Who's Going The Right Way....

[PoliticalChic]

6. Here's the guy driving against oncoming traffic, " hundreds of them!" ... Dan Demetriou, associate professor of philosophy.


Here is what the brave prof wrote:

"Illegal immigrants lower the confidence in the rule of law and add people and workers and students we don’t need. They on average have IQs lower than natives and low skills. They are harmful to an economy about to automate, especially when it is a welfare state. Look up the tragedy of the commons if you don’t understand the dangers of open access to a shared resource.

And refugees are way worse, as most adhere to a religious-political cult with repulsive values at war with the West from its inception. No country who has taken the current crop of refugees has made it work. No school with many refugees or illegals is a good school. None of their neighborhoods are safe. Not everyone has an extra $100k to avoid them.

What an insult to our kids, our educators, to suggest for a moment that a 20 yr old, raised in rubble and taught to hate you, gays, Christians, Jews, women’s rights, and western liberalism would be as good an American as your kid. Truly, let’s save a trillion and scrap the education system if we can’t produce better average children than the average refugee." Professor's anti-immigration comments on social media fuel a day of action on campus

a 20 yr old, raised in rubble and taught to hate you, gays, Christians, Jews, women’s rights, and western liberalism would be as good an American as your kid.
Sounds like a perfect description of half the conservative posters here. (Omit the Christians if you like).

Oh, my....a 'so are you' post from a Liberal.

How......insightful.

Thank you!
It's not so much to knock your argument down as to remind you that the problem doesn't lie with liberals OR conservatives, but folks with no balance wheel.

What did you think of the professor's exposition.....that is what the thread is centered on.

I disagreed with his opinions, but I don't think he should be professionally disciplined for it.
He's not doing so great with the balance wheel, either, imo.

What is 'the balance wheel,' and why is it his responsibility?

 

[OldLady]

a 20 yr old, raised in rubble and taught to hate you, gays, Christians, Jews, women’s rights, and western liberalism would be as good an American as your kid.
Sounds like a perfect description of half the conservative posters here. (Omit the Christians if you like).

Oh, my....a 'so are you' post from a Liberal.

How......insightful.

Thank you!
It's not so much to knock your argument down as to remind you that the problem doesn't lie with liberals OR conservatives, but folks with no balance wheel.

What did you think of the professor's exposition.....that is what the thread is centered on.

I disagreed with his opinions, but I don't think he should be professionally disciplined for it.
He's not doing so great with the balance wheel, either, imo.

What is 'the balance wheel,' and why is it his responsibility?

The balance wheel is the inner stability that, among other things, allows us to function without hatred for entire groups of people. I would think that a lot of students, hearing his opinions, would just opt not to take his class.
When I worked for my state, we were pretty strictly forbidden to voice any political opinions in earshot of clients, and FB certainly would apply.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Oh, my....a 'so are you' post from a Liberal.

How......insightful.

Thank you!
It's not so much to knock your argument down as to remind you that the problem doesn't lie with liberals OR conservatives, but folks with no balance wheel.

What did you think of the professor's exposition.....that is what the thread is centered on.

I disagreed with his opinions, but I don't think he should be professionally disciplined for it.
He's not doing so great with the balance wheel, either, imo.

What is 'the balance wheel,' and why is it his responsibility?

The balance wheel is the inner stability that, among other things, allows us to function without hatred for entire groups of people. I would think that a lot of students, hearing his opinions, would just opt not to take his class.
When I worked for my state, we were pretty strictly forbidden to voice any political opinions in earshot of clients, and FB certainly would apply.

Seems to me his 'balance wheel' is in exactly the right place: he's balancing the propaganda of the Left.

Further, he is exhibiting the a character trait we sorely need in this milieu....courage.

 

[Dschrute3]

It's why our MSM 'News' is dominated by Communist/Progressive Democrats. Journalism Schools are producing rabid Leftists in droves. Once you realize that, all the Democrat Fake News coming from CNN, NBC, and others, really isn't surprising at all. It's actually predictable. Most came from schools that thoroughly indoctrinated them on being loyal Communist/Progressive Democrats.

And it goes much deeper than just Journalism Schools. Our Public School System as a whole, has become a massive-sized indoctrination apparatus. It's about getting to people when they're young. It's about shaping and molding their minds at an early age. So the next time you watch MSM 'News', just realize what you're seeing. It's Communist/Progressive Democrat propaganda, or 'Fake News.'

 

[PoliticalChic]

Oh, my....a 'so are you' post from a Liberal.

How......insightful.

Thank you!
It's not so much to knock your argument down as to remind you that the problem doesn't lie with liberals OR conservatives, but folks with no balance wheel.

What did you think of the professor's exposition.....that is what the thread is centered on.

I disagreed with his opinions, but I don't think he should be professionally disciplined for it.
He's not doing so great with the balance wheel, either, imo.

What is 'the balance wheel,' and why is it his responsibility?

The balance wheel is the inner stability that, among other things, allows us to function without hatred for entire groups of people. I would think that a lot of students, hearing his opinions, would just opt not to take his class.
When I worked for my state, we were pretty strictly forbidden to voice any political opinions in earshot of clients, and FB certainly would apply.

"When I worked for my state, we were pretty strictly forbidden to voice any political opinions in earshot of clients, and FB certainly would apply."

Parenthetically, I'd add that every employer should be free to set such a tone if it finds it efficacious.



