Who is "The Liberal Media"??

[billyerock1991]

LOL, read your post, dumbshit.

Name 5 media outlets you consider objective.

Zero of them are. Why not read the posts before you respond to them?

You said I made a strawman argument. Now you admit you can't name any unbiased news outlets.

thats Iceweene love to embarrass him self every chance he gets

I love how he owns you like the cheap rented democrat mule you are...

and you keep prove to us your inability to debate... we get it your learnin comes slow for ya

 

[billyerock1991]

Conservatives don't want the federal government to have so much power because that gives people who are not conservatives too much power.

amend to that

 

[owebo]

Conservatives don't want the federal government to have so much power because that gives people who are not conservatives too much power.

Thank you for demonstrating to is again that,you are totally fucking clueless....

 

[NYcarbineer]

The truth is objective. The source of truth is irrelevant.

 

[owebo]

The truth is objective. The source of truth is irrelevant.

Power to the plantation....

 

[NYcarbineer]

Conservatives don't want the federal government to have so much power because that gives people who are not conservatives too much power.

Thank you for demonstrating to is again that,you are totally fucking clueless....

So now you wish to dispute that conservatives believe the federal government has too much power?

Now you wish to claim the opposite? Let's hear that argument.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The truth is objective. The source of truth is irrelevant.

Power to the plantation....

Getting them to babble incoherently is always a good indicator of how the debate is going.

What's biased about the truth?

 

[owebo]

Conservatives don't want the federal government to have so much power because that gives people who are not conservatives too much power.

Thank you for demonstrating to is again that,you are totally fucking clueless....

So now you wish to dispute that conservatives believe the federal government has too much power?

Now you wish to claim the opposite? Let's hear that argument.

So, you are admitting you can't even read what you write....

Thanks for reinforcing my point...

 

[owebo]

The truth is objective. The source of truth is irrelevant.

Power to the plantation....

Getting them to babble incoherently is always a good indicator of how the debate is going.

What's biased about the truth?

indeed....

 

[billyerock1991]

It's what liberals call themselves so that's the term we use. They are anything but liberal but when we communicate we must use a common language. One thing liberals do is manipulate meanings because he who controls the language, controls the culture.

These loons are not even near being true liberals, they are progressives...or better...progtards

I consider myself a far left lefty liberal ...so I believe you are wrong in that analogy ... but what do you expect from a repub-lie-tard like you ...

Far left lefty liberal is a progressive you loon. You're not even close to what a true liberal is

sorry sweetie they are 2 different things
progressive
adjective
1.
favoring or advocating progress, change, improvement, or reform, asopposed to wishing to maintain things as they are, especially inpolitical matters:
a progressive mayor.
2.
making progress toward better conditions; employing or advocatingmore enlightened or liberal ideas, new or experimental methods, etc.:
a progressive community.
3.
characterized by such progress, or by continuous improvement.
4.
(initial capital letter) of or relating to any of the Progressive parties inpolitics.
5.
going forward or onward; passing successively from one member of aseries to the next; proceeding step by step.
6.
noting or pertaining to a form of taxation in which the rate increaseswith certain increases in taxable income.
7.
of or relating to progressive education :

Liberal

1. open to new behavior or opinions and willing to discard traditional values:
   "they have more liberal views toward marriage and divorce than some people"
2. (of education) concerned mainly with broadening a person's general knowledge and experience, rather than with technical or professional training.
   synonyms: wide-ranging · broad-based · general
3. (especially of an interpretation of a law) broadly construed or understood; not strictly literal or exact:
   "they could have given the 1968 Act a more liberal interpretation"
   synonyms: flexible · broad · loose · rough · free · general · nonliteral ·
   abundant · copious · ample · plentiful · generous ·
   [more]

1. open to new behavior or opinions and willing to discard traditional values:
   "they have more liberal views toward marriage and divorce than some people"
2. (of education) concerned mainly with broadening a person's general knowledge and experience, rather than with technical or professional training.
   synonyms: wide-ranging · broad-based · general
3. (especially of an interpretation of a law) broadly construed or understood; not strictly literal or exact:
   "they could have given the 1968 Act a more liberal interpretation"
   synonyms: flexible · broad · loose · rough · free · general · nonliteral ·
   abundant · copious · ample · plentiful · generous ·
   seems ya lost that one huh

