Who do you think will be frog marched in cuffs on Monday?

[GordonGecko]

The Mueller investigation is about trump and Russia. If they find anything on Obama or Hillary, it should be thrown out because that’s not the investigation. Mueller needs to remove Trump from office for the good of the country. He is racist.

Wrong; The mandate was ANYTHING involving Russian interference.. Democrats don't get a free pass..

The investigation is into Russian interference in the election. Trump won. Hillary lost. Trump is the one who colluded. If Hillary colluded she would have won.

Your really are a dupe... winning or loosing doesn't make a difference.. It's the criminal conduct of people.. And that is what they are investigating, individual criminal conduct.... You don't get a free pass.. This special counsel has every right to take down democrats..

That’s not the investigation. If Ken Starr found out that Newt Gingrich broke the law, it shouldn’t have mattered, because the investigation was into Bill Clinton.

That was Bills personal life, by the way. Total miscarriage of justice. That’s between a man and his wife.

LOL...Starr had the same mandate and the same prosecutorial latitude...

View attachment 157038

And Starr stayed within the initial scope of the investigation.

If Mueller finds out that Hillary jaywalked, it’s not in the scope of the investigation.

 

[DarkFury]

John McCain

OJ Simpson

McCain was the bag man who paraded the bullshit report.

What law did he break?

Trying to impede the lawful actions of a president (felony)
Knowingly presenting false documents to the FBI (felony)

Trying to impede the actions of a president seems virtually impossible to prove unless they have a recording or email of him stating that intent.

As for your second charge.... when did McCain present the documents to the FBI and how do you prove that he knew they were false?

Donna Brazil trying to effect the outcome of an election (felony)
Read my OP/ED pissgate in the FZ for a longer list.

 

[Slade3200]

It’s interesting that this indictment news is getting nothing more than a whisper on Fox News while they continue to be quite loud about the Clinton collusion conspiracy theory. Makes me think the inside scoop is leaning towards an indictment of a Trump staffer.

Manafort and Flynn are the obvious suspects but it could also be a lower level staffer.

Also, I find it interesting that I don’t hear people from the Right spinning the scenario that the FBI informant who Trump just freed from the “gag order” may have provided evidence that could incriminate a Clinton associate.

What do you think is going to happen?

An unconfirmed rumor is all it is at this point...

You can only play that card for a few days but we all know something is coming. Reporters saw Mueller meet with the grand jury and they had inside sources tell them an indictment is coming. Question now is who? And why is Fox avoiding the story and not running with the Podesta/Clinton scenario? I would think this news would fall right in line with the narrative of their Clinton collusion story they’ve been pounding into for the past few days.

FOX has been reporting on it every 15 min today.. Your "not reporting it" crap is a bald face lie...

Ive been watching Fox. They are talking about Uranium One and the dossier. They have read the headline about the indictment but haven’t done one panel or interview or analysis that I’ve seen.

Its a breaking news item every 15 min... Take the democrat blinders off..

I’ve been sitting here for the last 3 hours with Fox News on and have heard zero discussions about it. And only a couple one liners reading the headline, then onto the next story.

Why aren’t they jumping around in excitement trying to tie this to Podesta or Clinton?

 

[DarkFury]

An unconfirmed rumor is all it is at this point...

You can only play that card for a few days but we all know something is coming. Reporters saw Mueller meet with the grand jury and they had inside sources tell them an indictment is coming. Question now is who? And why is Fox avoiding the story and not running with the Podesta/Clinton scenario? I would think this news would fall right in line with the narrative of their Clinton collusion story they’ve been pounding into for the past few days.

FOX has been reporting on it every 15 min today.. Your "not reporting it" crap is a bald face lie...

Ive been watching Fox. They are talking about Uranium One and the dossier. They have read the headline about the indictment but haven’t done one panel or interview or analysis that I’ve seen.

Its a breaking news item every 15 min... Take the democrat blinders off..

I’ve been sitting here for the last 3 hours with Fox News on and have heard zero discussions about it. And only a couple one liners reading the headline, then onto the next story.

Why aren’t they jumping around in excitement trying to tie this to Podesta or Clinton?

Everybody is waiting until Monday. Vegas is taking bets!

 

[GordonGecko]

An unconfirmed rumor is all it is at this point...

You can only play that card for a few days but we all know something is coming. Reporters saw Mueller meet with the grand jury and they had inside sources tell them an indictment is coming. Question now is who? And why is Fox avoiding the story and not running with the Podesta/Clinton scenario? I would think this news would fall right in line with the narrative of their Clinton collusion story they’ve been pounding into for the past few days.

FOX has been reporting on it every 15 min today.. Your "not reporting it" crap is a bald face lie...

Ive been watching Fox. They are talking about Uranium One and the dossier. They have read the headline about the indictment but haven’t done one panel or interview or analysis that I’ve seen.

Its a breaking news item every 15 min... Take the democrat blinders off..