I hope you can see how this is the very opposite of universities, where, as Phyllis Chesler has stated:

"Academic feminists who received tenure, promotion, and funding, tended to be pro-abortion, pro-pornography (anti-censorship), pro-prostitution (pro-sex workers), pro-surrogacy, and anti-colonialist, anti-imperialist, and anti-American…proponents of simplistic gender-neutrality (women and men are exactly the same) or essentialist: men and women are completely different, and women are better. They are loyal to their careers and their cliques, not to the truth."

...which is why Professor Demetriou's evocation is so.....unusual.

 

[PoliticalChic]

It's why our MSM 'News' is dominated by Communist/Progressive Democrats. Journalism Schools are producing rabid Leftists in droves. Once you realize that, all the Democrat Fake News coming from CNN, NBC, and others, really isn't surprising at all. It's actually predictable. Most came from schools that thoroughly indoctrinated them on being loyal Communist/Progressive Democrats.

And it goes much deeper than just Journalism Schools. Our Public School System as a whole, has a become a massive-sized indoctrination apparatus. It's about getting to people when they're young. It's about shaping and molding their minds at an early age. So the next time you watch MSM 'News', just realize what you're seeing. It's Communist/Progressive Democrat propaganda, or 'Fake News.'

Bravo, D3!

Unfortunately, I can't see a way out of this morass.


"....sociologist Max Weber dubbed the qualities that Tocqueville observed the “Protestant ethic” and considered them the cornerstone of successful capitalism. Like Tocqueville, Weber saw that ethic most fully realized in America, where it pervaded the society. Preached by luminaries like Benjamin Franklin, taught in public schools, embodied in popular novels, repeated in self-improvement books, and transmitted to immigrants, that ethic undergirded and promoted America’s economic success."
Whatever Happened to the Work Ethic?


Gone are the days....

 

[OldLady]

Thank you!
It's not so much to knock your argument down as to remind you that the problem doesn't lie with liberals OR conservatives, but folks with no balance wheel.

What did you think of the professor's exposition.....that is what the thread is centered on.

I disagreed with his opinions, but I don't think he should be professionally disciplined for it.
He's not doing so great with the balance wheel, either, imo.

What is 'the balance wheel,' and why is it his responsibility?

The balance wheel is the inner stability that, among other things, allows us to function without hatred for entire groups of people. I would think that a lot of students, hearing his opinions, would just opt not to take his class.
When I worked for my state, we were pretty strictly forbidden to voice any political opinions in earshot of clients, and FB certainly would apply.

"When I worked for my state, we were pretty strictly forbidden to voice any political opinions in earshot of clients, and FB certainly would apply."

Parenthetically, I'd add that every employer should be free to set such a tone if it finds it efficacious.



I hope you can see how this is the very opposite of universities, where, as Phyllis Chesler has stated:

"Academic feminists who received tenure, promotion, and funding, tended to be pro-abortion, pro-pornography (anti-censorship), pro-prostitution (pro-sex workers), pro-surrogacy, and anti-colonialist, anti-imperialist, and anti-American…proponents of simplistic gender-neutrality (women and men are exactly the same) or essentialist: men and women are completely different, and women are better. They are loyal to their careers and their cliques, not to the truth."

...which is why Professor Demetriou's evocation is so.....unusual.

It's "unusual," alright, saying academic feminists are "pro-pornography" and "anti-American." I realize what the prof is saying, and there is some truth in some of what he says. A lot of academics are so liberal there's barely any talking to them. Throwing reason to the winds in order to provide a "counterweight" is not going to win any arguments, though. Two pounds of horseshit on one side of the scale and two pounds of horseshit on the other does not turn it into gold for anyone.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Liberal's having epic meltdowns and being triggered over facts is well known. That is why they invented the "safe space" to cry in when overwhelmed by "facts" and "logic". .....

I just viewed this vid, Sunni.....hysterical!!!!


I hope this video is saved somewhere, so that it doesn't disappear from YouTube...as so many have.

You know that there will come a time when, so embarrassed, the Leftists who subscribe to this insanity will insist it never happened, just as we see Liberals on the board claim that the Left never referred to Obama as 'god,' and messiah, and Jesus.

 

[PoliticalChic]

What did you think of the professor's exposition.....that is what the thread is centered on.

I disagreed with his opinions, but I don't think he should be professionally disciplined for it.
He's not doing so great with the balance wheel, either, imo.

What is 'the balance wheel,' and why is it his responsibility?

The balance wheel is the inner stability that, among other things, allows us to function without hatred for entire groups of people. I would think that a lot of students, hearing his opinions, would just opt not to take his class.
When I worked for my state, we were pretty strictly forbidden to voice any political opinions in earshot of clients, and FB certainly would apply.

"When I worked for my state, we were pretty strictly forbidden to voice any political opinions in earshot of clients, and FB certainly would apply."

Parenthetically, I'd add that every employer should be free to set such a tone if it finds it efficacious.



I hope you can see how this is the very opposite of universities, where, as Phyllis Chesler has stated:

"Academic feminists who received tenure, promotion, and funding, tended to be pro-abortion, pro-pornography (anti-censorship), pro-prostitution (pro-sex workers), pro-surrogacy, and anti-colonialist, anti-imperialist, and anti-American…proponents of simplistic gender-neutrality (women and men are exactly the same) or essentialist: men and women are completely different, and women are better. They are loyal to their careers and their cliques, not to the truth."

