Who liberals really are and who liberals are according to the rightwing never really matches

[EdwardBaiamonte]

That would reduce price is 80%.

Yup, I'll bet those doctors and medical professionals are just lining up to take an 80% cut in pay.

yep!!! just like in Europe and Japan!!!!!

 

[francoHFW]

Current American definition of "liberal" = a hateful closed minded bigot who never thinks, just parrots and sticks hand out

Hilarious, hater dupe. Change the channel and get some real news.

yes a liberal is a bigot. He thinks he is morally superior because he supports crippling intergenerational welfare rather than a safety net.

So stop supporting no programs for training and a unlivable min wage....tax the rich ferchrissake- they've NEVER been more bloated and undertaxed in a hundred years......

 

[usmbguest5318]

Do you notice how you never hear liberals, in general, talk about "safe spaces" or "being triggered"? It's because they don't. Those are just terms heard on random college campuses in news stories and then the rightwing, in their simplistic thought processes, generalize liberals as talking about these things? I had never heard those terms until some republicans on this forum explained them.

Do you notice how you never hear liberals talk about how everyone should be on welfare and the government should take care of them instead? It's because they don't.

Do you notice how you never hear liberals say gay people should have special rights? It's because they don't.

Do you notice how liberals never say we should ban all guns?

You get the idea.

Well, yes. Naming and framing, along storming and norming, form the core of the rightwing approach to rhetoric.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Calling most of the leftwingers here "liberal" is an insult to true liberals.

 

[ptbw forever]

Do you notice how you never hear liberals, in general, talk about "safe spaces" or "being triggered"? It's because they don't. Those are just terms heard on random college campuses in news stories and then the rightwing, in their simplistic thought processes, generalize liberals as talking about these things? I had never heard those terms until some republicans on this forum explained them.

Do you notice how you never hear liberals talk about how everyone should be on welfare and the government should take care of them instead? It's because they don't.

Do you notice how you never hear liberals say gay people should have special rights? It's because they don't.

Do you notice how liberals never say we should ban all guns?

You get the idea.

Tumblr SJWs are the present and future of your party, not you.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Says the idiot who thinks the government will investigate itself honestly.

And yet, they did. You just don't like the results from the first time they investigated themselves ... or the second ... or the third ... or the fourth ... or the fifth, sixth, seventh, or eighth.



Even worse for you, you lack even the minimal brain capacity to comprehend that if the government didn't actually investigate itself honestly, as you moronically claim -- there never would have been a second investigation into Benghazi after finding nothing following the first investigation ... no less, eight in total.

But then, you're a conservative; so thinking isn't something you bother with.

Not a con....haven't been one for a couple decades now.

To think Obama and his minions did nothing wrong in Benghazi, makes you a fool.

LOLOLOLOL

Now you're switching your argument.

You just went from claiming they lied -- to they did something wrong.

Your surrender is accepted.

You really are slow....lying IS DOING something wrong.

If only LWNJs would learn that government sucks ALWAYS.

Lying and doing something wrong are not synonymous. While lying is doing something wrong, doing something wrong doesn't require lying.

But I understand why you tried to switch your argument -- it's fucking brain-dead.

The GOP investigates Obama and Clinton's role in Benghazi and finds nothing. If you were sane and the government didn't investigate itself honestly, that would have been the end of it right there. But it wasn't. Not happy with finding nothing, Republicans cranked up a second investigation in their best efforts to find something on Obama and/or Hillary. If you're not brain-dead enough after idiotically claiming they don't honestly investigate themselves after reopening the Benghazi investigation a second time; just imagine how retarded you are after they opened it again and again and again and again and again and again.

All to hide the lies you claim were told.

Hell, you're too senile to know you're crazy. You should consider yourself fortunate in that regard. You probably don't even realize what you're saying.

Just think about your claim that Republicans had proof that Obama, Hillary, and Rice all lied -- and they sat on it and instead said there were no lies.

Let that monumental idiocy sink in for a moment before you quadruple down on this stupid of yours.

btw, you're no liberal. You're a pure leftist troll

douche, k?

 

[francoHFW]

Calling most of the leftwingers here "liberal" is an insult to true liberals.

