- Moderator
- #121
Nobodies being forced to live with anyone last time I checked, if the demographics of a certain area don't suit you, you are free to pack up and move.
Correct.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nobodies being forced to live with anyone last time I checked, if the demographics of a certain area don't suit you, you are free to pack up and move.
If you didn't harbor extreme, possibly subliminal, antagonism against Whites you would not be so determined to believe and to propagate this common distortion of the facts.I dont hate whites.
Whites did not abduct Black Africans. Black Africans abducted other Black Africans and sold them to Dutch, Portugese, and Arab slave traders who transported them to the Americas and sold them to White slave dealers.Whites did abduct Africans from Africa.
Yes. They were abducted -- by other Black Africans, who sold them to slave traders.
Yes. I know what the word means. So do you. But the meaning doesn't accommodate your purpose, which is (self?) deception.
Kidnapping and ransom are two separate things. Ransom is not always the motive for kidnapping someone.
It has everything to do with blame.
Your obvious objective, whether conscious or not, is to absolve Blacks of any guilt where the practice of negro slavery in the Americas is concerned, and to shift all blame for that abomination onto Whites.
Your commentary seeks to convince this forum, and possibly yourself, that Black Africans played no part in the slave trade.
That is a good question. The simple answer is those who engaged in the slave trade were concerned only with profit and had no interest in the social potential of their evil enterprise.
Now you're resorting to semantic gimmickry.You can buy white slaves in Russia or any of the other European countries today. Whats your point?
The legal term, "white slavery," refers to verious forms of involuntary or coercive servitude being separate and apart from the enslavement of Black Africans in the Americas. In legal terminology, white slavery refers specifically to the transport, either voluntary or involuntary, of females, including non-White females, across borders or state lines for the purpose of prostitution. The term has nothing to do with the enslavement of Black Africans in the Americas -- which the the primary topic of this discussion.
Europeans enslaved each other before the Trans-Atlantic slave trade. What does that have to do with the OP?
The Forgotten White Slaves Of America
One of the largest white slavery rings targetting Eastern Europeans goes down
Not in the same manner or circumstance which occurred in the example of Black African slavery in the Americas. To understand the difference you need to research the separate circumstances of chattel slavery as opposed to indentured servitude. While both are referred to as forms of "slavery" there are extremely substantial differences.
The issues are all academic since African Americans, the descendants of slaves, will be extinct in a few more generations. They will be replaced by African nationals who have no issues with prior slavery, have never been slaves nor had any of their ancestors been slaves.
Then the issue will be dead.
The issues are all academic since African Americans, the descendants of slaves, will be extinct in a few more generations. They will be replaced by African nationals who have no issues with prior slavery, have never been slaves nor had any of their ancestors been slaves.
Then the issue will be dead.
African Americans will never die out. We are the descendants of the strongest of the strong that survived the Middle Passage, slavery, Jim Crow, etc. YOu could only wish we will be extinct. Yes more African nationals are on the way as well and they dislike white racists just as much.
Again, please post your source of that information.[...]
You made a reference that Africans still engaged in slavery. I said so are whites. What did your comment have to do with slavery in the US? How is that semantic gimmickry? I never used the term white slavery so dont attempt to change my words to that. I said you can buy white slaves. That means I can go buy a person of European descent.[...]
The issues are all academic since African Americans, the descendants of slaves, will be extinct in a few more generations. They will be replaced by African nationals who have no issues with prior slavery, have never been slaves nor had any of their ancestors been slaves.
Then the issue will be dead.
African Americans will never die out. We are the descendants of the strongest of the strong that survived the Middle Passage, slavery, Jim Crow, etc. YOu could only wish we will be extinct. Yes more African nationals are on the way as well and they dislike white racists just as much.
Most Africans I know hate white racists .
Not nearly as much as they hate whiney black racists in the USA though.
You are pretty much a joke to real Africans.
Most Africans can differentiate between whites and racist whites.
You might do well to visit Africa and learn from an African.
Again, please post your source of that information.[...]
You made a reference that Africans still engaged in slavery. I said so are whites. What did your comment have to do with slavery in the US? How is that semantic gimmickry? I never used the term white slavery so dont attempt to change my words to that. I said you can buy white slaves. That means I can go buy a person of European descent.[...]
The issues are all academic since African Americans, the descendants of slaves, will be extinct in a few more generations. They will be replaced by African nationals who have no issues with prior slavery, have never been slaves nor had any of their ancestors been slaves.
Then the issue will be dead.
The issues are all academic since African Americans, the descendants of slaves, will be extinct in a few more generations. .
Stop playing the, "I'm less racist than YOU card."
NOBODY wants to live in the inner city of any big city.
Stop acting as though it is noble of you to accept the degradation in our inner cities. Stop praising the creeps and jerks who sell drugs for Bling and those who rap on stage and screen but glorify the thug life.
Liberals use us to gain power and offer us trinkets and handouts and table scraps in exchange for our votes.
But what good have they done our families our culture our standard of living in the fifty years since LBJ's Great Society debacle?
The Tea Party treats us like men.
Not votes.
To make it simple, in general blacks want to live among whites but whites don't want to live around blacks.
Lets make it even simpler:
Only ignorant, fearful, hateful racists such as you dont want to live among Blacks; everyone else doesnt care.
Stop playing the, "I'm less racist than YOU card."
NOBODY wants to live in the inner city of any big city.
Stop acting as though it is noble of you to accept the degradation in our inner cities. Stop praising the creeps and jerks who sell drugs for Bling and those who rap on stage and screen but glorify the thug life.
Liberals use us to gain power and offer us trinkets and handouts and table scraps in exchange for our votes.
But what good have they done our families our culture our standard of living in the fifty years since LBJ's Great Society debacle?
The Tea Party treats us like men.
Not votes.
It would take far more time and resources to hire, equip, feed, and move an armed force into the interior of a country (or a continent) and find, engage, restrain, and then transport large numbers of prisoners than to make a deal with one guy right there in port who then provides the 'commodity' (however evil it is to refer to human beings as such) in the number you need, already restrained and most likely pacified to a degree (be it through physical violence or the withholding of food and water). This would also involve less risk and uncertainty. Thus, it would be "financially smarter and less time consuming."
You are almost as illogical as Lonelystar_Illogical.
Who is the illogical one here?
You're on the same side of the argument I'm on yet you insult me.
You know what they say about a broken clock. I was using you as a reference based on the history of your comments here.
Who is the illogical one here?
You're on the same side of the argument I'm on yet you insult me.
You know what they say about a broken clock. I was using you as a reference based on the history of your comments here.
If that were true then you would have referenced the many times I pwned you.