Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2

[Sixties Fan]

"If the State Department is interested in resolving the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, the number of actual refugees from Israel's War for Independence must be publicized," Kimball said. "For the approximately 5 million Palestinian Arabs in need of aid, they should be helped after acknowledging they are not refugees. By doing this, we can break the yoke of victimhood and oppression and give these ‘refugees' the human dignity they deserve. UNRWA has failed and it either needs to be drastically reformed or tossed into the dustbin of history."

(full article online)

State Department Hiding 'Game Changer' Report on Myth of Palestinian Refugees

 

[Sixties Fan]

(full article online)

Contrary to media claims, BDS activists are not “human rights” activists

 

[Sixties Fan]

Amnesty’s claims that Israel’s legal enforcement is “discriminatory” are also false, as Western democracies’ juvenile legal codes also contain provisions regarding the minimum and maximum sentencing for assault against security officers and members of the armed forces, and incitement to terrorism.

The following chart compares the maximum sentences for chargers related to assaulting a security officer and incitement to terrorism under Israeli military law with civilian law in Australia, Canada, Germany, Sweden, and the UK.



Show entries
Search:
Israeli Military Law Australia Canada Germany Sweden UK
Assault on an Officer 5 years 3 years 5 years 3 years 4 years 6 months + fine
Incitement to Terror 10 years 10 years Life 5 years 6 years 7 years

(full article online)

Amnesty International Ignores the Weaponization of Palestinian Children

 

[Sixties Fan]

• In his desperation, Abbas hurls abuse and in all directions. He has resorted to his old-new strategy of warning us that if his demands are not met, World War III will break out. Abbas would like us to believe that the Palestinian issue should remain at the center of the world's attention -- otherwise, there will be bloodshed and violence on the streets of most countries.
  
  
• Should anyone take Abbas's threats seriously? The answer is simple: No.
  
  
• The war to destroy Israel is still in full force. The Palestinians have not brought up a new generation that recognizes Israel's right to exist; on the contrary, they have brought up a generation that believes in jihad and death, one that denies any Biblical Jewish history or links to the Holy Land.
  

(full article online)

Palestinians: Abbas's Big Bluff - Again

 

[Sixties Fan]

BBC portrayals of the topic usually include the narrative seen in a frequently reused backgrounder on Jerusalem produced by Yolande Knell in which audiences were led to believe that a Palestinian capital in “east Jerusalem” is an already agreed component of the two-state solution rather than a topic to be discussed in final status negotiations.

“Of course, Palestinians see things starkly differently. They want east Jerusalem as their capital.

And that’s part of the long-standing international formula for peace here, known as the “two-state solution”.

Knell also portrayed the two-state solution in terms that dovetail with the PLO’s interpretation of that term.

“Basically the idea that an independent Palestinian state would be created alongside Israel, along the boundaries that existed before 1967, it’s written up in UN resolutions.” [emphasis added]

Of course the prime motivation behind Palestinian claims to a capital in the parts of Jerusalem occupied by Jordan between 1948 and 1967 is control over Temple Mount but the BBC repeatedly fails to adequately clarify that important point to its audiences.

Neither does it bother to inform them of the Palestinian Authority’s record on upholding agreements it has already signed with Israel regarding other holy places.

Under the terms of the Oslo Accords, freedom of access to and worship at holy sites was guaranteed.

“The agreement guarantees freedom of access to and freedom of worship at the holy sites, and defines access arrangements for the holy places located in Areas “A” and “B”. With regard to Rachel’s Tomb in Bethlehem and Joseph’s Tomb in Nablus, special arrangements are set out in the agreement which will also guarantee freedom of access and freedom of worship.”

(full article online)

The BBC’s narrative on ‘East Jerusalem’ omits relevant context

 

[P F Tinmore]

Amnesty’s claims that Israel’s legal enforcement is “discriminatory” are also false, as Western democracies’ juvenile legal codes also contain provisions regarding the minimum and maximum sentencing for assault against security officers and members of the armed forces, and incitement to terrorism.

The following chart compares the maximum sentences for chargers related to assaulting a security officer and incitement to terrorism under Israeli military law with civilian law in Australia, Canada, Germany, Sweden, and the UK.



Show entries
Search:
Israeli Military Law Australia Canada Germany Sweden UK
Assault on an Officer 5 years 3 years 5 years 3 years 4 years 6 months + fine
Incitement to Terror 10 years 10 years Life 5 years 6 years 7 years

(full article online)

Amnesty International Ignores the Weaponization of Palestinian Children

What is the sentence for "assaulting" foreign invading troops?

