White House Confirms It's Purging Disloyal Employees 'From the Bowels of the Federal Government

[Dr Grump]

Dems don't get it....Trump is us....so what is good for Trump is good for us.....

Spoken like a good little foot soldier. "I didn't have a choice. I was just following orders, your honour."

 

[Rambunctious]

Dems don't get it....Trump is us....so what is good for Trump is good for us.....

Spoken like a good little foot soldier. "I didn't have a choice. I was just following orders, your honour."

Says an Obama ball licker.....

 

[Dr Grump]

Dems don't get it....Trump is us....so what is good for Trump is good for us.....

Spoken like a good little foot soldier. "I didn't have a choice. I was just following orders, your honour."

Says an Obama ball licker.....

Nein, Herr Rambu...

 

[Denizen]

What I find disturbing is the progressive left's apparent approval of unelected, unaccountable people deciding what US foreign policy should be.

The PEOPLE elect the President, and the President sets policy. Elections have consequences, unless you are part of the ruling elite.

If you would like to see where that ends look up Russia when it was run by the Bureaus in the 1500's and 1600's.

It's not good for the people.

You oppose Putin telling Trump what US policy should be?

Pootins putz in the White House was obummer. Your hero.

Putin now owns the greatest Putz of all Putzes and the greatest Putz there will ever be, comrade Donald Trump.

If only you had evidence of that. So far the available evidence proves you to be an imbecile.

Obummer, your hero, let pootin run roughshod over Ukraine. Trump hasn't.

Obummer, your hero, allowed pootins troops to violate US Areas of Operation. Trump allowed our troops to kill them.

So, a thinking person, which leaves you out, comes to the obvious conclusion that obummer did his masters bidding while Trump has stopped pootin wherever possible.

But....but...that badass Barry Hussein sent the Ukraine blankets to fight off the Russians.

The Trump administration sent Rudy Giuliani to Ukraine to surrender to the Russians.

No blankets just a white flag and a red MAGA hat.

 

[Denizen]

I fail to see what all the hullabaloo is all about. Getting rid of people is common in any company or an organization. I spent half my life in the military and witnessed many firings and hirings when a new commander or leader took over. When the new boss comes in, he spends a good amount of time observing, talking to people and gauging the overall situation. Then he begins changing and replacing people until he gets the team he needs to operate with. Apparently Trump is merely fine tuning his administration to suit his needs and is pissing off people who need to be pissed on.

Is Donald Trump rejecting prospective recruits with bone spurs?

Just commies with bone spurs.

Except for the First Commie? Commie in Chief?

 

[westwall]

You oppose Putin telling Trump what US policy should be?

Pootins putz in the White House was obummer. Your hero.

Putin now owns the greatest Putz of all Putzes and the greatest Putz there will ever be, comrade Donald Trump.

If only you had evidence of that. So far the available evidence proves you to be an imbecile.

Obummer, your hero, let pootin run roughshod over Ukraine. Trump hasn't.

Obummer, your hero, allowed pootins troops to violate US Areas of Operation. Trump allowed our troops to kill them.

So, a thinking person, which leaves you out, comes to the obvious conclusion that obummer did his masters bidding while Trump has stopped pootin wherever possible.

But....but...that badass Barry Hussein sent the Ukraine blankets to fight off the Russians.

The Trump administration sent Rudy Giuliani to Ukraine to surrender to the Russians.

No blankets just a white flag and a red MAGA hat.

How does it feel to be deranged?

 

[Denizen]

love the maturity level of the Trumpists!

Loyalty tests and political purges....not surprising you support them.

What I find disturbing is the progressive left's apparent approval of unelected, unaccountable people deciding what US foreign policy should be.

The PEOPLE elect the President, and the President sets policy. Elections have consequences, unless you are part of the ruling elite.

If you would like to see where that ends look up Russia when it was run by the Bureaus in the 1500's and 1600's.

It's not good for the people.

You oppose Putin telling Trump what US policy should be?

Pootins putz in the White House was obummer. Your hero.

Putin now owns the greatest Putz of all Putzes and the greatest Putz there will ever be, comrade Donald Trump.

If only you had evidence of that. So far the available evidence proves you to be an imbecile.

Obummer, your hero, let pootin run roughshod over Ukraine. Trump hasn't.

