Who Approved Hunter Biden's Pre-Trial Diversion, Which Needed Special Approval?

Well, according to the data, 298 cases for false statements on a firearms application were referred in 2019.... suggesting Hunter Biden did no receive worse treatment.

I understood the need for Dems / Marxists to excuse the crimes of their privileged heroes but the facts are that weapons violations and tax fraud puts people in jail.
A majority of those cases were for felons.....not for those who are drug or alcohol users...I am sure you left that part out by mistake, right?



Also.....funny thing about your faux concern over restricting the right of someone owning a gun because of drug use.....Conservatives seem to love to restrict gun rights when they think the "right people" are going to be impacted by it....

"The organization's enthusiasm for enforcing federal bans on gun possession by illegal drug users and people convicted of drug-related felonies illustrates a blind spot shared by many right-leaning critics of gun control - That inconsistency is the mirror image of attitudes among progressives, who readily recognize the injustice and racially disparate impact of drug laws while enthusiastically supporting gun laws with strikingly similar historical roots and contemporary consequences. "How much the NRA cares about your legal right to own a gun is directly related to the color of your skin," Weatherspoon wrote."


It is also funny how the current "CONSERVATIVE" Supreme Court may have given Hunter a good legal defense against that gun charge anyway....I notice you left that part out too....so I will educate you....

"Hunter Biden might use a new legal defense stemming from a ruling passed by the six-justice conservative majority in the Supreme Court in the past that pertains to gun ownership rights under the Second Amendment. Other courts began to question the ban on drug users owning guns following the SCOTUS ruling. That same year, Utah federal district judge Jill Parrish ruled that the ban was unconstitutionalbecause it lacks clarity in defining the word "user." Parrish's ruling was based on the Fifth Amendment not the Second Amendment, but still, the Buren case strengthened challenges made against the drug users' gun ownership ban."


How pissed would you right-wingers have been if Hunter took that case to trial and had it thrown out behind that 2022 decision....but I guess either way, you would be pissed....sad....
 
A majority of those cases were for felons.....not for those who are drug or alcohol users...I am sure you left that part out by mistake, right?



Also.....funny thing about your faux concern over restricting the right of someone owning a gun because of drug use.....Conservatives seem to love to restrict gun rights when they think the "right people" are going to be impacted by it....

"The organization's enthusiasm for enforcing federal bans on gun possession by illegal drug users and people convicted of drug-related felonies illustrates a blind spot shared by many right-leaning critics of gun control - That inconsistency is the mirror image of attitudes among progressives, who readily recognize the injustice and racially disparate impact of drug laws while enthusiastically supporting gun laws with strikingly similar historical roots and contemporary consequences. "How much the NRA cares about your legal right to own a gun is directly related to the color of your skin," Weatherspoon wrote."


It is also funny how the current "CONSERVATIVE" Supreme Court may have given Hunter a good legal defense against that gun charge anyway....I notice you left that part out too....so I will educate you....

"Hunter Biden might use a new legal defense stemming from a ruling passed by the six-justice conservative majority in the Supreme Court in the past that pertains to gun ownership rights under the Second Amendment. Other courts began to question the ban on drug users owning guns following the SCOTUS ruling. That same year, Utah federal district judge Jill Parrish ruled that the ban was unconstitutionalbecause it lacks clarity in defining the word "user." Parrish's ruling was based on the Fifth Amendment not the Second Amendment, but still, the Buren case strengthened challenges made against the drug users' gun ownership ban."


How pissed would you right-wingers have been if Hunter took that case to trial and had it thrown out behind that 2022 decision....but I guess either way, you would be pissed....sad....
You might be surprised to learn that false statements on a firearms applications is a felony offense.

So yes, you can cut and paste from far left publications which used expected race-baiting tactics but the fact remains that people go to jail for individual crimes of false statements on firearms applications or tax fraud.

Did you know that Hunter Biden never paid his back taxes. Those were paid by attorney Kevin Morris. Hunter Biden has a sugar daddy.
 
That frantic rant really made no sense. It wasn't any right wing media lie about Hunter Biden making false statements on a firearm application.

That isn't what I was referring too. I was speaking of all the money laundering accusations from the right.

It was no right wing media lie about taxes that Hunter Crime Boy failed to pay.
Nope. Everyone already knew that.
 
That isn't what I was referring too. I was speaking of all the money laundering accusations from the right.


Nope. Everyone already knew that.
There are obvious reasons why the money laundering investigations are taking place.
 
Well, according to the data, 298 cases for false statements on a firearms application were referred in 2019.... suggesting Hunter Biden did no receive worse treatment.

Out of how many reported. Judging by the 2017 numbers, we can safely assume it was in six figures. So less than 0.2% are actually referred.