...which is why Professor Demetriou's evocation is so.....unusual.

It's "unusual," alright, saying academic feminists are "pro-pornography" and "anti-American." I realize what the prof is saying, and there is some truth in some of what he says. A lot of academics are so liberal there's barely any talking to them. Throwing reason to the winds in order to provide a "counterweight" is not going to win any arguments, though. Two pounds of horseshit on one side of the scale and two pounds of horseshit on the other does not turn it into gold for anyone.

1. I don't use profanity, and, always assume that adults who do so are admitting that they have been skewered by the truth presented by the other side.

2. You have two professors confused.
Phyllis Chesler wrote about Liberal 'feminists.' I recommend her book "The Death of Feminism."

Professor Demetriou wrote about the danger of illegal immigration in higher education.
And, as you state, "there is some truth in some of what he says."
And lots of truth in what I say: Liberals hide the data on how many illegals there are, the data on criminality of same, and how many vote.
The numbers are huge.

3. BTW....I don't ever expect to 'win any arguments' with indoctrinated Liberals.....my mission is to provide the other side, i.e., the truth.
No doubt you've found that I document everything I post, and am happy to debate same.
Far more read posts than comment on them....those readers are my aim.


Take care.

 

[OldLady]

I disagreed with his opinions, but I don't think he should be professionally disciplined for it.
He's not doing so great with the balance wheel, either, imo.

What is 'the balance wheel,' and why is it his responsibility?

The balance wheel is the inner stability that, among other things, allows us to function without hatred for entire groups of people. I would think that a lot of students, hearing his opinions, would just opt not to take his class.
When I worked for my state, we were pretty strictly forbidden to voice any political opinions in earshot of clients, and FB certainly would apply.

"When I worked for my state, we were pretty strictly forbidden to voice any political opinions in earshot of clients, and FB certainly would apply."

Parenthetically, I'd add that every employer should be free to set such a tone if it finds it efficacious.



I hope you can see how this is the very opposite of universities, where, as Phyllis Chesler has stated:

"Academic feminists who received tenure, promotion, and funding, tended to be pro-abortion, pro-pornography (anti-censorship), pro-prostitution (pro-sex workers), pro-surrogacy, and anti-colonialist, anti-imperialist, and anti-American…proponents of simplistic gender-neutrality (women and men are exactly the same) or essentialist: men and women are completely different, and women are better. They are loyal to their careers and their cliques, not to the truth."

...which is why Professor Demetriou's evocation is so.....unusual.

It's "unusual," alright, saying academic feminists are "pro-pornography" and "anti-American." I realize what the prof is saying, and there is some truth in some of what he says. A lot of academics are so liberal there's barely any talking to them. Throwing reason to the winds in order to provide a "counterweight" is not going to win any arguments, though. Two pounds of horseshit on one side of the scale and two pounds of horseshit on the other does not turn it into gold for anyone.

1. I don't use profanity, and, always assume that adults who do so are admitting that they have been skewered by the truth presented by the other side.

2. You have two professors confused.
Phyllis Chesler wrote about Liberal 'feminists.' I recommend her book "The Death of Feminism."

Professor Demetriou wrote about the danger of illegal immigration in higher education.
And, as you state, "there is some truth in some of what he says."
And lots of truth in what I say: Liberals hide the data on how many illegals there are, the data on criminality of same, and how many vote.
The numbers are huge.

3. BTW....I don't ever expect to 'win any arguments' with indoctrinated Liberals.....my mission is to provide the other side, i.e., the truth.
No doubt you've found that I document everything I post, and am happy to debate same.
Far more read posts than comment on them....those readers are my aim.


Take care.

Have fun with your silent readers! I'll not bother Your Highness again.

 

[Clementine]

....on immigration policy?


1. As a senior citizen was driving down the freeway, his car phone rang. Answering, he heard his wife's voice urgently warning him, "Herman, I just heard on the news that there's a car going the wrong way on 280. Please be careful!"

"Hell," said Herman, "It's not just one car. It's hundreds of them!"



2. So goes the tale of one individual racing the wrong way down the expressway. It hits home when we view our political landscape, and it can easily be viewed as the 'driver' on the other side of our political divide being the maniac driving the wrong way.

But.....is it possible the singleton going against traffic is the one going the right way? I'll get to that.....


3. But first.....our universities are overrun with just one political view....

"Liberal professors outnumber conservatives nearly 12 to 1, study finds" Liberal professors outnumber conservatives 12 to 1: Study
One can see the dire effects in the Berkeley Riots, or the shouting down of those with conservative viewpoints.

Here are the 'hundreds of 'em" all going the same direction.


Professor Phyllis Chesler, author of “The Death of Feminism,” explains why there are so few conservatives:

"Academic feminists who received tenure, promotion, and funding, tended to be pro-abortion, pro-pornography (anti-censorship), pro-prostitution (pro-sex workers), pro-surrogacy, and anti-colonialist, anti-imperialist, and anti-American…proponents of simplistic gender-neutrality (women and men are exactly the same) or essentialist: men and women are completely different, and women are better. They are loyal to their careers and their cliques, not to the truth."


4. A major dogma of Liberalism is that 'no human is illegal,' there should be no restrictions to movements of peoples,' and, by extension, opposition to national sovereignty. Hence, the acceptance of illegal immigration.