Oh no not the classical liberal BS AGAIN!

 

[Marion Morrison]

Calling most of the leftwingers here "liberal" is an insult to true liberals.

Oh no not the classical liberal BS AGAIN!

Of which you can lay no claim to. Hang your head in shame, leftist troll.

 

[francoHFW]

Calling most of the leftwingers here "liberal" is an insult to true liberals.

Oh no not the classical liberal BS AGAIN!

Of which you can lay no claim to. Hang your head in shame, leftist troll.

Classical liberalism as you know it only exists in GOP BS propaganda world, like Liberal Fascism a brand new term and philosophy, for ignorant dupes like you only...

 

[Marion Morrison]

Calling most of the leftwingers here "liberal" is an insult to true liberals.

Oh no not the classical liberal BS AGAIN!

Of which you can lay no claim to. Hang your head in shame, leftist troll.

Classical liberalism only exists in GOP BS propaganda world, like Liberal Fascism a brand new term and philosophy, for ignorant dupes like you only...

Wrong, leftist dupe! Many Americans are real Liberals. They outnumber asshats such as yourself 4:1 at least.

You fail, douchenozzle.

 

[francoHFW]

Calling most of the leftwingers here "liberal" is an insult to true liberals.

Oh no not the classical liberal BS AGAIN!

Of which you can lay no claim to. Hang your head in shame, leftist troll.

Classical liberalism only exists in GOP BS propaganda world, like Liberal Fascism a brand new term and philosophy, for ignorant dupes like you only...

Wrong, leftist dupe! Many Americans are real Liberals. They outnumber asshats such as yourself 4:1 at least.

You fail, douchenozzle.

As you know it...NOT. They're all Dems in reality.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Calling most of the leftwingers here "liberal" is an insult to true liberals.

Oh no not the classical liberal BS AGAIN!

Of which you can lay no claim to. Hang your head in shame, leftist troll.

Classical liberalism only exists in GOP BS propaganda world, like Liberal Fascism a brand new term and philosophy, for ignorant dupes like you only...

Wrong, leftist dupe! Many Americans are real Liberals. They outnumber asshats such as yourself 4:1 at least.

You fail, douchenozzle.

As you know it...NOT. They're all Dems in reality.

Liberals are fleeing the far leftist Dem party in droves.

Nothing remains there.

 

[Kosh]

Do you notice how you never hear liberals, in general, talk about "safe spaces" or "being triggered"? It's because they don't. Those are just terms heard on random college campuses in news stories and then the rightwing, in their simplistic thought processes, generalize liberals as talking about these things? I had never heard those terms until some republicans on this forum explained them.

Do you notice how you never hear liberals talk about how everyone should be on welfare and the government should take care of them instead? It's because they don't.

Do you notice how you never hear liberals say gay people should have special rights? It's because they don't.

Do you notice how liberals never say we should ban all guns?

You get the idea.

You are not a true liberal, please stop trying to say you are!

 

[Faun]

And yet, they did. You just don't like the results from the first time they investigated themselves ... or the second ... or the third ... or the fourth ... or the fifth, sixth, seventh, or eighth.



Even worse for you, you lack even the minimal brain capacity to comprehend that if the government didn't actually investigate itself honestly, as you moronically claim -- there never would have been a second investigation into Benghazi after finding nothing following the first investigation ... no less, eight in total.

But then, you're a conservative; so thinking isn't something you bother with.

Not a con....haven't been one for a couple decades now.

To think Obama and his minions did nothing wrong in Benghazi, makes you a fool.

LOLOLOLOL

Now you're switching your argument.

You just went from claiming they lied -- to they did something wrong.

Your surrender is accepted.

You really are slow....lying IS DOING something wrong.

If only LWNJs would learn that government sucks ALWAYS.

Lying and doing something wrong are not synonymous. While lying is doing something wrong, doing something wrong doesn't require lying.

But I understand why you tried to switch your argument -- it's fucking brain-dead.

The GOP investigates Obama and Clinton's role in Benghazi and finds nothing. If you were sane and the government didn't investigate itself honestly, that would have been the end of it right there. But it wasn't. Not happy with finding nothing, Republicans cranked up a second investigation in their best efforts to find something on Obama and/or Hillary. If you're not brain-dead enough after idiotically claiming they don't honestly investigate themselves after reopening the Benghazi investigation a second time; just imagine how retarded you are after they opened it again and again and again and again and again and again.

