Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2

[P F Tinmore]

 

[Hollie]

Who are the Arab-Moslem terrorists?

CAIR's Lamis Deek Fetes Jerusalem Terrorist


A Palestinian man shot dead Sunday after waging a terrorist attack that killed two people in Jerusalem and wounded five others was hailed as "the Lion of Jerusalem" and a martyr by an official with the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).

Mesbah Abu Sbeih, 39, engaged in "self-defense," Deek wrote Monday on Twitter. That is "...*not* an attack. Reporting otherwise perpetuates a false propaganda."

As we have shown, this kind of glorification of violence, when directed at Israelis, isconsistent for Deek, an attorney who serves on the board for CAIR's New York chapter. She has called Israel "the genocidal zionist regime."

In this case, she reposted a video tribute to Sbeih on Facebook, describing him as "this mountain of a man, how they envied him." The video shows footage of the shooting attack and its aftermath, including a Palestinian taping on his cell phone from a distance shouting, "Allahu Akhbar."

Deek's organization, CAIR, has roots in a Hamas support organization in the United States created by the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood. Witnesses and documentsestablish these connections, but CAIR officials refuse to confront the issue directly.

 

[RoccoR]

P F Tinmore, et al,

The entire notion that there was an "invader 'vs' "immigrant" question is fallacious.

The international understanding at the time was that: "Mandatory should be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2nd, 1917, by the Government of His Britannic Majesty, and adopted by the said Powers, in favor of the establishment in Palestine of a National Home for the Jewish People." And to meet this responsibility to establish of a Jewish National Home, as laid down in the preamble of the Mandate for Palestine, and the development of self-governing institutions. To that end, and the Allied Powers at San Remo recognizing the historical connection of the Jewish People with Palestine, the Administration of Palestine, shall facilitate Jewish immigration.

Now every one will recognize the special circumstances created by the official German Anti-Semitic Program 10 May 1933 Medieval Book Burning Night (“Action Against the Un-German Spirit”) when books by Jewish Authors (including Einstein, Freud, HG Wells, and many others) were deemed inappropriate. Now when you are a Jewish German (proven loyalty not withstanding) and you are running for your life, you don't tend to worry about quotas. So, during the period of about 1938 to 1944, there was a huge influx of Jewish Immigrants to territory under Mandate.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

P F Tinmore, et al,

The entire notion that there was an "invader 'vs' "immigrant" question is fallacious.

The international understanding at the time was that: "Mandatory should be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2nd, 1917, by the Government of His Britannic Majesty, and adopted by the said Powers, in favor of the establishment in Palestine of a National Home for the Jewish People." And to meet this responsibility to establish of a Jewish National Home, as laid down in the preamble of the Mandate for Palestine, and the development of self-governing institutions. To that end, and the Allied Powers at San Remo recognizing the historical connection of the Jewish People with Palestine, the Administration of Palestine, shall facilitate Jewish immigration.

Now every one will recognize the special circumstances created by the official German Anti-Semitic Program 10 May 1933 Medieval Book Burning Night (“Action Against the Un-German Spirit”) when books by Jewish Authors (including Einstein, Freud, HG Wells, and many others) were deemed inappropriate. Now when you are a Jewish German (proven loyalty not withstanding) and you are running for your life, you don't tend to worry about quotas. So, during the period of about 1938 to 1944, there was a huge influx of Jewish Immigrants to territory under Mandate.

Most Respectfully,
R

And this refutes my post how?

 

[Hollie]

P F Tinmore, et al,

The entire notion that there was an "invader 'vs' "immigrant" question is fallacious.

The international understanding at the time was that: "Mandatory should be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2nd, 1917, by the Government of His Britannic Majesty, and adopted by the said Powers, in favor of the establishment in Palestine of a National Home for the Jewish People." And to meet this responsibility to establish of a Jewish National Home, as laid down in the preamble of the Mandate for Palestine, and the development of self-governing institutions. To that end, and the Allied Powers at San Remo recognizing the historical connection of the Jewish People with Palestine, the Administration of Palestine, shall facilitate Jewish immigration.