The campaign goes so far that the numbers of illegals in the country is treated as a state secret, the data on criminality of immigrants in general is essentially marked 'classified., and 'confidential.'

As with so much of Liberal dogma, it is counterintuitive.

There is no benefit to this nation for illegal or inflated immigration.
None.
Illegals keep wages low, and unemployment of Americans high; it costs billions in welfare services and police costs high.
It is only through the actions of Democrats and illegal aliens that the Left is able to claim a popular vote victory in the last election.
After all, Obama told illegal aliens to get out and vote.


5. The basis of this thread is to expose the nexus of illegal immigration, and of the occupation of our universities by Liberals. The thread will provide the work of a brave professor who bucked the Liberal tide, and rebelled against the majority Liberals embracing of illegal aliens.

Coming right up.

The liberal professors have done well indoctrinating students, which is why we see protests and riots any time someone with a non-liberal view is scheduled to speak on campuses. They've been taught to reject all views not fed to them in the classroom.

The latest is a new course about 9/11 talking about the literature surrounding that day. It's got nothing to do with the victims or those who tried to rescue them. It's all about the poor terrorists and why they had to do what they did. It's the usual garbage about America's chickens coming home to roost.

Never will a lib admit that these cold-blooded killers have been raised to hate all infidels and have vowed death to them since they could speak. The college claims it is allowing this course because differing, even radical, views should always be allowed. Of course, we know the only views allowed are anti-American views and that no conservative or Christian views will ever be spoken in a classroom.

So, it continues with the left. On one hand, claim to support equal rights and on the other, openly support those who are against equal rights that include women and gays. The same lib politicians who live in fortresses claim that open borders are fine. For now, they support a poor vetting process to get around our laws. After all, those potential criminals and terrorists aren't going to be moving near them.

The left really wanted their open borders and universal government. I don't think they'll get over it in the near future, at least not until they mature enough to realize that what they were asking for would have been a total disaster for this country. I can only hope that common sense thinking will prevail over the irrational emotions that guide many of them.

 

[PoliticalChic]

....on immigration policy?


1. As a senior citizen was driving down the freeway, his car phone rang. Answering, he heard his wife's voice urgently warning him, "Herman, I just heard on the news that there's a car going the wrong way on 280. Please be careful!"

"Hell," said Herman, "It's not just one car. It's hundreds of them!"



2. So goes the tale of one individual racing the wrong way down the expressway. It hits home when we view our political landscape, and it can easily be viewed as the 'driver' on the other side of our political divide being the maniac driving the wrong way.

But.....is it possible the singleton going against traffic is the one going the right way? I'll get to that.....


3. But first.....our universities are overrun with just one political view....

"Liberal professors outnumber conservatives nearly 12 to 1, study finds" Liberal professors outnumber conservatives 12 to 1: Study
One can see the dire effects in the Berkeley Riots, or the shouting down of those with conservative viewpoints.

Here are the 'hundreds of 'em" all going the same direction.


Professor Phyllis Chesler, author of “The Death of Feminism,” explains why there are so few conservatives:

"Academic feminists who received tenure, promotion, and funding, tended to be pro-abortion, pro-pornography (anti-censorship), pro-prostitution (pro-sex workers), pro-surrogacy, and anti-colonialist, anti-imperialist, and anti-American…proponents of simplistic gender-neutrality (women and men are exactly the same) or essentialist: men and women are completely different, and women are better. They are loyal to their careers and their cliques, not to the truth."


4. A major dogma of Liberalism is that 'no human is illegal,' there should be no restrictions to movements of peoples,' and, by extension, opposition to national sovereignty. Hence, the acceptance of illegal immigration.

The campaign goes so far that the numbers of illegals in the country is treated as a state secret, the data on criminality of immigrants in general is essentially marked 'classified., and 'confidential.'

As with so much of Liberal dogma, it is counterintuitive.

There is no benefit to this nation for illegal or inflated immigration.
None.
Illegals keep wages low, and unemployment of Americans high; it costs billions in welfare services and police costs high.
It is only through the actions of Democrats and illegal aliens that the Left is able to claim a popular vote victory in the last election.
After all, Obama told illegal aliens to get out and vote.


5. The basis of this thread is to expose the nexus of illegal immigration, and of the occupation of our universities by Liberals. The thread will provide the work of a brave professor who bucked the Liberal tide, and rebelled against the majority Liberals embracing of illegal aliens.

Coming right up.

The liberal professors have done well indoctrinating students, which is why we see protests and riots any time someone with a non-liberal view is scheduled to speak on campuses. They've been taught to reject all views not fed to them in the classroom.

The latest is a new course about 9/11 talking about the literature surrounding that day. It's got nothing to do with the victims or those who tried to rescue them. It's all about the poor terrorists and why they had to do what they did. It's the usual garbage about America's chickens coming home to roost.

Never will a lib admit that these cold-blooded killers have been raised to hate all infidels and have vowed death to them since they could speak. The college claims it is allowing this course because differing, even radical, views should always be allowed. Of course, we know the only views allowed are anti-American views and that no conservative or Christian views will ever be spoken in a classroom.

So, it continues with the left. On one hand, claim to support equal rights and on the other, openly support those who are against equal rights that include women and gays. The same lib politicians who live in fortresses claim that open borders are fine. For now, they support a poor vetting process to get around our laws. After all, those potential criminals and terrorists aren't going to be moving near them.

