Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are the one that is complaining about the choice this family made, not me.
Not quite.
I've been saying they should have the choice to either end the baby's suffering or abort the fetus.
YOU have been doing the usual tired whine about wanting take basic rights away from women.
But, to be clear, I could not stand to starve a baby to death. I just could not do that.
Further, it is sickening to me that some of you seem to think that's just a damn dandy thing to do. There is no end to what rw's are willing to do. And, its sick.
And they chose to keep the child alive, yet you are in here whinging about the child suffering, even though it didn't.
If they refuse to treat the animal, and they are found it, its animal cruelty.
No it isn't. Animal cruelty is mistreating an animal, or forcing a cat to be a vegan. The latter, by the way, is not illegal, even though it should be.
Refusing to take a suffering animal to a vet (say the animal has a broken leg) is animal cruelty. The animal is in pain and it is suffering.
I agree that forcing a cat to follow a vegan diet is wrong, and completely retarded, too.
If they refuse to treat the animal, and they are found it, its animal cruelty.
No it isn't. Animal cruelty is mistreating an animal, or forcing a cat to be a vegan. The latter, by the way, is not illegal, even though it should be.
Refusing to take a suffering animal to a vet (say the animal has a broken leg) is animal cruelty. The animal is in pain and it is suffering.
I agree that forcing a cat to follow a vegan diet is wrong, and completely retarded, too.
No it isn't. Animal cruelty is mistreating an animal, or forcing a cat to be a vegan. The latter, by the way, is not illegal, even though it should be.
Refusing to take a suffering animal to a vet (say the animal has a broken leg) is animal cruelty. The animal is in pain and it is suffering.
I agree that forcing a cat to follow a vegan diet is wrong, and completely retarded, too.
Actually no it is not animal cruelty to refuse to take an animal with a broken leg to the vet unless you broke the animal's leg.
No it isn't. Animal cruelty is mistreating an animal, or forcing a cat to be a vegan. The latter, by the way, is not illegal, even though it should be.
Refusing to take a suffering animal to a vet (say the animal has a broken leg) is animal cruelty. The animal is in pain and it is suffering.
I agree that forcing a cat to follow a vegan diet is wrong, and completely retarded, too.
Not if you can treat it yourself.
Going back to animals....I had a tenant when I was managing apartments, and she had a dog that HOWLED from pain. She was very old, could barely walk, only ate small bites of cat food from me when I went over to try to soothe her. Her owner couldn't/wouldn't put her down. Refused. SHE was at work. SHE didn't have to hear the howling all day. Finally I had enough. I told her if she didn't take that dog to the vet and have her put down to finally find some peace, I would do it myself and she can go fuck herself while suing me. And I meant it. She knew I meant it, and took her the next day to the vet to do it. She never spoke to me again, paid the rent via envelope, and moved a few weeks later. I was glad to see her go. Talk about a selfish bitch.
Hogwash. I worked at a pet grooming service. Some rich bitch got a dog that was dirty, matted and had a broken leg. She wanted the dog cleaned up before taking it to the vet, so this dog was crying, held up with a chain around its neck so it could be groomed, then thrown in the closet with heat and fans to dry its fur. I didn't know about it until I heard the howls from the "drying" closet. I called the ASPCA immediately...and the sheriff. Sheriff got there first...and pulled that dog out of that cage right away, and took it to the vet. They shut the grooming place down and I flipped the whole crew off as I walked out with the sheriff. The owner was fined for animal cruelty along with the staff. One month later...the business closed.
So yes..it IS against the law not to help an animal in distress.
I am done with this thread. It is just too fucking depressing. And I don't like being depressed.
Sorry, Noomi.
Not quite.
I've been saying they should have the choice to either end the baby's suffering or abort the fetus.
YOU have been doing the usual tired whine about wanting take basic rights away from women.
But, to be clear, I could not stand to starve a baby to death. I just could not do that.
Further, it is sickening to me that some of you seem to think that's just a damn dandy thing to do. There is no end to what rw's are willing to do. And, its sick.
And they chose to keep the child alive, yet you are in here whinging about the child suffering, even though it didn't.
I don't really mind that your posts are mostly lies because that's what you do. You're not able to do anything else.
But, since you consider this CHILD an "IT", you really don't have any right to criticize anyone.
And, how many times has that spelling been corrected?
When are you going start spelling it correctly?
Or, perhaps you could just explain how one "whings".
16 One day two women[a] came to King Solomon, 17 and one of them said:
Your Majesty, this woman and I live in the same house. Not long ago my baby was born at home, 18 and three days later her baby was born. Nobody else was there with us.
19 One night while we were all asleep, she rolled over on her baby, and he died. 20 Then while I was still asleep, she got up and took my son out of my bed. She put him in her bed, then she put her dead baby next to me.
21 In the morning when I got up to feed my son, I saw that he was dead. But when I looked at him in the light, I knew he wasn’t my son.
22 “No!” the other woman shouted. “He was your son. My baby is alive!”
“The dead baby is yours,” the first woman yelled. “Mine is alive!”
They argued back and forth in front of Solomon, 23 until finally he said, “Both of you say this live baby is yours. 24 Someone bring me a sword.”
A sword was brought, and Solomon ordered, 25 “Cut the baby in half! That way each of you can have part of him.”
26 “Please don’t kill my son,” the baby’s mother screamed. “Your Majesty, I love him very much, but give him to her. Just don’t kill him.”
The other woman shouted, “Go ahead and cut him in half. Then neither of us will have the baby.”
27 Solomon said, “Don’t kill the baby.” Then he pointed to the first woman, “She is his real mother. Give the baby to her.”
28 Everyone in Israel was amazed when they heard how Solomon had made his decision. They realized that God had given him wisdom to judge fairly.
Refusing to take a suffering animal to a vet (say the animal has a broken leg) is animal cruelty. The animal is in pain and it is suffering.
I agree that forcing a cat to follow a vegan diet is wrong, and completely retarded, too.
Not if you can treat it yourself.
No one can treat a broken leg, you risk causing even more pain, and the bones may not fuse properly, making the animal limp.
Hogwash. I worked at a pet grooming service. Some rich bitch got a dog that was dirty, matted and had a broken leg. She wanted the dog cleaned up before taking it to the vet, so this dog was crying, held up with a chain around its neck so it could be groomed, then thrown in the closet with heat and fans to dry its fur. I didn't know about it until I heard the howls from the "drying" closet. I called the ASPCA immediately...and the sheriff. Sheriff got there first...and pulled that dog out of that cage right away, and took it to the vet. They shut the grooming place down and I flipped the whole crew off as I walked out with the sheriff. The owner was fined for animal cruelty along with the staff. One month later...the business closed.
So yes..it IS against the law not to help an animal in distress.
I am done with this thread. It is just too fucking depressing. And I don't like being depressed.
Sorry, Noomi.
Not if you can treat it yourself.
No one can treat a broken leg, you risk causing even more pain, and the bones may not fuse properly, making the animal limp.
Vets treat broken legs all the time.
No one can treat a broken leg, you risk causing even more pain, and the bones may not fuse properly, making the animal limp.
Vets treat broken legs all the time.
Yes, but pet owners don't.
