Who should be the next POTUS?

[Gadawg73]

We have too many "none of the above" voters now as it is.
They sit on their ass at home and we end up with politicians answerable to the growing moocher class.

 

[Steven_R]

I'd be okay with a "Vote of No Confidence" option. A majority of Americans votes that way and everyone in Congress and the Executive are immediately fired and barred from running and new elections within 60 days.

 

[Gadawg73]

Bachman has run and lost, she can never raise enough $$$ anymore. Everyone that knows a little about politics knows she is not a candidate that stands a chance.
Palin has more support but how many elections where the Republicans are on the losing side do we have to go through to fully and finally understand that caving into the religious right LOSES ELECTIONS EVERY TIME.

 

[blackhawk]

I want Bobby Jindal to be the next President mainly so he can appoint members of the Robertson family to his cabinet.
Willie for Sect of the Treasury.
Phil for Sect of Defense.
Jase for Sect of State.
Si for White House Press Secretary.

 

[Gadawg73]

I want Bobby Jindal to be the next President mainly so he can appoint members of the Robertson family to his cabinet.
Willie for Sect of the Treasury.
Phil for Sect of Defense.
Jase for Sect of State.
Si for White House Press Secretary.

I like Jindal but the last thing we need in any administration are wannabe ZZ Top impersonators that faked their appearances for a TV reality show.
And I have nothing against the Robertsons as they earned what they have.

 

[blackhawk]

I want Bobby Jindal to be the next President mainly so he can appoint members of the Robertson family to his cabinet.
Willie for Sect of the Treasury.
Phil for Sect of Defense.
Jase for Sect of State.
Si for White House Press Secretary.

I like Jindal but the last thing we need in any administration are wannabe ZZ Top impersonators that faked their appearances for a TV reality show.
And I have nothing against the Robertsons as they earned what they have.

Please tell me you didn't take my Robertson stuff serious.

 

[birddog]

I like Gov. Scott Walker. He's personable, handsome, knowledgeable, and a proven outspoken fighter!

What say you?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I want Bobby Jindal to be the next President mainly so he can appoint members of the Robertson family to his cabinet.
Willie for Sect of the Treasury.
Phil for Sect of Defense.
Jase for Sect of State.
Si for White House Press Secretary.

Rush Limbaugh White House Press Secretary

 

[Wry Catcher]

I want Bobby Jindal to be the next President mainly so he can appoint members of the Robertson family to his cabinet.
Willie for Sect of the Treasury.
Phil for Sect of Defense.
Jase for Sect of State.
Si for White House Press Secretary.

Rush Limbaugh White House Press Secretary

Has Rush Limbaugh ever had a real job?

 

[blackhawk]

I want Bobby Jindal to be the next President mainly so he can appoint members of the Robertson family to his cabinet.
Willie for Sect of the Treasury.
Phil for Sect of Defense.
Jase for Sect of State.
Si for White House Press Secretary.

Rush Limbaugh White House Press Secretary

Has Rush Limbaugh ever had a real job?

What do you consider a real job?

 

[The T]

I want Bobby Jindal to be the next President mainly so he can appoint members of the Robertson family to his cabinet.
Willie for Sect of the Treasury.
Phil for Sect of Defense.
Jase for Sect of State.
Si for White House Press Secretary.

Rush Limbaugh White House Press Secretary

Has Rush Limbaugh ever had a real job?

He isn't a POLITICIAN so I guess HE has a REAL job...it would interest YOU to know he has had several jobs...most he got fired from for one reason or another...

As a matter of FACT the one he has now HE created, and started a BOOM industry that you leftists aren't so good at. And YOU have a problem with that>? WHAT to you is a REAL job? And DON'T cite politicians...THAT isn't a job.

 

[kaz]

Calling someone a leftist is unintelligible because it means nothing when used as broadly as do many who post on this forum. Though, in fact, it does have something in common with those who call anyone who doesn't agree with them a commie, a statist, a progressive, a socialist, a Fabian, a Marxist, a liberal or an idiot - they are all used as pejoratives, and usually by people who have no idea of their actually meaning and who are incapable of making an intelligent post.

What is intelligible is that I have given you a solution, one which you don't have the gonads to take. Give me EXAMPLES. Name specific positions that separate liberals, progressives and leftists. And name politicians who are one and not the other.

Calling yourselves different things and then having identical positions on EVERY issue and supporting the exact same politicians is a distinction without a difference. Answer the question. I'm slapping your face with my glove, calling you a dickless wonder, and daring you to ANSWER THE QUESTION!

You too, [MENTION=15512]Dante[/MENTION]....

I'm going to mention you two every time someone else makes the claims you to do and doesn't have the Johnson to actually back it up like you to don't.

Hey, here's a thought. Finish this riddle. AProgressive, a liberal and a leftist walk into a bar. On TV is a dicussion of who might run for POTUS. They all support a different candidate. They each state a name and three clear, meaningful differences between them they disagree with the others about demonstrating why one is a liberal, one is a progressive and one is a leftist.