The left really wanted their open borders and universal government. I don't think they'll get over it in the near future, at least not until they mature enough to realize that what they were asking for would have been a total disaster for this country. I can only hope that common sense thinking will prevail over the irrational emotions that guide many of them.

Did you ever imagine you'd see a statement like this from one of those university professors???

"...refugees are way worse, as most adhere to a religious-political cult with repulsive values at war with the West from its inception. No country who has taken the current crop of refugees has made it work. No school with many refugees or illegals is a good school. None of their neighborhoods are safe. Not everyone has an extra $100k to avoid them."



Perhaps the tide is turning, and we're not seeing the Trump election as the tip of an iceberg.

 

[PoliticalChic]

you need stop calling everyone and their mother a liberal, seriously you trumptards think everyone to left of hitler is a liberal, there are progressives, socialists, anarchists, communists, all have different philosophies and ideas you wouldn't say the USSR wanted to abolish borders would you?

then again, you probably would

She's from a family of immigrants, yet hates herself..

I doubt it.... I dont doubt however that she claimed to be a "legal immigrant" in order get away with racist hate speech against mexicans, I woudn't be suprised if she claimed to be half-mexican or something herself, she's probably not even a "she".

And now for this dunce who refers to "hate speech"....

"...refugees are way worse, as most adhere to a religious-political cult with repulsive values at war with the West from its inception. No country who has taken the current crop of refugees has made it work. No school with many refugees or illegals is a good school. None of their neighborhoods are safe. Not everyone has an extra $100k to avoid them."


This professor should get off the fence, and state what he really feels!



10. Here is a further quote from Professor Demetrious, which gives the larger context...and one that should be carefully considered by those who love the country:


"....I am persuaded that the leftist immigration and refugee policy agenda, especially given the influence of divisive social justice theory and looming automation, is an existential threat to the US and other advanced western nations.
We need to talk honestly about social cohesion, assimilation, and the obligations we have to our citizens and our children who appear, as I see it, ignored in expansive homilies about immigration and refugees. As strongly as I feel this, I have done nothing more than state that these are my concerns on my Facebook page and engage in useful debate there."
Philosopher's Comments On Immigration Cause Stir On Campus - Daily Nous





Some anti-free-speech fools condemn his words as 'hate speech.'

As a conservative, I do not accept the concepts of either 'hate speech,' nor of 'hate crimes,' or, in fact, any sorts of 'thought crimes'...and would argue that no real American does, either.



My proof is the first amendment to the Constitution:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Carry on, professor!

 

[tycho1572]

Another excellent thread, PoliticalChic.

 

[Clementine]

....on immigration policy?


1. As a senior citizen was driving down the freeway, his car phone rang. Answering, he heard his wife's voice urgently warning him, "Herman, I just heard on the news that there's a car going the wrong way on 280. Please be careful!"

"Hell," said Herman, "It's not just one car. It's hundreds of them!"



2. So goes the tale of one individual racing the wrong way down the expressway. It hits home when we view our political landscape, and it can easily be viewed as the 'driver' on the other side of our political divide being the maniac driving the wrong way.

But.....is it possible the singleton going against traffic is the one going the right way? I'll get to that.....


3. But first.....our universities are overrun with just one political view....

"Liberal professors outnumber conservatives nearly 12 to 1, study finds" Liberal professors outnumber conservatives 12 to 1: Study
One can see the dire effects in the Berkeley Riots, or the shouting down of those with conservative viewpoints.

Here are the 'hundreds of 'em" all going the same direction.


Professor Phyllis Chesler, author of “The Death of Feminism,” explains why there are so few conservatives:

"Academic feminists who received tenure, promotion, and funding, tended to be pro-abortion, pro-pornography (anti-censorship), pro-prostitution (pro-sex workers), pro-surrogacy, and anti-colonialist, anti-imperialist, and anti-American…proponents of simplistic gender-neutrality (women and men are exactly the same) or essentialist: men and women are completely different, and women are better. They are loyal to their careers and their cliques, not to the truth."


4. A major dogma of Liberalism is that 'no human is illegal,' there should be no restrictions to movements of peoples,' and, by extension, opposition to national sovereignty. Hence, the acceptance of illegal immigration.

The campaign goes so far that the numbers of illegals in the country is treated as a state secret, the data on criminality of immigrants in general is essentially marked 'classified., and 'confidential.'

As with so much of Liberal dogma, it is counterintuitive.

There is no benefit to this nation for illegal or inflated immigration.
None.
Illegals keep wages low, and unemployment of Americans high; it costs billions in welfare services and police costs high.
It is only through the actions of Democrats and illegal aliens that the Left is able to claim a popular vote victory in the last election.
After all, Obama told illegal aliens to get out and vote.


5. The basis of this thread is to expose the nexus of illegal immigration, and of the occupation of our universities by Liberals. The thread will provide the work of a brave professor who bucked the Liberal tide, and rebelled against the majority Liberals embracing of illegal aliens.

Coming right up.

The liberal professors have done well indoctrinating students, which is why we see protests and riots any time someone with a non-liberal view is scheduled to speak on campuses. They've been taught to reject all views not fed to them in the classroom.

The latest is a new course about 9/11 talking about the literature surrounding that day. It's got nothing to do with the victims or those who tried to rescue them. It's all about the poor terrorists and why they had to do what they did. It's the usual garbage about America's chickens coming home to roost.