 

[Sixties Fan]

Amnesty’s claims that Israel’s legal enforcement is “discriminatory” are also false, as Western democracies’ juvenile legal codes also contain provisions regarding the minimum and maximum sentencing for assault against security officers and members of the armed forces, and incitement to terrorism.

The following chart compares the maximum sentences for chargers related to assaulting a security officer and incitement to terrorism under Israeli military law with civilian law in Australia, Canada, Germany, Sweden, and the UK.



Show entries
Search:
Israeli Military Law Australia Canada Germany Sweden UK
Assault on an Officer 5 years 3 years 5 years 3 years 4 years 6 months + fine
Incitement to Terror 10 years 10 years Life 5 years 6 years 7 years

(full article online)

Amnesty International Ignores the Weaponization of Palestinian Children

What is the sentence for "assaulting" foreign invading troops?

" Muslims invading the Land of Israel in the 7th century CE "
They had troops when they invaded.

The Crusaders had troops when they invaded the Land of Israel.
The Ottomans had troops when they invaded the Land of Israel.
The British had troops when they invaded the Land of Israel.


The Jews did not have troops at any time they returned to their ancient homeland.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Amnesty’s claims that Israel’s legal enforcement is “discriminatory” are also false, as Western democracies’ juvenile legal codes also contain provisions regarding the minimum and maximum sentencing for assault against security officers and members of the armed forces, and incitement to terrorism.

The following chart compares the maximum sentences for chargers related to assaulting a security officer and incitement to terrorism under Israeli military law with civilian law in Australia, Canada, Germany, Sweden, and the UK.



Show entries
Search:
Israeli Military Law Australia Canada Germany Sweden UK
Assault on an Officer 5 years 3 years 5 years 3 years 4 years 6 months + fine
Incitement to Terror 10 years 10 years Life 5 years 6 years 7 years

(full article online)

Amnesty International Ignores the Weaponization of Palestinian Children

What is the sentence for "assaulting" foreign invading troops?

" Muslims invading the Land of Israel in the 7th century CE "
They had troops when they invaded.

The Jews did not have troops at any time they returned to their ancient homeland.

Thank you, Mr. Israeli talking points.

 

[Sixties Fan]

Amnesty’s claims that Israel’s legal enforcement is “discriminatory” are also false, as Western democracies’ juvenile legal codes also contain provisions regarding the minimum and maximum sentencing for assault against security officers and members of the armed forces, and incitement to terrorism.

The following chart compares the maximum sentences for chargers related to assaulting a security officer and incitement to terrorism under Israeli military law with civilian law in Australia, Canada, Germany, Sweden, and the UK.



Show entries
Search:
Israeli Military Law Australia Canada Germany Sweden UK
Assault on an Officer 5 years 3 years 5 years 3 years 4 years 6 months + fine
Incitement to Terror 10 years 10 years Life 5 years 6 years 7 years

(full article online)

Amnesty International Ignores the Weaponization of Palestinian Children

What is the sentence for "assaulting" foreign invading troops?

" Muslims invading the Land of Israel in the 7th century CE "
They had troops when they invaded.

The Jews did not have troops at any time they returned to their ancient homeland.

Thank you, Mr. Israeli talking points.

Not historical facts?

Show me the evidence that this is not history, but only Israeli talking points (as in It never happened ).

Are you going to actually deny that what I wrote is historically correct?

What troops did the Jews invade with at the end of the 19th Century and start of the 20th century.

Show me the photos, reports, etc.

 

[P F Tinmore]

"If the State Department is interested in resolving the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, the number of actual refugees from Israel's War for Independence must be publicized," Kimball said. "For the approximately 5 million Palestinian Arabs in need of aid, they should be helped after acknowledging they are not refugees. By doing this, we can break the yoke of victimhood and oppression and give these ‘refugees' the human dignity they deserve. UNRWA has failed and it either needs to be drastically reformed or tossed into the dustbin of history."

(full article online)

State Department Hiding 'Game Changer' Report on Myth of Palestinian Refugees

Israeli bullshit. Israel wants to remove all support for all Palestinians. This is just part of that.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Amnesty’s claims that Israel’s legal enforcement is “discriminatory” are also false, as Western democracies’ juvenile legal codes also contain provisions regarding the minimum and maximum sentencing for assault against security officers and members of the armed forces, and incitement to terrorism.

