Who should be the next POTUS?

[The T]

Color me surprised. They vote for idiots with cute suits and hair cuts and an R or D beside their names but not someone with sanity. Exactly why power comes from the barrel of a gun.I do intend to rule this country one day.

Au contraire...I LOATHE the parties...And YOU intend to RULE one day? Really? Good luck with that.

 

[Two Thumbs]

It begins when the future POTUS is a child, for the child is the father of the man.

Maybe all of us should read biographies of past Presidents, and even those who lost to them, as we look ahead to 2016. Both the job and the man or women who is to occupy the Oval Office need to be serious, curious and committed to preserving our Union and making sure that our nation remains focused on this vision statement written over two centuries ago:

"We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

Read the words and consider what they mean in this, the Twenty-First Century. And please, don't vote for a Charlatan or Demagogue; there are too many with too much ambition and too little vision to be given the power and prestige of the office of President of the United States.

DEMAGOGUE: a person, especially an orator or political leader, who gains power and popularity by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people.

CHARLATAN: a person who pretends or claims to have more knowledge or skill than he or she possesses

I don't know if this post is ironic, hpocritical or subtle Freudian apology for supporting obama

 

[O.R.I.O.N]

Color me surprised. They vote for idiots with cute suits and hair cuts and an R or D beside their names but not someone with sanity. Exactly why power comes from the barrel of a gun.I do intend to rule this country one day.

Au contraire...I LOATHE the parties...And YOU intend to RULE one day? Really? Good luck with that.

Well we agree there then on the parties. Voting is a waste of time..violence is the only way to fix things now. Yes I intend to be a dictator a benevolent one but a dictator..

 

[IlarMeilyr]

Color me surprised. They vote for idiots with cute suits and hair cuts and an R or D beside their names but not someone with sanity. Exactly why power comes from the barrel of a gun.I do intend to rule this country one day.

Au contraire...I LOATHE the parties...And YOU intend to RULE one day? Really? Good luck with that.

Well we agree there then on the parties. Voting is a waste of time..violence is the only way to fix things now. Yes I intend to be a dictator a benevolent one but a dictator..

Not a very smart "ambition."

You would likely end up "ruling" like Mussalini did:

from the end of a rope, probably upside down.

 

[natstew]

Ted Cruz is my choice.

He is "Hispanic" and makes Democraps look like shit.

Why does ethnicity matter? What is his record? Does Cruz stick to the Constitution?

Yes, he is a strict Constitutionist.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Hopefully not someone that thinks of themselve above the rest of the country. 2016 needs to be about fixing America and bringing it together.....NOT about historic mindless bull shit.

 

[Redfish]

Hopefully not someone that thinks of themselve above the rest of the country. 2016 needs to be about fixing America and bringing it together.....NOT about historic mindless bull shit.

I'm curious, who is your pick, Matt?

 

[natstew]

Obama not a Demagogue? You're goddam delusional!!

Merriam-Webster-
1dem·a·gogue noun \ˈde-mə-ˌgäg\
: a political leader who tries to get support by making false claims and promises and using arguments based on emotion rather than reason

Do you have the gall to say Obama hasn't done these things, and isn't still doing them?

You're suggesting he does and is a demagogue. Provide some real evidence and while you're at it show evidence that he is a leftist. You will first need to define "leftist" and then give examples what he has done or promised which fits both definitions.

I'm not responsible for your detachment from reality. I'm not doing your research for you. Evidently you haven't followed Obama from 2007 to present. you're a hopeless lemming. Not wasting my time on you.

 

[The T]

It begins when the future POTUS is a child, for the child is the father of the man.

Maybe all of us should read biographies of past Presidents, and even those who lost to them, as we look ahead to 2016. Both the job and the man or women who is to occupy the Oval Office need to be serious, curious and committed to preserving our Union and making sure that our nation remains focused on this vision statement written over two centuries ago:

"We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

Read the words and consider what they mean in this, the Twenty-First Century. And please, don't vote for a Charlatan or Demagogue; there are too many with too much ambition and too little vision to be given the power and prestige of the office of President of the United States.

DEMAGOGUE: a person, especially an orator or political leader, who gains power and popularity by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people.

CHARLATAN: a person who pretends or claims to have more knowledge or skill than he or she possesses

I don't know if this post is ironic, hpocritical or subtle Freudian apology for supporting obama

Or BOTH. Subtly telling us his intent which renders the thread MOOT and a poor exercise of his time. What a waste.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Hopefully not someone that thinks of themselve above the rest of the country. 2016 needs to be about fixing America and bringing it together.....NOT about historic mindless bull shit.

I'm curious, who is your pick, Matt?

Since Christy is gone well I don't yet know. Maybe huntsman can push the republican party back towards the sensible center

 

[The T]

Hopefully not someone that thinks of themselve above the rest of the country. 2016 needs to be about fixing America and bringing it together.....NOT about historic mindless bull shit.

I'm curious, who is your pick, Matt?

Since Christy is gone well I don't yet know. Maybe huntsman can push the republican party back towards the sensible center

CENTER of what? AND as a BONUS? Whom defines center?