All to hide the lies you claim were told.

Hell, you're too senile to know you're crazy. You should consider yourself fortunate in that regard. You probably don't even realize what you're saying.

Just think about your claim that Republicans had proof that Obama, Hillary, and Rice all lied -- and they sat on it and instead said there were no lies.

Let that monumental idiocy sink in for a moment before you quadruple down on this stupid of yours.

btw, you're no liberal. You're a pure leftist troll

douche, k?

I take that as a badge of honor, just so ya know.

 

[Dale Smith]

Medicaid, payed by the States or private organizations. It's not a federal function. This is what Madison, the father of the Constitution said on such topics.

The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government, are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State. -James Madison Federalist 45

.

Um, okay. So how would the disabled and poor get healthcare?

Your understanding of how the world actually works is utterly pathetic....but you have a lot of company. I don't blame you personally, you are simply a by-product of a horrifically ran indoctrination program that we refer to as "public education". I could go into a long ass dissertation about how it got to this level, how critical thinking skills became a liability and cognitive dissonance became the norm.....I doubt that you have the intellectual capacity to take all this in because the programming is just that deeply ingrained in you.I have to admit, it was tough for me to shake it off and I wasn't able to take that leap until I was 48 years of age. The "de-programming" process was an ass-kicking ordeal.....like a heroin addict that was a life long user with withdrawal symptoms that caused me to lose weight along with the inability to sleep...but I did it. I compare it to what Marines have to go through during basic training.....they wouldn't go through it again had they known what they were in for, but they are glad that they made it.

"Liberalism" in the true sense of the word was about individual freedom as in "if I am nit infringing on your rights to exist then you have no rights to infringe on mine" kinda deal. They believed in the "Bill of Rights" and what it stood for....but somewhere along the line? The communist infiltration that Joseph McCarthy warned us about took control. McCarthy was proven right 35 plus years later by the release of the Venona papers showed that McCarthy was straight on point. Now? What passes for "liberalism" isn't about individual rights but all about the "collective" and that is a fact that cannot even be disputed. Today's "pseudo liberals" fight against any speech that that they do not approve of. Their motto is straight out of the communist manifesto......"the ends justifies the means". What does that mean? That like Sal Alinsky's "Rules For Radicals"? Whatever it takes justifies doing anything that it takes.....all rules are off the table just so long as it advances the goals of communism.

The pseudo liberals (when they were exposed for the commie faction that they are) tried to re-brand themselves as "progressives"....meaning that anyone that opposed their globalist agenda (bought, paid for and subsidized by the very elites that they claimed to be fighting against) were "regressives". I would laugh loud and long if I was watching this theater being played out on some TV show and how these "progressives" have been used like a cheap whore hooked on heroin that depended on their pimp to provide them with their next "fix" if the implications of their actions only affected those of their ilk.

Billy, (and I say this sincerely) you are one of the "useful idiots" that the globalists (that funded communism to begin with) could not have come this far without idiots like you. Pat yourself on the back.....but herein lies the reality....you will never see that commie utopia in your lifetime nor mine and you can bet the farm on that one.

Hope this helps!!!!

Another RWNJ WAYYYY off...Globalism is no conspiracy, it's the natural result of the world getting smaller, cheap labor giving new markets to countries smart enough to train workers for the good and techie jobs produced. Most modern countries but not the New BS, pander to the greedy idiot rich GOP dominated poor old America... Thanks, dupes.

So, what you are saying is that countries should have no borders, no sovereignty and should adhere to unfair "Free Trade Agreements"....correct? I simply want to get you on the record for being for this. BTW, you do know that the central bankers that control the printing and then retracting of a fiat currency with no intrinsic value are behind this....I just want to see if you actually understand the true economics behind a monetary system based on debt....what say ye?

Not at all, jackass dupe, DUHHH. I'm saying we should have cheap training and college education/loans so we can compete with smart countries on good and techie jobs, and have fair taxing of the bloated rich to pay for it. So feqqing obvious except to total dupes of the greedy idiot rich GOP...35 YEARS of this crap...

