Who is "The Liberal Media"??

[healthmyths]

For 20+ years I've been listening to Republicans cry like little girls about "The Liberal Media" After looking into this for awhile, I finally found out just "The Liberal Media" is: The Liberal Media is any media outlet that tells Republicans something they don't want to hear. Cases In Point:

* When CNN, MSNBC ABC, NBC, and CBS covered countless hours of Hillary Clinton being grilled about the situation in Benghazi, Republicans seemed fine with this, but when these same media outlets caught Mrs. Trump plagiarizing Mrs. Obama's speech they became "The Liberal Media"

* When CNN, MSNBC ABC, NBC, and CBS covered countless hours of Hillary Clinton being grilled about her emails , Republicans seemed fine with this, but when these same media outlets caught Donald Trump showing his ignorance about the Russia -Ukraine situation they became "The Liberal Media"

* When CNN, MSNBC ABC, NBC, and CBS grilled Bill Clinton about his affair with Monica Lewinsky, as well as the hours of impeachment proceedings Republicans seemed fine with this, but when these same media outlets caught G.W. Bush or his people lying about those weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, they became "The Liberal Media"

* When CNN, MSNBC ABC, NBC, and CBS spent countless hours questioning John Kerry about his military service, Republicans seemed fine with this, but when these same media outlets caught The Reagan administration illegally funneling money in the Iran-Contra mess they became "The Liberal Media"

...and the list goes on. Republicans have complained about "Liberal Bias" for so long, it's now been accepted as fact. The reality is media outlets are after stories that boost their ratings, and don't care who they exploit to do so. Republicans...you can keep crying about "The Liberal Media" if you want, but it just ain't so!

So would you put your money where your mouth is?

Explain to me how the When CNN, MSNBC ABC, NBC, and CBS did the following:
Bias with their pocketbook...
In 2008 there were 1,160 or 85% of the 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008, according to an analysis by The Examiner of data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.
Obama, Democrats got 88 percent of 2008 contributions by TV network execs, writers, reporters

Bias with the news stories
This study of some 130,213 news articles on the 2012 presidential match between President Obama and Mitt Romney has proven anew that there was a strong pro-Democratic bias in the U.S. and international press. The study, published in the authoritative journal Big Data Society, also tested the campaign themes the media focused on and determined that Obama succeeded in stealing the economic issue from Republican Romney.
"Overall, media reporting contained more frequently positive statements about the Democrats than the Republicans. Overall, the Republicans were more frequently the object of negative statements," wrote the study authors,
Their conclusion: "The Republican Party is the most divisive subject in the campaign, and is portrayed in a more negative fashion than the Democrats."
Smooch: Study of 130,213 stories shows Obama bias in 2012 election

What most Americans believe
POLL: 70 PERCENT OF AMERICANS BELIEVE NEWS MEDIA IS INTENTIONALLY BIASED
"These are discouraging results for those of us who have spent our careers in journalism"
Poll: 70 percent of Americans believe news media is intentionally biased

News personalities pronounced bias
Minutes later on ABC, anchor George Stephanopoulos gushed over First Lady Michelle Obama: “Polished, passionate and personal,”
while on MSNBC, Joy Reid called the First Lady’s speech “magnificent, exquisite...[and] splendid.”
Hardball host Chris Matthews loved all of it: “I just thought the whole night was a slugger’s row of wonderful sentiments.”
As the week wore on, none of the major Democrats earned a bad review.
On Tuesday night, CBS’s Gayle King found Bill Clinton’s speech on behalf of Hillary “heartwarming.”
The next night, correspondents for NBC, CBS and ABC praised vice presidential candidate Tim Kaine for his “suburban dad” personality, whose “extraordinary” Spanish-speaking skills made for “a Spanish lesson down here.”
And, of course, President Obama sent thrills up journalists’ legs. “I don’t think we’ve ever had a President, save Lincoln, who is as great a speechwriter as this man,”
NBC’s Andrea Mitchell oozed. “It was magnificent,” MSNBC’s Matthews tingled, “a wonderful farewell address.”
Condemning Republicans, Cheering Democrats: The Media’s Biased 2016 Convention Coverage