 

[The T]

Au contraire...I LOATHE the parties...And YOU intend to RULE one day? Really? Good luck with that.

Well we agree there then on the parties. Voting is a waste of time..violence is the only way to fix things now. Yes I intend to be a dictator a benevolent one but a dictator..

Not a very smart "ambition."

You would likely end up "ruling" like Mussalini did:

from the end of a rope, probably upside down.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snuvlXq17Io&feature=player_embedded"]Mussolini is Strung Up (Graphic) 1945 Milan, Italy - YouTube[/ame]

___________________________________

 

[Rozman]

Perhaps I should run.

President deanie
VP Truthmatters
Minister of Infrastructure..... Matthew

 

[Redfish]

Hopefully not someone that thinks of themselve above the rest of the country. 2016 needs to be about fixing America and bringing it together.....NOT about historic mindless bull shit.

I'm curious, who is your pick, Matt?

Since Christy is gone well I don't yet know. Maybe huntsman can push the republican party back towards the sensible center

Christie is not gone, but Huntsman is gone.

So you're a Chlristie guy? Who for VP?

 

[Redfish]

Perhaps I should run.

President deanie
VP Truthmatters
Minister of Infrastructure..... Matthew

LOL the United states of Detroit.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Which is why this thread by FlySnatcher is dubious at best. This HAS TO BE Seminar...he's working for someone gathering info...

It's a pretty simple request and since many of you 'conservatives' use the term "leftist" ubiquitously; you must have some idea - well maybe. I suspect most use it as a pejorative and substitute "commie" "Marxist" "Socialist" "dumbocrat" and other inaccurate and childish words as if they all describe a similar political ideology. It's why I believe most of you are fools.

Which offends YOU most? I'll be SURE to use it in your honor...

SCHMUCK

I wear you insults as a badge of honor T; you are a fool and sadly, as in the case of most fools, you don't know it. Obama was also a State Senator and a US Senator, facts you left out because you are dishonest.

 

[O.R.I.O.N]

Au contraire...I LOATHE the parties...And YOU intend to RULE one day? Really? Good luck with that.

Well we agree there then on the parties. Voting is a waste of time..violence is the only way to fix things now. Yes I intend to be a dictator a benevolent one but a dictator..

Not a very smart "ambition."

You would likely end up "ruling" like Mussalini did:

from the end of a rope, probably upside down.

Yeah possibly but I will change things for the better IMO..read a book called Dark Millennium. I take many ideas from it among other sources.

 

[Wry Catcher]

many of you 'conservatives' use the term "leftist" ubiquitously; you must have some idea - well maybe. I suspect most use it as a pejorative and substitute "commie" "Marxist" "Socialist" "dumbocrat" and other inaccurate and childish words as if they all describe a similar political ideology. It's why I believe most of you are fools.

No, it's not similar, it's identical. I ask one after another of you who say you are liberal, not leftist or you're liberal not socialist or progressive not liberal or whatever to give me specific positions you disagree on and none of you can ever answer the question. And none of you can give me examples of politicians from the Democratic party to illustrate the same point.

You haven't asked me, nor I suspect anyone else. I forgot to include "Statist" and "Fabian Socialist" a favorite of a former member who was sent away (I guess his being Odd offended someone).

 

[Wry Catcher]

It begins when the future POTUS is a child, for the child is the father of the man.

Maybe all of us should read biographies of past Presidents, and even those who lost to them, as we look ahead to 2016. Both the job and the man or women who is to occupy the Oval Office need to be serious, curious and committed to preserving our Union and making sure that our nation remains focused on this vision statement written over two centuries ago:

"We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

Read the words and consider what they mean in this, the Twenty-First Century. And please, don't vote for a Charlatan or Demagogue; there are too many with too much ambition and too little vision to be given the power and prestige of the office of President of the United States.

DEMAGOGUE: a person, especially an orator or political leader, who gains power and popularity by arousing the emotions, passions, and prejudices of the people.

CHARLATAN: a person who pretends or claims to have more knowledge or skill than he or she possesses

I don't know if this post is ironic, hpocritical or subtle Freudian apology for supporting obama

I'm not surprised, there's a lot you don't know (but you seem to think you know everything).

 

[Wry Catcher]

Merriam-Webster-
1dem·a·gogue noun \ˈde-mə-ˌgäg\
: a political leader who tries to get support by making false claims and promises and using arguments based on emotion rather than reason

Do you have the gall to say Obama hasn't done these things, and isn't still doing them?

You're suggesting he does and is a demagogue. Provide some real evidence and while you're at it show evidence that he is a leftist. You will first need to define "leftist" and then give examples what he has done or promised which fits both definitions.

I'm not responsible for your detachment from reality. I'm not doing your research for you. Evidently you haven't followed Obama from 2007 to present. you're a hopeless lemming. Not wasting my time on you.

In short, you're incapable of providing evidence to support your claims and thus resort to a personal attack. So far the only thing you've proved is you're a partisan hack and incapable of providing probative evidence to support your opinions. As such, you are a new member of the echo chamber.