Who's the conspiracy theorist?

[SAYIT]

Pyroclastic flows are fluidized masses of rock fragments and gases that move rapidly in response to gravity. Pyroclastic flows can form in several different ways. They can form when an eruption column collapses, or as the result of gravitational collapse

Pyroclastic Flows

And as Daws noted there was no pyroclastic flow and your "expert" was, like you, full of CTBS.
Thanks again for playin', Princess. You're dismissed.

 

[eots]

Pyroclastic flows are fluidized masses of rock fragments and gases that move rapidly in response to gravity. Pyroclastic flows can form in several different ways. They can form when an eruption column collapses, or as the result of gravitational collapse

Pyroclastic Flows

And as Daws noted there was no pyroclastic flow and your "expert" was, like you, full of CTBS.
Thanks again for playin', Princess. You're dismissed.

so you are saying their was no masses of rock [concrete) fragments and gases that move rapidly as the result of gravitational collapse ?
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AO_Tz3FhkMo]WTC 7 Pyroclastic Flow - YouTube[/ame]

I guess thats why you never made the whos who of science list like deets

 

[eots]

Pyroclastic flows are fluidized masses of rock fragments and gases that move rapidly in response to gravity. Pyroclastic flows can form in several different ways. They can form when an eruption column collapses, or as the result of gravitational collapse

Pyroclastic Flows

And as Daws noted there was no pyroclastic flow and your "expert" was, like you, full of CTBS.
Thanks again for playin', Princess. You're dismissed.

my expert ?..actually he was NASA expert and a highly regarded one at that

 

[Gamolon]

Pyroclastic flows are fluidized masses of rock fragments and gases that move rapidly in response to gravity. Pyroclastic flows can form in several different ways. They can form when an eruption column collapses, or as the result of gravitational collapse

Pyroclastic Flows

And as Daws noted there was no pyroclastic flow and your "expert" was, like you, full of CTBS.
Thanks again for playin', Princess. You're dismissed.

Not the pyroclastic flow bullshit again...



There were no volcanoes, there was no fluidized mass of rock fragments/gases, and there were no 100-1000℃ temperatures in the debris cloud.

Missing the above characteristics proves that there was no pyroclastic flow. It may have LOOKED like one, but it wasn't.

 

[daws101]

Pyroclastic flows are fluidized masses of rock fragments and gases that move rapidly in response to gravity. Pyroclastic flows can form in several different ways. They can form when an eruption column collapses, or as the result of gravitational collapse

Pyroclastic Flows

none of which happened at the wtc..

 

[daws101]

Pyroclastic flows are fluidized masses of rock fragments and gases that move rapidly in response to gravity. Pyroclastic flows can form in several different ways. They can form when an eruption column collapses, or as the result of gravitational collapse

Pyroclastic Flows

And as Daws noted there was no pyroclastic flow and your "expert" was, like you, full of CTBS.
Thanks again for playin', Princess. You're dismissed.

so you are saying their was no masses of rock [concrete) fragments and gases that move rapidly as the result of gravitational collapse ?
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AO_Tz3FhkMo]WTC 7 Pyroclastic Flow - YouTube[/ame]

I guess thats why you never made the whos who of science list like deets

no the rock aka concrete was not moving fast enough
once again the facts: no recorded wind speeds of 450 mph.
no recorded 1,830 degree gas.
most importantly no thousands of parboiled people in the streets the cloud passed through.

 

[eots]

 

[daws101]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lPw-_g639M

you wish. if it were a pyroclastic flow al of those cars would be flaming wreaks the pavement would be burning and all the windows in the buildings blown out.
the paint on the cars isn't even singed...asshat.
Effects of Pyroclastic Flows

A pyroclastic flow will destroy nearly everything in its path. With rock fragments ranging in size from ash to boulders traveling across the ground at speeds typically greater than 80 km per hour, pyroclastic flows knock down, shatter, bury or carry away nearly all objects and structures in their way. The extreme temperatures of rocks and gas inside pyroclastic flows, generally between 200°C and 700°C, can cause combustible material to burn, especially petroleum products, wood, vegetation, and houses.

Pyroclastic flows vary considerably in size and speed, but even relatively small flows that move less than 5 km from a volcano can destroy buildings, forests, and farmland. And on the margins of pyroclastic flows, death and serious injury to people and animals may result from burns and inhalation of hot ash and gases.
http://volcanoes.usgs.gov/hazards/pyroclasticflow/

 

[eots]

where in the dentition of pyroiclastic does it say wind speeds of 450 mph.
or 1,830 degree gas.???