Nothing that you wish to accomplish can be done using a central bank that extends credit from nothing.....even an idiot like you should have that figured out......or did they not teach you that in "leftard school"??? Tis a pity.....

first of all I don't do credit ... I pay cash for everything ... now the last credit I applied for was my house 40 years ago... from then on cash only ... so what you are saying is a waste of my time I don't care about the banking cause I don't get my money from banks i just have them hold it for me ...I get it from corproations paying out on covered calls

 

[billyerock1991]

Actually its what you conservative call it the liberal press ... during in the 1960 election when Nixon was getting bad press it was Nixon who coined the phrase the liberal press not us liberals ...
besides theres no such thing as the liberal press .... there is however, a such of a thing as press that you don't like

Wrong as always Beeelly. When a so called media outlet does everything it can to destroy one presidential candidate and polish another then it's ideology that runs the show, not reporting. Reporters report the news, journalists make the news. And that's what we have now, they are all journalists. Yes, even FOX, one of the few right leaning ones, but at least they give libs a voice, unlike the opposite for their counterparts.

For example, when a Republican is in office, 5% unemployment is unacceptable. 8 trillion in debt is unacceptable. Home ownership, gas prices and on and on.

When a Democrat is on offe we suddenly see a completely differnt measuring stick. 5% unemployment is a good thing, even when the numbers are phony as hell. 1 to 2% growth is OK too, for how many decades I don't know, I guess we could find out. Home ownership is at historic lows, I see nothing about it on the msm.

No mention of the 19 trillion in debt, soon to be 22 trillion. No daily military body counts like we had with Bush, even though more have died during obama's term. It's a complete blackout for negative news against Democrats.

You see no problem with that because you are a liberal. You live in a bubble. A hate filled bubble at that.

you mean like fox news does ???? that kind of press !!!! lest see who makes the unemployment numbers ??? oh thats right a non-biased government agency called the Bureau of Labor Statistics... come on ownership at a low ??? now thats real funny ... in my state, run by us Dems/liberals can't build homes fast enough ... hell the stock market is up higher then its ever been, I personally am making money hand over fist in the market and you're trying to tell us how bad it is ... now thats funny
the problem that I have is how can you be so ignorant when it comes to how the government works ... it is you who lives it the world of stupid

I hope that you have that alleged wealth in something more than worthless paper because we are going to go through a crash that will make 2008 seem like a mother's kiss by comparison. Let me know how much food that worthless paper buys you. USA.INC is up to it's neck in shit with a fiat currency backed by nothing with an intrinsic value. You strike me as one of the idiots that refused to get into one of those yucky life boats on the Titanic after it was taking on water because the lights stayed on and the band played on.......of course as you sit on the curb when the electricity is off and you have no food? You will sit on the curb with your little head in your hands hoping that your beloved corporate "gubermint" is going to come to your rescue.....(snicker). Good luck with all that.....

actually i don't buy stocks or bonds . I do what is called covered calls ... what my money manager does he buy a call where it held for 3 to 4 months then the call is up ... either I sell it because it went through the roof ... or keep it and watch it slowly go up ... it has kept me in money for many, mamy many years .. i have my manager give me 2500 dollars a month it goes right to my checking along with social security ... so I could care less where the market goes ...I'm never in a call more then 3 months but thanks for your concern

When the banks collapse, all that funny money collapses with it....good luck trying to pull any fiat currency out of the ATM., Due to fractional banking, 97 percent of all "funny money" is nothing but numbers on a computer screen. Even as we speak, ATMs are struggling to keep up with the demand for real paper. If you attempt to pull out too much in any given time, the DHS/gestapo places you on notice.....learn, grow, evolve.

you know if you want to say stupid shit, I can't stop you ... right now not sure exactly how much I have I generally pull out the money from a IRA and put it into my account ... I have 35 or 40 thousand in my checking ??? my main money is in a Ira ... in that Ira instead of doing stocks and bonds like every body does, a take 40 to 50 thousand dollars out of it to buy a covered call ... again the are short time 3 to 4 months in ...have I lost money ??? sure i have ... but nothing to compared to what people lost in 2001 and 2008 the most I lost was 10,000 dollars in level 3 communications because I couldn't pull it out fast enough ... but nothing compared to what the normal stock and bond holders lost ...

