Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2

[P F Tinmore]

What are real motives for PA government visit to Egypt?

 

[Hollie]

What are real motives for PA government visit to Egypt?

Begging for welfare money?

 

[Hollie]

Yes. Shocking. A politico-religious ideology with an endemic, 1400 years history of virulent Jew hatreds is still exporting those hatreds.



A report released Wednesday made the case that a pro-Palestinian student group at many colleges, National Students for Justice in Palestine (NSJP), “is a main driver of Jew-hatred on campus,” citing dozens of examples of alleged anti-Semitism involving the group’s members.

The Institute for the Study of Global Antisemitism and Policy (ISGAP) released the 96-page report titled “National Students for Justice in Palestine (NSJP) and the Promotion of Hate and Anti-Semitism on the University Campus: The Threat to Academic Freedom” ahead of NSJP’s conference at the University of Minnesota planned for this weekend. According to the authors of the report, NSJP has promoted anti-Semitic rhetoric and has been associated with “violence and terror ideologically and politically.”

 

[Hollie]

Islamic Death Cult Mother of the Year nominee.

A "symbol for Death Cult Mothers"


PA official praises terror mom with imprisoned sons who murdered at least 10 | PMW Translations
Palestinian PM sees mother of 6 terrorist murderers as role model

Nan Jacques Zilberdik | Oct 31, 2019

Palestinian PM praises mother of 6 terrorist murderers as role model:
She is "a school for patience...
we learn perseverance and resolve from her"

• Ramallah Governor lauds terror mom as "symbol for Palestinian women"

 

[member]

What are real motives for PA government visit to Egypt?

​

​

​

​

​

​

psssspssp -- fahgetaboutit my frrrriend?​

​

 

[Hollie]

It may be that the Iranian Mullocrats ordered their Sunni stooges in Hamas or Islamics gee-had to earn their welfare money.


IDF Attacks Hamas Military Posts in Gaza

https://www.jewishpress.com/news/israel/idf/idf-attacks-hamas-military-posts-in-gaza/2019/10/31/

October 31, 2019

Israeli tanks and aircraft attacked Hamas military posts in Gaza late Thursday night in response to a rocket attack fired from the enclave at southern Israel at around 8:30 pm. One rocket landed in an open area. There was no property damage and no one was injured.

 

[member]

It may be that the Iranian Mullocrats ordered their Sunni stooges in Hamas or Islamics gee-had to earn their welfare money.


IDF Attacks Hamas Military Posts in Gaza

IDF Attacks Hamas Military Posts in Gaza

October 31, 2019

Israeli tanks and aircraft attacked Hamas military posts in Gaza late Thursday night in response to a rocket attack fired from the enclave at southern Israel at around 8:30 pm. One rocket landed in an open area. There was no property damage and no one was injured.

"IDF Attacks Hamas Military Posts in Gaza.."

oh no............if they did some REAL attacking - [i.m.o.] the whole place would wind up like.... Abu Al Big Daddy's househole............

​

DING-DONG THE WITCH IS DEAD---WHICH OLD WITCH---THE WICKED WITCH…. DING-DONG THE WICKED WITCH IS DEAD!!!
Wake up you sleepy head, rub your eyes, get out of bed……LaLaLa…..
THE WICKED WITCH IS DEAD !
​

​

​

​

 

[Hollie]

Hopelessness in the occupied Palestinian territories

Hopelessness in the occupied Palestinian territories

Palestinians can't continue to live like this. We need to rise and act before we fall deeper into the abyss.


Shed a tear for those "Poor, oppressed Arabs-Moslems"

House of Palestinian businessman Mohamed Abdel-Hadi

 

[Mindful]

Hopelessness in the occupied Palestinian territories

Hopelessness in the occupied Palestinian territories

Palestinians can't continue to live like this. We need to rise and act before we fall deeper into the abyss.


Shed a tear for those "Poor, oppressed Arabs-Moslems"

House of Palestinian businessman Mohamed Abdel-Hadi

I've seen such mansions, whilst driving by the hills of Nazareth.

 

[Mindful]

I and many others have posted this stuff before.