So, who did they each name,and what were their issues?

 

[FJO]

I like Gov. Scott Walker. He's personable, handsome, knowledgeable, and a proven outspoken fighter!

What say you?

Exactly, plus the fact that he broke union's will to exist (JUSTIFIABLY!!) and also turned a deficit into a surplus.

If he decides to run, he would not have many primary challengers, because based on record, there should not be any. Provided, of course, that those potential challengers bother to look in the mirror, first.

He would need a no-nonsense running mate like Judge Janine Pirro.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Calling someone a leftist is unintelligible because it means nothing when used as broadly as do many who post on this forum. Though, in fact, it does have something in common with those who call anyone who doesn't agree with them a commie, a statist, a progressive, a socialist, a Fabian, a Marxist, a liberal or an idiot - they are all used as pejoratives, and usually by people who have no idea of their actually meaning and who are incapable of making an intelligent post.

What is intelligible is that I have given you a solution, one which you don't have the gonads to take. Give me EXAMPLES. Name specific positions that separate liberals, progressives and leftists. And name politicians who are one and not the other.

Calling yourselves different things and then having identical positions on EVERY issue and supporting the exact same politicians is a distinction without a difference. Answer the question. I'm slapping your face with my glove, calling you a dickless wonder, and daring you to ANSWER THE QUESTION!

You too, [MENTION=15512]Dante[/MENTION]....

I'm going to mention you two every time someone else makes the claims you to do and doesn't have the Johnson to actually back it up like you to don't.

Hey, here's a thought. Finish this riddle. A Progressive, a liberal and a leftist walk into a bar. On TV is a discussion of who might run for POTUS. They all support a different candidate. They each state a name and three clear, meaningful differences between them they disagree with the others about demonstrating why one is a liberal, one is a progressive and one is a leftist.

So, who did they each name,and what were their issues?

[MENTION=26616]kaz[/MENTION] [MENTION=20297]Wry Catcher[/MENTION]
Always with the false choices? Would be disappointing if I came to a thread with you in it looking for serious and rational discussion.

but watch for this:

Thread coming soon: A Progressive, a Liberal, and a Leftist walk into a forum. by Dante

 

[kaz]

Calling someone a leftist is unintelligible because it means nothing when used as broadly as do many who post on this forum. Though, in fact, it does have something in common with those who call anyone who doesn't agree with them a commie, a statist, a progressive, a socialist, a Fabian, a Marxist, a liberal or an idiot - they are all used as pejoratives, and usually by people who have no idea of their actually meaning and who are incapable of making an intelligent post.

What is intelligible is that I have given you a solution, one which you don't have the gonads to take. Give me EXAMPLES. Name specific positions that separate liberals, progressives and leftists. And name politicians who are one and not the other.

Calling yourselves different things and then having identical positions on EVERY issue and supporting the exact same politicians is a distinction without a difference. Answer the question. I'm slapping your face with my glove, calling you a dickless wonder, and daring you to ANSWER THE QUESTION!

You too, [MENTION=15512]Dante[/MENTION]....

I'm going to mention you two every time someone else makes the claims you to do and doesn't have the Johnson to actually back it up like you to don't.

Hey, here's a thought. Finish this riddle. A Progressive, a liberal and a leftist walk into a bar. On TV is a discussion of who might run for POTUS. They all support a different candidate. They each state a name and three clear, meaningful differences between them they disagree with the others about demonstrating why one is a liberal, one is a progressive and one is a leftist.

So, who did they each name,and what were their issues?

[MENTION=26616]kaz[/MENTION] [MENTION=20297]Wry Catcher[/MENTION]
Always with the false choices? Would be disappointing if I came to a thread with you in it looking for serious and rational discussion.

but watch for this:

Thread coming soon: A Progressive, a Liberal, and a Leftist walk into a forum. by Dante

No, it's not serious and rational discussion. You said you are a liberal, you are not a leftist like the Democrats. I asked for positions that make you a liberal not a leftist, things you disagree with them on. You can't give me a single one. I asked for politicians who are liberal, not leftist, you can't name one.

And I asked who you would support for POTUS who is a liberal, not a leftist, you can't name one either. You're not serious at all, you're just shooting blanks.

The answer is you like the word liberal, you don't like the word leftists. Which is what I said to Wry, there is no difference, none. And neither of you can think of any.

QED, they are the same...

 

[NoTeaPartyPleez]

.

Someone who can get the two narcissistic sides of the political spectrum to get the fuck over themselves, behave like honest adults, stop playing bullshit partisan games and work together to get America back to what made us the most prosperous and dynamic country on the planet.

And no, I don't think such a person exists.

.

It has nothing to do with narcissism, and everything to do with money. That's why they will not behave like honest anything much less adults.

They are corporate and banking America's bitches in $2000 gray suits with muted, carefully coordinated silk ties and, of course, the mandatory American flag lapel pin.