 

[daws101]

where in the dentition of pyroiclastic does it say wind speeds of 450 mph.
or 1,830 degree gas.???

pyroclastic flow (also known scientifically as a pyroclastic density current[1]) is a fast-moving current of hot gas and rock (collectively known as tephra), which reaches speeds moving away from a volcano of up to 700 km/h (450 mph).[2] The gas can reach temperatures of about 1,000 °C (1,830 °F). Pyroclastic flows normally hug the ground and travel downhill, or spread laterally under gravity. Their speed depends upon the density of the current, the volcanic output rate, and the gradient of the slope. They are a common and devastating result of certain explosive volcanic eruptions.
Pyroclastic flow - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

ASSHAT..

 

[eots]

where in the dentition of pyroiclastic does it say wind speeds of 450 mph.
or 1,830 degree gas.???

pyroclastic flow (also known scientifically as a pyroclastic density current[1]) is a fast-moving current of hot gas and rock (collectively known as tephra), which reaches speeds moving away from a volcano of up to 700 km/h (450 mph).[2] The gas can reach temperatures of about 1,000 °C (1,830 °F). Pyroclastic flows normally hug the ground and travel downhill, or spread laterally under gravity. Their speed depends upon the density of the current, the volcanic output rate, and the gradient of the slope. They are a common and devastating result of certain explosive volcanic eruptions.
Pyroclastic flow - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

ASSHAT..

wkki asshat...I provided the definition already...you provide one from wikki
and due to your reading comprehensions problems you seem to miss the part
"of up to"... "can reach temperatures of"

 

[daws101]

where in the dentition of pyroiclastic does it say wind speeds of 450 mph.
or 1,830 degree gas.???

pyroclastic flow (also known scientifically as a pyroclastic density current[1]) is a fast-moving current of hot gas and rock (collectively known as tephra), which reaches speeds moving away from a volcano of up to 700 km/h (450 mph).[2] The gas can reach temperatures of about 1,000 °C (1,830 °F). Pyroclastic flows normally hug the ground and travel downhill, or spread laterally under gravity. Their speed depends upon the density of the current, the volcanic output rate, and the gradient of the slope. They are a common and devastating result of certain explosive volcanic eruptions.
Pyroclastic flow - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

ASSHAT..

wkki asshat...I provided the definition already...you provide one from wikki
and due to your reading comprehensions problems you seem to miss the part
"of up to"... "can reach temperatures of"

rolf!
talk about desperate...

 

[eots]

pyroclastic flow (also known scientifically as a pyroclastic density current[1]) is a fast-moving current of hot gas and rock (collectively known as tephra), which reaches speeds moving away from a volcano of up to 700 km/h (450 mph).[2] The gas can reach temperatures of about 1,000 °C (1,830 °F). Pyroclastic flows normally hug the ground and travel downhill, or spread laterally under gravity. Their speed depends upon the density of the current, the volcanic output rate, and the gradient of the slope. They are a common and devastating result of certain explosive volcanic eruptions.
Pyroclastic flow - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

ASSHAT..

wkki asshat...I provided the definition already...you provide one from wikki
and due to your reading comprehensions problems you seem to miss the part
"of up to"... "can reach temperatures of"

rolf!
talk about desperate...

just the facts ...asshat...deal with it

 

[daws101]

wkki asshat...I provided the definition already...you provide one from wikki
and due to your reading comprehensions problems you seem to miss the part
"of up to"... "can reach temperatures of"

rolf!
talk about desperate...

just the facts ...asshat...deal with it

not fact at all .
you are trying and failing epically to infer there is some kind of heretofore unknown low temperature pyroclastic flow that did the damage to the wtc rolf!
what definition did you provide? even if you did it was long after I presented it first.
sorry but these phrases are meaningless: "of up to"... "can reach temperatures of"
as all pyroclastic flows are well above the ignition temps of most all substances.
speaking of missing important parts, you have dodged around the thousands of cooked people ..that would have been smoking gun proof of a pyroclastic flow.
instead.. you chose ignorance.

 

[SFC Ollie]

I wonder, where is this gas? We can see debris and dust, but Gas?

 

[daws101]

I wonder, where is this gas? We can see debris and dust, but Gas?

he who smelt it dealt it!

 

[eots]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXCQ3KIt-ro]9/11 WTC Highly Toxic Gases, Vapors and Dust - YouTube[/ame]

 

[eots]

Study says air toxic weeks after 9/11
Trade center fires spewed gases like 'chemical factory'
By Ellen Wulfhorst, Reuters, 9/11/2003
NEW YORK -- The burning ruins of the World Trade Center spewed toxic gases "like a chemical factory" for at least six weeks after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks despite government assurances the air was safe, according to a study released yesterday.

Boston.com / News / Nation / Study says air toxic weeks after 9/11

 

[SFC Ollie]

But there were no gases in that initial dust cloud, other than whatever gas lines broke during the collapse.....Gases from the aftermath were not in the cloud......

 

[daws101]

But there were no gases in that initial dust cloud, other than whatever gas lines broke during the collapse.....Gases from the aftermath were not in the cloud......

there were no super heated gasses, one of the hallmarks of a pyroclastic flow..
as always eots is attempting to do an end run around the facts...