I don't know why I bother.


See old maps of Palestine and Palestina that show the Biblical division of the so called West Bank.

In recent history, the area called Palestine includes the territories of the present day Israel and Jordan (see map above. For earlier history of the term see article). From 1517 to 1917 most of this area remained under the rule of the Ottoman Empire.

Ottoman Empire was dissolved at the end of World War I. Its successor, modern republic of Turkey, transferred Palestine to British Empire control under the Lausanne agreement that followed WW I.

In 1917 Great Britain issued the Balfour Declaration for "the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people". In 1922 Britain allocated nearly 80% of Palestine to Transjordan. Thus, Jordan covers the majority of the land of Palestine under British Mandate. Jordan also includes the majority of the Arabs who lived there. In other words, Jordan is the Arab portion of Palestine.

The residents of Palestine are called "Palestinians". Since Palestine includes both modern day Israel and Jordan both Arab and Jewish residents of this area were referred to as "Palestinians".

It was only after the Jews re-inhabited their historic homeland of Judea and Samaria, that the myth of an Arab Palestinian nation was created and marketed worldwide. Jews come from Judea, not Palestinians. There is no language known as Palestinian, or any Palestinian culture distinct from that of all the Arabs in the area. There has never been a land known as Palestine governed by Palestinians. "Palestinians" are Arabs indistinguishable from Arabs throughout the Middle East. The great majority of Arabs in greater Palestine and Israel share the same culture, language and religion.

Much of the Arab population in this area actually migrated into Israel and Judea and Samaria from the surrounding Arab countries in the past 100 years. The rebirth of Israel was accompanied by economic prosperity for the region. Arabs migrated to this area to find employment and enjoy the higher standard of living. In documents not more than hundred years, the area is described as a scarcely populated region. Jews by far were the majority in Jerusalem over the small Arab minority. Until the Oslo agreement the major source of income for Arab residents was employment in the Israeli sector. To this day, many Arabs try to migrate into Israel with various deceptions to become a citizen of Israel.

Even the Chairman of the Palestinian Authority, Arafat himself, is not a "Palestinian". He was born in Egypt. The famous "Palestinian covenant" states that Palestinians are "an integral part of the Arab nation" -- a nation which is blessed with a sparsely populated land mass 660 times the size of tiny Israel (Judea, Samaria and Gaza included).

All attempts to claim Arab sovereignty over Israel of today, should be seen with their real intention: The destruction of Israel as a Jewish state and the only bulwark of the Judeo-Christian Western civilization in the Middle East.


History of Palestine and Palestinians

 

[Hollie]

More Islamic terrorist attacks as the Israeli defense systems are working as needed.

Now we wait for the Israeli proportional response as opposed to a punishing beatdown making Islamic terrorist attacks untenable.


Rocket fired from Gaza hits home in Israel as Iron Dome intercepts 8 others

 

[Hollie]

Was anyone really expecting an Islamic terrorist franchise to respect enterprises such as a free press or freedom of expression?

Islamiist sharia is totalitarianism essentially void of the values most of us take for granted.



Palestinian journalist Bassam Moheisen detained by Hamas forces in Gaza since October 23

“Hamas authorities in Gaza have again demonstrated how low press freedom ranks in their priorities,” said CPJ Middle East and North Africa Representative Ignacio Miguel Delgado. “Hamas forces must immediately release Bassem Moheisen and allow journalists to do their jobs freely and without fear of reprisal.”

 

[Hollie]

Another “proportional” (tepid) response from Israel following attacks from the Islamic terrorists in the “country of Pal’istan”, which as we know, was invented in 1924 by the Treaty of Lausanne.





Gaza Barrage: IDF Strikes Hamas Targets After 10 Rockets Launched at Israel, Gaza Ministry Reports 1 Dead

Gaza barrage: IDF strikes Hamas targets after 10 rockets launched at Israel, Gaza ministry reports 1 dead

The Israeli army struck a wide range of Hamas targets throughout the Strip overnight Friday after ten rockets were launched at Israel on Friday evening, marking the second such attack in two days. The Gaza Health Ministry reported one dead in the strikes.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
⁜→ Hollie, et al,

This is a very difficult question, not because it is complex, but because most participants in the discussion have very little concept of what it means in terms of "military advantage."