Now every one will recognize the special circumstances created by the official German Anti-Semitic Program 10 May 1933 Medieval Book Burning Night (“Action Against the Un-German Spirit”) when books by Jewish Authors (including Einstein, Freud, HG Wells, and many others) were deemed inappropriate. Now when you are a Jewish German (proven loyalty not withstanding) and you are running for your life, you don't tend to worry about quotas. So, during the period of about 1938 to 1944, there was a huge influx of Jewish Immigrants to territory under Mandate.

Most Respectfully,
R

And this refutes my post how?

And this refutes my post how? ™

 

[RoccoR]

P F Tinmore, et al,

You have absolutely no correlation to a Jewish Invasion of Allied Powers territory under Mandate.

And this refutes my post how?

(COMMENT)

Just where and when did the Ottoman Empire/Turkish Republic render the Hostile Arab Palestinians any territory, independence or sovereignty --- anywhere in the region?

As I said in a earlier post, this absurd notion that there was an armed invasion by Jewish Immigrants is just an attempt to spice-up the just cause issue in the minds of the general society. The association of an armed invasion a blatant misrepresentation of the fact.



Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

P F Tinmore, et al,

You have absolutely no correlation to a Jewish Invasion of Allied Powers territory under Mandate.

And this refutes my post how?

(COMMENT)

Just where and when did the Ottoman Empire/Turkish Republic render the Hostile Arab Palestinians any territory, independence or sovereignty --- anywhere in the region?

As I said in a earlier post, this absurd notion that there was an armed invasion by Jewish Immigrants is just an attempt to spice-up the just cause issue in the minds of the general society. The association of an armed invasion a blatant misrepresentation of the fact.



Most Respectfully,
R

So you are back to the old the Palestinians had no rights canard.

Why did the British need its military to "render administrative assistance and advise" as specified in the LoN Covenant? That must have been some pretty heavy duty advice.

 

[RoccoR]

P F Tinmore, et al,

Sometimes, I cannot tell what you are talking about.

So you are back to the old the Palestinians had no rights canard.

(COMMENT)

I did not mention the issue of "rights" at all. Where did that come from?

The people (that were to eventually become known as the Arab Palestinian) of 1918, under the Occupied Enemy Territory Administration (OETA), had the same rights as the people of 1925 becoming citizens of the Government of Palestine (the British Mandatory); and the post-Mandate Period (14/15 May 1948); the same Arab people of the post-War of Independence for Israel (post-Armistice); the same people of the post-1950 Annexation of the West Bank and the establishment of the Egyptian Military Governorship in the Gaza Strip; the same people as the having declared a Jihad against Israel; the same Arabs of the post-Jordanian Sovereignty period, and the release from Egyptian Governorship; and the very same Arab Palestinian people that in 1988 declared Independence over the territory occupied since 1967. AND, substantially the same Arab Palestinian People that signed the Oslo Accords.

As various rights coming into existence for all other people, so did the rights of the Arab Palestinian people. They never changed and they were never taken away. Not even the Treaty between the Israelis and Egypt/Jordan changed the rights of the Arab Palestinian.

The Arab Palestinian people do not have the right to demand something that was never theirs to begin with, and they just do not have the right to take by force what they want.

Why did the British need its military to "render administrative assistance and advise" as specified in the LoN Covenant? That must have been some pretty heavy duty advice.

(COMMENT)

As part of the Mandate and in observance of the 1907 Hague Regulation, the Administration of Palestine for the preservation of peace and order; and also for the defence of the country, subject to the supervision of the British Mandatory.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

P F Tinmore, et al,

Sometimes, I cannot tell what you are talking about.

So you are back to the old the Palestinians had no rights canard.

(COMMENT)

I did not mention the issue of "rights" at all. Where did that come from?