Of the 298 that were referred, most were plead out with fines.. and usually they are additional charges if a crime was committed with the gun. Not a stand alone charge.

So, yeah, after 3 years of whining about laptops and special treatment, you got Hunter to fess up to a case because it was cheaper than beating it in court, where you know damned well a jury in Delaware isn't going to convict a Biden of anything short of murder.
 
Out of how many reported. Judging by the 2017 numbers, we can safely assume it was in six figures. So less than 0.2% are actually referred.

Of the 298 that were referred, most were plead out with fines.. and usually they are additional charges if a crime was committed with the gun. Not a stand alone charge.

So, yeah, after 3 years of whining about laptops and special treatment, you got Hunter to fess up to a case because it was cheaper than beating it in court, where you know damned well a jury in Delaware isn't going to convict a Biden of anything short of murder.
Um, yeah. It's hilarious that you whine and moan about Hunter Biden not receiving preferential treatment, yet, in the same post you acknowledge that a jury in Delaware will never convict a Biden.

After stalling and attempting to bury evidence for four years, the corrupt Biden DOJ gave Hunter a sweetheart deal.
 
Uh, Hunter got exactly the same sentence nearly anyone else charged with the

That's what you do to traitors.

People died on January 6th. The people involved deserve prison time.


Was she charged with treason? No. All she did was walk into an open door.

And who died on January 6, give us the names.
 
t
View attachment 797251

Hunter Biden is not accused of an offense involving brandish or use of a firearm.

Jenna Ellis is still an idiot.

He brandished a weapon. They conveniently chose to ignore that, just as they chose to ignore his violating the Mann Act, among other felonious activities.

Video discovered on Hunter's laptop computer shows him naked and brandishing a handgun in a hotel room in 2018, allegedly five days after buying the gun.

 
Last edited:
He brandished a weapon. They conveniently chose to ignore that, just as they chose to ignore his violating the Mann Act, among other felonious activities.

Video discovered on Hunter's laptop computer shows him naked and brandishing a handgun in a hotel room in 2018, allegedly five days after buying the gun.

You moron. That’s not what it means under the criminal code.

For purposes of this subsection, the term “brandish” means, with respect to a firearm, to display all or part of the firearm, or otherwise make the presence of the firearm known to another person, in order to intimidate that person, regardless of whether thefirearm is directly visible to that person.
 
Yeah. Because Gym Jordin is Trump's own personal hand puppet.
Multiple members of the Biden family received sums of money from foreign nationals through shell companies. That is what is being investigated.
 
Multiple members of the Biden family received sums of money from foreign nationals through shell companies. That is what is being investigated.
Is gym going to investigate every politician with shell companies who made money or just Biden?

I'd making money via shell companies illegal?

If not, why is gym investigating legal activities?

What makes Biden's shell companies worse then the former guy?

"President Donald Trump's latest financial disclosure includes details on the 500 or so limited liability companies (LLCs) he owns, and their revenue. But what exactly is an LLC, and does disclosing these numbers provide more — or less — information about Trump's businesses?"

 
Is gym going to investigate every politician with shell companies who made money or just Biden?

I'd making money via shell companies illegal?

If not, why is gym investigating legal activities?

What makes Biden's shell companies worse then the former guy?

"President Donald Trump's latest financial disclosure includes details on the 500 or so limited liability companies (LLCs) he owns, and their revenue. But what exactly is an LLC, and does disclosing these numbers provide more — or less — information about Trump's businesses?"

The judiciary committee is investigating Biden for criminal activity. There were numerous banks that reported suspicious activity.

"But... but...but...but what about Trump", is irrelevant to the Biden Crime Family investigation.
 
Naw, man. The Hunter Biden portion of the Biden Crime Syndicate was never in any danger of legal consequences. The lack of real accountability for his spree of crimes highlights the lack of ethics on the Dem / Marxist left and how corrupt the Biden - Dem / Marxist system has become. It's a bankrupt free-for-all where the left has made criminals a protected class.

The irony is that the Dems / Marxists are left to wallow in the pig stye cities they create.
From sea to shining sea.
 
The judiciary committee is investigating Biden for criminal activity. There were numerous banks that reported suspicious activity.

"But... but...but...but what about Trump", is irrelevant to the Biden Crime Family investigation.
It is relevant if the investigation is predicated on a politician having shell companies and having SARs generated.

Look. Trump had SARs too.

“Anti-money-laundering specialists at Deutsche Bank recommended in 2016 and 2017 that multiple transactions involving legal entities controlled by Donald J. Trump and his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, be reported to a federal financial-crimes watchdog.”


Do you think Gym should investigate? Yes or no?
 

Forum List

Back
Top