The following chart compares the maximum sentences for chargers related to assaulting a security officer and incitement to terrorism under Israeli military law with civilian law in Australia, Canada, Germany, Sweden, and the UK.



Show entries
Search:
Israeli Military Law Australia Canada Germany Sweden UK
Assault on an Officer 5 years 3 years 5 years 3 years 4 years 6 months + fine
Incitement to Terror 10 years 10 years Life 5 years 6 years 7 years

(full article online)

Amnesty International Ignores the Weaponization of Palestinian Children

What is the sentence for "assaulting" foreign invading troops?

" Muslims invading the Land of Israel in the 7th century CE "
They had troops when they invaded.

The Jews did not have troops at any time they returned to their ancient homeland.

Thank you, Mr. Israeli talking points.

Not historical facts?

Show me the evidence that this is not history, but only Israeli talking points (as in It never happened ).

Are you going to actually deny that what I wrote is historically correct?

What troops did the Jews invade with at the end of the 19th Century and start of the 20th century.

Show me the photos, reports, etc.

What troops did the Jews invade with at the end of the 19th Century and start of the 20th century.

They mooched British troops.

 

[Sixties Fan]

Amnesty’s claims that Israel’s legal enforcement is “discriminatory” are also false, as Western democracies’ juvenile legal codes also contain provisions regarding the minimum and maximum sentencing for assault against security officers and members of the armed forces, and incitement to terrorism.

The following chart compares the maximum sentences for chargers related to assaulting a security officer and incitement to terrorism under Israeli military law with civilian law in Australia, Canada, Germany, Sweden, and the UK.



Show entries
Search:
Israeli Military Law Australia Canada Germany Sweden UK
Assault on an Officer 5 years 3 years 5 years 3 years 4 years 6 months + fine
Incitement to Terror 10 years 10 years Life 5 years 6 years 7 years

(full article online)

Amnesty International Ignores the Weaponization of Palestinian Children

What is the sentence for "assaulting" foreign invading troops?

" Muslims invading the Land of Israel in the 7th century CE "
They had troops when they invaded.

The Jews did not have troops at any time they returned to their ancient homeland.

Thank you, Mr. Israeli talking points.

Not historical facts?

Show me the evidence that this is not history, but only Israeli talking points (as in It never happened ).

Are you going to actually deny that what I wrote is historically correct?

What troops did the Jews invade with at the end of the 19th Century and start of the 20th century.

Show me the photos, reports, etc.

What troops did the Jews invade with at the end of the 19th Century and start of the 20th century.

They mooched British troops.

You are mooching your brain and it is not helping.

No proof of anything, do not make the statements.

Jews migrated BACK to their ancient homeland, where Jews have always been present.

Check the history books.

Your first statement was that the Jews were "Foreign invading troops"

And as always, you back it up with air - hot, cold, poisoned air.

 

[P F Tinmore]

What is the sentence for "assaulting" foreign invading troops?

" Muslims invading the Land of Israel in the 7th century CE "
They had troops when they invaded.

The Jews did not have troops at any time they returned to their ancient homeland.

Thank you, Mr. Israeli talking points.

Not historical facts?

Show me the evidence that this is not history, but only Israeli talking points (as in It never happened ).

Are you going to actually deny that what I wrote is historically correct?

What troops did the Jews invade with at the end of the 19th Century and start of the 20th century.

Show me the photos, reports, etc.

What troops did the Jews invade with at the end of the 19th Century and start of the 20th century.

They mooched British troops.

You are mooching your brain and it is not helping.

No proof of anything, do not make the statements.

Jews migrated BACK to their ancient homeland, where Jews have always been present.

Check the history books.

Your first statement was that the Jews were "Foreign invading troops"

And as always, you back it up with air - hot, cold, poisoned air.

They are not Palestinians but are in Palestine stealing land and attacking civilians.

My assessment is correct.

 

[Sixties Fan]

" Muslims invading the Land of Israel in the 7th century CE "
They had troops when they invaded.

The Jews did not have troops at any time they returned to their ancient homeland.

Thank you, Mr. Israeli talking points.

Not historical facts?

Show me the evidence that this is not history, but only Israeli talking points (as in It never happened ).

Are you going to actually deny that what I wrote is historically correct?

What troops did the Jews invade with at the end of the 19th Century and start of the 20th century.

Show me the photos, reports, etc.

What troops did the Jews invade with at the end of the 19th Century and start of the 20th century.

They mooched British troops.

You are mooching your brain and it is not helping.

No proof of anything, do not make the statements.

Jews migrated BACK to their ancient homeland, where Jews have always been present.