Obummer, your hero, allowed pootins troops to violate US Areas of Operation. Trump allowed our troops to kill them.

So, a thinking person, which leaves you out, comes to the obvious conclusion that obummer did his masters bidding while Trump has stopped pootin wherever possible.

Donald Trump is Putin's poodle. He wouldn't have sent any aid if it hadn't been for the whistleblower.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Dems don't get it....Trump is us....so what is good for Trump is good for us.....

Spoken like a good little foot soldier. "I didn't have a choice. I was just following orders, your honour."

Says an Obama ball licker.....

You mean Michelle too, right

 

[Meister]

What I find disturbing is the progressive left's apparent approval of unelected, unaccountable people deciding what US foreign policy should be.

The PEOPLE elect the President, and the President sets policy. Elections have consequences, unless you are part of the ruling elite.

If you would like to see where that ends look up Russia when it was run by the Bureaus in the 1500's and 1600's.

It's not good for the people.

You oppose Putin telling Trump what US policy should be?

Pootins putz in the White House was obummer. Your hero.

Putin now owns the greatest Putz of all Putzes and the greatest Putz there will ever be, comrade Donald Trump.

If only you had evidence of that. So far the available evidence proves you to be an imbecile.

Obummer, your hero, let pootin run roughshod over Ukraine. Trump hasn't.

Obummer, your hero, allowed pootins troops to violate US Areas of Operation. Trump allowed our troops to kill them.

So, a thinking person, which leaves you out, comes to the obvious conclusion that obummer did his masters bidding while Trump has stopped pootin wherever possible.

Donald Trump is Putin's poodle. He wouldn't have sent any aid if it hadn't been for the whistleblower.

I think you're using a knockoff Crystal Ball that says Trump wouldn't have sent aid. just sayin'

 

[Kondor3]

The US Federal government has "bowels" ??? !!!

In that context, a proctologist would prove most efficacious at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue...

 

[Denizen]

Pootins putz in the White House was obummer. Your hero.

Putin now owns the greatest Putz of all Putzes and the greatest Putz there will ever be, comrade Donald Trump.

If only you had evidence of that. So far the available evidence proves you to be an imbecile.

Obummer, your hero, let pootin run roughshod over Ukraine. Trump hasn't.

Obummer, your hero, allowed pootins troops to violate US Areas of Operation. Trump allowed our troops to kill them.

So, a thinking person, which leaves you out, comes to the obvious conclusion that obummer did his masters bidding while Trump has stopped pootin wherever possible.

But....but...that badass Barry Hussein sent the Ukraine blankets to fight off the Russians.

The Trump administration sent Rudy Giuliani to Ukraine to surrender to the Russians.

No blankets just a white flag and a red MAGA hat.

How does it feel to be deranged?

Are you seeking a diagnosis? Sufferers mostly wear red hats which cost $0.25 to make in China and sell for $25.

Sufferers also walk around with unrestrained erections at Trump rallies.

Sufferers are compelled to wear red hats to warn healthy humans of the sufferer's plight and danger of infection.

 

[Hossfly]

I fail to see what all the hullabaloo is all about. Getting rid of people is common in any company or an organization. I spent half my life in the military and witnessed many firings and hirings when a new commander or leader took over. When the new boss comes in, he spends a good amount of time observing, talking to people and gauging the overall situation. Then he begins changing and replacing people until he gets the team he needs to operate with. Apparently Trump is merely fine tuning his administration to suit his needs and is pissing off people who need to be pissed on.

Is Donald Trump rejecting prospective recruits with bone spurs?

Just commies with bone spurs.

Except for the First Commie? Commie in Chief?

 

[Denizen]

You oppose Putin telling Trump what US policy should be?

Pootins putz in the White House was obummer. Your hero.

Putin now owns the greatest Putz of all Putzes and the greatest Putz there will ever be, comrade Donald Trump.

If only you had evidence of that. So far the available evidence proves you to be an imbecile.

Obummer, your hero, let pootin run roughshod over Ukraine. Trump hasn't.

Obummer, your hero, allowed pootins troops to violate US Areas of Operation. Trump allowed our troops to kill them.

So, a thinking person, which leaves you out, comes to the obvious conclusion that obummer did his masters bidding while Trump has stopped pootin wherever possible.

