Why are Conservatives (GOP) cheering on Russian aggression?

http://anewdomain.net/2016/10/09/why-are-us-conservatives-cheering-the-new-russian-aggression/


aNewDomain PoliticsCheered on by American conservatives, Russia has executed a clever multi-faceted campaign to extend its influence and territorial control. Not only is it invading its neighbors, but it’s attempting to alter the course of an American presidential election.

For much of the past 100 years, Russia’s actions have terrified Americans, particularly conservative Americans. No longer.

This time around, if not actively cheering on Vladimir Putin, conservative Americans appear to care less.

Let’s review the elements of Russia’s intricate plan:

_____________________________________________________________

This is the ultimate example of "PARTY OVER COUNTRY." No one,including the Trumpettes, can argue anything else.

In 2012, the Republican Candidate for President was laughed and mocked at for calling out for the potential for Russian aggression. The same pig fuckers that laughed at him then are now the same criers about Russian aggression.
 
You can't keep the head of another country under control

Especially when, like Obama and Hillary, you didn't even see them as a threat.

How's Obama's post 2012 flexibility working out? LOL!

You are right, we shouldn't vote for Hillary who is too soft on Putin...we need Trump who loves Putin and his big spending Russian oligarch buddies and will be tough on our NATO allies.


CONSISTENCY - Trump/Pence already rejected such ridiculous vocabulary, how about you?

we shouldn't vote for Hillary who is too soft on Putin

Too soft? Or too incompetent?

Lets note you completely dodged the comparison of Hillary to the only other alternative we have - Putin's lapdog Trump.

Trump hasn't handed a reset button to the Russians......or tell Romney the 80s want their foreign policy back.

That sure was funny though.

Yea that totally put Putin in a shitty mood and made him annex a part of Ukraine and back Assad's regime.

Your theories are straight retarded, like most conservatives. Does it really take a liberal to be able to reason sanely?
 
You can't keep the head of another country under control

Especially when, like Obama and Hillary, you didn't even see them as a threat.

How's Obama's post 2012 flexibility working out? LOL!

You are right, we shouldn't vote for Hillary who is too soft on Putin...we need Trump who loves Putin and his big spending Russian oligarch buddies and will be tough on our NATO allies.


CONSISTENCY - Trump/Pence already rejected such ridiculous vocabulary, how about you?

we shouldn't vote for Hillary who is too soft on Putin

Too soft? Or too incompetent?

Lets note you completely dodged the comparison of Hillary to the only other alternative we have - Putin's lapdog Trump.

Trump hasn't handed a reset button to the Russians......or tell Romney the 80s want their foreign policy back.

That sure was funny though.

Yea that totally put Putin in a shitty mood and made him annex a part of Ukraine and back Assad's regime.

Your theories are straight retarded, like most conservatives. Does it really take a liberal to be able to reason sanely?
Let us know if you ever find one....
 
http://anewdomain.net/2016/10/09/why-are-us-conservatives-cheering-the-new-russian-aggression/


aNewDomain PoliticsCheered on by American conservatives, Russia has executed a clever multi-faceted campaign to extend its influence and territorial control. Not only is it invading its neighbors, but it’s attempting to alter the course of an American presidential election.

For much of the past 100 years, Russia’s actions have terrified Americans, particularly conservative Americans. No longer.

This time around, if not actively cheering on Vladimir Putin, conservative Americans appear to care less.

Let’s review the elements of Russia’s intricate plan:

_____________________________________________________________

This is the ultimate example of "PARTY OVER COUNTRY." No one,including the Trumpettes, can argue anything else.
"
Forums > US Discussion > Politics >
Why are Conservatives (GOP) cheering on Russian aggression"

Because they are treasonous. They are traitors to their country.
 
http://anewdomain.net/2016/10/09/why-are-us-conservatives-cheering-the-new-russian-aggression/


aNewDomain PoliticsCheered on by American conservatives, Russia has executed a clever multi-faceted campaign to extend its influence and territorial control. Not only is it invading its neighbors, but it’s attempting to alter the course of an American presidential election.

For much of the past 100 years, Russia’s actions have terrified Americans, particularly conservative Americans. No longer.

This time around, if not actively cheering on Vladimir Putin, conservative Americans appear to care less.

Let’s review the elements of Russia’s intricate plan:

_____________________________________________________________

This is the ultimate example of "PARTY OVER COUNTRY." No one,including the Trumpettes, can argue anything else.
"
Forums > US Discussion > Politics >
Why are Conservatives (GOP) cheering on Russian aggression"

Because they are treasonous. They are traitors to their country.
image.jpeg
 
We tried to warn you that Obama was no match for Putin.