Remember folks... these are suppose to be the objective, hard nosed, bash the president, news people that here is a quote from Evan Thomas that exemplifies this extreme bias:
The Editor of NewsWeek, Evan Thomas was once asked about George Bush and this is his response.
"our job is to bash the president[Bush], that's what we do." Evan Thomas responding to a question on whether the media's unfair to Bush on the TV talk show Inside Washington, February 2, 2007.He-Could-Go-All-The-Way: 'Today' Cheers Obama's Football Play

RIGHT HIS job was to BASH Bush. He is a journalist. Unbiased. Objective. Professional. RIGHT??
But when it came to Obama? This same hard-nosed "bashing journalist"- Editor of NewsWeek gushed about Obama.....
"I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above – above the world, he’s sort of God."
Newsweek’s Evan Thomas: Obama Is ‘Sort of God’
A professional NEWS editor calling a mortal man "sort of God"??? That's not reporting, that's gushing!

Finally an ADMISSION by the BIASED MSM!
By Ellen Ratner 7/24/2016 on LIBERAL & PROUD
EVEN THIS LIBERAL SEES MEDIA BIAS AT GOP CONVENTION
Exclusive: Ellen Ratner shares eye-opening observation about RNC coverage
"Everyone knows I am a liberal. That is why this column is called “Liberal & Proud.”
Even though I am a liberal, I don’t like it when the news media go out on a limb and try to influence the news rather than just report it.
There are several examples just this week alone, and all have been examples of media bias.
There is always competition to get a story, which can lead to media bias in place of good, old-fashioned reporting.
Even this liberal sees media bias at GOP convention

when you use a source like daily caller, Whilrynut daily, newsman,and so on and so on as your source of information I would expect a one side post just like this one is ... these news companies CNN, MSNBC ABC, NBC, and CBS are known for correcting any untruth that is discovered by anyone the research it and it it is wrong they correct sort .... I have never heard Bretbart, newsman, whirlynutdaily, or the daily caller ever correct and untruth that they made .. they will stand by their lie to the end ....your source here is nothing more the right wing propaganda

NOT ONE admission on your part regarding the ABOVE links!
Where was daily caller,etc. used in my links?
Again.. when the Editor of Newsweek tells people they were to Bash Bush but later calls Obama a God??? Come on that is bias in it's purest Form!
Tell me when 85% of 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008 and they don't have a vested interest???
And finally when a liberal ADMITS there is a bias that in Ratner's words..."news media go out on a limb and try to influence the news rather than just report it."
That's the major blow to your idiot comment! When are your sources to counter the above facts?

 

[billyerock1991]

For 20+ years I've been listening to Republicans cry like little girls about "The Liberal Media" After looking into this for awhile, I finally found out just "The Liberal Media" is: The Liberal Media is any media outlet that tells Republicans something they don't want to hear. Cases In Point:

* When CNN, MSNBC ABC, NBC, and CBS covered countless hours of Hillary Clinton being grilled about the situation in Benghazi, Republicans seemed fine with this, but when these same media outlets caught Mrs. Trump plagiarizing Mrs. Obama's speech they became "The Liberal Media"

* When CNN, MSNBC ABC, NBC, and CBS covered countless hours of Hillary Clinton being grilled about her emails , Republicans seemed fine with this, but when these same media outlets caught Donald Trump showing his ignorance about the Russia -Ukraine situation they became "The Liberal Media"

* When CNN, MSNBC ABC, NBC, and CBS grilled Bill Clinton about his affair with Monica Lewinsky, as well as the hours of impeachment proceedings Republicans seemed fine with this, but when these same media outlets caught G.W. Bush or his people lying about those weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, they became "The Liberal Media"

* When CNN, MSNBC ABC, NBC, and CBS spent countless hours questioning John Kerry about his military service, Republicans seemed fine with this, but when these same media outlets caught The Reagan administration illegally funneling money in the Iran-Contra mess they became "The Liberal Media"

...and the list goes on. Republicans have complained about "Liberal Bias" for so long, it's now been accepted as fact. The reality is media outlets are after stories that boost their ratings, and don't care who they exploit to do so. Republicans...you can keep crying about "The Liberal Media" if you want, but it just ain't so!

So would you put your money where your mouth is?