Now we wait for the Israeli proportional response as opposed to a punishing beatdown making Islamic terrorist attacks untenable.

(COMMENT)

In any military response to ats of aggression, there are a couple of aspects to be nailed down. And, there are a couple of aspects that need to be immediately dispelled.

◈ DISPELL: Often, in the interpretation of the concept "Proportionality in an Attack" (Rule 14 Customary and IHL), many attempt to reduce it to something along the lines of an "equality." That is to say, they think that the appropriate proportional response in the case of the Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) throwing a rock is that the Israelis should just throw a rock back. (WRONG) Or, in the case of the HoAP throwing launching a Qassam Rocket (30-50kg total weight • 5-10kg Warhead) is to return in counterfire of 10kg warhead. (ALSO WRONG). The problem with this interpretation (exact eqivalence) is that it ensures the "conflict will never end."

◈ PROPER CONTEXT: The key to a proportional response is in the question: What is necessary response to attain a "concrete and direct military advantage" (Article 51(5)(b) of Additional Protocol I) that results in the prevention of further attacks?

"(b) an attack which may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, or a combination thereof, which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated."
​

The idea is based on restoring the International Objective: "international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace." (Chapter I • Article 1(1) Purpose of the United Nations) This is the ultimate objective in any response to an attack by the HoAP.

The fact that the conflict has lasted so long, suggest that the proportional response was insufficient to achieve the International Purpose in the "prevention and removal of threats to the peace." (Silence the Guns)
...........
Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
⁜→ Hollie, et al,

This is a very difficult question, not because it is complex, but because most participants in the discussion have very little concept of what it means in terms of "military advantage."

Now we wait for the Israeli proportional response as opposed to a punishing beatdown making Islamic terrorist attacks untenable.

(COMMENT)

In any military response to ats of aggression, there are a couple of aspects to be nailed down. And, there are a couple of aspects that need to be immediately dispelled.

◈ DISPELL: Often, in the interpretation of the concept "Proportionality in an Attack" (Rule 14 Customary and IHL), many attempt to reduce it to something along the lines of an "equality." That is to say, they think that the appropriate proportional response in the case of the Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) throwing a rock is that the Israelis should just throw a rock back. (WRONG) Or, in the case of the HoAP throwing launching a Qassam Rocket (30-50kg total weight • 5-10kg Warhead) is to return in counterfire of 10kg warhead. (ALSO WRONG). The problem with this interpretation (exact eqivalence) is that it ensures the "conflict will never end."

◈ PROPER CONTEXT: The key to a proportional response is in the question: What is necessary response to attain a "concrete and direct military advantage" (Article 51(5)(b) of Additional Protocol I) that results in the prevention of further attacks?

"(b) an attack which may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, or a combination thereof, which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated."
​

The idea is based on restoring the International Objective: "international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace." (Chapter I • Article 1(1) Purpose of the United Nations) This is the ultimate objective in any response to an attack by the HoAP.

The fact that the conflict has lasted so long, suggest that the proportional response was insufficient to achieve the International Purpose in the "prevention and removal of threats to the peace." (Silence the Guns)
...........
Most Respectfully,
R

"(b) an attack which may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, or a combination thereof, which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated."

What military advantage does Israel anticipate? Year after year Israel kills Palestinian civilians by the thousands. Yet they still get protests. They still get rockets. Nothing has changed.

Israel keeps trying to shoot its way out of a political problem.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
⁜→ Hollie, et al,

This is a very difficult question, not because it is complex, but because most participants in the discussion have very little concept of what it means in terms of "military advantage."

Now we wait for the Israeli proportional response as opposed to a punishing beatdown making Islamic terrorist attacks untenable.

(COMMENT)

In any military response to ats of aggression, there are a couple of aspects to be nailed down. And, there are a couple of aspects that need to be immediately dispelled.

