reviewed Comey FBI FISA Court Abuse - he ignored it altogether.

Wha'samatter, snowflake? Getting nervous about the pending US IG FISA Court Abuse report?

You already trying to set the stage for calling the unreleased report biased / false?!

Bwuhahahaha....
 
Out here in the real world, three years into Trump’s admin, FISA warrants were reviewed and nothing illegal was found, no one charged with anything.


Mueller - Comey mentor and former FBI Director who was called before a Secret FISA Court hearing to answer for numerous FBI FISA Court Abuses -actually NEVER reviewed Comey FBI FISA Court Abuse - he ignored it altogether.

Wha'samatter, snowflake? Getting nervous about the pending US IG FISA Court Abuse report?

You already trying to set the stage for calling the unreleased report biased / false?!

Bwuhahahaha....

Crazy dumbass, wtf does Special Investigation into Russian interference and Trump’s Obstruction have to do with investigating FISA court warrants?

If Trump’s DOJ actually had something they would act on it long ago. They got nothing.
 
If Trump’s DOJ actually had something they would act on it long ago. They got nothing.
Patience, lil' snowflake....the FISA Abuse report will be out soon, followed by more recommended indictments of criminal Democrats...

.
 
If Trump’s DOJ actually had something they would act on it long ago. They got nothing.
Patience, lil' snowflake....the FISA Abuse report will be out soon
.

What wait are we talking about? Let put a date on it, so I'll come back here with undeniable proof that you are a clueless dupe.
Please do, lil' snowflake.

Earlier OldLady asked what was to debate about regarding Quid Pro Quo and what the President did. I had to educate / remind her of 2 existing pieces of 2 documents the Democrats refuse to name / mention out loud because they totally destroy their false narrative on which they are basing their latest coup attempt.

1 is the Law Enforcement Assistance and Cooperation treaty that exists between the US & other nations - to include Ukraine.

This treaty establishes a process in which nations can obtain the other's assistance in investigating corruption, crime, and terrorism, a process / treaty initiated by the President contacting another nation's leader and asking for that assistance...which is what the President did.

Democrats have failed about the potential for foreign interference in the 2020 election and how something must be done to ensure it does not happen.

In 2016, evidence shows, Democrats sent reps to Ukraine to collaborate with former corrupt Ukraine politicians to get 'dirt' on the President's team to use during the election, thereby interfering in the 2016 election.

Ensuring corrupt Ukraine officials were / are no longer interfering in US elections is this not only a 'good idea' but falls within the President's duty / responsibility in protecting this nation / our national security.

Democrats...and snowflakes dare not being this treaty up or acknowledge it in debate because it completely shreds their 'Collusion Delusion 2.0: Ukraine' false coup narrative.

There is 1 more I have brought up numerous times, with links to the legislation passed I. 2018 by Congress regarding military aid given to foreign nations that also shred the liberal false coup narrative.

Why don't you go away, research that one, and come back and ADMIT the Democrats don't have a legitimate, non-treasonous leg to stand on, snowflake?!

Put that peg back in the ground for this discussion so we can come back and revisit it...

:p
 
If Trump’s DOJ actually had something they would act on it long ago. They got nothing.
Patience, lil' snowflake....the FISA Abuse report will be out soon
.

What wait are we talking about? Let put a date on it, so I'll come back here with undeniable proof that you are a clueless dupe.
Please do, lil' snowflake.

Earlier OldLady asked what was to debate about regarding Quid Pro Quo and what the President did. I had to educate / remind her of 2 existing pieces of 2 documents the Democrats refuse to name / mention out loud because they totally destroy their false narrative on which they are basing their latest coup attempt.

1 is the Law Enforcement Assistance and Cooperation treaty that exists between the US & other nations - to include Ukraine.

This treaty establishes a process in which nations can obtain the other's assistance in investigating corruption, crime, and terrorism, a process / treaty initiated by the President contacting another nation's leader and asking for that assistance...which is what the President did.

Democrats have failed about the potential for foreign interference in the 2020 election and how something must be done to ensure it does not happen.

In 2016, evidence shows, Democrats sent reps to Ukraine to collaborate with former corrupt Ukraine politicians to get 'dirt' on the President's team to use during the election, thereby interfering in the 2016 election.

Ensuring corrupt Ukraine officials were / are no longer interfering in US elections is this not only a 'good idea' but falls within the President's duty / responsibility in protecting this nation / our national security.

Democrats...and snowflakes dare not being this treaty up or acknowledge it in debate because it completely shreds their 'Collusion Delusion 2.0: Ukraine' false coup narrative.

There is 1 more I have brought up numerous times, with links to the legislation passed I. 2018 by Congress regarding military aid given to foreign nations that also shred the liberal false coup narrative.

Why don't you go away, research that one, and come back and ADMIT the Democrats don't have a legitimate, non-treasonous leg to stand on, snowflake?!

Put that peg back in the ground for this discussion so we can come back and revisit it...

:p

Hey rambling moron, whats the due-by date?
 
Rambling? Are you too stupid to understand the Law Enforcement Assistance & Cooperation Treaty or just too partisanly dishonest / loyal to acknowledge its existence, like your Democrat Puppet Masters?
 
Meanwhile the left releases names of people they WANT attacked all the time with no repercussions at all.
/----/ Another confirmation.
upload_2019-11-6_11-32-37.png
 
Wait, what happened to freedom of the press? If they have the name, they should release the name. Inquiring minds want to know. And I don't care about his family and friends. I do think he should be required to testify as a significant witness for this whole impeachment circus.
/----/ The purpose of the Whistle Bower Act is to protect the informant from losing his job - not to hide his/her identity.
The Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989, 5 U.S.C. 2302(b)(8)-(9), Pub.L. 101-12 as amended, is a United States federal law that protects federal whistleblowers who work for the government and report the possible existence of an activity constituting a violation of law, rules, or regulations, or mismanagement, gross waste of funds, abuse of authority or a substantial and specific danger to public health and safety. A federal agency violates the Whistleblower Protection Act if agency authorities take (or threaten to take) retaliatory personnel action against any employee or applicant because of disclosure of information by that employee or applicant.[1]
Whistleblower Protection Act - Wikipedia
 
Wait, what happened to freedom of the press? If they have the name, they should release the name. Inquiring minds want to know. And I don't care about his family and friends. I do think he should be required to testify as a significant witness for this whole impeachment circus.
Why? Out of one side of your mouth, you're saying the guy knows nothing first hand. So what do you want him to testify to?
 
Eric Ciaramella.Eric Ciaramella.Eric Ciaramella.Eric Ciaramella.Eric
Ciaramella.Eric Ciaramella. Eric Ciaramella.Eric Ciaramella.Eric
Ciaramella.Eric Ciaramella.Eric Ciaramella.Eric Ciaramella.
Eric Ciaramella.Eric Ciaramella.Eric Ciaramella.Eric Ciaramella.Eric
Ciaramella.Eric Ciaramella. Eric Ciaramella.Eric Ciaramella.Eric
Ciaramella.Eric Ciaramella.Eric Ciaramella.Eric Ciaramella.

Alleged Identity Of Whistleblower Leaked; Whistleblower's Lawyers Release Statement Threatening Journalists
Not only was THE SPY involved in Extorting The Ukraine in to firing the prosecutor investigating Hunter Biden and Soros, now we learn that he was directly connected to Biden and Obama and was also involved in Propagating The Dirty Russian Dossier that Obama and Clinton paid for and used as the basis to mount a COUP and Espionage Operation against The President.
 

Forum List

Back
Top