Explain to me how the When CNN, MSNBC ABC, NBC, and CBS did the following:
Bias with their pocketbook...
In 2008 there were 1,160 or 85% of the 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008, according to an analysis by The Examiner of data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.
Obama, Democrats got 88 percent of 2008 contributions by TV network execs, writers, reporters

Bias with the news stories
This study of some 130,213 news articles on the 2012 presidential match between President Obama and Mitt Romney has proven anew that there was a strong pro-Democratic bias in the U.S. and international press. The study, published in the authoritative journal Big Data Society, also tested the campaign themes the media focused on and determined that Obama succeeded in stealing the economic issue from Republican Romney.
"Overall, media reporting contained more frequently positive statements about the Democrats than the Republicans. Overall, the Republicans were more frequently the object of negative statements," wrote the study authors,
Their conclusion: "The Republican Party is the most divisive subject in the campaign, and is portrayed in a more negative fashion than the Democrats."
Smooch: Study of 130,213 stories shows Obama bias in 2012 election

What most Americans believe
POLL: 70 PERCENT OF AMERICANS BELIEVE NEWS MEDIA IS INTENTIONALLY BIASED
"These are discouraging results for those of us who have spent our careers in journalism"
Poll: 70 percent of Americans believe news media is intentionally biased

News personalities pronounced bias
Minutes later on ABC, anchor George Stephanopoulos gushed over First Lady Michelle Obama: “Polished, passionate and personal,”
while on MSNBC, Joy Reid called the First Lady’s speech “magnificent, exquisite...[and] splendid.”
Hardball host Chris Matthews loved all of it: “I just thought the whole night was a slugger’s row of wonderful sentiments.”
As the week wore on, none of the major Democrats earned a bad review.
On Tuesday night, CBS’s Gayle King found Bill Clinton’s speech on behalf of Hillary “heartwarming.”
The next night, correspondents for NBC, CBS and ABC praised vice presidential candidate Tim Kaine for his “suburban dad” personality, whose “extraordinary” Spanish-speaking skills made for “a Spanish lesson down here.”
And, of course, President Obama sent thrills up journalists’ legs. “I don’t think we’ve ever had a President, save Lincoln, who is as great a speechwriter as this man,”
NBC’s Andrea Mitchell oozed. “It was magnificent,” MSNBC’s Matthews tingled, “a wonderful farewell address.”
Condemning Republicans, Cheering Democrats: The Media’s Biased 2016 Convention Coverage

Remember folks... these are suppose to be the objective, hard nosed, bash the president, news people that here is a quote from Evan Thomas that exemplifies this extreme bias:
The Editor of NewsWeek, Evan Thomas was once asked about George Bush and this is his response.
"our job is to bash the president[Bush], that's what we do." Evan Thomas responding to a question on whether the media's unfair to Bush on the TV talk show Inside Washington, February 2, 2007.He-Could-Go-All-The-Way: 'Today' Cheers Obama's Football Play

RIGHT HIS job was to BASH Bush. He is a journalist. Unbiased. Objective. Professional. RIGHT??
But when it came to Obama? This same hard-nosed "bashing journalist"- Editor of NewsWeek gushed about Obama.....
"I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above – above the world, he’s sort of God."
Newsweek’s Evan Thomas: Obama Is ‘Sort of God’
A professional NEWS editor calling a mortal man "sort of God"??? That's not reporting, that's gushing!

Finally an ADMISSION by the BIASED MSM!
By Ellen Ratner 7/24/2016 on LIBERAL & PROUD
EVEN THIS LIBERAL SEES MEDIA BIAS AT GOP CONVENTION
Exclusive: Ellen Ratner shares eye-opening observation about RNC coverage
"Everyone knows I am a liberal. That is why this column is called “Liberal & Proud.”
Even though I am a liberal, I don’t like it when the news media go out on a limb and try to influence the news rather than just report it.
There are several examples just this week alone, and all have been examples of media bias.
There is always competition to get a story, which can lead to media bias in place of good, old-fashioned reporting.
Even this liberal sees media bias at GOP convention

when you use a source like daily caller, Whilrynut daily, newsman,and so on and so on as your source of information I would expect a one side post just like this one is ... these news companies CNN, MSNBC ABC, NBC, and CBS are known for correcting any untruth that is discovered by anyone the research it and it it is wrong they correct sort .... I have never heard Bretbart, newsman, whirlynutdaily, or the daily caller ever correct and untruth that they made .. they will stand by their lie to the end ....your source here is nothing more the right wing propaganda