◈ DISPELL: Often, in the interpretation of the concept "Proportionality in an Attack" (Rule 14 Customary and IHL), many attempt to reduce it to something along the lines of an "equality." That is to say, they think that the appropriate proportional response in the case of the Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) throwing a rock is that the Israelis should just throw a rock back. (WRONG) Or, in the case of the HoAP throwing launching a Qassam Rocket (30-50kg total weight • 5-10kg Warhead) is to return in counterfire of 10kg warhead. (ALSO WRONG). The problem with this interpretation (exact eqivalence) is that it ensures the "conflict will never end."

◈ PROPER CONTEXT: The key to a proportional response is in the question: What is necessary response to attain a "concrete and direct military advantage" (Article 51(5)(b) of Additional Protocol I) that results in the prevention of further attacks?

"(b) an attack which may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, or a combination thereof, which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated."
​

The idea is based on restoring the International Objective: "international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace." (Chapter I • Article 1(1) Purpose of the United Nations) This is the ultimate objective in any response to an attack by the HoAP.

The fact that the conflict has lasted so long, suggest that the proportional response was insufficient to achieve the International Purpose in the "prevention and removal of threats to the peace." (Silence the Guns)
...........
Most Respectfully,
R

"(b) an attack which may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, or a combination thereof, which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated."

What military advantage does Israel anticipate? Year after year Israel kills Palestinian civilians by the thousands. Yet they still get protests. They still get rockets. Nothing has changed.

Israel keeps trying to shoot its way out of a political problem.

Year after year Israel kills Palestinian civilians by the thousands.

The Palestinian plan to attack from civilian areas has been very successful.
Hiding behind women and children, Palestinian strategy for decades.

 

[Hollie]

RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
⁜→ Hollie, et al,

This is a very difficult question, not because it is complex, but because most participants in the discussion have very little concept of what it means in terms of "military advantage."

Now we wait for the Israeli proportional response as opposed to a punishing beatdown making Islamic terrorist attacks untenable.

(COMMENT)

In any military response to ats of aggression, there are a couple of aspects to be nailed down. And, there are a couple of aspects that need to be immediately dispelled.

◈ DISPELL: Often, in the interpretation of the concept "Proportionality in an Attack" (Rule 14 Customary and IHL), many attempt to reduce it to something along the lines of an "equality." That is to say, they think that the appropriate proportional response in the case of the Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) throwing a rock is that the Israelis should just throw a rock back. (WRONG) Or, in the case of the HoAP throwing launching a Qassam Rocket (30-50kg total weight • 5-10kg Warhead) is to return in counterfire of 10kg warhead. (ALSO WRONG). The problem with this interpretation (exact eqivalence) is that it ensures the "conflict will never end."

◈ PROPER CONTEXT: The key to a proportional response is in the question: What is necessary response to attain a "concrete and direct military advantage" (Article 51(5)(b) of Additional Protocol I) that results in the prevention of further attacks?

"(b) an attack which may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, or a combination thereof, which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated."
​

The idea is based on restoring the International Objective: "international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace." (Chapter I • Article 1(1) Purpose of the United Nations) This is the ultimate objective in any response to an attack by the HoAP.

The fact that the conflict has lasted so long, suggest that the proportional response was insufficient to achieve the International Purpose in the "prevention and removal of threats to the peace." (Silence the Guns)
...........
Most Respectfully,
R

"(b) an attack which may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, or a combination thereof, which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated."

What military advantage does Israel anticipate? Year after year Israel kills Palestinian civilians by the thousands. Yet they still get protests. They still get rockets. Nothing has changed.

Israel keeps trying to shoot its way out of a political problem.

You obviously missed it but Israel was dealing with an Islamic terrorist problem during the latest acts of war perpetrated by the “country of Pal’istan”, which, as we know, was invented by the Treaty of Lausanne.

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
⁜→ Hollie, et al,

This is a very difficult question, not because it is complex, but because most participants in the discussion have very little concept of what it means in terms of "military advantage."

Now we wait for the Israeli proportional response as opposed to a punishing beatdown making Islamic terrorist attacks untenable.