The people (that were to eventually become known as the Arab Palestinian) of 1918, under the Occupied Enemy Territory Administration (OETA), had the same rights as the people of 1925 becoming citizens of the Government of Palestine (the British Mandatory); and the post-Mandate Period (14/15 May 1948); the same Arab people of the post-War of Independence for Israel (post-Armistice); the same people of the post-1950 Annexation of the West Bank and the establishment of the Egyptian Military Governorship in the Gaza Strip; the same people as the having declared a Jihad against Israel; the same Arabs of the post-Jordanian Sovereignty period, and the release from Egyptian Governorship; and the very same Arab Palestinian people that in 1988 declared Independence over the territory occupied since 1967. AND, substantially the same Arab Palestinian People that signed the Oslo Accords.

As various rights coming into existence for all other people, so did the rights of the Arab Palestinian people. They never changed and they were never taken away. Not even the Treaty between the Israelis and Egypt/Jordan changed the rights of the Arab Palestinian.

The Arab Palestinian people do not have the right to demand something that was never theirs to begin with, and they just do not have the right to take by force what they want.

Why did the British need its military to "render administrative assistance and advise" as specified in the LoN Covenant? That must have been some pretty heavy duty advice.

(COMMENT)

As part of the Mandate and in observance of the 1907 Hague Regulation, the Administration of Palestine for the preservation of peace and order; and also for the defence of the country, subject to the supervision of the British Mandatory.

Most Respectfully,
R

Are you saying the the Palestinian cities and villages had no local police departments?

 

[Hossfly]

P F Tinmore, et al,

Sometimes, I cannot tell what you are talking about.

So you are back to the old the Palestinians had no rights canard.

(COMMENT)

I did not mention the issue of "rights" at all. Where did that come from?

The people (that were to eventually become known as the Arab Palestinian) of 1918, under the Occupied Enemy Territory Administration (OETA), had the same rights as the people of 1925 becoming citizens of the Government of Palestine (the British Mandatory); and the post-Mandate Period (14/15 May 1948); the same Arab people of the post-War of Independence for Israel (post-Armistice); the same people of the post-1950 Annexation of the West Bank and the establishment of the Egyptian Military Governorship in the Gaza Strip; the same people as the having declared a Jihad against Israel; the same Arabs of the post-Jordanian Sovereignty period, and the release from Egyptian Governorship; and the very same Arab Palestinian people that in 1988 declared Independence over the territory occupied since 1967. AND, substantially the same Arab Palestinian People that signed the Oslo Accords.

As various rights coming into existence for all other people, so did the rights of the Arab Palestinian people. They never changed and they were never taken away. Not even the Treaty between the Israelis and Egypt/Jordan changed the rights of the Arab Palestinian.

The Arab Palestinian people do not have the right to demand something that was never theirs to begin with, and they just do not have the right to take by force what they want.

Why did the British need its military to "render administrative assistance and advise" as specified in the LoN Covenant? That must have been some pretty heavy duty advice.

(COMMENT)

As part of the Mandate and in observance of the 1907 Hague Regulation, the Administration of Palestine for the preservation of peace and order; and also for the defence of the country, subject to the supervision of the British Mandatory.

Most Respectfully,
R

Are you saying the the Palestinian cities and villages had no local police departments?

The head tribal honchos would handle matters within their own little villages. Perhaps your new sidekick can tell us how the head honchos figured out the pay scale, the uniforms they wore, and their retirement benefits.

 

[Phoenall]

P F Tinmore, et al,

Just Remember - There was no country of Palestine that was not an Artificial construct by the Allied Powers.

The Government of Palestine (The British Mandatory) was not an Arab sovereign State. It was a portion of the surrendered territory placed under Mandate.

If a people are invited by the Government to immigrate

Let's see if this is true or false. The Mandate said that its purpose was to facilitate the immigration and acquisition of citizenship by Jews. Even though this policy was imposed on the Palestinians at the point of a gun against their wishes it might not have been that bad. There was no inherent animosity between the Muslims, Christians, and Jews in Palestine. Ultimately the Mandate had control of this process.

What is the difference between immigrants and foreign invaders?

An immigrant moves to a country to be a part of that country and live with the existing population.

The Zionists, however, imported as many Jews as they could find from around the world to live separate from the local population with the stated goal of taking over Palestine for an exclusive Jewish state.