NOT ONE admission on your part regarding the ABOVE links!
Where was daily caller,etc. used in my links?
Again.. when the Editor of Newsweek tells people they were to Bash Bush but later calls Obama a God??? Come on that is bias in it's purest Form!
Tell me when 85% of 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008 and they don't have a vested interest???
And finally when a liberal ADMITS there is a bias that in Ratner's words..."news media go out on a limb and try to influence the news rather than just report it."
That's the major blow to your idiot comment! When are your sources to counter the above facts?

you asked: "Where was daily caller,etc. used in my links?" in the very first link was the daily caller ... do you not look at your sources when you pick them??? Obama, Democrats got 88 percent of 2008 contributions by TV network execs, writers, reporters

Please show us where any of these news ever said: "when the Editor of Newsweek tells people they were to Bash Bush but later calls Obama a God???" never happen ....

You said Tell me when 85% of 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008 and they don't have a vested interest???

when they see what republican have to offer and what democrats have to offer, its not a case of being biased when the donate... its a case of what they want as a citizen of this country ... but again your source the daily caller, is know for biased reporting and not telling the truth ... they are a right wing source so your post here that states that 85% of the news companies donated money to them, well I don't accept that one or buy it try and get a crediabl source...


And finally you said when a liberal ADMITS there is a bias that in Ratner's words..."news media go out on a limb and try to influence the news rather than just report it." WND ... really you want me to believe what WND says ???? ... don't thinks so ... do you not look at your sources ...

finally ... I watched the RNC convention ...all I saw was personal attack name calling at hillary and obana and the democrats .. it was unbelievable bad ... the worse RNC convention that I have seen in my life time ... your pissed because the media didn't give the a RNC a glowing review ???? you're pissed because the democrats did a better job informing the people ... your pissed because all of the democrats out shine the pathetic convention the RNC had ...

PRICELESS

 

[sealybobo]

For 20+ years I've been listening to Republicans cry like little girls about "The Liberal Media" After looking into this for awhile, I finally found out just "The Liberal Media" is: The Liberal Media is any media outlet that tells Republicans something they don't want to hear. Cases In Point:

* When CNN, MSNBC ABC, NBC, and CBS covered countless hours of Hillary Clinton being grilled about the situation in Benghazi, Republicans seemed fine with this, but when these same media outlets caught Mrs. Trump plagiarizing Mrs. Obama's speech they became "The Liberal Media"

* When CNN, MSNBC ABC, NBC, and CBS covered countless hours of Hillary Clinton being grilled about her emails , Republicans seemed fine with this, but when these same media outlets caught Donald Trump showing his ignorance about the Russia -Ukraine situation they became "The Liberal Media"

* When CNN, MSNBC ABC, NBC, and CBS grilled Bill Clinton about his affair with Monica Lewinsky, as well as the hours of impeachment proceedings Republicans seemed fine with this, but when these same media outlets caught G.W. Bush or his people lying about those weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, they became "The Liberal Media"

* When CNN, MSNBC ABC, NBC, and CBS spent countless hours questioning John Kerry about his military service, Republicans seemed fine with this, but when these same media outlets caught The Reagan administration illegally funneling money in the Iran-Contra mess they became "The Liberal Media"

...and the list goes on. Republicans have complained about "Liberal Bias" for so long, it's now been accepted as fact. The reality is media outlets are after stories that boost their ratings, and don't care who they exploit to do so. Republicans...you can keep crying about "The Liberal Media" if you want, but it just ain't so!

We need a truly liberal cable channel. MSNBC like but I would want it to explain

1. How the Florida elections were rigged 2000
2. How bush delay and hastert deregulations and policies caused the 2008 crash
3. How bad the GOP Congress acted badly under Obama
4. How come is playing politics
5. How global warming is a fact
6. Bush lied us into Iraq
7. How bush created Isis
8. Why people are doing worse under Obama

I want this station to truly represent liberals. Not half way like MSNBC does.