(COMMENT)

In any military response to ats of aggression, there are a couple of aspects to be nailed down. And, there are a couple of aspects that need to be immediately dispelled.

◈ DISPELL: Often, in the interpretation of the concept "Proportionality in an Attack" (Rule 14 Customary and IHL), many attempt to reduce it to something along the lines of an "equality." That is to say, they think that the appropriate proportional response in the case of the Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) throwing a rock is that the Israelis should just throw a rock back. (WRONG) Or, in the case of the HoAP throwing launching a Qassam Rocket (30-50kg total weight • 5-10kg Warhead) is to return in counterfire of 10kg warhead. (ALSO WRONG). The problem with this interpretation (exact eqivalence) is that it ensures the "conflict will never end."

◈ PROPER CONTEXT: The key to a proportional response is in the question: What is necessary response to attain a "concrete and direct military advantage" (Article 51(5)(b) of Additional Protocol I) that results in the prevention of further attacks?

"(b) an attack which may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, or a combination thereof, which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated."
​

The idea is based on restoring the International Objective: "international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace." (Chapter I • Article 1(1) Purpose of the United Nations) This is the ultimate objective in any response to an attack by the HoAP.

The fact that the conflict has lasted so long, suggest that the proportional response was insufficient to achieve the International Purpose in the "prevention and removal of threats to the peace." (Silence the Guns)
...........
Most Respectfully,
R

"(b) an attack which may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, or a combination thereof, which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated."

What military advantage does Israel anticipate? Year after year Israel kills Palestinian civilians by the thousands. Yet they still get protests. They still get rockets. Nothing has changed.

Israel keeps trying to shoot its way out of a political problem.

Year after year Israel kills Palestinian civilians by the thousands.

The Palestinian plan to attack from civilian areas has been very successful.
Hiding behind women and children, Palestinian strategy for decades.

Cool Israeli talking points.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
⁜→ Hollie, et al,

This is a very difficult question, not because it is complex, but because most participants in the discussion have very little concept of what it means in terms of "military advantage."

Now we wait for the Israeli proportional response as opposed to a punishing beatdown making Islamic terrorist attacks untenable.

(COMMENT)

In any military response to ats of aggression, there are a couple of aspects to be nailed down. And, there are a couple of aspects that need to be immediately dispelled.

◈ DISPELL: Often, in the interpretation of the concept "Proportionality in an Attack" (Rule 14 Customary and IHL), many attempt to reduce it to something along the lines of an "equality." That is to say, they think that the appropriate proportional response in the case of the Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) throwing a rock is that the Israelis should just throw a rock back. (WRONG) Or, in the case of the HoAP throwing launching a Qassam Rocket (30-50kg total weight • 5-10kg Warhead) is to return in counterfire of 10kg warhead. (ALSO WRONG). The problem with this interpretation (exact eqivalence) is that it ensures the "conflict will never end."

◈ PROPER CONTEXT: The key to a proportional response is in the question: What is necessary response to attain a "concrete and direct military advantage" (Article 51(5)(b) of Additional Protocol I) that results in the prevention of further attacks?

"(b) an attack which may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, or a combination thereof, which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated."
​

The idea is based on restoring the International Objective: "international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace." (Chapter I • Article 1(1) Purpose of the United Nations) This is the ultimate objective in any response to an attack by the HoAP.

The fact that the conflict has lasted so long, suggest that the proportional response was insufficient to achieve the International Purpose in the "prevention and removal of threats to the peace." (Silence the Guns)
...........
Most Respectfully,
R

"(b) an attack which may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, or a combination thereof, which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated."

What military advantage does Israel anticipate? Year after year Israel kills Palestinian civilians by the thousands. Yet they still get protests. They still get rockets. Nothing has changed.

Israel keeps trying to shoot its way out of a political problem.

Year after year Israel kills Palestinian civilians by the thousands.

The Palestinian plan to attack from civilian areas has been very successful.
Hiding behind women and children, Palestinian strategy for decades.

Cool Israeli talking points.

I know, to Pallies, the truth is an Israeli talking point.
Pallie cowards never hide behind women and children.