Donald Trump is Putin's poodle. He wouldn't have sent any aid if it hadn't been for the whistleblower.

I think you're using a knockoff Crystal Ball that says Trump wouldn't have sent aid. just sayin'

I didn't have a bag of real balls of GOP lawmakers at hand like Donald Trump has.

 

[Denizen]

I fail to see what all the hullabaloo is all about. Getting rid of people is common in any company or an organization. I spent half my life in the military and witnessed many firings and hirings when a new commander or leader took over. When the new boss comes in, he spends a good amount of time observing, talking to people and gauging the overall situation. Then he begins changing and replacing people until he gets the team he needs to operate with. Apparently Trump is merely fine tuning his administration to suit his needs and is pissing off people who need to be pissed on.

Is Donald Trump rejecting prospective recruits with bone spurs?

Just commies with bone spurs.

Except for the First Commie? Commie in Chief?

View attachment 309404

Keep it under your MAGA hat comrade.

 

[justoffal]

Trump...as usual...conflates loyalty to the country (or the office of the president) with loyalty to him, personally. Perhaps that should be fealty.

Can't recall this sort of things happening before. I wonder if this means combing Facebook and private lives?


White House Confirms It's Purging Disloyal Employees 'From the Bowels of the Federal Government'

The White House this week confirmed it is combing through federal agencies to identify employees not sufficiently loyal to President Trump to facilitate their ouster, sparking concerns the administration could run afoul of long-established civil service laws.

The administration is examining employees throughout the government to find anyone taking action officials decide represents an effort to undermine Trump, White House spokesman Hogan Gidley said on Fox News Monday. Gidley did not specifically mention career employees, who are statutorily protected against political retaliation, but did note the “millions” of individuals agencies employ. By contrast, there are only about 4,000 political appointees in government.

“It’s not a secret that we want people in positions that work with this president, not against him, and too often we have people in this government—I mean the federal government is massive, with millions of people—and there are a lot people out there taking action against this president and when we find them we will take appropriate action,” Gidley said.

His comments followed reports in Axios that the administration maintains “deep state” hit lists of employees to fire and the president has tasked the head of the Presidential Personnel Office, Johnny McEntee, to purge “bad people” who are not loyal to him. The latter report mentioned only political appointees, who serve at the pleasure of the president and can be dismissed at will, but Gidley’s comments this week appeared to go further.

“Time and time again we see in the media reports from people in the bowels of the federal government working against this president,” he said.

Gidley added that unelected federal workers were pushing “their own selfish political agenda” rather than advancing and executing Trump’s.

The latest comments do not mark the first time the Trump administration has stretched the limits of what is allowable under civil service protections. The number of federal employees proving their agencies took prohibited personnel practices against them reached an all-time high in Trump’s first year in office, according to the Office of Special Counsel. The State Department’s inspector general released two reports this year finding that the department illegally engaged in the political targeting of career employees. Federal law prohibits agencies from discriminating against any employee on the basis of political affiliation, or for any federal official to “coerce any applicant or employee to engage in political activity, or to retaliate against such individuals based on partisan politics.”

Read it carefully....
He's not asking for their vote.... He's not asking them to change parties. He's asking them to stop using their federal jobs as basically political terrorist cells to launch attacks on the administration that they work for. They're not supposed to do that but they have been right along.

Jo

 

[Uncensored2008]

Trump...as usual...conflates loyalty to the country (or the office of the president) with loyalty to him, personally. Perhaps that should be fealty.

Can't recall this sort of things happening before. I wonder if this means combing Facebook and private lives?


White House Confirms It's Purging Disloyal Employees 'From the Bowels of the Federal Government'

The White House this week confirmed it is combing through federal agencies to identify employees not sufficiently loyal to President Trump to facilitate their ouster, sparking concerns the administration could run afoul of long-established civil service laws.

The administration is examining employees throughout the government to find anyone taking action officials decide represents an effort to undermine Trump, White House spokesman Hogan Gidley said on Fox News Monday. Gidley did not specifically mention career employees, who are statutorily protected against political retaliation, but did note the “millions” of individuals agencies employ. By contrast, there are only about 4,000 political appointees in government.

“It’s not a secret that we want people in positions that work with this president, not against him, and too often we have people in this government—I mean the federal government is massive, with millions of people—and there are a lot people out there taking action against this president and when we find them we will take appropriate action,” Gidley said.