Never will a lib admit that these cold-blooded killers have been raised to hate all infidels and have vowed death to them since they could speak. The college claims it is allowing this course because differing, even radical, views should always be allowed. Of course, we know the only views allowed are anti-American views and that no conservative or Christian views will ever be spoken in a classroom.

So, it continues with the left. On one hand, claim to support equal rights and on the other, openly support those who are against equal rights that include women and gays. The same lib politicians who live in fortresses claim that open borders are fine. For now, they support a poor vetting process to get around our laws. After all, those potential criminals and terrorists aren't going to be moving near them.

The left really wanted their open borders and universal government. I don't think they'll get over it in the near future, at least not until they mature enough to realize that what they were asking for would have been a total disaster for this country. I can only hope that common sense thinking will prevail over the irrational emotions that guide many of them.

Did you ever imagine you'd see a statement like this from one of those university professors???

"...refugees are way worse, as most adhere to a religious-political cult with repulsive values at war with the West from its inception. No country who has taken the current crop of refugees has made it work. No school with many refugees or illegals is a good school. None of their neighborhoods are safe. Not everyone has an extra $100k to avoid them."



Perhaps the tide is turning, and we're not seeing the Trump election as the tip of an iceberg.

Refreshing to hear a voice of reason from a college campus. The libs will no doubt target this professor for his 'radical' views. The truth is considered hate speech these days.

 

[Desperado]

Ronald Reagan, a president, legalized illegals in the US with the stroke of his pen...What a liberal looking for votes..

REAGAN'S SON SAYS HIS FATHER HAD DEMENTIA WHILE PRESIDENT. Maybe that could explain it.
Did Ronald Reagan have Alzheimer's while in office? | Daily Mail Online

 

[Moonglow]

Ronald Reagan, a president, legalized illegals in the US with the stroke of his pen...What a liberal looking for votes..

REAGAN'S SON SAYS HIS FATHER HAD DEMENTIA WHILE PRESIDENT. Maybe that could explain it.
Did Ronald Reagan have Alzheimer's while in office? | Daily Mail Online

He was not near as bad as James Watts..

 

[PoliticalChic]

....on immigration policy?


1. As a senior citizen was driving down the freeway, his car phone rang. Answering, he heard his wife's voice urgently warning him, "Herman, I just heard on the news that there's a car going the wrong way on 280. Please be careful!"

"Hell," said Herman, "It's not just one car. It's hundreds of them!"



2. So goes the tale of one individual racing the wrong way down the expressway. It hits home when we view our political landscape, and it can easily be viewed as the 'driver' on the other side of our political divide being the maniac driving the wrong way.

But.....is it possible the singleton going against traffic is the one going the right way? I'll get to that.....


3. But first.....our universities are overrun with just one political view....

"Liberal professors outnumber conservatives nearly 12 to 1, study finds" Liberal professors outnumber conservatives 12 to 1: Study
One can see the dire effects in the Berkeley Riots, or the shouting down of those with conservative viewpoints.

Here are the 'hundreds of 'em" all going the same direction.


Professor Phyllis Chesler, author of “The Death of Feminism,” explains why there are so few conservatives:

"Academic feminists who received tenure, promotion, and funding, tended to be pro-abortion, pro-pornography (anti-censorship), pro-prostitution (pro-sex workers), pro-surrogacy, and anti-colonialist, anti-imperialist, and anti-American…proponents of simplistic gender-neutrality (women and men are exactly the same) or essentialist: men and women are completely different, and women are better. They are loyal to their careers and their cliques, not to the truth."


4. A major dogma of Liberalism is that 'no human is illegal,' there should be no restrictions to movements of peoples,' and, by extension, opposition to national sovereignty. Hence, the acceptance of illegal immigration.

The campaign goes so far that the numbers of illegals in the country is treated as a state secret, the data on criminality of immigrants in general is essentially marked 'classified., and 'confidential.'

As with so much of Liberal dogma, it is counterintuitive.

There is no benefit to this nation for illegal or inflated immigration.
None.
Illegals keep wages low, and unemployment of Americans high; it costs billions in welfare services and police costs high.
It is only through the actions of Democrats and illegal aliens that the Left is able to claim a popular vote victory in the last election.
After all, Obama told illegal aliens to get out and vote.


5. The basis of this thread is to expose the nexus of illegal immigration, and of the occupation of our universities by Liberals. The thread will provide the work of a brave professor who bucked the Liberal tide, and rebelled against the majority Liberals embracing of illegal aliens.

Coming right up.

The liberal professors have done well indoctrinating students, which is why we see protests and riots any time someone with a non-liberal view is scheduled to speak on campuses. They've been taught to reject all views not fed to them in the classroom.

The latest is a new course about 9/11 talking about the literature surrounding that day. It's got nothing to do with the victims or those who tried to rescue them. It's all about the poor terrorists and why they had to do what they did. It's the usual garbage about America's chickens coming home to roost.

Never will a lib admit that these cold-blooded killers have been raised to hate all infidels and have vowed death to them since they could speak. The college claims it is allowing this course because differing, even radical, views should always be allowed. Of course, we know the only views allowed are anti-American views and that no conservative or Christian views will ever be spoken in a classroom.