"The 80's called, they wanted their foreign policy back" - Obama 2012
Your hero Putin is nothing more than a sawed-off little runt dictator, that Obama could crush anytime he wants.

Putin is not my hero, but unlike Obama, he's a leader who loves the country he leads
He's a dictator, not a leader. As Kaine said during the VP debate: one needs to understand the difference between a dictator and a leader.
 
We tried to warn you that Obama was no match for Putin.

"The 80's called, they wanted their foreign policy back" - Obama 2012
Your hero Putin is nothing more than a sawed-off little runt dictator, that Obama could crush anytime he wants.

Putin is not my hero, but unlike Obama, he's a leader who loves the country he leads
He's a dictator, not a leader. As Kaine said during the VP debate: one needs to understand the difference between a dictator and a leader.
image.jpeg
 
Funny. Obama is president, Trump is a citizen. Obama has power to negotiate with or threaten Russia, Trump is a citizen. Hillary was Secretary of State and dealt with Russia representing the full power and strength of the US military. Trump is a citizen.

Why again are democrats running around squalling about Russians and Republicans? If they're really that upset about Russians messing with our elections, why don't they do something about it? Maybe Obama can draw another red line, or come out with another hashtag. I mean, isn't there anything the poor dears can do?

Essentially, they're admitting that there is nothing they can do (or can think of to do) about Russia influencing our election.
Trump isn't very smart. Putin is. Putin want's Trump as president so he can manipulate him. It is patently obvious to anyone who is unbiased and who has half a brain.
 
We tried to warn you that Obama was no match for Putin.

"The 80's called, they wanted their foreign policy back" - Obama 2012
Your hero Putin is nothing more than a sawed-off little runt dictator, that Obama could crush anytime he wants.
Then why doesn't Obama do it, my little Orgasmic ObamaBot pissant?

Perhaps Obama will draw another Line in the Sand, eh?

News flash, Tinkerbell...

Vladimir Putin is the head a a resurgent and increasingly militaristic self-aggrandizing and aggressive Russia...

They have spent the past decade or more, chipping the rust off their old Soviet military rolling stock, and they've been busy little bees, building more...

Their unilateral and illegal annexation of the Crimea was their "We're Back" coming-out party...

And the world, including the United States, and your boy, didn't do jack-shit about it, at least nothing worthwhile, other than to piss and moan and serve-up a few sanctions...

Small price to pay for securing the premier Black Sea port for the Motherland, eh?

And, given the gutless, nutless reaction of the rest of the world, to the Crimea annexation, that lack of backbone only emboldened them to intervene more extensively in Syria.

To the point where the Russians warned the US not to press the attack against Syrian regular forces (former Soviet client-state, shaping up to be a Russian client-state).

The Russians also still have a fairly sizable nuclear weapons arsenal, which may be why Fearless Leader hasn't "crushed him anytime he wants", eh?

Blind, unthinking, emoting ObamaBots... it will be great fun, watching you weep as Marine One takes your boy off the stage on January 20, 2017.

Yours was one of the more stupid remarks I've seen on that subject in quite some time...
 
Last edited:
You can't keep the head of another country under control

Especially when, like Obama and Hillary, you didn't even see them as a threat.

How's Obama's post 2012 flexibility working out? LOL!

You are right, we shouldn't vote for Hillary who is too soft on Putin...we need Trump who loves Putin and his big spending Russian oligarch buddies and will be tough on our NATO allies.


CONSISTENCY - Trump/Pence already rejected such ridiculous vocabulary, how about you?

we shouldn't vote for Hillary who is too soft on Putin

Too soft? Or too incompetent?

Lets note you completely dodged the comparison of Hillary to the only other alternative we have - Putin's lapdog Trump.

Trump hasn't handed a reset button to the Russians......or tell Romney the 80s want their foreign policy back.

That sure was funny though.

Yea that totally put Putin in a shitty mood and made him annex a part of Ukraine and back Assad's regime.

Your theories are straight retarded, like most conservatives. Does it really take a liberal to be able to reason sanely?

Yea that totally put Putin in a shitty mood and made him annex a part of Ukraine


Hillary and Obama kissing his ass didn't fix everything?
They must have been fucking morons to think it would, eh?

Does it really take a liberal to be able to reason sanely?

I haven't seen one do it lately.
 
You are right, we shouldn't vote for Hillary who is too soft on Putin...we need Trump who loves Putin and his big spending Russian oligarch buddies and will be tough on our NATO allies.


CONSISTENCY - Trump/Pence already rejected such ridiculous vocabulary, how about you?

we shouldn't vote for Hillary who is too soft on Putin

Too soft? Or too incompetent?