I’ve been sitting here for the last 3 hours with Fox News on and have heard zero discussions about it. And only a couple one liners reading the headline, then onto the next story.

Why aren’t they jumping around in excitement trying to tie this to Podesta or Clinton?

It’s the weekend and Hannity is having his landscapers cut his hair, so he can’t tell the Trumpanzees what to feel.

 

[Slade3200]

OJ Simpson

McCain was the bag man who paraded the bullshit report.

What law did he break?

Trying to impede the lawful actions of a president (felony)
Knowingly presenting false documents to the FBI (felony)

Trying to impede the actions of a president seems virtually impossible to prove unless they have a recording or email of him stating that intent.

As for your second charge.... when did McCain present the documents to the FBI and how do you prove that he knew they were false?

Donna Brazil trying to effect the outcome of an election (felony)
Read my OP/ED pissgate in the FZ for a longer list.

Thanks but I’m not interested in partisan flame zone rants

 

[DarkFury]

McCain was the bag man who paraded the bullshit report.

What law did he break?

Trying to impede the lawful actions of a president (felony)
Knowingly presenting false documents to the FBI (felony)

Trying to impede the actions of a president seems virtually impossible to prove unless they have a recording or email of him stating that intent.

As for your second charge.... when did McCain present the documents to the FBI and how do you prove that he knew they were false?

Donna Brazil trying to effect the outcome of an election (felony)
Read my OP/ED pissgate in the FZ for a longer list.

Thanks but I’m not interested in partisan flame zone rants

Not a rant idiot.

 

[Slade3200]

You can only play that card for a few days but we all know something is coming. Reporters saw Mueller meet with the grand jury and they had inside sources tell them an indictment is coming. Question now is who? And why is Fox avoiding the story and not running with the Podesta/Clinton scenario? I would think this news would fall right in line with the narrative of their Clinton collusion story they’ve been pounding into for the past few days.

FOX has been reporting on it every 15 min today.. Your "not reporting it" crap is a bald face lie...

Ive been watching Fox. They are talking about Uranium One and the dossier. They have read the headline about the indictment but haven’t done one panel or interview or analysis that I’ve seen.

Its a breaking news item every 15 min... Take the democrat blinders off..

I’ve been sitting here for the last 3 hours with Fox News on and have heard zero discussions about it. And only a couple one liners reading the headline, then onto the next story.

Why aren’t they jumping around in excitement trying to tie this to Podesta or Clinton?

Everybody is waiting until Monday. Vegas is taking bets!

The News doesn’t wait. The News speculates and drums up conflict and drama for their base. Fox is running all over Clinton collusion but not tying it to this indictment. I can only assume they are doing this because their sources are reporting this as a likely blow to Trump

 

[DarkFury]

If it were a Trump staffer the name would have been leaked... Its an attempt to deflect from the DNC/Clinton treason scandal.

I am going to laugh my ass off, if on Monday they say "false alarm, we got nothing"....

Debbie Wasserman Shultz is a 3 to 1 favorite in Vegas!

 

[Slade3200]

What law did he break?

Trying to impede the lawful actions of a president (felony)
Knowingly presenting false documents to the FBI (felony)

Trying to impede the actions of a president seems virtually impossible to prove unless they have a recording or email of him stating that intent.

As for your second charge.... when did McCain present the documents to the FBI and how do you prove that he knew they were false?

Donna Brazil trying to effect the outcome of an election (felony)
Read my OP/ED pissgate in the FZ for a longer list.

Thanks but I’m not interested in partisan flame zone rants

Not a rant idiot.

Then why is it in the flame zone

 

[DarkFury]

FOX has been reporting on it every 15 min today.. Your "not reporting it" crap is a bald face lie...

Ive been watching Fox. They are talking about Uranium One and the dossier. They have read the headline about the indictment but haven’t done one panel or interview or analysis that I’ve seen.

Its a breaking news item every 15 min... Take the democrat blinders off..

I’ve been sitting here for the last 3 hours with Fox News on and have heard zero discussions about it. And only a couple one liners reading the headline, then onto the next story.

Why aren’t they jumping around in excitement trying to tie this to Podesta or Clinton?

Everybody is waiting until Monday. Vegas is taking bets!

The News doesn’t wait. The News speculates and drums up conflict and drama for their base. Fox is running all over Clinton collusion but not tying it to this indictment. I can only assume they are doing this because their sources are reporting this as a likely blow to Trump

Well if you assume wrong!

 

[DarkFury]

Trying to impede the lawful actions of a president (felony)
Knowingly presenting false documents to the FBI (felony)

Trying to impede the actions of a president seems virtually impossible to prove unless they have a recording or email of him stating that intent.

As for your second charge.... when did McCain present the documents to the FBI and how do you prove that he knew they were false?

Donna Brazil trying to effect the outcome of an election (felony)
Read my OP/ED pissgate in the FZ for a longer list.