Immigrants or foreign invaders?

(COMMENT)

The Jewish immigrants did not use force to enter Palestine. It was there to re-establish the Jewish National Home (JNH), not further defined. It was the UN that invited the Jewish People to accept the partition and re-constitute the JNH.

No matter what you call it, the essential fact remains that the Jewish People were intended to be in the territory as determined as the territory for which the Mandate for Palestine applied; by the Allied Powers.

YES, you are absolutely and 100% correct. The imported as many Jews as they could find from around the world. The Zionist Organization, so long as its organization and constitution are in the opinion of the Mandatory appropriate, shall be recognized as such agency (later to be called the Jewish Agency). And yes, it was an advantage for the Jewish agency to become a regular public body for the purpose of advising and co-operating with the Administration of Palestine. It should be amplified that three attempt was made to establish an institution through which the Arab population of Palestine could be brought into cooperation with the government. The Arab leaders declined that this offer on the ground that it would not satisfy the aspirations of the Arab people. They added that, never having recognised the status of the Jewish Agency, they had no desire for the establishment of an Arab Agency on the same basis.

Now it is important here notice this growing trend for the Arab Population to adopt this myopic view and NOT recognize that which is a tangible and functioning entity (The Jewish Agency). This is a recurring modus operandi which will cause them difficulty periodically through this adventure.

• The Jewish Agency link-up the Jewish People with the "historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting their national home."

• The Jewish Agency did take steps in consultation with His Britannic Majesty's Government to secure the
co-operation of all Jews who are willing to assist in the establishment of the Jewish national home.
​

Yes, the Jewish People did this. They do not deny it. And way should they? They followed the Mandate for Palestine and the ruling body behind the Ottoman Empire/Turkish Republic that renounced all rights and title whatsoever over or respecting the territories situated outside the frontiers laid down in the present Treaty and the islands other than those over which her sovereignty is recognised by the said Treaty, the future of these territories and islands being settled or to be settled by the parties concerned.

Most Respectfully,
R

Just Remember - There was no country of Palestine that was not an Artificial construct by the Allied Powers.​

The same for Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and Jordan. Do you have a point?

The Jewish immigrants did not use force to enter Palestine.​

That is a lie. When the occupation of Transjordan changed to the Mandate, Britain withdrew its forces leaving a handful of advisors behind.

When the occupation of Palestine changed to the Mandate, Britain maintained a military force. They knew they were going to pull some shit and needed to keep their guns to pull it off.

Different scenarios as trans Jordan would have an islamic governemnt that would shoot first and ask questions later. Just look at what they did to the palestinians in the camps when 50,000 were massacred as an object lesson.

From day one the arab muslims flooded into palestine to wipe out the Jews, and so the British kept a garrison there to keep the arab muslims under control.As team palestine links show the arab muslims were attacking the British constantly

 

[Phoenall]

P F Tinmore, et al,

Sometimes, I cannot tell what you are talking about.

So you are back to the old the Palestinians had no rights canard.

(COMMENT)

I did not mention the issue of "rights" at all. Where did that come from?

The people (that were to eventually become known as the Arab Palestinian) of 1918, under the Occupied Enemy Territory Administration (OETA), had the same rights as the people of 1925 becoming citizens of the Government of Palestine (the British Mandatory); and the post-Mandate Period (14/15 May 1948); the same Arab people of the post-War of Independence for Israel (post-Armistice); the same people of the post-1950 Annexation of the West Bank and the establishment of the Egyptian Military Governorship in the Gaza Strip; the same people as the having declared a Jihad against Israel; the same Arabs of the post-Jordanian Sovereignty period, and the release from Egyptian Governorship; and the very same Arab Palestinian people that in 1988 declared Independence over the territory occupied since 1967. AND, substantially the same Arab Palestinian People that signed the Oslo Accords.

As various rights coming into existence for all other people, so did the rights of the Arab Palestinian people. They never changed and they were never taken away. Not even the Treaty between the Israelis and Egypt/Jordan changed the rights of the Arab Palestinian.