His comments followed reports in Axios that the administration maintains “deep state” hit lists of employees to fire and the president has tasked the head of the Presidential Personnel Office, Johnny McEntee, to purge “bad people” who are not loyal to him. The latter report mentioned only political appointees, who serve at the pleasure of the president and can be dismissed at will, but Gidley’s comments this week appeared to go further.

“Time and time again we see in the media reports from people in the bowels of the federal government working against this president,” he said.

Gidley added that unelected federal workers were pushing “their own selfish political agenda” rather than advancing and executing Trump’s.

The latest comments do not mark the first time the Trump administration has stretched the limits of what is allowable under civil service protections. The number of federal employees proving their agencies took prohibited personnel practices against them reached an all-time high in Trump’s first year in office, according to the Office of Special Counsel. The State Department’s inspector general released two reports this year finding that the department illegally engaged in the political targeting of career employees. Federal law prohibits agencies from discriminating against any employee on the basis of political affiliation, or for any federal official to “coerce any applicant or employee to engage in political activity, or to retaliate against such individuals based on partisan politics.”

About bloody time.

 

[Denizen]

Trump...as usual...conflates loyalty to the country (or the office of the president) with loyalty to him, personally. Perhaps that should be fealty.

Can't recall this sort of things happening before. I wonder if this means combing Facebook and private lives?


White House Confirms It's Purging Disloyal Employees 'From the Bowels of the Federal Government'

The White House this week confirmed it is combing through federal agencies to identify employees not sufficiently loyal to President Trump to facilitate their ouster, sparking concerns the administration could run afoul of long-established civil service laws.

The administration is examining employees throughout the government to find anyone taking action officials decide represents an effort to undermine Trump, White House spokesman Hogan Gidley said on Fox News Monday. Gidley did not specifically mention career employees, who are statutorily protected against political retaliation, but did note the “millions” of individuals agencies employ. By contrast, there are only about 4,000 political appointees in government.

“It’s not a secret that we want people in positions that work with this president, not against him, and too often we have people in this government—I mean the federal government is massive, with millions of people—and there are a lot people out there taking action against this president and when we find them we will take appropriate action,” Gidley said.

His comments followed reports in Axios that the administration maintains “deep state” hit lists of employees to fire and the president has tasked the head of the Presidential Personnel Office, Johnny McEntee, to purge “bad people” who are not loyal to him. The latter report mentioned only political appointees, who serve at the pleasure of the president and can be dismissed at will, but Gidley’s comments this week appeared to go further.

“Time and time again we see in the media reports from people in the bowels of the federal government working against this president,” he said.

Gidley added that unelected federal workers were pushing “their own selfish political agenda” rather than advancing and executing Trump’s.

The latest comments do not mark the first time the Trump administration has stretched the limits of what is allowable under civil service protections. The number of federal employees proving their agencies took prohibited personnel practices against them reached an all-time high in Trump’s first year in office, according to the Office of Special Counsel. The State Department’s inspector general released two reports this year finding that the department illegally engaged in the political targeting of career employees. Federal law prohibits agencies from discriminating against any employee on the basis of political affiliation, or for any federal official to “coerce any applicant or employee to engage in political activity, or to retaliate against such individuals based on partisan politics.”

About bloody time.

... for the rise of poorly-educated, red-hat-wearing, anus-kissers that follow dear leader Donald Trump?

Trumpery is a greater danger to America than any other political ideology. Thank god most of the sufferers of Trumpery are compelled to wear red hats to identify them t the uninfected public.

 

[justoffal]

Trump...as usual...conflates loyalty to the country (or the office of the president) with loyalty to him, personally. Perhaps that should be fealty.

Can't recall this sort of things happening before. I wonder if this means combing Facebook and private lives?


White House Confirms It's Purging Disloyal Employees 'From the Bowels of the Federal Government'

The White House this week confirmed it is combing through federal agencies to identify employees not sufficiently loyal to President Trump to facilitate their ouster, sparking concerns the administration could run afoul of long-established civil service laws.

The administration is examining employees throughout the government to find anyone taking action officials decide represents an effort to undermine Trump, White House spokesman Hogan Gidley said on Fox News Monday. Gidley did not specifically mention career employees, who are statutorily protected against political retaliation, but did note the “millions” of individuals agencies employ. By contrast, there are only about 4,000 political appointees in government.