You are such an idiot......seriously. Your stupidity, your lack of understanding as to how this fiat, debt based monetary system works and the ones behind it and how you believe that if you steal worthless fiat Federal Reserve notes and credits from others and give it to others that somehow this (snicker) "system" could be fixed overnight just NEVER fails to amuse me. The leftard clown posse party and the trotsky-ite neocons are simply different sides of the same coin. How did all these "politicians" that claimed to have so little end up being millionaires like McCain, Feinstein, Pelousy, Boehner, Barrypuppet and the list goes on and on and on while claiming that the coffers of USA.INC are barren and dry while the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report tells a very different story? Can you explain that? I doubt that you can because I doubt that you can wipe your own ass without a daily tutorial on the method....soon, lame fucks like you will be insisting that an illustrated pictorial be shown in every public bathroom.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Not a con....haven't been one for a couple decades now.

To think Obama and his minions did nothing wrong in Benghazi, makes you a fool.

LOLOLOLOL

Now you're switching your argument.

You just went from claiming they lied -- to they did something wrong.

Your surrender is accepted.

You really are slow....lying IS DOING something wrong.

If only LWNJs would learn that government sucks ALWAYS.

Lying and doing something wrong are not synonymous. While lying is doing something wrong, doing something wrong doesn't require lying.

But I understand why you tried to switch your argument -- it's fucking brain-dead.

The GOP investigates Obama and Clinton's role in Benghazi and finds nothing. If you were sane and the government didn't investigate itself honestly, that would have been the end of it right there. But it wasn't. Not happy with finding nothing, Republicans cranked up a second investigation in their best efforts to find something on Obama and/or Hillary. If you're not brain-dead enough after idiotically claiming they don't honestly investigate themselves after reopening the Benghazi investigation a second time; just imagine how retarded you are after they opened it again and again and again and again and again and again.

All to hide the lies you claim were told.

Hell, you're too senile to know you're crazy. You should consider yourself fortunate in that regard. You probably don't even realize what you're saying.

Just think about your claim that Republicans had proof that Obama, Hillary, and Rice all lied -- and they sat on it and instead said there were no lies.

Let that monumental idiocy sink in for a moment before you quadruple down on this stupid of yours.

btw, you're no liberal. You're a pure leftist troll

douche, k?

I take that as a badge of honor, just so ya know.

All that means is that you're a true turd.

 

[Faun]

LOLOLOLOL

Now you're switching your argument.

You just went from claiming they lied -- to they did something wrong.

Your surrender is accepted.

You really are slow....lying IS DOING something wrong.

If only LWNJs would learn that government sucks ALWAYS.

Lying and doing something wrong are not synonymous. While lying is doing something wrong, doing something wrong doesn't require lying.

But I understand why you tried to switch your argument -- it's fucking brain-dead.

The GOP investigates Obama and Clinton's role in Benghazi and finds nothing. If you were sane and the government didn't investigate itself honestly, that would have been the end of it right there. But it wasn't. Not happy with finding nothing, Republicans cranked up a second investigation in their best efforts to find something on Obama and/or Hillary. If you're not brain-dead enough after idiotically claiming they don't honestly investigate themselves after reopening the Benghazi investigation a second time; just imagine how retarded you are after they opened it again and again and again and again and again and again.

All to hide the lies you claim were told.

Hell, you're too senile to know you're crazy. You should consider yourself fortunate in that regard. You probably don't even realize what you're saying.

Just think about your claim that Republicans had proof that Obama, Hillary, and Rice all lied -- and they sat on it and instead said there were no lies.

Let that monumental idiocy sink in for a moment before you quadruple down on this stupid of yours.

btw, you're no liberal. You're a pure leftist troll

douche, k?

I take that as a badge of honor, just so ya know.

All that means is that you're a true turd.

 

[Kosh]

Yes this thread proves that are not any true liberals on this board!

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Yes this thread proves that are not any true liberals on this board!

There was a question ?

I would also say that many who call themselves the right are nothing more than statists.

 

[francoHFW]

Um, okay. So how would the disabled and poor get healthcare?