We need a fox. Not fox light. This is why our candidate is basically a moderate republican

 

[sealybobo]

For 20+ years I've been listening to Republicans cry like little girls about "The Liberal Media" After looking into this for awhile, I finally found out just "The Liberal Media" is: The Liberal Media is any media outlet that tells Republicans something they don't want to hear. Cases In Point:

* When CNN, MSNBC ABC, NBC, and CBS covered countless hours of Hillary Clinton being grilled about the situation in Benghazi, Republicans seemed fine with this, but when these same media outlets caught Mrs. Trump plagiarizing Mrs. Obama's speech they became "The Liberal Media"

* When CNN, MSNBC ABC, NBC, and CBS covered countless hours of Hillary Clinton being grilled about her emails , Republicans seemed fine with this, but when these same media outlets caught Donald Trump showing his ignorance about the Russia -Ukraine situation they became "The Liberal Media"

* When CNN, MSNBC ABC, NBC, and CBS grilled Bill Clinton about his affair with Monica Lewinsky, as well as the hours of impeachment proceedings Republicans seemed fine with this, but when these same media outlets caught G.W. Bush or his people lying about those weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, they became "The Liberal Media"

* When CNN, MSNBC ABC, NBC, and CBS spent countless hours questioning John Kerry about his military service, Republicans seemed fine with this, but when these same media outlets caught The Reagan administration illegally funneling money in the Iran-Contra mess they became "The Liberal Media"

...and the list goes on. Republicans have complained about "Liberal Bias" for so long, it's now been accepted as fact. The reality is media outlets are after stories that boost their ratings, and don't care who they exploit to do so. Republicans...you can keep crying about "The Liberal Media" if you want, but it just ain't so!

So would you put your money where your mouth is?

Explain to me how the When CNN, MSNBC ABC, NBC, and CBS did the following:
Bias with their pocketbook...
In 2008 there were 1,160 or 85% of the 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008, according to an analysis by The Examiner of data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.
Obama, Democrats got 88 percent of 2008 contributions by TV network execs, writers, reporters

Bias with the news stories
This study of some 130,213 news articles on the 2012 presidential match between President Obama and Mitt Romney has proven anew that there was a strong pro-Democratic bias in the U.S. and international press. The study, published in the authoritative journal Big Data Society, also tested the campaign themes the media focused on and determined that Obama succeeded in stealing the economic issue from Republican Romney.
"Overall, media reporting contained more frequently positive statements about the Democrats than the Republicans. Overall, the Republicans were more frequently the object of negative statements," wrote the study authors,
Their conclusion: "The Republican Party is the most divisive subject in the campaign, and is portrayed in a more negative fashion than the Democrats."
Smooch: Study of 130,213 stories shows Obama bias in 2012 election

What most Americans believe
POLL: 70 PERCENT OF AMERICANS BELIEVE NEWS MEDIA IS INTENTIONALLY BIASED
"These are discouraging results for those of us who have spent our careers in journalism"
Poll: 70 percent of Americans believe news media is intentionally biased

News personalities pronounced bias
Minutes later on ABC, anchor George Stephanopoulos gushed over First Lady Michelle Obama: “Polished, passionate and personal,”
while on MSNBC, Joy Reid called the First Lady’s speech “magnificent, exquisite...[and] splendid.”
Hardball host Chris Matthews loved all of it: “I just thought the whole night was a slugger’s row of wonderful sentiments.”
As the week wore on, none of the major Democrats earned a bad review.
On Tuesday night, CBS’s Gayle King found Bill Clinton’s speech on behalf of Hillary “heartwarming.”
The next night, correspondents for NBC, CBS and ABC praised vice presidential candidate Tim Kaine for his “suburban dad” personality, whose “extraordinary” Spanish-speaking skills made for “a Spanish lesson down here.”
And, of course, President Obama sent thrills up journalists’ legs. “I don’t think we’ve ever had a President, save Lincoln, who is as great a speechwriter as this man,”
NBC’s Andrea Mitchell oozed. “It was magnificent,” MSNBC’s Matthews tingled, “a wonderful farewell address.”
Condemning Republicans, Cheering Democrats: The Media’s Biased 2016 Convention Coverage

Remember folks... these are suppose to be the objective, hard nosed, bash the president, news people that here is a quote from Evan Thomas that exemplifies this extreme bias:
The Editor of NewsWeek, Evan Thomas was once asked about George Bush and this is his response.
"our job is to bash the president[Bush], that's what we do." Evan Thomas responding to a question on whether the media's unfair to Bush on the TV talk show Inside Washington, February 2, 2007.He-Could-Go-All-The-Way: 'Today' Cheers Obama's Football Play

RIGHT HIS job was to BASH Bush. He is a journalist. Unbiased. Objective. Professional. RIGHT??
But when it came to Obama? This same hard-nosed "bashing journalist"- Editor of NewsWeek gushed about Obama.....
"I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above – above the world, he’s sort of God."
Newsweek’s Evan Thomas: Obama Is ‘Sort of God’
A professional NEWS editor calling a mortal man "sort of God"??? That's not reporting, that's gushing!