The Arab Palestinian people do not have the right to demand something that was never theirs to begin with, and they just do not have the right to take by force what they want.

Why did the British need its military to "render administrative assistance and advise" as specified in the LoN Covenant? That must have been some pretty heavy duty advice.

(COMMENT)

As part of the Mandate and in observance of the 1907 Hague Regulation, the Administration of Palestine for the preservation of peace and order; and also for the defence of the country, subject to the supervision of the British Mandatory.

Most Respectfully,
R

Are you saying the the Palestinian cities and villages had no local police departments?

No as they had British police to keep the peace, the British were after all the de facto interim government

 

[Phoenall]

P F Tinmore, et al,

The entire notion that there was an "invader 'vs' "immigrant" question is fallacious.

The international understanding at the time was that: "Mandatory should be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2nd, 1917, by the Government of His Britannic Majesty, and adopted by the said Powers, in favor of the establishment in Palestine of a National Home for the Jewish People." And to meet this responsibility to establish of a Jewish National Home, as laid down in the preamble of the Mandate for Palestine, and the development of self-governing institutions. To that end, and the Allied Powers at San Remo recognizing the historical connection of the Jewish People with Palestine, the Administration of Palestine, shall facilitate Jewish immigration.

Now every one will recognize the special circumstances created by the official German Anti-Semitic Program 10 May 1933 Medieval Book Burning Night (“Action Against the Un-German Spirit”) when books by Jewish Authors (including Einstein, Freud, HG Wells, and many others) were deemed inappropriate. Now when you are a Jewish German (proven loyalty not withstanding) and you are running for your life, you don't tend to worry about quotas. So, during the period of about 1938 to 1944, there was a huge influx of Jewish Immigrants to territory under Mandate.

Most Respectfully,
R

And this refutes my post how?

Simply because it does as you have no argument other than your fantasy islamonazi propaganda

 

[Phoenall]

P F Tinmore, et al,

You have absolutely no correlation to a Jewish Invasion of Allied Powers territory under Mandate.

And this refutes my post how?

(COMMENT)

Just where and when did the Ottoman Empire/Turkish Republic render the Hostile Arab Palestinians any territory, independence or sovereignty --- anywhere in the region?

As I said in a earlier post, this absurd notion that there was an armed invasion by Jewish Immigrants is just an attempt to spice-up the just cause issue in the minds of the general society. The association of an armed invasion a blatant misrepresentation of the fact.



Most Respectfully,
R

So you are back to the old the Palestinians had no rights canard.

Why did the British need its military to "render administrative assistance and advise" as specified in the LoN Covenant? That must have been some pretty heavy duty advice.

At that time in history they didn't, and this is what you have a problem understanding. You are under the impression that human rights have always been universal and cant understand that they are granted at various times in history. They are not to be used retrospectively as you think, and dont work before their date of implementation

 

[RoccoR]

P F Tinmore, et al,

OK, what is this, a trick question?

Are you saying the the Palestinian cities and villages had no local police departments?

(COMMENT)

The British originally used the very same set-up as they did all around the world. They used the Colonial Police Service Model (administered most of Britain's overseas possessions) as they did all around the world. So as the civil administration took responsibility for security from the Occupied Enemy Territory Administration (1920) was placed under the Palestine Colonial Police; originally all British Serving Officers and constables and a pure British Membership in the rank and file. But as time moved on, just as in the other areas of the world where the British established a Civilian Police contingent, gradually phased in recruits from the general population. This integrated force coving the entirety of the British Mandate of Palestine had, just prior to the 1929 riots, more than a couple thousand officers and constables of all ranks. This mix fluctuated but generally had a few hundred Jews Police constables, a slightly larger number of Arab Christian Police constables, and more than a thousand Arabs Muslim constables. Similar percentages were found in the leading officer ranks.

To meet special security and police concerns, the Palestinian Administration --- shortly after the Arab Revolt --- saw the need for the establishment of a Jewish Settlement Police contingent, later augmented by a mix British-Jewish Special Nighttime Unit. It is believe that it was these two groups that largely responsible for the success in the police manhunt that eventually surrounded and killed the leader of the Black Hand which murdered a British Constable (Nov '35). The leader of the Black Hand was (of course) the Muslim Cleric and anti-Semitic activist Izz ad-Din al-Qassam who was a very well known instigator of trouble and known to incite violence throughout the British Mandate Territory.