 

[Hollie]

RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
⁜→ Hollie, et al,

This is a very difficult question, not because it is complex, but because most participants in the discussion have very little concept of what it means in terms of "military advantage."

Now we wait for the Israeli proportional response as opposed to a punishing beatdown making Islamic terrorist attacks untenable.

(COMMENT)

In any military response to ats of aggression, there are a couple of aspects to be nailed down. And, there are a couple of aspects that need to be immediately dispelled.

◈ DISPELL: Often, in the interpretation of the concept "Proportionality in an Attack" (Rule 14 Customary and IHL), many attempt to reduce it to something along the lines of an "equality." That is to say, they think that the appropriate proportional response in the case of the Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) throwing a rock is that the Israelis should just throw a rock back. (WRONG) Or, in the case of the HoAP throwing launching a Qassam Rocket (30-50kg total weight • 5-10kg Warhead) is to return in counterfire of 10kg warhead. (ALSO WRONG). The problem with this interpretation (exact eqivalence) is that it ensures the "conflict will never end."

◈ PROPER CONTEXT: The key to a proportional response is in the question: What is necessary response to attain a "concrete and direct military advantage" (Article 51(5)(b) of Additional Protocol I) that results in the prevention of further attacks?

"(b) an attack which may be expected to cause incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, or a combination thereof, which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated."
​

The idea is based on restoring the International Objective: "international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace." (Chapter I • Article 1(1) Purpose of the United Nations) This is the ultimate objective in any response to an attack by the HoAP.

The fact that the conflict has lasted so long, suggest that the proportional response was insufficient to achieve the International Purpose in the "prevention and removal of threats to the peace." (Silence the Guns)
...........
Most Respectfully,
R

While I acknowledge my armchair quarterbacking, I believe an objective view of the situation identifies that devcades of “proportional responses” have only emboldened the Islamic terrorists. Just months ago, 700 rockets rained down on Israel from Gaza. I must think the Islamic terrorist groups realized that even an attack of that magnitude will only cost some buildings and some sacrificial civilians. That’s a cost the Islamic terrorist groups are willing to bear. The PA and leaders in Gaza mold entire generations with praise of suicide bombers/mass murderers, grooming women and children who have been recruited and sent to their deaths with the purpose of murdering Israelis.

Israel withdrew from Gaza, and it became a terrorist staging ground for carrying out attacks against Israel and governed by a militant group that calls for Israel's destruction.
Eight years, thousands of rockets rained upon Israel from Hamas--and the world did nothing.
And when Israel finally said "enough" and fought back, as any nation would do to protect her citizens, Israel was condemned.

Israel withdrew from Southern Lebanon (which it again entered to stop attacks against her citizens) and the UN promised to ensure Hezbollah would not rearm. As in 1987, the UN broke its trust, and Hezbollah is now rearmed now with missiles that can strike Tel Aviv.

Iran continues to call for the destruction of "the Zionist regime" while enriching uranium for its nuclear program (aka "the Allah bomb"), and the world does nothing. After 50 years of wars, attacks, suicide bombings, Arab anti-Semitic media, Israel’s very existence still faces threats from Islamic terrorist States and their proxies. And I can only assume that for some, self-denial and scapegoating is easier, rather than acknowledging the major problem in Islam and the extensive world terrorism performed by Moslems and Moslem intolerance that are so frequently in the headlines.

This, in light of the fight for Israeli Independence when the world stood by and watched as 5 Arab armies acted to "push the Jews into the Sea". For swaths of the Islamic Middle East, that goal has not faded.

And "Israeli Apatheid Week" only continues the insanity of the Islamism.

At the end of WW2, there was no question as to who won / who lost and who would set the terms of peace. I’m afraid that the endless allowance by Israel for the constant attacks againt its citizens will only escalate with the presence of Iranian cash and ideological goals in Gaza. I see nothing that will change Arab-Moslem attitudes toward Israel and I see nothing that will prevent the Islamic terrorist attacks from Gaza and the West Bank without a concerted effort on the part of Israel to systematically eliminate the people who organize and plan the attacks.