Your understanding of how the world actually works is utterly pathetic....but you have a lot of company. I don't blame you personally, you are simply a by-product of a horrifically ran indoctrination program that we refer to as "public education". I could go into a long ass dissertation about how it got to this level, how critical thinking skills became a liability and cognitive dissonance became the norm.....I doubt that you have the intellectual capacity to take all this in because the programming is just that deeply ingrained in you.I have to admit, it was tough for me to shake it off and I wasn't able to take that leap until I was 48 years of age. The "de-programming" process was an ass-kicking ordeal.....like a heroin addict that was a life long user with withdrawal symptoms that caused me to lose weight along with the inability to sleep...but I did it. I compare it to what Marines have to go through during basic training.....they wouldn't go through it again had they known what they were in for, but they are glad that they made it.

"Liberalism" in the true sense of the word was about individual freedom as in "if I am nit infringing on your rights to exist then you have no rights to infringe on mine" kinda deal. They believed in the "Bill of Rights" and what it stood for....but somewhere along the line? The communist infiltration that Joseph McCarthy warned us about took control. McCarthy was proven right 35 plus years later by the release of the Venona papers showed that McCarthy was straight on point. Now? What passes for "liberalism" isn't about individual rights but all about the "collective" and that is a fact that cannot even be disputed. Today's "pseudo liberals" fight against any speech that that they do not approve of. Their motto is straight out of the communist manifesto......"the ends justifies the means". What does that mean? That like Sal Alinsky's "Rules For Radicals"? Whatever it takes justifies doing anything that it takes.....all rules are off the table just so long as it advances the goals of communism.

The pseudo liberals (when they were exposed for the commie faction that they are) tried to re-brand themselves as "progressives"....meaning that anyone that opposed their globalist agenda (bought, paid for and subsidized by the very elites that they claimed to be fighting against) were "regressives". I would laugh loud and long if I was watching this theater being played out on some TV show and how these "progressives" have been used like a cheap whore hooked on heroin that depended on their pimp to provide them with their next "fix" if the implications of their actions only affected those of their ilk.

Billy, (and I say this sincerely) you are one of the "useful idiots" that the globalists (that funded communism to begin with) could not have come this far without idiots like you. Pat yourself on the back.....but herein lies the reality....you will never see that commie utopia in your lifetime nor mine and you can bet the farm on that one.

Hope this helps!!!!

Another RWNJ WAYYYY off...Globalism is no conspiracy, it's the natural result of the world getting smaller, cheap labor giving new markets to countries smart enough to train workers for the good and techie jobs produced. Most modern countries but not the New BS, pander to the greedy idiot rich GOP dominated poor old America... Thanks, dupes.

So, what you are saying is that countries should have no borders, no sovereignty and should adhere to unfair "Free Trade Agreements"....correct? I simply want to get you on the record for being for this. BTW, you do know that the central bankers that control the printing and then retracting of a fiat currency with no intrinsic value are behind this....I just want to see if you actually understand the true economics behind a monetary system based on debt....what say ye?

Not at all, jackass dupe, DUHHH. I'm saying we should have cheap training and college education/loans so we can compete with smart countries on good and techie jobs, and have fair taxing of the bloated rich to pay for it. So feqqing obvious except to total dupes of the greedy idiot rich GOP...35 YEARS of this crap...

You are such an idiot......seriously. Your stupidity, your lack of understanding as to how this fiat, debt based monetary system works and the ones behind it and how you believe that if you steal worthless fiat Federal Reserve notes and credits from others and give it to others that somehow this (snicker) "system" could be fixed overnight just NEVER fails to amuse me. The leftard clown posse party and the trotsky-ite neocons are simply different sides of the same coin. How did all these "politicians" that claimed to have so little end up being millionaires like McCain, Feinstein, Pelousy, Boehner, Barrypuppet and the list goes on and on and on while claiming that the coffers of USA.INC are barren and dry while the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report tells a very different story? Can you explain that? I doubt that you can because I doubt that you can wipe your own ass without a daily tutorial on the method....soon, lame fucks like you will be insisting that an illustrated pictorial be shown in every public bathroom.

Look them up. McCain married money, Obama wrote best sellers, Pelosi is just rich...