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Are American right wingers prevented from setting up their own media outlets ?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Conservatives don't want the federal government to have so much power because that gives people who are not conservatives too much power.

Thank you for demonstrating to is again that,you are totally fucking clueless....

So now you wish to dispute that conservatives believe the federal government has too much power?

Now you wish to claim the opposite? Let's hear that argument.

So, you are admitting you can't even read what you write....

Thanks for reinforcing my point...

You didn't even try to make a point.

Conservatives want power taken away from the federal government and given to the states. Disagree?

 

[Weatherman2020]

File that under "If Bush had done it"

 

[Tehon]

For 20+ years I've been listening to Republicans cry like little girls about "The Liberal Media" After looking into this for awhile, I finally found out just "The Liberal Media" is: The Liberal Media is any media outlet that tells Republicans something they don't want to hear. Cases In Point:

* When CNN, MSNBC ABC, NBC, and CBS covered countless hours of Hillary Clinton being grilled about the situation in Benghazi, Republicans seemed fine with this, but when these same media outlets caught Mrs. Trump plagiarizing Mrs. Obama's speech they became "The Liberal Media"

* When CNN, MSNBC ABC, NBC, and CBS covered countless hours of Hillary Clinton being grilled about her emails , Republicans seemed fine with this, but when these same media outlets caught Donald Trump showing his ignorance about the Russia -Ukraine situation they became "The Liberal Media"

* When CNN, MSNBC ABC, NBC, and CBS grilled Bill Clinton about his affair with Monica Lewinsky, as well as the hours of impeachment proceedings Republicans seemed fine with this, but when these same media outlets caught G.W. Bush or his people lying about those weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, they became "The Liberal Media"

* When CNN, MSNBC ABC, NBC, and CBS spent countless hours questioning John Kerry about his military service, Republicans seemed fine with this, but when these same media outlets caught The Reagan administration illegally funneling money in the Iran-Contra mess they became "The Liberal Media"

...and the list goes on. Republicans have complained about "Liberal Bias" for so long, it's now been accepted as fact. The reality is media outlets are after stories that boost their ratings, and don't care who they exploit to do so. Republicans...you can keep crying about "The Liberal Media" if you want, but it just ain't so!

Ninety percent of our lamestream media is owned by 6 major corporations and the heads of those six conglomerates have seats on the Council On Foreign Relations and the owners are members of the "Committee Of 300". Why does our media have such a liberal slant? Because the goal of the global elites is to erase the boundaries of all countries, demonize those that support the organic constitution. The sheeple say "why would the uber rich want a totalitarian, technocratic communist like system since it would cut into their profit margins?" Easy, if you already own the wealth and sitting atop of the pyramid, communism works really good because you have only two classes...the elites and the serfs that they control with no pesky middle class to threaten the power structure. Communism in China, the USSR and parts of Asia were funded by the banking oligarchs and that is a fact that has indisputable proof. Hope this helps......I always look forward to any chance I get to enlighten the clueless.

What you describe is more akin to feudalism than communism and is antithetical to liberalism.

Indeed...and that is what the Bush and Clinton crime families wish to accomplish.....congrats...you are partly "awake"...

Indeed nothing. You think the oligarchs want to create a system in which all property is publicly owned. Go back to studying, get back to us when you have a better understanding of what you are saying.

 

[billyerock1991]

Conservatives don't want the federal government to have so much power because that gives people who are not conservatives too much power.

Thank you for demonstrating to is again that,you are totally fucking clueless....

"to is" really rocket scents??? whose supposed to be smarter

 

[NYcarbineer]

Are American right wingers prevented from setting up their own media outlets ?

Excellent point. I've tried that one on them myself. Usually the response is either stunned silence or an irrelevant rant.
Don't miss their real objective here. They want unilateral withdrawal by the so-called liberal media so their own rightwing propaganda machine, led by Foxnews,

can operate unmolested and uncontested.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Editor calls out NY Times for liberal bias

A whistle-blowing ombudsman: Proof The New York Times has a liberal bias?

 

[Weatherman2020]

 

[owebo]

Conservatives don't want the federal government to have so much power because that gives people who are not conservatives too much power.

Thank you for demonstrating to is again that,you are totally fucking clueless....

"to is" really rocket scents??? whose supposed to be smarter

Thank you for proving my point...again.....