(ANSWER)

No --- I did not say that had no local police departments.

But all Colonial and Territorial Police in the British Mandate Territory, including the Settlement Police (Stations and Gendarmeries) and joint British-Jewish unit known as the Special Night Squads (forerunner of the Special Operations Units) were under the responsibility of the High Commissioner; the the Legislative Council and the Inspector-General of Police. (Palestine Order in Council)

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

P F Tinmore, et al,

OK, what is this, a trick question?

Are you saying the the Palestinian cities and villages had no local police departments?

(COMMENT)

The British originally used the very same set-up as they did all around the world. They used the Colonial Police Service Model (administered most of Britain's overseas possessions) as they did all around the world. So as the civil administration took responsibility for security from the Occupied Enemy Territory Administration (1920) was placed under the Palestine Colonial Police; originally all British Serving Officers and constables and a pure British Membership in the rank and file. But as time moved on, just as in the other areas of the world where the British established a Civilian Police contingent, gradually phased in recruits from the general population. This integrated force coving the entirety of the British Mandate of Palestine had, just prior to the 1929 riots, more than a couple thousand officers and constables of all ranks. This mix fluctuated but generally had a few hundred Jews Police constables, a slightly larger number of Arab Christian Police constables, and more than a thousand Arabs Muslim constables. Similar percentages were found in the leading officer ranks.

To meet special security and police concerns, the Palestinian Administration --- shortly after the Arab Revolt --- saw the need for the establishment of a Jewish Settlement Police contingent, later augmented by a mix British-Jewish Special Nighttime Unit. It is believe that it was these two groups that largely responsible for the success in the police manhunt that eventually surrounded and killed the leader of the Black Hand which murdered a British Constable (Nov '35). The leader of the Black Hand was (of course) the Muslim Cleric and anti-Semitic activist Izz ad-Din al-Qassam who was a very well known instigator of trouble and known to incite violence throughout the British Mandate Territory.

(ANSWER)

No --- I did not say that had no local police departments.

But all Colonial and Territorial Police in the British Mandate Territory, including the Settlement Police (Stations and Gendarmeries) and joint British-Jewish unit known as the Special Night Squads (forerunner of the Special Operations Units) were under the responsibility of the High Commissioner; the the Legislative Council and the Inspector-General of Police. (Palestine Order in Council)

Most Respectfully,
R

The British originally used the very same set-up as they did all around the world. They used the Colonial Police Service Model (administered most of Britain's overseas possessions) as they did all around the world. So as the civil administration took responsibility for security from the Occupied Enemy Territory Administration (1920) was placed under the Palestine Colonial Police;​

So, it was to enforce their colonial project. The existing police would not enforce the "right" stuff.

That's good to know.

 

[Hollie]

P F Tinmore, et al,

OK, what is this, a trick question?

Are you saying the the Palestinian cities and villages had no local police departments?

(COMMENT)

The British originally used the very same set-up as they did all around the world. They used the Colonial Police Service Model (administered most of Britain's overseas possessions) as they did all around the world. So as the civil administration took responsibility for security from the Occupied Enemy Territory Administration (1920) was placed under the Palestine Colonial Police; originally all British Serving Officers and constables and a pure British Membership in the rank and file. But as time moved on, just as in the other areas of the world where the British established a Civilian Police contingent, gradually phased in recruits from the general population. This integrated force coving the entirety of the British Mandate of Palestine had, just prior to the 1929 riots, more than a couple thousand officers and constables of all ranks. This mix fluctuated but generally had a few hundred Jews Police constables, a slightly larger number of Arab Christian Police constables, and more than a thousand Arabs Muslim constables. Similar percentages were found in the leading officer ranks.