Thanks but I’m not interested in partisan flame zone rants

Not a rant idiot.

Then why is it in the flame zone

That is where I write my OP/ed

 

[ClosedCaption]

You people are masturbating over this, but your bitch Hillary is in ten times worse trouble.

Yes, because a federal investigation is nothing compared to rumors lol. Oh btw, I'm going left hand on this story because its sooo sexy

 

[deanrd]

It’s interesting that this indictment news is getting nothing more than a whisper on Fox News while they continue to be quite loud about the Clinton collusion conspiracy theory. Makes me think the inside scoop is leaning towards an indictment of a Trump staffer.

Manafort and Flynn are the obvious suspects but it could also be a lower level staffer.

Also, I find it interesting that I don’t hear people from the Right spinning the scenario that the FBI informant who Trump just freed from the “gag order” may have provided evidence that could incriminate a Clinton associate.

What do you think is going to happen?

I think going after the Clinton's again is wishful thinking on the side of the GOP.
We already know about lies told by:

Mike Flynn
Paul Manafort
Jared Kushner
Carter Page
Jeff Sessions
Trump Jr.
Mike Cohen
Roger Stone

These lies are well documented. They can't be denied.

But my personal feeling is all these guys are too high in the food chain to be charged this early in the investigation. Remember, Clinton's investigation was already going on forever before Monica even started working at the White House. She was a Godsend for the GOP after spending all that money and wasting all that time.

So my feeling is it's going to be Flynn's son for several reasons.

He's high up enough to know what's going on but still low in the food chain.
Flynn Sr. will freak out if his son is charged.
Flynn Jr. went every where his father went and knew everything that was going on.
Flynn Jr. doesn't have the money to defend himself.

But I guess we'll see.

For the Republicans to hang their hats on an investigation of Hillary on a transaction she had nothing to do with they've been litigating for nearly a decade is a stretch. Even for them. What it shows is how clean the Obama administration was because that's all they could come up with. They've already tried wire tapping which was laughable. And Fast and Furious which was ridiculous. All they have is he was born in Kenya and only the most insane of the GOP hold on to that nonsense.

 

[Billy_Bob]

If it were a Trump staffer the name would have been leaked... Its an attempt to deflect from the DNC/Clinton treason scandal.

I am going to laugh my ass off, if on Monday they say "false alarm, we got nothing"....

Debbie Wasserman Shultz is a 3 to 1 favorite in Vegas!

The odds are long for everyone else... now that's funny! Podesta is 5-1 and the rest (Trump people) are far behind.. We at least know where the big money thinks things are going to land..

 

[deanrd]

Trying to impede the lawful actions of a president (felony)
Knowingly presenting false documents to the FBI (felony)

Trying to impede the actions of a president seems virtually impossible to prove unless they have a recording or email of him stating that intent.

As for your second charge.... when did McCain present the documents to the FBI and how do you prove that he knew they were false?

Donna Brazil trying to effect the outcome of an election (felony)
Read my OP/ED pissgate in the FZ for a longer list.

Thanks but I’m not interested in partisan flame zone rants

Not a rant idiot.

Then why is it in the flame zone

Because 54% of the USMB think it's going to be a Clinton Associate who colluded with the Russians to get Trump elected president. Democrats see that as laughable. For some reason, the Republicans don't.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

The Mueller investigation is about trump and Russia. If they find anything on Obama or Hillary, it should be thrown out because that’s not the investigation. Mueller needs to remove Trump from office for the good of the country. He is racist.

The investigation is about Russian influence in the election. That's a wide net and Democraps can get taught too!

 

[DarkFury]

The Mueller investigation is about trump and Russia. If they find anything on Obama or Hillary, it should be thrown out because that’s not the investigation. Mueller needs to remove Trump from office for the good of the country. He is racist.

The investigation is about Russian influence in the election. That's a wide net and Democraps can get taught too!

I think it will include both parties sooner or later.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

The Mueller investigation is about trump and Russia. If they find anything on Obama or Hillary, it should be thrown out because that’s not the investigation. Mueller needs to remove Trump from office for the good of the country. He is racist.

Wrong; The mandate was ANYTHING involving Russian interference.. Democrats don't get a free pass..

The investigation is into Russian interference in the election. Trump won. Hillary lost. Trump is the one who colluded. If Hillary colluded she would have won.

You are either a comedic genius or an idiot. Which is it?

 

[deanrd]

The Mueller investigation is about trump and Russia. If they find anything on Obama or Hillary, it should be thrown out because that’s not the investigation. Mueller needs to remove Trump from office for the good of the country. He is racist.

Wrong; The mandate was ANYTHING involving Russian interference.. Democrats don't get a free pass..

The investigation is into Russian interference in the election. Trump won. Hillary lost. Trump is the one who colluded. If Hillary colluded she would have won.

You are either a comedic genius or an idiot. Which is it?

How about "correct"?