So, it continues with the left. On one hand, claim to support equal rights and on the other, openly support those who are against equal rights that include women and gays. The same lib politicians who live in fortresses claim that open borders are fine. For now, they support a poor vetting process to get around our laws. After all, those potential criminals and terrorists aren't going to be moving near them.

The left really wanted their open borders and universal government. I don't think they'll get over it in the near future, at least not until they mature enough to realize that what they were asking for would have been a total disaster for this country. I can only hope that common sense thinking will prevail over the irrational emotions that guide many of them.

Did you ever imagine you'd see a statement like this from one of those university professors???

"...refugees are way worse, as most adhere to a religious-political cult with repulsive values at war with the West from its inception. No country who has taken the current crop of refugees has made it work. No school with many refugees or illegals is a good school. None of their neighborhoods are safe. Not everyone has an extra $100k to avoid them."



Perhaps the tide is turning, and we're not seeing the Trump election as the tip of an iceberg.

Refreshing to hear a voice of reason from a college campus. The libs will no doubt target this professor for his 'radical' views. The truth is considered hate speech these days.

We may actually see a sort of irony, if the professor has tenure....and the Liberals can't get rid of him.



1.Did you know that academic tenure was a Progressive idea. In the 19th century, university professors largely served at the pleasure of the board of trustees of the university. Sometimes, major donors could successfully remove professors or prohibit the hiring of certain individuals;…
Tenure (academic) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tenure was advanced so a professor could be racist.
True story.

2. The modern institution of academic tenure was hastened by progressive academia’s solidarity with E.A.Ross, progressive sociologist and social engineer and eugenicist. His thesis was that immigration would lead to “race suicide,” and was influenced, as were most progressives, by German national socialists.

Know what eugenics is? The Progressive idea that government should simply kill people who don't fit their criterion.

3. E.A.Ross shared with Woodrow Wilson the belief that social progress had to realize innate differences between races: Africans and South Americans were close to being savages, and Asians might be more advanced but were degenerating.
He served as a tutor to Teddy Roosevelt on immigration, and Roosevelt wrote the introduction to Ross’s “Sin and Society.”
Gotta love those Progressives, huh?

a. Ross wrote this:
“Observe immigrants…in their gatherings, washed and combed, and in their Sunday best…[They] are hirsute, low-browed, big-faced persons of obviously low mentality…[C]learly they belong in skins, in wattled huts at the close of the Great Ice Age. These ox-like men are descendants of those who always stayed behind.”
David M. Kennedy, “Can We Still Afford To Be A Nation Of Immigrants?” Atlantic Monthly, Nov. 1996, p.52-68




4. Ross got a position at Stanford, but Stanford’s conservative grande dame and benefactor, Jane Lathrop Stanford disliked his loud and crude denunciation of Chinese ‘coolies,’ as this position was at odds with the university's founding family, the Stanfords, who had made their fortune in Western rail construction - a major employer of Chinese laborers.
Ibid.

5. Numerous professors at Stanford resigned after protests of his dismissal, sparking "a national debate.” Progressive organizations led by Richard Ely’s American Economic Association, rallied to his cause.

The NYTimes and other newspapers editorialized on his behalf.



6. But, Ross moved on to the University of Nebraska, where he worked with Roscoe Pound, on ‘sociological jurisprudence,’ and modern liberalism’s “living Constitution.”
In 1915, this was followed by the American Association of University Professors' (AAUP) declaration of principles—the traditional justification for academic freedom and tenure. In 1940, the AAUP recommended that the academic tenure probationary period be seven years -- still the current norm.
Goldberg, "Liberal Fascism."


Now....if Demetriou has tenure......the circle closes.

 

[tycho1572]

The level of hate from the left surprised me. I honestly wasn't expecting it. I guess we can all take solace in knowing they're a minority.
We can also chalk up another Trump win for bringing them out in the open. lol

It really is refreshing to know some professors are willing to speak up for what most Americans believe.

Thanks again, PoliticalChic.

 

[Clementine]

....on immigration policy?


1. As a senior citizen was driving down the freeway, his car phone rang. Answering, he heard his wife's voice urgently warning him, "Herman, I just heard on the news that there's a car going the wrong way on 280. Please be careful!"

"Hell," said Herman, "It's not just one car. It's hundreds of them!"



2. So goes the tale of one individual racing the wrong way down the expressway. It hits home when we view our political landscape, and it can easily be viewed as the 'driver' on the other side of our political divide being the maniac driving the wrong way.

But.....is it possible the singleton going against traffic is the one going the right way? I'll get to that.....


3. But first.....our universities are overrun with just one political view....

"Liberal professors outnumber conservatives nearly 12 to 1, study finds" Liberal professors outnumber conservatives 12 to 1: Study
One can see the dire effects in the Berkeley Riots, or the shouting down of those with conservative viewpoints.

Here are the 'hundreds of 'em" all going the same direction.


Professor Phyllis Chesler, author of “The Death of Feminism,” explains why there are so few conservatives:

"Academic feminists who received tenure, promotion, and funding, tended to be pro-abortion, pro-pornography (anti-censorship), pro-prostitution (pro-sex workers), pro-surrogacy, and anti-colonialist, anti-imperialist, and anti-American…proponents of simplistic gender-neutrality (women and men are exactly the same) or essentialist: men and women are completely different, and women are better. They are loyal to their careers and their cliques, not to the truth."