“It’s not a secret that we want people in positions that work with this president, not against him, and too often we have people in this government—I mean the federal government is massive, with millions of people—and there are a lot people out there taking action against this president and when we find them we will take appropriate action,” Gidley said.

His comments followed reports in Axios that the administration maintains “deep state” hit lists of employees to fire and the president has tasked the head of the Presidential Personnel Office, Johnny McEntee, to purge “bad people” who are not loyal to him. The latter report mentioned only political appointees, who serve at the pleasure of the president and can be dismissed at will, but Gidley’s comments this week appeared to go further.

“Time and time again we see in the media reports from people in the bowels of the federal government working against this president,” he said.

Gidley added that unelected federal workers were pushing “their own selfish political agenda” rather than advancing and executing Trump’s.

The latest comments do not mark the first time the Trump administration has stretched the limits of what is allowable under civil service protections. The number of federal employees proving their agencies took prohibited personnel practices against them reached an all-time high in Trump’s first year in office, according to the Office of Special Counsel. The State Department’s inspector general released two reports this year finding that the department illegally engaged in the political targeting of career employees. Federal law prohibits agencies from discriminating against any employee on the basis of political affiliation, or for any federal official to “coerce any applicant or employee to engage in political activity, or to retaliate against such individuals based on partisan politics.”

About bloody time.

... for the rise of poorly-educated, red-hat-wearing, anus-kissers that follow dear leader Donald Trump?

Trumpery is a greater danger to America than any other political ideology. Thank god most of the sufferers of Trumpery are compelled to wear red hats to identify them t the uninfected public.

Useless propaganda post...
All smear.... no substance....no intellect.

Jo

 

[justoffal]

Trump...as usual...conflates loyalty to the country (or the office of the president) with loyalty to him, personally. Perhaps that should be fealty.

Can't recall this sort of things happening before. I wonder if this means combing Facebook and private lives?


White House Confirms It's Purging Disloyal Employees 'From the Bowels of the Federal Government'

The White House this week confirmed it is combing through federal agencies to identify employees not sufficiently loyal to President Trump to facilitate their ouster, sparking concerns the administration could run afoul of long-established civil service laws.

The administration is examining employees throughout the government to find anyone taking action officials decide represents an effort to undermine Trump, White House spokesman Hogan Gidley said on Fox News Monday. Gidley did not specifically mention career employees, who are statutorily protected against political retaliation, but did note the “millions” of individuals agencies employ. By contrast, there are only about 4,000 political appointees in government.

“It’s not a secret that we want people in positions that work with this president, not against him, and too often we have people in this government—I mean the federal government is massive, with millions of people—and there are a lot people out there taking action against this president and when we find them we will take appropriate action,” Gidley said.

His comments followed reports in Axios that the administration maintains “deep state” hit lists of employees to fire and the president has tasked the head of the Presidential Personnel Office, Johnny McEntee, to purge “bad people” who are not loyal to him. The latter report mentioned only political appointees, who serve at the pleasure of the president and can be dismissed at will, but Gidley’s comments this week appeared to go further.

“Time and time again we see in the media reports from people in the bowels of the federal government working against this president,” he said.

Gidley added that unelected federal workers were pushing “their own selfish political agenda” rather than advancing and executing Trump’s.

The latest comments do not mark the first time the Trump administration has stretched the limits of what is allowable under civil service protections. The number of federal employees proving their agencies took prohibited personnel practices against them reached an all-time high in Trump’s first year in office, according to the Office of Special Counsel. The State Department’s inspector general released two reports this year finding that the department illegally engaged in the political targeting of career employees. Federal law prohibits agencies from discriminating against any employee on the basis of political affiliation, or for any federal official to “coerce any applicant or employee to engage in political activity, or to retaliate against such individuals based on partisan politics.”

About bloody time.

Yeah he would have been much better off if this happened immediately.

Jo

 

[MeBelle]

We live in a sad time

Yeah, how dare Trump purge people actively undermining him and his agenda.

The nerve!

Grow the fuck up, asshat.

love the maturity level of the Trumpists!

Loyalty tests and political purges....not surprising you support them.

Coyote

Personally, I love the maturity level of


#haters


You are merely one of the #haters.