To meet special security and police concerns, the Palestinian Administration --- shortly after the Arab Revolt --- saw the need for the establishment of a Jewish Settlement Police contingent, later augmented by a mix British-Jewish Special Nighttime Unit. It is believe that it was these two groups that largely responsible for the success in the police manhunt that eventually surrounded and killed the leader of the Black Hand which murdered a British Constable (Nov '35). The leader of the Black Hand was (of course) the Muslim Cleric and anti-Semitic activist Izz ad-Din al-Qassam who was a very well known instigator of trouble and known to incite violence throughout the British Mandate Territory.

(ANSWER)

No --- I did not say that had no local police departments.

But all Colonial and Territorial Police in the British Mandate Territory, including the Settlement Police (Stations and Gendarmeries) and joint British-Jewish unit known as the Special Night Squads (forerunner of the Special Operations Units) were under the responsibility of the High Commissioner; the the Legislative Council and the Inspector-General of Police. (Palestine Order in Council)

Most Respectfully,
R

The British originally used the very same set-up as they did all around the world. They used the Colonial Police Service Model (administered most of Britain's overseas possessions) as they did all around the world. So as the civil administration took responsibility for security from the Occupied Enemy Territory Administration (1920) was placed under the Palestine Colonial Police;​

So, it was to enforce their colonial project. The existing police would not enforce the "right" stuff.

That's good to know.

The British, as administrators of the area, would of course bear responsibility for law enforcement. You're so desperate to promote your usual colonial project ™ meme that you are, as usual, left to spam the thread with your usual slogans and cliches.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Who are the Palestinians?

Rula Jebreal

 

[Hollie]

Who are the Arab-Moslem Hitler Youth?

 

[Phoenall]

P F Tinmore, et al,

OK, what is this, a trick question?

Are you saying the the Palestinian cities and villages had no local police departments?

(COMMENT)

The British originally used the very same set-up as they did all around the world. They used the Colonial Police Service Model (administered most of Britain's overseas possessions) as they did all around the world. So as the civil administration took responsibility for security from the Occupied Enemy Territory Administration (1920) was placed under the Palestine Colonial Police; originally all British Serving Officers and constables and a pure British Membership in the rank and file. But as time moved on, just as in the other areas of the world where the British established a Civilian Police contingent, gradually phased in recruits from the general population. This integrated force coving the entirety of the British Mandate of Palestine had, just prior to the 1929 riots, more than a couple thousand officers and constables of all ranks. This mix fluctuated but generally had a few hundred Jews Police constables, a slightly larger number of Arab Christian Police constables, and more than a thousand Arabs Muslim constables. Similar percentages were found in the leading officer ranks.

To meet special security and police concerns, the Palestinian Administration --- shortly after the Arab Revolt --- saw the need for the establishment of a Jewish Settlement Police contingent, later augmented by a mix British-Jewish Special Nighttime Unit. It is believe that it was these two groups that largely responsible for the success in the police manhunt that eventually surrounded and killed the leader of the Black Hand which murdered a British Constable (Nov '35). The leader of the Black Hand was (of course) the Muslim Cleric and anti-Semitic activist Izz ad-Din al-Qassam who was a very well known instigator of trouble and known to incite violence throughout the British Mandate Territory.

(ANSWER)

No --- I did not say that had no local police departments.

But all Colonial and Territorial Police in the British Mandate Territory, including the Settlement Police (Stations and Gendarmeries) and joint British-Jewish unit known as the Special Night Squads (forerunner of the Special Operations Units) were under the responsibility of the High Commissioner; the the Legislative Council and the Inspector-General of Police. (Palestine Order in Council)

Most Respectfully,
R

The British originally used the very same set-up as they did all around the world. They used the Colonial Police Service Model (administered most of Britain's overseas possessions) as they did all around the world. So as the civil administration took responsibility for security from the Occupied Enemy Territory Administration (1920) was placed under the Palestine Colonial Police;​

So, it was to enforce their colonial project. The existing police would not enforce the "right" stuff.

That's good to know.

What colonial project as the Ottomans were the first to invite the Jews to migrate and close colonise the land of palestine. Are they not guilty of the same crime as the British then in your eyes