Lets note you completely dodged the comparison of Hillary to the only other alternative we have - Putin's lapdog Trump.

Trump hasn't handed a reset button to the Russians......or tell Romney the 80s want their foreign policy back.

That sure was funny though.

Yea that totally put Putin in a shitty mood and made him annex a part of Ukraine and back Assad's regime.

Your theories are straight retarded, like most conservatives. Does it really take a liberal to be able to reason sanely?

Yea that totally put Putin in a shitty mood and made him annex a part of Ukraine


Hillary and Obama kissing his ass didn't fix everything?
They must have been fucking morons to think it would, eh?

Does it really take a liberal to be able to reason sanely?

I haven't seen one do it lately.

Again I ask for consistency - if Hillary/Obama was playing too nice with Putin, then why is Trump all but giving him blowjobs your solution?

It just makes no sense. Help me out buddy.
 
we shouldn't vote for Hillary who is too soft on Putin

Too soft? Or too incompetent?

Lets note you completely dodged the comparison of Hillary to the only other alternative we have - Putin's lapdog Trump.

Trump hasn't handed a reset button to the Russians......or tell Romney the 80s want their foreign policy back.

That sure was funny though.

Yea that totally put Putin in a shitty mood and made him annex a part of Ukraine and back Assad's regime.

Your theories are straight retarded, like most conservatives. Does it really take a liberal to be able to reason sanely?

Yea that totally put Putin in a shitty mood and made him annex a part of Ukraine


Hillary and Obama kissing his ass didn't fix everything?
They must have been fucking morons to think it would, eh?

Does it really take a liberal to be able to reason sanely?

I haven't seen one do it lately.

Again I ask for consistency - if Hillary/Obama was playing too nice with Putin, then why is Trump all but giving him blowjobs your solution?

Trump can't blow him, Obama is there already.
 
Lets note you completely dodged the comparison of Hillary to the only other alternative we have - Putin's lapdog Trump.

Trump hasn't handed a reset button to the Russians......or tell Romney the 80s want their foreign policy back.

That sure was funny though.

Yea that totally put Putin in a shitty mood and made him annex a part of Ukraine and back Assad's regime.

Your theories are straight retarded, like most conservatives. Does it really take a liberal to be able to reason sanely?

Yea that totally put Putin in a shitty mood and made him annex a part of Ukraine


Hillary and Obama kissing his ass didn't fix everything?
They must have been fucking morons to think it would, eh?

Does it really take a liberal to be able to reason sanely?

I haven't seen one do it lately.

Again I ask for consistency - if Hillary/Obama was playing too nice with Putin, then why is Trump all but giving him blowjobs your solution?

Trump can't blow him, Obama is there already.

What you say is straight stupid. Hillary, and by the way Trump's running mate too, have much more hawkish positions on Russia compared to Trump who you will NEVER hear criticize Putin.

Why are you making a fool of yourself this way?
 
Funny. Obama is president, Trump is a citizen. Obama has power to negotiate with or threaten Russia, Trump is a citizen. Hillary was Secretary of State and dealt with Russia representing the full power and strength of the US military. Trump is a citizen.

Why again are democrats running around squalling about Russians and Republicans? If they're really that upset about Russians messing with our elections, why don't they do something about it? Maybe Obama can draw another red line, or come out with another hashtag. I mean, isn't there anything the poor dears can do?

Essentially, they're admitting that there is nothing they can do (or can think of to do) about Russia influencing our election.
Trump isn't very smart. Putin is. Putin want's Trump as president so he can manipulate him. It is patently obvious to anyone who is unbiased and who has half a brain.
Maybe Obama can draw another red line, or come out with another hashtag. I mean, isn't there anything the poor dears can do?
 
Funny. Obama is president, Trump is a citizen. Obama has power to negotiate with or threaten Russia, Trump is a citizen. Hillary was Secretary of State and dealt with Russia representing the full power and strength of the US military. Trump is a citizen.

Why again are democrats running around squalling about Russians and Republicans? If they're really that upset about Russians messing with our elections, why don't they do something about it? Maybe Obama can draw another red line, or come out with another hashtag. I mean, isn't there anything the poor dears can do?

Essentially, they're admitting that there is nothing they can do (or can think of to do) about Russia influencing our election.
Trump isn't very smart. Putin is. Putin want's Trump as president so he can manipulate him. It is patently obvious to anyone who is unbiased and who has half a brain.
Maybe Obama can draw another red line, or come out with another hashtag. I mean, isn't there anything the poor dears can do?

Red lines, reset buttons and flexibility.....worked so well in the past.
Maybe he needs another apology tour?
 

Forum List

Back
Top