Finally an ADMISSION by the BIASED MSM!
By Ellen Ratner 7/24/2016 on LIBERAL & PROUD
EVEN THIS LIBERAL SEES MEDIA BIAS AT GOP CONVENTION
Exclusive: Ellen Ratner shares eye-opening observation about RNC coverage
"Everyone knows I am a liberal. That is why this column is called “Liberal & Proud.”
Even though I am a liberal, I don’t like it when the news media go out on a limb and try to influence the news rather than just report it.
There are several examples just this week alone, and all have been examples of media bias.
There is always competition to get a story, which can lead to media bias in place of good, old-fashioned reporting.
Even this liberal sees media bias at GOP convention

when you use a source like daily caller, Whilrynut daily, newsman,and so on and so on as your source of information I would expect a one side post just like this one is ... these news companies CNN, MSNBC ABC, NBC, and CBS are known for correcting any untruth that is discovered by anyone the research it and it it is wrong they correct sort .... I have never heard Bretbart, newsman, whirlynutdaily, or the daily caller ever correct and untruth that they made .. they will stand by their lie to the end ....your source here is nothing more the right wing propaganda

NOT ONE admission on your part regarding the ABOVE links!
Where was daily caller,etc. used in my links?
Again.. when the Editor of Newsweek tells people they were to Bash Bush but later calls Obama a God??? Come on that is bias in it's purest Form!
Tell me when 85% of 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008 and they don't have a vested interest???
And finally when a liberal ADMITS there is a bias that in Ratner's words..."news media go out on a limb and try to influence the news rather than just report it."
That's the major blow to your idiot comment! When are your sources to counter the above facts?

you asked: "Where was daily caller,etc. used in my links?" in the very first link was the daily caller ... do you not look at your sources when you pick them??? Obama, Democrats got 88 percent of 2008 contributions by TV network execs, writers, reporters

Please show us where any of these news ever said: "when the Editor of Newsweek tells people they were to Bash Bush but later calls Obama a God???" never happen ....

You said Tell me when 85% of 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008 and they don't have a vested interest???

when they see what republican have to offer and what democrats have to offer, its not a case of being biased when the donate... its a case of what they want as a citizen of this country ... but again your source the daily caller, is know for biased reporting and not telling the truth ... they are a right wing source so your post here that states that 85% of the news companies donated money to them, well I don't accept that one or buy it try and get a crediabl source...


And finally you said when a liberal ADMITS there is a bias that in Ratner's words..."news media go out on a limb and try to influence the news rather than just report it." WND ... really you want me to believe what WND says ???? ... don't thinks so ... do you not look at your sources ...

finally ... I watched the RNC convention ...all I saw was personal attack name calling at hillary and obana and the democrats .. it was unbelievable bad ... the worse RNC convention that I have seen in my life time ... your pissed because the media didn't give the a RNC a glowing review ???? you're pissed because the democrats did a better job informing the people ... your pissed because all of the democrats out shine the pathetic convention the RNC had ...

PRICELESS

If the reporters realize their neocon bosses control the news of course that makes them silent liberals

 

[ptbw forever]

For 20+ years I've been listening to Republicans cry like little girls about "The Liberal Media" After looking into this for awhile, I finally found out just "The Liberal Media" is: The Liberal Media is any media outlet that tells Republicans something they don't want to hear. Cases In Point:

* When CNN, MSNBC ABC, NBC, and CBS covered countless hours of Hillary Clinton being grilled about the situation in Benghazi, Republicans seemed fine with this, but when these same media outlets caught Mrs. Trump plagiarizing Mrs. Obama's speech they became "The Liberal Media"

* When CNN, MSNBC ABC, NBC, and CBS covered countless hours of Hillary Clinton being grilled about her emails , Republicans seemed fine with this, but when these same media outlets caught Donald Trump showing his ignorance about the Russia -Ukraine situation they became "The Liberal Media"

* When CNN, MSNBC ABC, NBC, and CBS grilled Bill Clinton about his affair with Monica Lewinsky, as well as the hours of impeachment proceedings Republicans seemed fine with this, but when these same media outlets caught G.W. Bush or his people lying about those weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, they became "The Liberal Media"

* When CNN, MSNBC ABC, NBC, and CBS spent countless hours questioning John Kerry about his military service, Republicans seemed fine with this, but when these same media outlets caught The Reagan administration illegally funneling money in the Iran-Contra mess they became "The Liberal Media"

...and the list goes on. Republicans have complained about "Liberal Bias" for so long, it's now been accepted as fact. The reality is media outlets are after stories that boost their ratings, and don't care who they exploit to do so. Republicans...you can keep crying about "The Liberal Media" if you want, but it just ain't so!