Check the history books.

Your first statement was that the Jews were "Foreign invading troops"

And as always, you back it up with air - hot, cold, poisoned air.

They are not Palestinians but are in Palestine stealing land and attacking civilians.

My assessment is correct.

Israel is Palestine and they have been on the land for over 3800 years, unlike the Arabs (call them Palestinians all you like) have been around mostly for the past 1400 years as INVADERS to the land.

Your assessments are as good as your logic.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Thank you, Mr. Israeli talking points.

Not historical facts?

Show me the evidence that this is not history, but only Israeli talking points (as in It never happened ).

Are you going to actually deny that what I wrote is historically correct?

What troops did the Jews invade with at the end of the 19th Century and start of the 20th century.

Show me the photos, reports, etc.

What troops did the Jews invade with at the end of the 19th Century and start of the 20th century.

They mooched British troops.

You are mooching your brain and it is not helping.

No proof of anything, do not make the statements.

Jews migrated BACK to their ancient homeland, where Jews have always been present.

Check the history books.

Your first statement was that the Jews were "Foreign invading troops"

And as always, you back it up with air - hot, cold, poisoned air.

They are not Palestinians but are in Palestine stealing land and attacking civilians.

My assessment is correct.

Israel is Palestine and they have been on the land for over 3800 years, unlike the Arabs (call them Palestinians all you like) have been around mostly for the past 1400 years as INVADERS to the land.

Your assessments are as good as your logic.

You keep banging away on an issue that is not contested.

 

[fanger]

Amnesty’s claims that Israel’s legal enforcement is “discriminatory” are also false, as Western democracies’ juvenile legal codes also contain provisions regarding the minimum and maximum sentencing for assault against security officers and members of the armed forces, and incitement to terrorism.

The following chart compares the maximum sentences for chargers related to assaulting a security officer and incitement to terrorism under Israeli military law with civilian law in Australia, Canada, Germany, Sweden, and the UK.



Show entries
Search:
Israeli Military Law Australia Canada Germany Sweden UK
Assault on an Officer 5 years 3 years 5 years 3 years 4 years 6 months + fine
Incitement to Terror 10 years 10 years Life 5 years 6 years 7 years

(full article online)

Amnesty International Ignores the Weaponization of Palestinian Children

What is the sentence for "assaulting" foreign invading troops?

" Muslims invading the Land of Israel in the 7th century CE "
They had troops when they invaded.

The Jews did not have troops at any time they returned to their ancient homeland.

Thank you, Mr. Israeli talking points.

Not historical facts?

Show me the evidence that this is not history, but only Israeli talking points (as in It never happened ).

Are you going to actually deny that what I wrote is historically correct?

What troops did the Jews invade with at the end of the 19th Century and start of the 20th century.

Show me the photos, reports, etc.

British troops uncover an illegal Jewish arms dump at the Great Synagogue in Tel-Aviv.
Arms Dump Found In Palestine

Ashkenazi Jews Arrive in Palestine | 1913: Seeds of Conflict | PBS

 

[fanger]

Embedded media from this media site is no longer available

 

[Sixties Fan]

A new kind of "honor" killing in Gaza: "Sorry, son, we hate Israel more than we love you." BANG! ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News

 

[fanger]

Spies are often shot.




A Palestinian man has been killed by his family in Gaza after he was found to be providing information to Israeli security forces, according to a statement released by the family.

Relatives of Ahmed Barhoum said they shot him in the city of Rafah after being told by the Hamas militant group that he had been spying for Israel.

They said Mr Barhoum's information was used in an Israeli air strike during the 2014 Gaza war which killed three Hamas militants – including Mr Barhoum’s own kinsman.

The family statement said members had seen evidence against Mr Barhoum and heard his confession.
Palestinian family shoot dead relative believed to be spying for Israel

 

[Sixties Fan]

Spies are often shot.




A Palestinian man has been killed by his family in Gaza after he was found to be providing information to Israeli security forces, according to a statement released by the family.

Relatives of Ahmed Barhoum said they shot him in the city of Rafah after being told by the Hamas militant group that he had been spying for Israel.

They said Mr Barhoum's information was used in an Israeli air strike during the 2014 Gaza war which killed three Hamas militants – including Mr Barhoum’s own kinsman.

The family statement said members had seen evidence against Mr Barhoum and heard his confession.
Palestinian family shoot dead relative believed to be spying for Israel

It has usually Hamas or other groups who kill the alleged collaborators.

It has never been the family of the person in question.

That is what is new.