4. A major dogma of Liberalism is that 'no human is illegal,' there should be no restrictions to movements of peoples,' and, by extension, opposition to national sovereignty. Hence, the acceptance of illegal immigration.

The campaign goes so far that the numbers of illegals in the country is treated as a state secret, the data on criminality of immigrants in general is essentially marked 'classified., and 'confidential.'

As with so much of Liberal dogma, it is counterintuitive.

There is no benefit to this nation for illegal or inflated immigration.
None.
Illegals keep wages low, and unemployment of Americans high; it costs billions in welfare services and police costs high.
It is only through the actions of Democrats and illegal aliens that the Left is able to claim a popular vote victory in the last election.
After all, Obama told illegal aliens to get out and vote.


5. The basis of this thread is to expose the nexus of illegal immigration, and of the occupation of our universities by Liberals. The thread will provide the work of a brave professor who bucked the Liberal tide, and rebelled against the majority Liberals embracing of illegal aliens.

Coming right up.

The liberal professors have done well indoctrinating students, which is why we see protests and riots any time someone with a non-liberal view is scheduled to speak on campuses. They've been taught to reject all views not fed to them in the classroom.

The latest is a new course about 9/11 talking about the literature surrounding that day. It's got nothing to do with the victims or those who tried to rescue them. It's all about the poor terrorists and why they had to do what they did. It's the usual garbage about America's chickens coming home to roost.

Never will a lib admit that these cold-blooded killers have been raised to hate all infidels and have vowed death to them since they could speak. The college claims it is allowing this course because differing, even radical, views should always be allowed. Of course, we know the only views allowed are anti-American views and that no conservative or Christian views will ever be spoken in a classroom.

So, it continues with the left. On one hand, claim to support equal rights and on the other, openly support those who are against equal rights that include women and gays. The same lib politicians who live in fortresses claim that open borders are fine. For now, they support a poor vetting process to get around our laws. After all, those potential criminals and terrorists aren't going to be moving near them.

The left really wanted their open borders and universal government. I don't think they'll get over it in the near future, at least not until they mature enough to realize that what they were asking for would have been a total disaster for this country. I can only hope that common sense thinking will prevail over the irrational emotions that guide many of them.

Did you ever imagine you'd see a statement like this from one of those university professors???

"...refugees are way worse, as most adhere to a religious-political cult with repulsive values at war with the West from its inception. No country who has taken the current crop of refugees has made it work. No school with many refugees or illegals is a good school. None of their neighborhoods are safe. Not everyone has an extra $100k to avoid them."



Perhaps the tide is turning, and we're not seeing the Trump election as the tip of an iceberg.

Refreshing to hear a voice of reason from a college campus. The libs will no doubt target this professor for his 'radical' views. The truth is considered hate speech these days.

We may actually see a sort of irony, if the professor has tenure....and the Liberals can't get rid of him.



1.Did you know that academic tenure was a Progressive idea. In the 19th century, university professors largely served at the pleasure of the board of trustees of the university. Sometimes, major donors could successfully remove professors or prohibit the hiring of certain individuals;…
Tenure (academic) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tenure was advanced so a professor could be racist.
True story.

2. The modern institution of academic tenure was hastened by progressive academia’s solidarity with E.A.Ross, progressive sociologist and social engineer and eugenicist. His thesis was that immigration would lead to “race suicide,” and was influenced, as were most progressives, by German national socialists.

Know what eugenics is? The Progressive idea that government should simply kill people who don't fit their criterion.

3. E.A.Ross shared with Woodrow Wilson the belief that social progress had to realize innate differences between races: Africans and South Americans were close to being savages, and Asians might be more advanced but were degenerating.
He served as a tutor to Teddy Roosevelt on immigration, and Roosevelt wrote the introduction to Ross’s “Sin and Society.”
Gotta love those Progressives, huh?

a. Ross wrote this:
“Observe immigrants…in their gatherings, washed and combed, and in their Sunday best…[They] are hirsute, low-browed, big-faced persons of obviously low mentality…[C]learly they belong in skins, in wattled huts at the close of the Great Ice Age. These ox-like men are descendants of those who always stayed behind.”
David M. Kennedy, “Can We Still Afford To Be A Nation Of Immigrants?” Atlantic Monthly, Nov. 1996, p.52-68




4. Ross got a position at Stanford, but Stanford’s conservative grande dame and benefactor, Jane Lathrop Stanford disliked his loud and crude denunciation of Chinese ‘coolies,’ as this position was at odds with the university's founding family, the Stanfords, who had made their fortune in Western rail construction - a major employer of Chinese laborers.
Ibid.

5. Numerous professors at Stanford resigned after protests of his dismissal, sparking "a national debate.” Progressive organizations led by Richard Ely’s American Economic Association, rallied to his cause.

The NYTimes and other newspapers editorialized on his behalf.



6. But, Ross moved on to the University of Nebraska, where he worked with Roscoe Pound, on ‘sociological jurisprudence,’ and modern liberalism’s “living Constitution.”
In 1915, this was followed by the American Association of University Professors' (AAUP) declaration of principles—the traditional justification for academic freedom and tenure. In 1940, the AAUP recommended that the academic tenure probationary period be seven years -- still the current norm.
Goldberg, "Liberal Fascism."


Now....if Demetriou has tenure......the circle closes.

This post just made my day. Thanks, PoliticalChic!!