We need a truly liberal cable channel. MSNBC like but I would want it to explain

1. How the Florida elections were rigged 2000
2. How bush delay and hastert deregulations and policies caused the 2008 crash
3. How bad the GOP Congress acted badly under Obama
4. How come is playing politics
5. How global warming is a fact
6. Bush lied us into Iraq
7. How bush created Isis
8. Why people are doing worse under Obama

I want this station to truly represent liberals. Not half way like MSNBC does.

We need a fox. Not fox light. This is why our candidate is basically a moderate republican

How low is your IQ?

 

[sealybobo]

For 20+ years I've been listening to Republicans cry like little girls about "The Liberal Media" After looking into this for awhile, I finally found out just "The Liberal Media" is: The Liberal Media is any media outlet that tells Republicans something they don't want to hear. Cases In Point:

* When CNN, MSNBC ABC, NBC, and CBS covered countless hours of Hillary Clinton being grilled about the situation in Benghazi, Republicans seemed fine with this, but when these same media outlets caught Mrs. Trump plagiarizing Mrs. Obama's speech they became "The Liberal Media"

* When CNN, MSNBC ABC, NBC, and CBS covered countless hours of Hillary Clinton being grilled about her emails , Republicans seemed fine with this, but when these same media outlets caught Donald Trump showing his ignorance about the Russia -Ukraine situation they became "The Liberal Media"

* When CNN, MSNBC ABC, NBC, and CBS grilled Bill Clinton about his affair with Monica Lewinsky, as well as the hours of impeachment proceedings Republicans seemed fine with this, but when these same media outlets caught G.W. Bush or his people lying about those weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, they became "The Liberal Media"

* When CNN, MSNBC ABC, NBC, and CBS spent countless hours questioning John Kerry about his military service, Republicans seemed fine with this, but when these same media outlets caught The Reagan administration illegally funneling money in the Iran-Contra mess they became "The Liberal Media"

...and the list goes on. Republicans have complained about "Liberal Bias" for so long, it's now been accepted as fact. The reality is media outlets are after stories that boost their ratings, and don't care who they exploit to do so. Republicans...you can keep crying about "The Liberal Media" if you want, but it just ain't so!

We need a truly liberal cable channel. MSNBC like but I would want it to explain

1. How the Florida elections were rigged 2000
2. How bush delay and hastert deregulations and policies caused the 2008 crash
3. How bad the GOP Congress acted badly under Obama
4. How come is playing politics
5. How global warming is a fact
6. Bush lied us into Iraq
7. How bush created Isis
8. Why people are doing worse under Obama

I want this station to truly represent liberals. Not half way like MSNBC does.

We need a fox. Not fox light. This is why our candidate is basically a moderate republican

How low is your IQ?

My political IQ is very high.

Even Republicans finally admitted to agreeing with me when they said fuck no to Cruz, rubio, kasich, jeb, Christie, Ben carson, carli, etc.

If I was wrong about republicans how did trump beat them all? So even Republican primary voters agree with me.

And trump agrees with me that George Bush should have never invaded Iraq. For 16 fucking years you guys were so fucking stupid. How low is your IQ that you only now hate free trade because trump told you it's bad? Before you wanted to the cheap products and you bragged about the corporate profits.

Ive been studying you cons for 35 years. I don't like anything about you.

 

[sealybobo]

I even remember Republicans were all about illegals doing jobs Americans won't do

 

[ABikerSailor]

I even remember Republicans were all about illegals doing jobs Americans won't do

Yeah......and remember when their great deity St. Reagan granted amnesty to illegals back in 1986?

And...............I'll even make it easier for you to read conservatives, it's from Breitbart.

Experts: 'Reagan Amnesty' for Illegal Aliens Set The Stage for Immigration Battles - Breitbart